<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Episode 1 of Wil Wheaton and Felicia Day&#039;s &quot;Tabletop,&quot; a net-show about tabletop gaming&#160;sessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Knutson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1387060</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Knutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1387060</guid>
		<description>In Small World, the score is meant to be a secret.  There&#039;s a bit of metagaming in this particular game (in the form of &quot;I&#039;m not winning, he&#039;s winning,&quot; &quot;No, look at how good that other guy did this last turn!&quot;), I suppose so people don&#039;t always know who the winning player is at the moment and therefore know who to directly knock down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Small World, the score is meant to be a secret.  There&#8217;s a bit of metagaming in this particular game (in the form of &#8220;I&#8217;m not winning, he&#8217;s winning,&#8221; &#8220;No, look at how good that other guy did this last turn!&#8221;), I suppose so people don&#8217;t always know who the winning player is at the moment and therefore know who to directly knock down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1387017</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1387017</guid>
		<description>Sure, if you want to keep track and winning is your only goal. I generally toss back a few adult beverages while tabletop gaming and try not to win badly. You could keep track, but just go play Diplomacy if that&#039;s your thing. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, if you want to keep track and winning is your only goal. I generally toss back a few adult beverages while tabletop gaming and try not to win badly. You could keep track, but just go play Diplomacy if that&#8217;s your thing. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1387016</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1387016</guid>
		<description>Munchkin is on a shelf in the background. Another great game! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Munchkin is on a shelf in the background. Another great game! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1387009</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 06:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1387009</guid>
		<description> Except that the number of points each player won was spoken aloud at the end of their turn. The score wasn&#039;t a secret, it&#039;s just that the score-keeping device wasn&#039;t well designed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Except that the number of points each player won was spoken aloud at the end of their turn. The score wasn&#8217;t a secret, it&#8217;s just that the score-keeping device wasn&#8217;t well designed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimEJim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386990</link>
		<dc:creator>JimEJim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386990</guid>
		<description>The only problem I&#039;m having with this format is I don&#039;t really understand the game yet, so I&#039;m really just watching them have fun.  Not bad, but it&#039;s a bit different when you&#039;re watching something like &quot;poker after dark&quot; where the rules don&#039;t change every episode and it&#039;s easier to keep up.  

I know they spend a little time explaining the rules, but I think they may need to give a better summary of the rules up front or maybe pick games that are easier to pickup.

On that note, I would like to see them play something like the card game Fluxx, especially the Monty Python variant:  http://www.looneylabs.com/games/monty-python-fluxx  It was surprisingly easy to pick up and loads of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem I&#8217;m having with this format is I don&#8217;t really understand the game yet, so I&#8217;m really just watching them have fun.  Not bad, but it&#8217;s a bit different when you&#8217;re watching something like &#8220;poker after dark&#8221; where the rules don&#8217;t change every episode and it&#8217;s easier to keep up.  </p>
<p>I know they spend a little time explaining the rules, but I think they may need to give a better summary of the rules up front or maybe pick games that are easier to pickup.</p>
<p>On that note, I would like to see them play something like the card game Fluxx, especially the Monty Python variant:  <a href="http://www.looneylabs.com/games/monty-python-fluxx " rel="nofollow">http://www.looneylabs.com/games/monty-python-fluxx </a> It was surprisingly easy to pick up and loads of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syn -</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386970</link>
		<dc:creator>Syn -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386970</guid>
		<description>Tabletop games are really coming back up huh? Im building quite a collection here in argentina (my wallet is NOT happy).

