<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Great moments in pedantry: Winter is coming. But&#160;why?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DewiMorgan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1425165</link>
		<dc:creator>DewiMorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1425165</guid>
		<description>Started watching the series just last night actually. My only thought at the mentions of erratic season-lengths was &quot;cool, a three-body system!&quot; 

Then I thought &quot;Or maybe seasons are just like Earth&#039;s, but there are one or more 
orbiting bodies large enough to obscure the sun, with cl0se-to-heliosynchornous orbits, but affecting each others&#039; orbits enough to make them erratic, like the moons of Saturn. Or some kind of atmospheric behavior, like a cyclical ozone layer, or cascading cloud cover changes, or...&quot;

Then I thought &quot;...or magic. Glowing-eyed undead WERE in the very first scene, after all. Maybe magic flux-lines are affecting the planet&#039;s orbital path; or magic is locally affecting the passage of time on the planet while still keeping it constant WRT the orbit; or magic is affecting the planet&#039;s mass WRT the sun without affecting its local gravity; or magic is affecting the sun&#039;s own gravity.&quot;

Then I... got bored and went back to watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started watching the series just last night actually. My only thought at the mentions of erratic season-lengths was &#8220;cool, a three-body system!&#8221; </p>
<p>Then I thought &#8220;Or maybe seasons are just like Earth&#8217;s, but there are one or more<br />
orbiting bodies large enough to obscure the sun, with cl0se-to-heliosynchornous orbits, but affecting each others&#8217; orbits enough to make them erratic, like the moons of Saturn. Or some kind of atmospheric behavior, like a cyclical ozone layer, or cascading cloud cover changes, or&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I thought &#8220;&#8230;or magic. Glowing-eyed undead WERE in the very first scene, after all. Maybe magic flux-lines are affecting the planet&#8217;s orbital path; or magic is locally affecting the passage of time on the planet while still keeping it constant WRT the orbit; or magic is affecting the planet&#8217;s mass WRT the sun without affecting its local gravity; or magic is affecting the sun&#8217;s own gravity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I&#8230; got bored and went back to watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DewiMorgan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1425166</link>
		<dc:creator>DewiMorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1425166</guid>
		<description>Started watching the series just last night actually. My only thought at the mentions of erratic season-lengths was &quot;cool, a three-body system!&quot; 

Then I thought &quot;Or maybe seasons are just like Earth&#039;s, but there are one or more 
orbiting bodies large enough to obscure the sun, with cl0se-to-heliosynchornous orbits, but affecting each others&#039; orbits enough to make them erratic, like the moons of Saturn. Or some kind of atmospheric behavior, like a cyclical ozone layer, or cascading cloud cover changes, or...&quot;

Then I thought &quot;...or magic. Glowing-eyed undead WERE in the very first scene, after all. Maybe magic flux-lines are affecting the planet&#039;s orbital path; or magic is locally affecting the passage of time on the planet while still keeping it constant WRT the orbit; or magic is affecting the planet&#039;s mass WRT the sun without affecting its local gravity; or magic is affecting the sun&#039;s own gravity.&quot;

