<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boing Boing...&#160;FOREVER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Putney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1397559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Putney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1397559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m having some difficulty fixing this. It looks like it works if you&#039;re logged out, but not if you&#039;re logged in. Driving me mad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m having some difficulty fixing this. It looks like it works if you&#8217;re logged out, but not if you&#8217;re logged in. Driving me mad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobrk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1397421</link>
		<dc:creator>bobrk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1397421</guid>
		<description>Still seems broken to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still seems broken to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pearce</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1397288</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1397288</guid>
		<description>I reached the end of the page. Now what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reached the end of the page. Now what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobtwells</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1397172</link>
		<dc:creator>bobtwells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 15:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1397172</guid>
		<description>Nooooo! The end of page was my reminder to get back to work, now nothing will get done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nooooo! The end of page was my reminder to get back to work, now nothing will get done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Putney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1396859</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Putney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1396859</guid>
		<description>Paginated URLs such as http://boingboing.net/page/2 still work. I&#039;ll look into history.js. Thanks for the recommendations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paginated URLs such as <a href="http://boingboing.net/page/2" rel="nofollow">http://boingboing.net/page/2</a> still work. I&#8217;ll look into history.js. Thanks for the recommendations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1396579</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1396579</guid>
		<description> From my perspective, nothing.  
Running scripts can break things.  
Not running them can mean that something doesn&#039;t work for you, nor against you, until you make it.  
I whitelist every trusted domain that gives me a functionality I desire, but I feel no compunction for not running scripts that don&#039;t benefit me.  
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> From my perspective, nothing. <br />
Running scripts can break things. <br />
Not running them can mean that something doesn&#8217;t work for you, nor against you, until you make it. <br />
I whitelist every trusted domain that gives me a functionality I desire, but I feel no compunction for not running scripts that don&#8217;t benefit me.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1396224</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1396224</guid>
		<description>Top job... really like the loading of more content. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top job&#8230; really like the loading of more content. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niktemadur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1396186</link>
		<dc:creator>niktemadur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1396186</guid>
		<description>The half artwork manages to be disturbing and adorable at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The half artwork manages to be disturbing and adorable at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Anselm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1396080</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Anselm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1396080</guid>
		<description>That will destroy my RAM to get far back. Will you implement a page view as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That will destroy my RAM to get far back. Will you implement a page view as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookie_b</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395945</link>
		<dc:creator>cookie_b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395945</guid>
		<description>If you click out to read a linked article then hit back, it doesn&#039;t go back to the same depth in the page as the article you clicked out from, it goes to  the top of the page and you have to scroll down to where you were. Inconvenient, and if it&#039;s been a day or two and you&#039;re starting at the oldest unread, it can take a long time to get back there.

And if you&#039;re going to do this (endless going down) then you might as well implement the corollary (endless going up): when you get to the top, pull down to get anything new that&#039;s shown up in the meantime, like on iOS (&quot;Pull to refresh&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you click out to read a linked article then hit back, it doesn&#8217;t go back to the same depth in the page as the article you clicked out from, it goes to  the top of the page and you have to scroll down to where you were. Inconvenient, and if it&#8217;s been a day or two and you&#8217;re starting at the oldest unread, it can take a long time to get back there.</p>
<p>And if you&#8217;re going to do this (endless going down) then you might as well implement the corollary (endless going up): when you get to the top, pull down to get anything new that&#8217;s shown up in the meantime, like on iOS (&#8220;Pull to refresh&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395849</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395849</guid>
		<description> What else does that break?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> What else does that break?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spool32</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395768</link>
		<dc:creator>spool32</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395768</guid>
		<description>Thank you very much for this. I&#039;d given up on reading BoingBoing because the page seemed to freeze Chrome for 20s or so. Glad to see the site is faster now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much for this. I&#8217;d given up on reading BoingBoing because the page seemed to freeze Chrome for 20s or so. Glad to see the site is faster now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labargmd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395569</link>
		<dc:creator>labargmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395569</guid>
		<description>So glad that ..oing.net/page/n/ still works!  That&#039;s the way to catch up on some days of missed bB on a tablet that doesn&#039;t have enough RAM!  Thanks for all you do, boingers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad that ..oing.net/page/n/ still works!  That&#8217;s the way to catch up on some days of missed bB on a tablet that doesn&#8217;t have enough RAM!  Thanks for all you do, boingers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zachstronaut</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395530</link>
		<dc:creator>zachstronaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395530</guid>
		<description>I think infinite scroll works well on mobile, but otherwise is a poisonous UX anti-pattern.