shut up and sit down is worth checking out too! They do great episodes once in a while, though its more a review show than a gameplay one. Still feeling kinda awkward about the tv exaggeration of jokes to make it look not boring, but then thats how i feel about most tv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tabletop games are really coming back up huh? Im building quite a collection here in argentina (my wallet is NOT happy).</p>
<p>shut up and sit down is worth checking out too! They do great episodes once in a while, though its more a review show than a gameplay one. Still feeling kinda awkward about the tv exaggeration of jokes to make it look not boring, but then thats how i feel about most tv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobcorrigan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386922</link>
		<dc:creator>bobcorrigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386922</guid>
		<description>I want to see 30 minutes of LCR + copious beer drinking + $100 table stakes.  Followed by a fake police raid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to see 30 minutes of LCR + copious beer drinking + $100 table stakes.  Followed by a fake police raid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gtmac</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386844</link>
		<dc:creator>Gtmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386844</guid>
		<description>There was a lot of misplay. For example, ghouls only get to conquer in decline on following rounds, not the round they go into decline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a lot of misplay. For example, ghouls only get to conquer in decline on following rounds, not the round they go into decline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Gorski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386840</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Gorski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386840</guid>
		<description>They play the giants wrong in the first round :(
They only get to conquer with one less army if they already hold the adjacent mountain. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They play the giants wrong in the first round :(<br />
They only get to conquer with one less army if they already hold the adjacent mountain. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marilove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386596</link>
		<dc:creator>marilove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386596</guid>
		<description>And Wil isn&#039;t a &quot;real gamer&quot;?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Wil isn&#8217;t a &#8220;real gamer&#8221;?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386585</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386585</guid>
		<description> Was starting to suspect as much once i went back over the video and found some views that better showed the size and shape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Was starting to suspect as much once i went back over the video and found some views that better showed the size and shape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hume</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386571</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 19:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386571</guid>
		<description>Awesome! I love watching the pretty people play tabletop RPGs! It takes the sting out of all the mean things they&#039;ve joked about real gamers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! I love watching the pretty people play tabletop RPGs! It takes the sting out of all the mean things they&#8217;ve joked about real gamers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Hamster King</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386515</link>
		<dc:creator>The Hamster King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386515</guid>
		<description>Argh ... Jenna Busch&#039;s opening move is killing me.   Mountains cost extra armies to conquer.  You get points based on how many territories you can conquer with your limited number of armies.  The whole point of Small World is figuring out how to grab the most with the least.  Unless you have a special ability involving mountain territories, don&#039;t conquer them first!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh &#8230; Jenna Busch&#8217;s opening move is killing me.   Mountains cost extra armies to conquer.  You get points based on how many territories you can conquer with your limited number of armies.  The whole point of Small World is figuring out how to grab the most with the least.  Unless you have a special ability involving mountain territories, don&#8217;t conquer them first!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Nelson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386503</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386503</guid>
		<description>I hit Play to see Felicia Day. Where is Felicia Day?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hit Play to see Felicia Day. Where is Felicia Day?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfan916</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386489</link>
		<dc:creator>bfan916</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386489</guid>
		<description>It is in fact from GeekChic. Wil mentioned it on FB yesterday. It&#039;s the Emissary:  http://www.geekchichq.com/furniture/emissary/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is in fact from GeekChic. Wil mentioned it on FB yesterday. It&#8217;s the Emissary:  <a href="http://www.geekchichq.com/furniture/emissary/" rel="nofollow">http://www.geekchichq.com/furniture/emissary/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GyroMagician</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386410</link>
		<dc:creator>GyroMagician</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386410</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very good. You get to be mean to your friends in all sorts of entertaining ways. We usually play a couple of rounds of SW, followed by a Munchkin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very good. You get to be mean to your friends in all sorts of entertaining ways. We usually play a couple of rounds of SW, followed by a Munchkin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386323</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386323</guid>
		<description>I think that was a narrative/dramatic device based on the way that one game was turning out. Surprise winner! The #of points each player has is their prerogative to keep secret. 

But yes, i think with  most other games that will prove a great idea you&#039;re sharing there, in terms of watchability. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that was a narrative/dramatic device based on the way that one game was turning out. Surprise winner! The #of points each player has is their prerogative to keep secret. </p>
<p>But yes, i think with  most other games that will prove a great idea you&#8217;re sharing there, in terms of watchability. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gtmac</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386259</link>
		<dc:creator>Gtmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386259</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t tell whether Jenna Busch was trying (and failing) to play the shrewd female gamer rope-a-dope. I hope to see more and better female representation on the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t tell whether Jenna Busch was trying (and failing) to play the shrewd female gamer rope-a-dope. I hope to see more and better female representation on the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386150</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386150</guid>
		<description>I hope they do an episode where they play Paranoia. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope they do an episode where they play Paranoia. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386149</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386149</guid>
		<description>Agreed. It was enjoyable to see the personalities but despite their best efforts to explain the rules as they went along (which is a great way to do this in theory) I couldn&#039;t follow what was happening and stopped watching halfway through. 