Then I... got bored and went back to watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started watching the series just last night actually. My only thought at the mentions of erratic season-lengths was &#8220;cool, a three-body system!&#8221; </p>
<p>Then I thought &#8220;Or maybe seasons are just like Earth&#8217;s, but there are one or more<br />
orbiting bodies large enough to obscure the sun, with cl0se-to-heliosynchornous orbits, but affecting each others&#8217; orbits enough to make them erratic, like the moons of Saturn. Or some kind of atmospheric behavior, like a cyclical ozone layer, or cascading cloud cover changes, or&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I thought &#8220;&#8230;or magic. Glowing-eyed undead WERE in the very first scene, after all. Maybe magic flux-lines are affecting the planet&#8217;s orbital path; or magic is locally affecting the passage of time on the planet while still keeping it constant WRT the orbit; or magic is affecting the planet&#8217;s mass WRT the sun without affecting its local gravity; or magic is affecting the sun&#8217;s own gravity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then I&#8230; got bored and went back to watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: onereader</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424869</link>
		<dc:creator>onereader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424869</guid>
		<description> It&#039;s implied in a few places in the books that the &quot;official&quot; chronologies are inflated and absolutely not reliable (there weren&#039;t almost 1000 Lord Commanders). If you reduce the supposed 12000 years of history (most of them pre-Andal Invasion) to 2000-3000 you get something a lot more reasonable: the Children of the Forest were a Neolithic hunter-gatherer culture, the First Men were agriculturalist with bronze weapons, the Andals were an Iron Age culture, the Valirian Freehold was a Roman Empire equivalent. Also, it&#039;s implied that most of the legends about the Age of Heroes are anachronistic, à la Matter of Rome, and don&#039;t reflect the actual culture of the time but the &quot;current&quot; Westeros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It&#8217;s implied in a few places in the books that the &#8220;official&#8221; chronologies are inflated and absolutely not reliable (there weren&#8217;t almost 1000 Lord Commanders). If you reduce the supposed 12000 years of history (most of them pre-Andal Invasion) to 2000-3000 you get something a lot more reasonable: the Children of the Forest were a Neolithic hunter-gatherer culture, the First Men were agriculturalist with bronze weapons, the Andals were an Iron Age culture, the Valirian Freehold was a Roman Empire equivalent. Also, it&#8217;s implied that most of the legends about the Age of Heroes are anachronistic, à la Matter of Rome, and don&#8217;t reflect the actual culture of the time but the &#8220;current&#8221; Westeros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424783</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424783</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think you need another elf to create friction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you need another elf to create friction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424773</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424773</guid>
		<description>You obviously haven&#039;t read Tolkiien&#039;s notes on elf nookie.  They do it a couple of times until they have children and then get bored and wander off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You obviously haven&#8217;t read Tolkiien&#8217;s notes on elf nookie.  They do it a couple of times until they have children and then get bored and wander off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424764</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424764</guid>
		<description>Ah.  Well, though I&#039;m still not very far into the second book (and I don&#039;t have HBO so I have yet to see the series), but so far I get the impression that the Maesters are similar to the Harper Masters of the &lt;i&gt;Pern&lt;/i&gt; books, acting as bards and politico-cultural advisors, but not wielding any direct authoritarian power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  Well, though I&#8217;m still not very far into the second book (and I don&#8217;t have HBO so I have yet to see the series), but so far I get the impression that the Maesters are similar to the Harper Masters of the <i>Pern</i> books, acting as bards and politico-cultural advisors, but not wielding any direct authoritarian power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypnosifl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424743</link>
		<dc:creator>hypnosifl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424743</guid>
		<description>OK, I was just responding to Halloween Jack&#039;s comment, I didn&#039;t say there&#039;s anything wrong with enjoying thinking about the details about how a fictional world &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; work, I do this all the time myself. It&#039;s true that Halloween Jack was responding to Gabriel Morgan&#039;s comment which called the original post &quot;aggravating&quot;, which I don&#039;t agree with, but I also don&#039;t agree with Halloween Jack&#039;s seeming position that you &quot;get an F in worldbuilding&quot; if you just allow for certain details of a &lt;i&gt;fantasy&lt;/i&gt; novel to be explained by magic rather than some detailed law-based explanation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I was just responding to Halloween Jack&#8217;s comment, I didn&#8217;t say there&#8217;s anything wrong with enjoying thinking about the details about how a fictional world <i>might</i> work, I do this all the time myself. It&#8217;s true that Halloween Jack was responding to Gabriel Morgan&#8217;s comment which called the original post &#8220;aggravating&#8221;, which I don&#8217;t agree with, but I also don&#8217;t agree with Halloween Jack&#8217;s seeming position that you &#8220;get an F in worldbuilding&#8221; if you just allow for certain details of a <i>fantasy</i> novel to be explained by magic rather than some detailed law-based explanation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Seale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424742</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Seale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424742</guid>
		<description>@retepslluerb:disqus I thought that it means we agree about the main point... =)

