— FEATURED —
Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Compton, Lonzo Williams and the Wreckin' Cru
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Super-Fun-Pak Comix, featuring Caveman Robot, and MORE!
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala awaits Constitutional Court rulings, defense continues legal challenges to genocide trial
Victoria Sanford: "It’s Too Soon to Declare Victory in Guatemalan Genocide"
— RECENTLY —
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
Nothing Can Possibly Go Wrong: YA graphic novel about robots, romance and school elections
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Rob Beschizza at 6:11 am Thu, Mar 1, 2012
I’m waiting for the camera that captures all possible timelines for whatever you photograph – like, you take a picture of Big Ben and it has a Soviet flag flying from it or something.
Awesome camera. They should have made it round, like a small telescope.
You got yerself a nice little short story there. Or an alibi. Oooh… or the maddening jealousy of seeing one’s wife in such a photo happy with the family she’d have had with a hated nemesis. Or the stalky obsession after seeing the one who got away, had she instead returned the feelings…
“If you’d rather use your images some other way, you can export a JPG with the focus you choose; the resulting JPG’s resolution is 1080 x 1080″
So we have a camera that takes pictures that can’t be printed and look decent as a 4×6…
Kind of reminds me of smartphones, good at a lot of things, just not always being a phone.
I’ll never understand these reviews. He gives it an 8 for design and a 6 for controls, when he excoriates them in the review. Unconfortable to hold, hard to steady, takes too long to zoom, accidental zooming, hard to find controls.
What does it take to get an “average” 5 ?!?!
Good detailed hands-on review on DPR about this puppy: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/lytro/
The limitations on displaying the photos are a bummer, they need to get that API out there and perhaps some more development options and you have yourself a neat novelty camera. Resolution is not great for printing but uh, how can you print all those layers anyways? Could have fun applications on exhibit kiosks, museum displays, etc.
So, an array of pinhole cameras, each with a bunch of pixels. Sixteen megapixels of data to get a 90kp image. Much more impressive than bracketing a series of 175 images, all at different exposure times, focus, etc. But then again, I might be jaded, because I’ve worked in the field of photography for a few decades…
I’ve read the paper when it was initially announced. It’s a little less than the sum of its parts.
“It gathers data for all focal lengths with each snapshot” is kind of meaningless. I really don’t know, but I suspect David Pierce is more familiar with computers than with optics and how cameras have worked for more than a century.
1) the link to the economist points to a boingboing article;
2) I’ve never come across an ‘in-depth’ article on anything in The Economist. I used to read it regularly, then I gave up. It was like eating unsalted, oil-free, flavourless potato chips.
Yes, never mind that it is fundamentally different from any other camera you have ever seen, please spend several minutes telling the world about how they didn’t shape it the way you would have liked and that the screen is too small.
And if you want a model for a “real” camera, Google “Nikon F”.