Now I lose my spot if I reload the page.

If ajax loading fails for some reason, such as a network timeout, I&#039;m probably just screwed and have to reload and then scroll down a half dozen times to get back to where I was... there&#039;s no direct link anymore.

And what if there&#039;s an article I want to find, and I can&#039;t quite remember what it was, but I know I saw it a few days ago.  No longer can I skip ahead quickly several pages.  I have to scroll and wait for things to load.  And before I could simply go up and change page 2 to be page 5 in the URL to skip ahead several pages at once.

I really don&#039;t like it.  And I certainly don&#039;t understand why infinite scroll isn&#039;t implemented in conjunction with the HTML5 history API (or with the history.js shim) so that page URLs are maintained to fix the majority of the above listed problems.

Sorry to be so negative, but bad UX is a pet peeve.

tl;dr I love boingboing. Please integrate page URLs via history.js into your infinite scroll implementation for maximum win.  Or just go back to regular pagination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think infinite scroll works well on mobile, but otherwise is a poisonous UX anti-pattern.</p>
<p>Now I lose my spot if I reload the page.</p>
<p>If ajax loading fails for some reason, such as a network timeout, I&#8217;m probably just screwed and have to reload and then scroll down a half dozen times to get back to where I was&#8230; there&#8217;s no direct link anymore.</p>
<p>And what if there&#8217;s an article I want to find, and I can&#8217;t quite remember what it was, but I know I saw it a few days ago.  No longer can I skip ahead quickly several pages.  I have to scroll and wait for things to load.  And before I could simply go up and change page 2 to be page 5 in the URL to skip ahead several pages at once.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t like it.  And I certainly don&#8217;t understand why infinite scroll isn&#8217;t implemented in conjunction with the HTML5 history API (or with the history.js shim) so that page URLs are maintained to fix the majority of the above listed problems.</p>
<p>Sorry to be so negative, but bad UX is a pet peeve.</p>
<p>tl;dr I love boingboing. Please integrate page URLs via history.js into your infinite scroll implementation for maximum win.  Or just go back to regular pagination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395418</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395418</guid>
		<description>&quot;things&quot; &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; be really &quot;annoying&quot;. I agree. 

Might I suggest you open links into new tabs? Also, maybe some proofreading would help your suggestions gain traction?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;things&#8221; <i>can</i> be really &#8220;annoying&#8221;. I agree. </p>
<p>Might I suggest you open links into new tabs? Also, maybe some proofreading would help your suggestions gain traction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395378</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395378</guid>
		<description> NoScript.  
Don&#039;t whitelist &quot;googleapis.com&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> NoScript. <br />
Don&#8217;t whitelist &#8220;googleapis.com&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395376</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395376</guid>
		<description> Just block Google APIs and scrolling remains finite.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Just block Google APIs and scrolling remains finite.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noah django</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395322</link>
		<dc:creator>noah django</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 07:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395322</guid>
		<description>  came here for this.  I used J successfully until Maggie&#039;s smartgrid post, then it sent me back to the masthead.  annoying.  I thought it was a bug with the ad below her post goofing it up, but then i saw this.  macOSX 10.5.8/firefox latest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>  came here for this.  I used J successfully until Maggie&#8217;s smartgrid post, then it sent me back to the masthead.  annoying.  I thought it was a bug with the ad below her post goofing it up, but then i saw this.  macOSX 10.5.8/firefox latest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randall Cooper</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395292</link>
		<dc:creator>Randall Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395292</guid>
		<description>Thank you, BoingBoingers.  We love you, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, BoingBoingers.  We love you, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hunter</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395239</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395239</guid>
		<description>You have one the same very annoying &quot;features&quot; of others &quot;upgrading&quot; which is if I have gotten to &quot;page 3&quot; then click on something read it and go back you put me on page 1 and I have to scroll through and wait while the content I already loaded previously is reloaded...  I sadly find so many of these javascript &quot;enhancements&quot; are just annoying. 