And yea, I think it&#039;s silly when fantasy novels do that. I understand why of course, but it still makes me go &#039;argh!&#039;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@retepslluerb:disqus I thought that it means we agree about the main point&#8230; =)</p>
<p>And yea, I think it&#8217;s silly when fantasy novels do that. I understand why of course, but it still makes me go &#8216;argh!&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424739</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424739</guid>
		<description>@boingboing-096f32c997988c54d6d7c09ff0be4d32:disqus Sure, nowadays “master” isn&#039;t used to imply lordship (except over dogs), but here it happens in a specific context where “master” could be a lord/servant relationship. 
Granted, Vader *was* an apprentice to Palpatine, but I don&#039;t think that was the vibe people got when they hear him talk “What is thy bidding, my master?”. 

Anyway, it&#039;s not that important.  I&#039;m even more conflicted about the dubbing and translation of this work. On one hand, the whole thing is clearly a take on the British islands (complete with Germanic and Norman invasions) and the War of the Roses, on the other hand it is a fantasy world with no relation to Earth. 

There are nearly religious wars on how to translate names  - is is Jon Snow or Jon Schnee ? 

Thanksfully, I can read and watch it in English. :-) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boingboing-096f32c997988c54d6d7c09ff0be4d32:disqus Sure, nowadays “master” isn&#8217;t used to imply lordship (except over dogs), but here it happens in a specific context where “master” could be a lord/servant relationship. <br />
Granted, Vader *was* an apprentice to Palpatine, but I don&#8217;t think that was the vibe people got when they hear him talk “What is thy bidding, my master?”. </p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s not that important.  I&#8217;m even more conflicted about the dubbing and translation of this work. On one hand, the whole thing is clearly a take on the British islands (complete with Germanic and Norman invasions) and the War of the Roses, on the other hand it is a fantasy world with no relation to Earth. </p>
<p>There are nearly religious wars on how to translate names  - is is Jon Snow or Jon Schnee ? </p>
<p>Thanksfully, I can read and watch it in English. :-) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424723</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424723</guid>
		<description>@SummerSeale:disqus Well, we can bicker about the details, but why, when we [don&#039;t] disagree about the main point: It&#039;s absolutely puzzling that nothing much happened in Westeros during thousand of years, even though their have a fairly developed technology  and society.(Feudalism, yes, but a rather lenient one.)

