<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejected and controversial New Yorker cover art: exclusive Boing Boing preview&#160;gallery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412973</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412973</guid>
		<description>Fave: The woman receiving an Amazon package as the bookshop owner next door opens his shop. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fave: The woman receiving an Amazon package as the bookshop owner next door opens his shop. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Zimmermann</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412545</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Zimmermann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412545</guid>
		<description>This book is $14 and change on Amazon. Cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This book is $14 and change on Amazon. Cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llazy8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412517</link>
		<dc:creator>llazy8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412517</guid>
		<description>You mean they&#039;re not nekkid under there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean they&#8217;re not nekkid under there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412143</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412143</guid>
		<description>Saudi women are dressed like any woman of their economic status would be in New York or Paris.  I wonder what westerners think is under there - some Disney Arabian Nights princess outfit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saudi women are dressed like any woman of their economic status would be in New York or Paris.  I wonder what westerners think is under there &#8211; some Disney Arabian Nights princess outfit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy66</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412116</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412116</guid>
		<description>A friend once said to me, &quot;You&#039;ll know you&#039;re sophisticated when you understand every cartoon in a year&#039;s worth of New Yorkers.&quot; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend once said to me, &#8220;You&#8217;ll know you&#8217;re sophisticated when you understand every cartoon in a year&#8217;s worth of New Yorkers.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buddy66</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1412099</link>
		<dc:creator>buddy66</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1412099</guid>
		<description>How about John McPhee&#039;s wonderful 3-issue essay &quot;The Control of Nature&quot; that dealt with the realities of Los Angeles geology? (It should have been subtitled &quot;Men To Match My Mudslides.&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about John McPhee&#8217;s wonderful 3-issue essay &#8220;The Control of Nature&#8221; that dealt with the realities of Los Angeles geology? (It should have been subtitled &#8220;Men To Match My Mudslides.&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BardofAvon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411701</link>
		<dc:creator>BardofAvon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411701</guid>
		<description>Thats a great quote but I think you are misconstruing what I am saying.

I didn&#039;t say controversial is a bad thing, I just said these images rely a LOT more on controversy to sell themselves than any artistic quality.

Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Bill Hicks, Dave Chappelle... shit they were all controversial but they were more than just controversial, they were genius and genuinely funny.

This is a scrapbook of rejects, I personally wouldn&#039;t waste my money. You can buy quite a few Carlin DVD&#039;s for the amount this book costs and learn a lot more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a great quote but I think you are misconstruing what I am saying.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t say controversial is a bad thing, I just said these images rely a LOT more on controversy to sell themselves than any artistic quality.</p>
<p>Richard Pryor, George Carlin, Bill Hicks, Dave Chappelle&#8230; shit they were all controversial but they were more than just controversial, they were genius and genuinely funny.</p>
<p>This is a scrapbook of rejects, I personally wouldn&#8217;t waste my money. You can buy quite a few Carlin DVD&#8217;s for the amount this book costs and learn a lot more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millie fink</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411682</link>
		<dc:creator>millie fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411682</guid>
		<description>I wonder if any submitted by Adrian Tomine got rejected. Some of his that got accepted rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if any submitted by Adrian Tomine got rejected. Some of his that got accepted rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millie fink</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411675</link>
		<dc:creator>millie fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411675</guid>
		<description>Laughably tepid, I&#039;d say. I gave up on it years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughably tepid, I&#8217;d say. I gave up on it years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millie fink</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411672</link>
		<dc:creator>millie fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411672</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately. 

--George Carlin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately. </p>
<p>&#8211;George Carlin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411669</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411669</guid>
		<description>Paid to see the cartoon editor, Mankoff, on tour a year or two ago with the rejected cartoons. Brutally funny stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid to see the cartoon editor, Mankoff, on tour a year or two ago with the rejected cartoons. Brutally funny stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donniebnyc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411643</link>
		<dc:creator>donniebnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411643</guid>
		<description>I have a female friend who often travels to Saudi Arabia.  She has seen many women wearing very stylish clothes that are only revealed when they are inside either at home or among other women.  Whether the artist knew this or not, or what he might have been trying to say is of course a mystery.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a female friend who often travels to Saudi Arabia.  She has seen many women wearing very stylish clothes that are only revealed when they are inside either at home or among other women.  Whether the artist knew this or not, or what he might have been trying to say is of course a mystery.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamish Grant</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411593</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamish Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411593</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m not mistaken Chris Ware himself recently became a father - it looks like he drew himself in on the cover sitting on the park bench at the left of the frame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m not mistaken Chris Ware himself recently became a father &#8211; it looks like he drew himself in on the cover sitting on the park bench at the left of the frame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambiguity</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambiguity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411587</guid>
		<description>...and sometimes a Baby Bjorn is just a Baby Bjorn.

