Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Macro photos of the inside of musical instruments

Cory Doctorow at 3:42 pm Thu, Mar 8, 2012

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle


On Behance, art director Bjoern Ewers shows off the gorgeous macro-photo ads he produced for the Berlin Philharmonic, which depict the insides of instruments as airy atria (or, as Colossal has it, "vast and spacious, almost as if you could walk around inside them.")

ART DIRECTION: INSTRUMENTS FROM INSIDE (via Colossal)

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  ads • berlin • germany • happy mutants • macro • photos

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • Hakuin

    why are f holes f’s?

    • EchoCharlie

      they’re centered around the bridge, which in a stringed instrument like a violin is a floating one. in a violin, they’re not meant to work the same way the holes in a guitar work. violins are fairly rigid on the top bit, so the f-holes create a bit of springiness around the bridge, allowing the vibrations to transmit through the body of the instrument. as far as I know the shape is mostly traditional, but it seems to me the shape of the classic f makes for the most springiness with the least reduction of stability / change of tone.

      also, boo. ;)

      • Hakuin

         domo!

  • benenglish

    I’m being pedantic.  Stop reading now if that bothers you (it bothers me, too) but I was a photographer for too many years to let this one go by.

    I went to the links.  I saw some lovely, fairly close-up photography.  I saw no macrophotography.  “Macro” has a specific meaning and I don’t care if the Wikipedia article is waffling about it and indicating that the terms is being used more broadly.  If it ain’t 1:1 reproduction or higher, it ain’t macro.

    This is almost as irritating as people referring to EVF (electronic viewfinder) cameras as SLRs.  Any camera type with “reflex” in the name has a mirror in it.  I’ve actually seen manufacturer advertising that gets this wrong and it drives me nuts.

    OK, two pet peeves aired.  Everyone feel free to jeer away.

    • dmatos

       I marvel at the depth of field they’ve managed to get with this photography.  I have to assume either very long exposure times, or magic.

      As a(n ex)photographer, would you care to comment on that?

      • benenglish

        I have no good explanations.  Some of the shots (e.g., the pipe organ shots) could have simply been good light and a small aperture.

        The shots inside the stringed instruments are more problematic.  I can think of a dozen possibilities and it may be some combination of them all and not all of them involve the way the photos are shot.

        Notice the first picture at this link:  http://www.behance.net/werk314/frame/340016

        Look at the finish of the wood edges of the f-hole on the right.  It’s quite clear and it looks like it was hacked out with a penknife wielded by a spastic hand.  Then look at the f-hole on the left.  It’s fuzzy.  Both are approximately the same distance from the apparent camera position.  Both should be just as in focus.  They aren’t. 

        I won’t hazard a guess but something funny is definitely going on.  “Funny”, in this context, isn’t by any means the same as “bad” but this pretty clearly isn’t “straight” photography.

        • penguinchris

          Maybe they used some sort of tilt-shift setup, and combined multiple images at different focus distances in photoshop.

  • http://fallsastar.com Crashproof

    How are they getting cameras *in* there?

    • Cefeida

      That’s what I want to know. Are those photos, or is it CGI? I can’t find any description at the link to explain.

    • http://www.jimdraws.com Thorzdad

      You’re assuming they are intact instruments.

      • Lobster

         Yeah, that was my first thought.  You can probably buy a cheap violin and a hacksaw for less than a high-quality camera small enough to slip through an f-slot.

  • Lobster

    Reminds me of the cargo hold of a ship.  A very fancy ship.

  • http://artdonovan.typepad.com Art

    Damn!  It’s downright architectural. Great concept and masterfully done.

    • zarray

      Yeah I though it was a giant building.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Turner/675798585 Rick Turner

    Where’s the soundpost?  Where is a label?  This looks bogus…though it is a pretty picture.

  • IndexMe

    I recently found the otherwise junky lens on my android (HTC Evo 4G) phone took some really nice pictures of the interior landscape of a kind of open lid pot by just looking over the brim. I wonder if there are endoscopy like extensions one could connect to a camera phone so as to allow photos of tight places.

  • http://www.facebook.com/codejunkie Nick Fotopoulos

    This makes me want to build a room that looks like the inside of a giant violin…