Edit: Added &#039;don&#039;t&#039; to my text. See
@SummerSeale&#039;s post below.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SummerSeale:disqus Well, we can bicker about the details, but why, when we [don't] disagree about the main point: It&#8217;s absolutely puzzling that nothing much happened in Westeros during thousand of years, even though their have a fairly developed technology  and society.(Feudalism, yes, but a rather lenient one.)</p>
<p>Edit: Added &#8216;don&#8217;t&#8217; to my text. See<br />
@SummerSeale&#8217;s post below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Seale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424720</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Seale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424720</guid>
		<description>Oh I guess it could have been taken that way. Sorry. =) I meant to say slow it down, really. I think they did actually slow it down somewhat more than if there had been no dogmatic approach to &quot;the way the world works&quot;. I suppose it is alternate history and we&#039;ll never know for sure, but I agree that it never was stopped and, obviously, I think that it did increase in time regardless. =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I guess it could have been taken that way. Sorry. =) I meant to say slow it down, really. I think they did actually slow it down somewhat more than if there had been no dogmatic approach to &#8220;the way the world works&#8221;. I suppose it is alternate history and we&#8217;ll never know for sure, but I agree that it never was stopped and, obviously, I think that it did increase in time regardless. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424712</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424712</guid>
		<description>Well, you wrote “they couldn&#039;t hold back innovation for more than a couple of hundred years”.  And looking back at the Middle Ages, that&#039;s not really what happened.  I&#039;m not even sure that the Romans were that great innovators. Great builders, yes, but much more pragmatic than the Greeks who really were on their way to invent modern science.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you wrote “they couldn&#8217;t hold back innovation for more than a couple of hundred years”.  And looking back at the Middle Ages, that&#8217;s not really what happened.  I&#8217;m not even sure that the Romans were that great innovators. Great builders, yes, but much more pragmatic than the Greeks who really were on their way to invent modern science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Seale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424691</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Seale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424691</guid>
		<description>Well I said that... =) I said that even with all the rules about keeping the status quo, people still innovated during the middle ages. =) Maybe not as fast as during the Roman period, but it never stopped. =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I said that&#8230; =) I said that even with all the rules about keeping the status quo, people still innovated during the middle ages. =) Maybe not as fast as during the Roman period, but it never stopped. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424682</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424682</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s a great modern myth that Western societies were stagnant during the Middle Ages.  There was certainly a lot of stuff lost after the fall of Rome, but lots of other stuff happened shortly after - many of the staples of Western civilization - down to how our cities work - got hammered out in these times, with many new inventions surpassing those of antiquity.  Regression - a downfall - seems much more likely to happen to human societies than being stagnant for centuries. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s a great modern myth that Western societies were stagnant during the Middle Ages.  There was certainly a lot of stuff lost after the fall of Rome, but lots of other stuff happened shortly after &#8211; many of the staples of Western civilization &#8211; down to how our cities work &#8211; got hammered out in these times, with many new inventions surpassing those of antiquity.  Regression &#8211; a downfall &#8211; seems much more likely to happen to human societies than being stagnant for centuries. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424679</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424679</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Digital copy - find/replace ; )&lt;/blockquote&gt;Nah, couldn&#039;t bring myself to do that.  Too much like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/01/04/132652272/new-edition-of-huckleberry-finn-will-eliminate-offensive-words?ft=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the edition&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;i&gt;Huckleberry Finn&lt;/i&gt; that removed all instances of the N-word.

I can live with it as is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Digital copy &#8211; find/replace ; )</p></blockquote>
<p>Nah, couldn&#8217;t bring myself to do that.  Too much like <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2011/01/04/132652272/new-edition-of-huckleberry-finn-will-eliminate-offensive-words?ft=1" rel="nofollow">the edition</a> of <i>Huckleberry Finn</i> that removed all instances of the N-word.</p>
<p>I can live with it as is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424673</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424673</guid>
		<description>Well, the English &quot;Master&quot; would have worked perfectly well in that context as well.  Anne McCaffrey&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Pern&lt;/i&gt; books had a pretty standard hierarchy of apprentices, journeymen, craftmasters, and Mastercraftsmen which is roughly analogous to British and American apprenticeship programs.  For Americans, at least, Master is used more often as &quot;a title of learning and craftsmanship,&quot; as you say.  Especially since the abolition of slavery, with the absence of titled gentry in the U.S., we only use &quot;master&quot; in the authoritarian sense when we speak of dog ownership.

So I didn&#039;t really see a reason for Martin to subtly alter the spelling of those two words by themselves, when nearly every other non-proper noun in his books seems to be modern American English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the English &#8220;Master&#8221; would have worked perfectly well in that context as well.  Anne McCaffrey&#8217;s <i>Pern</i> books had a pretty standard hierarchy of apprentices, journeymen, craftmasters, and Mastercraftsmen which is roughly analogous to British and American apprenticeship programs.  For Americans, at least, Master is used more often as &#8220;a title of learning and craftsmanship,&#8221; as you say.  Especially since the abolition of slavery, with the absence of titled gentry in the U.S., we only use &#8220;master&#8221; in the authoritarian sense when we speak of dog ownership.</p>
<p>So I didn&#8217;t really see a reason for Martin to subtly alter the spelling of those two words by themselves, when nearly every other non-proper noun in his books seems to be modern American English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cola Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424610</link>
		<dc:creator>Cola Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424610</guid>
		<description>Everyone misses it, but it was clearly mentioned in the post that the idea is that these worlds have an internal and consistent logic in order to keep the reader engaged.  No one said the books *have* to be scientifically consistent, just consistent with the rules already laid out previously.  Having read all the books, the world seems internally consistent to me, and that&#039;s fine.