Reading the comments you all do at least seem to be trying to fix some of the annoyances added.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have one the same very annoying &#8220;features&#8221; of others &#8220;upgrading&#8221; which is if I have gotten to &#8220;page 3&#8243; then click on something read it and go back you put me on page 1 and I have to scroll through and wait while the content I already loaded previously is reloaded&#8230;  I sadly find so many of these javascript &#8220;enhancements&#8221; are just annoying. </p>
<p>Reading the comments you all do at least seem to be trying to fix some of the annoyances added.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevinC</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395228</link>
		<dc:creator>DevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395228</guid>
		<description>This is awesome.  Thank you BoingBoing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is awesome.  Thank you BoingBoing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395163</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395163</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan either; infinite scrolling feels to me like some sort of pushy, commercially-driven appropriation of control from the user.

&lt;b&gt;Please&lt;/b&gt; give us an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan either; infinite scrolling feels to me like some sort of pushy, commercially-driven appropriation of control from the user.</p>
<p><b>Please</b> give us an option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: screwt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1395066</link>
		<dc:creator>screwt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1395066</guid>
		<description>ha, this happened to me exactly on the &quot;Infinite scroll&quot; post. I read &quot;Infinite scroll&quot;, then 4 articles that I&#039;d just seen, and then &quot;Infinite scroll&quot; again... I thought this was some kind of horrible joke and it would keep looping forever :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha, this happened to me exactly on the &#8220;Infinite scroll&#8221; post. I read &#8220;Infinite scroll&#8221;, then 4 articles that I&#8217;d just seen, and then &#8220;Infinite scroll&#8221; again&#8230; I thought this was some kind of horrible joke and it would keep looping forever :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394997</link>
		<dc:creator>jimh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394997</guid>
		<description>Awesome news, and at least SIXTY TWO TIMES more awesome when accompanied by Hyperbole and a Half artwork!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome news, and at least SIXTY TWO TIMES more awesome when accompanied by Hyperbole and a Half artwork!!! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394990</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394990</guid>
		<description>I hate infinite scrolling on Tumblr blogs that are mostly little posts with pictures.  It jerks the page around and makes me lose my place.  On BB, where the posts are longer and you&#039;re actually reading, it doesn&#039;t seem to have the same effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate infinite scrolling on Tumblr blogs that are mostly little posts with pictures.  It jerks the page around and makes me lose my place.  On BB, where the posts are longer and you&#8217;re actually reading, it doesn&#8217;t seem to have the same effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unaboomer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394980</link>
		<dc:creator>unaboomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394980</guid>
		<description>Please tell the rest of the internet about this feature please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please tell the rest of the internet about this feature please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Ewing</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394960</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Ewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394960</guid>
		<description> As noted by others, there seems to be an interesting glitch of duplicate articles showing up.  Presumably due to the aforementioned action of scrolling down partially and sitting idle for awhile.

Nice though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As noted by others, there seems to be an interesting glitch of duplicate articles showing up.  Presumably due to the aforementioned action of scrolling down partially and sitting idle for awhile.</p>
<p>Nice though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tilthouse</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394943</link>
		<dc:creator>tilthouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394943</guid>
		<description>&quot;It couldn&#039;t possibly be bottomless.&quot;
&quot;Well, for all intents and purposes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It couldn&#8217;t possibly be bottomless.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Well, for all intents and purposes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Putney</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394937</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Putney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394937</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been cracking down on load times in the last couple weeks. Glad to see it&#039;s paying off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been cracking down on load times in the last couple weeks. Glad to see it&#8217;s paying off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/04/13/boing-boing-forever.html#comment-1394930</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=154492#comment-1394930</guid>
		<description>When I &quot;J&quot; to the bottom it goes back to the top of the site, where it stops I can wheel back to that spot on the site, &#039;til it gets to the bottom and J and K are not workin a-gaiiin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I &#8220;J&#8221; to the bottom it goes back to the top of the site, where it stops I can wheel back to that spot on the site, &#8217;til it gets to the bottom and J and K are not workin a-gaiiin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
