<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Synchrotrons explained (with&#160;donuts)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jlargentaye</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html#comment-1371657</link>
		<dc:creator>jlargentaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 23:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=149612#comment-1371657</guid>
		<description>I used to work in view of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?q=synchotron,+grenoble,+france&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=45.207138,5.692742&amp;spn=0.007211,0.013754&amp;sll=36.031332,-120.541992&amp;sspn=8.471302,14.084473&amp;t=h&amp;hq=synchotron,+grenoble,+france&amp;radius=15000&amp;z=16&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;European Synchotron Research Facility&lt;/a&gt;[1], and was lucky to visit it once. Though it wasn&#039;t as tasty as the Diamond Light Source, it was damn sexy for this geek. 

The most interesting tidbit was that most particle accelerators, like the LHC, want to *avoid* losing energy at those bends: it&#039;s energy lost from the particles you&#039;re trying to accelerate as fast as possible for the Final Collision. Synchotrons do the opposite: they don&#039;t care about the particles themselves, but the X-Ray radiation is the brightest (most photons) we can make, and really useful to look into stuff.

Also, it&#039;s fucking difficult to get x-rays to focus through a lens and reflect on a mirror. In fact that&#039;s why they were initially called &quot;X&quot;-rays, because they didn&#039;t refract and reflect like light so they thought it was something else!

[1] and the neighboring pressure cooker, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ill.eu/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ILL&lt;/a&gt;, one of the most powerful neutron beams in the world (don&#039;t call it &quot;radiation&quot;, it&#039;ll freak out the population).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work in view of the <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?q=synchotron,+grenoble,+france&amp;hl=en&amp;ll=45.207138,5.692742&amp;spn=0.007211,0.013754&amp;sll=36.031332,-120.541992&amp;sspn=8.471302,14.084473&amp;t=h&amp;hq=synchotron,+grenoble,+france&amp;radius=15000&amp;z=16" rel="nofollow">European Synchotron Research Facility</a>[1], and was lucky to visit it once. Though it wasn&#8217;t as tasty as the Diamond Light Source, it was damn sexy for this geek. </p>
<p>The most interesting tidbit was that most particle accelerators, like the LHC, want to *avoid* losing energy at those bends: it&#8217;s energy lost from the particles you&#8217;re trying to accelerate as fast as possible for the Final Collision. Synchotrons do the opposite: they don&#8217;t care about the particles themselves, but the X-Ray radiation is the brightest (most photons) we can make, and really useful to look into stuff.</p>
<p>Also, it&#8217;s fucking difficult to get x-rays to focus through a lens and reflect on a mirror. In fact that&#8217;s why they were initially called &#8220;X&#8221;-rays, because they didn&#8217;t refract and reflect like light so they thought it was something else!</p>
<p>[1] and the neighboring pressure cooker, <a href="http://www.ill.eu/" rel="nofollow">ILL</a>, one of the most powerful neutron beams in the world (don&#8217;t call it &#8220;radiation&#8221;, it&#8217;ll freak out the population).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Dow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html#comment-1371568</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Dow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=149612#comment-1371568</guid>
		<description>The Kit-Kats at 2:00 are called wigglers, the creamy center of synchrotron radiation production.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggler_(synchrotron)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kit-Kats at 2:00 are called wigglers, the creamy center of synchrotron radiation production.<br />
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiggler_(synchrotron)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squibble</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html#comment-1371516</link>
		<dc:creator>Squibble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=149612#comment-1371516</guid>
		<description>&quot;The atoms in the raisin disrupt the light beam...&quot; 

Pastries are better with science. Science is better with pastries. Now, all we have to do is figure out how to get a feedback loop going... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The atoms in the raisin disrupt the light beam&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Pastries are better with science. Science is better with pastries. Now, all we have to do is figure out how to get a feedback loop going&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doctor Device</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html#comment-1371497</link>
		<dc:creator>Doctor Device</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=149612#comment-1371497</guid>
		<description>high energy particle physics: because synchrotrons are tasty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>high energy particle physics: because synchrotrons are tasty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angusm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/03/15/synchrotrons-explained-with-d.html#comment-1371424</link>
		<dc:creator>angusm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=149612#comment-1371424</guid>
		<description>Synchrotrons. Is there anything they can&#039;t do? -- H. Simpson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Synchrotrons. Is there anything they can&#8217;t do? &#8212; H. Simpson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