Asking questions about potential scientific explanations is about engaging the material in another way because it is ALSO fun.  I don&#039;t know why people freak out when someone is thinking about a book or film &quot;too much.&quot;  It&#039;s like they&#039;re demanding everyone just receive the world uncritically because otherwise they must be joyless pedants.  What total nonsense.  Sputtering &quot;B-but!! MAGIC! DRAGONS!!!!&quot; sounds like another way of saying, &quot;THIS ISN&#039;T HOW I ENJOY THINGS SO SHUT UP!&quot;

Not everyone feels so threatened by a little curiosity. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone misses it, but it was clearly mentioned in the post that the idea is that these worlds have an internal and consistent logic in order to keep the reader engaged.  No one said the books *have* to be scientifically consistent, just consistent with the rules already laid out previously.  Having read all the books, the world seems internally consistent to me, and that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Asking questions about potential scientific explanations is about engaging the material in another way because it is ALSO fun.  I don&#8217;t know why people freak out when someone is thinking about a book or film &#8220;too much.&#8221;  It&#8217;s like they&#8217;re demanding everyone just receive the world uncritically because otherwise they must be joyless pedants.  What total nonsense.  Sputtering &#8220;B-but!! MAGIC! DRAGONS!!!!&#8221; sounds like another way of saying, &#8220;THIS ISN&#8217;T HOW I ENJOY THINGS SO SHUT UP!&#8221;</p>
<p>Not everyone feels so threatened by a little curiosity. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cola Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424588</link>
		<dc:creator>Cola Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424588</guid>
		<description>Actually, in the book they talk about hoping for a long autumn so that they have time to harvest before winter.  You&#039;re right about there being milder winters and summers, but in the big bad winter that&#039;s coming, the characters talk about whole years without any sunlight whatsoever.  No mini-summers.  Just darkness and freezing cold. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, in the book they talk about hoping for a long autumn so that they have time to harvest before winter.  You&#8217;re right about there being milder winters and summers, but in the big bad winter that&#8217;s coming, the characters talk about whole years without any sunlight whatsoever.  No mini-summers.  Just darkness and freezing cold. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Summer Seale</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424558</link>
		<dc:creator>Summer Seale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424558</guid>
		<description>I absolutely loved the books and so far, love the series. However, it isn&#039;t the weather that bothers me (although, OK, that&#039;s a good point and a good write-up), as much as the fact that their societies are stagnant since thousands of years.

Of course, we only have ourselves to compare them to, but if they display the least bit of intelligence and innovative thinking as we earth humans do, then it doesn&#039;t make any sense. They&#039;d have discovered more &quot;modern&quot; technology by now.

The fact that they&#039;re a society based on many different types of people, gathered together over large areas of land, sort of necessitates changes over time - again, if they&#039;re even remotely like us. Very few societies made absolutely no changes in the last few thousand years on earth after reaching a certain level of technology and trade (medieval, in this respect). Certain natural observations would have been made over and over again to the point that they would have become common knowledge and people would have acted upon that information with other observations.

It&#039;s just a nitpick, I know. But it&#039;s something which always bothered me about fantasy stories. Eventually, you&#039;re going to get people who will notice things, create things, or invent things to make other things better. It&#039;s a natural course of evolution. It&#039;s a little hard to see how they could have reached the art of making a sword and plate mail, with all that innovation and technology required to create such things, and then completely and utterly abandon everything which led up to that point in their evolving brains. I think it would actually take a willful and concerted effort on the part of all of the societies to accept that no more changes should ever be made and life should stay exactly the same as it is forever more. And, even that would fail. I mean, in some respects...the Church and &quot;Powers that be&quot; during the Middle Ages held that view (in different places, mind you) - the order of societies; never being able to move outside of your birth rank; never challenging the precepts of &quot;holy writ&quot;; and on and on. And still, with an entire set of rules, dogma, and society itself hammering down on everyone&#039;s head, including the threat of Hell itself on a daily basis, they couldn&#039;t hold back innovation for more than a couple of hundred years.