(Or, as they say in the Academy... something about hermeneutics, identity politics, and oppression.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and sometimes a Baby Bjorn is just a Baby Bjorn.</p>
<p>(Or, as they say in the Academy&#8230; something about hermeneutics, identity politics, and oppression.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlexG55</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411430</link>
		<dc:creator>AlexG55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411430</guid>
		<description>Interesting that in the first cover (the WTC bombing one) the kid pretending to be an Arab terrorist is the only obviously white one (you can see red hair peeking out from under the towel), though the one with his back to the camera might be- I imagine he&#039;s either Jewish or Hispanic if they&#039;re supposed to represent New York&#039;s ethnic mix. 

I wonder what this says about conspiracy theories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that in the first cover (the WTC bombing one) the kid pretending to be an Arab terrorist is the only obviously white one (you can see red hair peeking out from under the towel), though the one with his back to the camera might be- I imagine he&#8217;s either Jewish or Hispanic if they&#8217;re supposed to represent New York&#8217;s ethnic mix. </p>
<p>I wonder what this says about conspiracy theories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jery Kilker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411409</link>
		<dc:creator>jery Kilker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411409</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading The New Yorker for the past 60 years, first in California, then in Massachusetts and Arizona (while in the Army), then New York (while in graduate school), then Bangkok, Geneva, Phnom Penh, South Africa (while working for the United Nations and the World Health Organization), and now in Bonneville, France (in retirement). I&#039;ve always found the magazine to be exciting, well-written, and informative and of interest to my frequent lunch partners from other countries. The New Yorker is a world-class read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading The New Yorker for the past 60 years, first in California, then in Massachusetts and Arizona (while in the Army), then New York (while in graduate school), then Bangkok, Geneva, Phnom Penh, South Africa (while working for the United Nations and the World Health Organization), and now in Bonneville, France (in retirement). I&#8217;ve always found the magazine to be exciting, well-written, and informative and of interest to my frequent lunch partners from other countries. The New Yorker is a world-class read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EvilTerran</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411390</link>
		<dc:creator>EvilTerran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 09:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411390</guid>
		<description>Further to others&#039; comments, the thought that first sprung to my mind is that archetypally, a father will take the kids off his wife&#039;s hands for mothers&#039; day -- hence all the men -- which got me thinking that the uncomfortable-looking woman might be intended to &quot;have no man&quot;, as it were (be she unmarried, lesbian, widowed, whatever).

Hence the picture could be interpreted to be pointing out that mothers&#039; day marginalises those who don&#039;t fit into the hetero-normative atomic-family mould.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to others&#8217; comments, the thought that first sprung to my mind is that archetypally, a father will take the kids off his wife&#8217;s hands for mothers&#8217; day &#8212; hence all the men &#8212; which got me thinking that the uncomfortable-looking woman might be intended to &#8220;have no man&#8221;, as it were (be she unmarried, lesbian, widowed, whatever).</p>
<p>Hence the picture could be interpreted to be pointing out that mothers&#8217; day marginalises those who don&#8217;t fit into the hetero-normative atomic-family mould.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hostile_17</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411337</link>
		<dc:creator>hostile_17</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411337</guid>
		<description>Shared the sandcastle one had to be done.