Not being able to closely examine the board and the pieces is what made it the most difficult. It doesn&#039;t help that the game&#039;s various designs seem to blend into each other - even when there were closeups I couldn&#039;t tell anything apart (a common issue these days to be sure).

It definitely did get me interested in playing games like this, though. I don&#039;t think it would be as much fun without Wesley Crusher (and Grant, my favorite from Mythbusters) though ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. It was enjoyable to see the personalities but despite their best efforts to explain the rules as they went along (which is a great way to do this in theory) I couldn&#8217;t follow what was happening and stopped watching halfway through. </p>
<p>Not being able to closely examine the board and the pieces is what made it the most difficult. It doesn&#8217;t help that the game&#8217;s various designs seem to blend into each other &#8211; even when there were closeups I couldn&#8217;t tell anything apart (a common issue these days to be sure).</p>
<p>It definitely did get me interested in playing games like this, though. I don&#8217;t think it would be as much fun without Wesley Crusher (and Grant, my favorite from Mythbusters) though ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386096</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386096</guid>
		<description>The personalities involved made the show entertaining for me.  The game itself was almost immaterial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The personalities involved made the show entertaining for me.  The game itself was almost immaterial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1386013</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1386013</guid>
		<description>Agreed. I now want that game. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. I now want that game. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385982</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385982</guid>
		<description>I kind of enjoyed it, but gave up 3/4ths of the way through. It needed better visual tracking of who was winning (either with a digital layover of the board or a better scoreboard). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of enjoyed it, but gave up 3/4ths of the way through. It needed better visual tracking of who was winning (either with a digital layover of the board or a better scoreboard). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Saul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385939</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385939</guid>
		<description>Yeah, but if he does it again, Saul Rubinek should show up to sweep him for artifacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, but if he does it again, Saul Rubinek should show up to sweep him for artifacts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385940</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385940</guid>
		<description>I kind of like it.  It was pretty well edited, mildly entertaining, and gave you a pretty good feel for the game.  I&#039;ll almost certainly watch the ones for games that I don&#039;t own as sort of a mini-preview.  Nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of like it.  It was pretty well edited, mildly entertaining, and gave you a pretty good feel for the game.  I&#8217;ll almost certainly watch the ones for games that I don&#8217;t own as sort of a mini-preview.  Nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385927</link>
		<dc:creator>xian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385927</guid>
		<description>Jesus, for a minute there I thought Wil was hanging out with Jenna Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, for a minute there I thought Wil was hanging out with Jenna Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Saul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385923</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 04:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385923</guid>
		<description>Very nice communication of the rules, and appealing focus on the creative elements... I haven&#039;t played complex tabletop games in years but now I&#039;m jonesing to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice communication of the rules, and appealing focus on the creative elements&#8230; I haven&#8217;t played complex tabletop games in years but now I&#8217;m jonesing to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: littlebone</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385839</link>
		<dc:creator>littlebone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385839</guid>
		<description>I think the rules were only slightly less complicated than those of 43-Man Squamish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the rules were only slightly less complicated than those of 43-Man Squamish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385793</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385793</guid>
		<description>&quot;that counts, because it was &lt;i&gt;awesome&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Good show. Well played. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that counts, because it was <i>awesome</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Good show. Well played. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milkman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/02/episode-1-of-wil-wheaton-and-f.html#comment-1385794</link>
		<dc:creator>milkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=152551#comment-1385794</guid>
		<description>Will, not sure if you read these, but nice work!  Love the show.  Also, that table is the bee&#039;s knees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will, not sure if you read these, but nice work!  Love the show.  Also, that table is the bee&#8217;s knees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