Change is basically inevitable. We know it is at least on our planet. And I submit that a planet that discovers their level of technology over the years would continue developing and not stop in the same way that we didn&#039;t stop either.

Sorry for the dissertation, but it&#039;s something I always wanted to rant about. =)

That being said, I&#039;m still a fan. =)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely loved the books and so far, love the series. However, it isn&#8217;t the weather that bothers me (although, OK, that&#8217;s a good point and a good write-up), as much as the fact that their societies are stagnant since thousands of years.</p>
<p>Of course, we only have ourselves to compare them to, but if they display the least bit of intelligence and innovative thinking as we earth humans do, then it doesn&#8217;t make any sense. They&#8217;d have discovered more &#8220;modern&#8221; technology by now.</p>
<p>The fact that they&#8217;re a society based on many different types of people, gathered together over large areas of land, sort of necessitates changes over time &#8211; again, if they&#8217;re even remotely like us. Very few societies made absolutely no changes in the last few thousand years on earth after reaching a certain level of technology and trade (medieval, in this respect). Certain natural observations would have been made over and over again to the point that they would have become common knowledge and people would have acted upon that information with other observations.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a nitpick, I know. But it&#8217;s something which always bothered me about fantasy stories. Eventually, you&#8217;re going to get people who will notice things, create things, or invent things to make other things better. It&#8217;s a natural course of evolution. It&#8217;s a little hard to see how they could have reached the art of making a sword and plate mail, with all that innovation and technology required to create such things, and then completely and utterly abandon everything which led up to that point in their evolving brains. I think it would actually take a willful and concerted effort on the part of all of the societies to accept that no more changes should ever be made and life should stay exactly the same as it is forever more. And, even that would fail. I mean, in some respects&#8230;the Church and &#8220;Powers that be&#8221; during the Middle Ages held that view (in different places, mind you) &#8211; the order of societies; never being able to move outside of your birth rank; never challenging the precepts of &#8220;holy writ&#8221;; and on and on. And still, with an entire set of rules, dogma, and society itself hammering down on everyone&#8217;s head, including the threat of Hell itself on a daily basis, they couldn&#8217;t hold back innovation for more than a couple of hundred years.</p>
<p>Change is basically inevitable. We know it is at least on our planet. And I submit that a planet that discovers their level of technology over the years would continue developing and not stop in the same way that we didn&#8217;t stop either.</p>
<p>Sorry for the dissertation, but it&#8217;s something I always wanted to rant about. =)</p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m still a fan. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Lenethen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Lenethen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424536</guid>
		<description>Its obvious that the variability of Winter is caused by Climate Change. Stark is trying to tell them that Winter is Coming, but there are &quot;Deniers&quot; out there. I mean they have Dragons, that has to put out some CO2! Sure they died off, or was that a geoengineering experiment gone wrong leading to more instability? 


Another more likely theroy is that they are stupid superstitious uneducated people, with poor records, and a penchant for exaggeration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its obvious that the variability of Winter is caused by Climate Change. Stark is trying to tell them that Winter is Coming, but there are &#8220;Deniers&#8221; out there. I mean they have Dragons, that has to put out some CO2! Sure they died off, or was that a geoengineering experiment gone wrong leading to more instability? </p>
<p>Another more likely theroy is that they are stupid superstitious uneducated people, with poor records, and a penchant for exaggeration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashypete</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424509</link>
		<dc:creator>ashypete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424509</guid>
		<description>My take on the Maesters is that they are dogmatic archivists first and clerks &amp; bandagers second. Any Maester seeking unsanctioned &quot;new&quot; knowledge is frowned on or possibly treated as an apostate. I guess any ancient organisation needs to justify itself and its value by insinuating itself into the world at large (like all lordlings must be taught by Maesters or Maesters need to maintain ravens... despite there being no real evidence that this matters).  