Love the style of the playground one... even if I don&#039;t get it, love the style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shared the sandcastle one had to be done.</p>
<p>Love the style of the playground one&#8230; even if I don&#8217;t get it, love the style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VicqRuiz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411102</link>
		<dc:creator>VicqRuiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411102</guid>
		<description>High heels on the burqa bomber - a brilliant touch</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High heels on the burqa bomber &#8211; a brilliant touch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balance of Power</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411072</link>
		<dc:creator>Balance of Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411072</guid>
		<description> Ah! Your comment provides the context I was looking for. Thank you for making sense of it for me. I originally had a different interpretation which suggested fatherhood was a &quot;bad&quot; thing... needless to say it left me perplexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Ah! Your comment provides the context I was looking for. Thank you for making sense of it for me. I originally had a different interpretation which suggested fatherhood was a &#8220;bad&#8221; thing&#8230; needless to say it left me perplexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sirkowski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1411010</link>
		<dc:creator>Sirkowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1411010</guid>
		<description>I like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410908</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410908</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Controversy is not a substitute for talent.&lt;/blockquote&gt;How many &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Spiegelman#Awards&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pulitzers&lt;/a&gt; do &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Controversy is not a substitute for talent.</p></blockquote>
<p>How many <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Spiegelman#Awards" rel="nofollow">Pulitzers</a> do <em>you</em> have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410903</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410903</guid>
		<description>More context: it&#039;s for the Mother&#039;s Day issue, so it forces the viewer to reflect on what &quot;motherhood&quot; means in the 21st century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More context: it&#8217;s for the Mother&#8217;s Day issue, so it forces the viewer to reflect on what &#8220;motherhood&#8221; means in the 21st century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: estragon_nyc</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410887</link>
		<dc:creator>estragon_nyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410887</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the cover of the current issue.  And I think you actually described the message quite well -- a woman and child arrive at a playground where the other children are accompanied by their fathers (or other male caregivers), taking on a role once considered exclusively &quot;woman&#039;s work.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the cover of the current issue.  And I think you actually described the message quite well &#8212; a woman and child arrive at a playground where the other children are accompanied by their fathers (or other male caregivers), taking on a role once considered exclusively &#8220;woman&#8217;s work.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balance of Power</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410873</link>
		<dc:creator>Balance of Power</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410873</guid>
		<description>Can someone give context to the first image credited to Chris Ware (i.e., the solitary mother looking out over a playground with fathers and their children)?  I&#039;m confused. Is this also a rejected image? Either way, the message is lost on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone give context to the first image credited to Chris Ware (i.e., the solitary mother looking out over a playground with fathers and their children)?  I&#8217;m confused. Is this also a rejected image? Either way, the message is lost on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410824</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410824</guid>
		<description>A) They&#039;re scamps.

B) Talent in this case is subjective.  And IMO political cartoons are all about the message, the style is more than secondary. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A) They&#8217;re scamps.</p>
<p>B) Talent in this case is subjective.  And IMO political cartoons are all about the message, the style is more than secondary. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Benbenek</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410813</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Benbenek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410813</guid>
		<description>The New Yorker cartoon book I have is 650 pages with 2000 cartoons. That&#039;s about all the comics sharing I can handle. If I read two cartoons a day, it would take me almost 3 years to get through them all - I like cartoons, but not that much - apparently the included DVD has cartoons with bad resolution, but I haven&#039;t gone there yet. Any magazine that prints Sam Gross is probably alright with me (frogs legs anybody?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Yorker cartoon book I have is 650 pages with 2000 cartoons. That&#8217;s about all the comics sharing I can handle. If I read two cartoons a day, it would take me almost 3 years to get through them all &#8211; I like cartoons, but not that much &#8211; apparently the included DVD has cartoons with bad resolution, but I haven&#8217;t gone there yet. Any magazine that prints Sam Gross is probably alright with me (frogs legs anybody?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE GAJILLIONAIRES</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410808</link>
		<dc:creator>THE GAJILLIONAIRES</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410808</guid>
		<description>These are great. Cliches being used to say something new is right on the money. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are great. Cliches being used to say something new is right on the money. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teller</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410797</link>
		<dc:creator>Teller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410797</guid>
		<description>The journalism, profiles, film and book reviews are terrific; the political writing is laughably shrill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The journalism, profiles, film and book reviews are terrific; the political writing is laughably shrill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeePapa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/01/rejected-and-controversial-new.html#comment-1410782</link>
		<dc:creator>eeePapa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=157790#comment-1410782</guid>
		<description>They are sketches</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are sketches</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