Which makes me wonder if  GRRM&#039;s treatment of the Maesters is not a commentary on how some &quot;truth seekers&quot; can be just as dogmatic and arrogant as &quot;people of faith&quot; and thus ultimately stifling any productive growth of knowledge.  The books certainly seem to, at least to me, imply that Maesters have ulterior motives.  Which I guess we&#039;ll see more of as the books continue with that particular storyline.

In any case, I think it is telling that any time a book is mentioned, which is written by a Maester, it is always some ridiculously boring sounding, pedantic examination of an insignificant king or event which all the characters in the book seem to roll their eyes about. 

Regarding Plagues &amp; Seasons: Doesn&#039;t one of the short stories (maybe the third one) mention a devastating plague in a &quot;spring&quot; after a long winter? Mind you, it didn&#039;t sound like the Maesters were much help during it (at least based on my memory of the short story in question).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on the Maesters is that they are dogmatic archivists first and clerks &amp; bandagers second. Any Maester seeking unsanctioned &#8220;new&#8221; knowledge is frowned on or possibly treated as an apostate. I guess any ancient organisation needs to justify itself and its value by insinuating itself into the world at large (like all lordlings must be taught by Maesters or Maesters need to maintain ravens&#8230; despite there being no real evidence that this matters).  </p>
<p>Which makes me wonder if  GRRM&#8217;s treatment of the Maesters is not a commentary on how some &#8220;truth seekers&#8221; can be just as dogmatic and arrogant as &#8220;people of faith&#8221; and thus ultimately stifling any productive growth of knowledge.  The books certainly seem to, at least to me, imply that Maesters have ulterior motives.  Which I guess we&#8217;ll see more of as the books continue with that particular storyline.</p>
<p>In any case, I think it is telling that any time a book is mentioned, which is written by a Maester, it is always some ridiculously boring sounding, pedantic examination of an insignificant king or event which all the characters in the book seem to roll their eyes about. </p>
<p>Regarding Plagues &amp; Seasons: Doesn&#8217;t one of the short stories (maybe the third one) mention a devastating plague in a &#8220;spring&#8221; after a long winter? Mind you, it didn&#8217;t sound like the Maesters were much help during it (at least based on my memory of the short story in question).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424499</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424499</guid>
		<description>@wysinwyg:disqus The Maesters are more than Librarians, though. They are an order of “scholars, healers, postmen, and scientists” and distinguish between some sixteen “majors”, so to speak. Also, they are in business far longer than the Library of Alexandria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wysinwyg:disqus The Maesters are more than Librarians, though. They are an order of “scholars, healers, postmen, and scientists” and distinguish between some sixteen “majors”, so to speak. Also, they are in business far longer than the Library of Alexandria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Morgan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424489</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424489</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the discussion guys. If you would have told me a year ago that I&#039;d be discussing an epic fantasy series on the internet today, I&#039;d tell you there&#039;s approximately a 10% chance of that happening. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the discussion guys. If you would have told me a year ago that I&#8217;d be discussing an epic fantasy series on the internet today, I&#8217;d tell you there&#8217;s approximately a 10% chance of that happening. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424487</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424487</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;and yet they produce nearly no new knowledge.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Neither did the scholars at the library of Alexandria FWIW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>and yet they produce nearly no new knowledge.</p></blockquote>
<p>Neither did the scholars at the library of Alexandria FWIW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424482</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424482</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;fantasy is Dionysian, unbounded, imaginative, orgiastic. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Little of it is orgiastic or Dionysian; most of it&#039;s rather stuffy.  Tolkein is about as stuffy as I can imagine, and obviously he&#039;s the granddaddy.  I&#039;ve only read a few bits of fantasy that were really explicit about anything sexy.  Nerds are often rather inhibited people.  

Fantasy is never unbounded or imaginative.  It&#039;s genre fiction.  it&#039;s bounded by genre conventions and the imagination only comes in when those conventions are broken, i.e. when the work straddles the line between fantasy and not.

I&#039;m a little aggravated that you would count the Alice books as fantasy.  Note the distinct lack of juvenile male wish fulfillment in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>fantasy is Dionysian, unbounded, imaginative, orgiastic. </p></blockquote>
<p>Little of it is orgiastic or Dionysian; most of it&#8217;s rather stuffy.  Tolkein is about as stuffy as I can imagine, and obviously he&#8217;s the granddaddy.  I&#8217;ve only read a few bits of fantasy that were really explicit about anything sexy.  Nerds are often rather inhibited people.  </p>
<p>Fantasy is never unbounded or imaginative.  It&#8217;s genre fiction.  it&#8217;s bounded by genre conventions and the imagination only comes in when those conventions are broken, i.e. when the work straddles the line between fantasy and not.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a little aggravated that you would count the Alice books as fantasy.  Note the distinct lack of juvenile male wish fulfillment in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocomaan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424471</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocomaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424471</guid>
		<description>Sure, here&#039;s the link to the new chapter (Theon):
http://georgerrmartin.com/if-sample.html 

Definitely has a lot going on, and took me a reread to understand what the plan is.

It&#039;s true what you&#039;re saying about the other continents. I&#039;m mostly going off of what Marwyn says to Sam about the maesters killing the dragons two hundred years ago.  The theory has been thrown around the boards on westeros.org for awhile, it&#039;s really fascinating. There&#039;s also quite a few about the Faceless Men. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, here&#8217;s the link to the new chapter (Theon):<br />
<a href="http://georgerrmartin.com/if-sample.html " rel="nofollow">http://georgerrmartin.com/if-sample.html </a></p>
<p>Definitely has a lot going on, and took me a reread to understand what the plan is.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true what you&#8217;re saying about the other continents. I&#8217;m mostly going off of what Marwyn says to Sam about the maesters killing the dragons two hundred years ago.  The theory has been thrown around the boards on westeros.org for awhile, it&#8217;s really fascinating. There&#8217;s also quite a few about the Faceless Men. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424463</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424463</guid>
		<description>@boingboing-9150af663ce704426e8486f1593edde3:disqus  But the Maesters are mainly limited to Westeros and yet the rest of the world is mostly on the same technological and societal level. 

Do you have a link for  the chapters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boingboing-9150af663ce704426e8486f1593edde3:disqus  But the Maesters are mainly limited to Westeros and yet the rest of the world is mostly on the same technological and societal level. </p>
<p>Do you have a link for  the chapters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocomaan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424460</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocomaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424460</guid>
		<description>I think that the Maesters&#039; role in society has been the destruction of magic, rather than attempting to learn. Someone says (in AFFC maybe?) that nobody should trust the maesters, as they are attendant to all the kings and know all their secrets. I don&#039;t think that was a throwaway line. BTW, check out GRRM&quot;s website, there are some bonus chapters on there from Winds of Winter. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Maesters&#8217; role in society has been the destruction of magic, rather than attempting to learn. Someone says (in AFFC maybe?) that nobody should trust the maesters, as they are attendant to all the kings and know all their secrets. I don&#8217;t think that was a throwaway line. BTW, check out GRRM&#8221;s website, there are some bonus chapters on there from Winds of Winter. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424456</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424456</guid>
		<description>@boingboing-9150af663ce704426e8486f1593edde3:disqus I&#039;ve read them all in March, but don&#039;t remember anything conclusive - yet.  Yes, I think that there will be some  relevations about the Citadel, but they better be good. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@boingboing-9150af663ce704426e8486f1593edde3:disqus I&#8217;ve read them all in March, but don&#8217;t remember anything conclusive &#8211; yet.  Yes, I think that there will be some  relevations about the Citadel, but they better be good. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cocomaan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/14/great-moments-in-pedantry-win.html#comment-1424386</link>
		<dc:creator>Cocomaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=160709#comment-1424386</guid>
		<description>Not sure how far you are in the books, but a particular character&#039;s storyline might answer those questions in future books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure how far you are in the books, but a particular character&#8217;s storyline might answer those questions in future books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
