<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Miles O&#039;Brien on SpaceX Launch: &quot;Space for the Rest of&#160;Us&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 08:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dot hachey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html#comment-1432228</link>
		<dc:creator>dot hachey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=162413#comment-1432228</guid>
		<description>Actually, it wasn&#039;t  the Space Shuttle Endeavour whose &quot;wheels stopped on runway 15 at KSC on July 21, it was Space Shuttle Atlantis&#039; - STS-135. Endeavour was the second to the last mission, STS-134. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it wasn&#8217;t  the Space Shuttle Endeavour whose &#8220;wheels stopped on runway 15 at KSC on July 21, it was Space Shuttle Atlantis&#8217; &#8211; STS-135. Endeavour was the second to the last mission, STS-134. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Carlsen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html#comment-1430235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Carlsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=162413#comment-1430235</guid>
		<description>This is probably old news to a lot of people, but there&#039;s seriously a space journalist named Miles O&#039;Brien?  Does he get a lot of people calling him &quot;Chief?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is probably old news to a lot of people, but there&#8217;s seriously a space journalist named Miles O&#8217;Brien?  Does he get a lot of people calling him &#8220;Chief?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Singleton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html#comment-1430231</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Singleton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=162413#comment-1430231</guid>
		<description>Think about it this way. If the Private Sector can handle the people moving bits and monitizing  it allows NASA to focus even moreso on the Science and Discovery bits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think about it this way. If the Private Sector can handle the people moving bits and monitizing  it allows NASA to focus even moreso on the Science and Discovery bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Ochs</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/22/miles-obrien-on-spacex-launc.html#comment-1430188</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Ochs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=162413#comment-1430188</guid>
		<description>Seems a fair assessment, but I always worry that the private sector won&#039;t focus on the basic science and long-term goals that NASA used to (at least before it became the ultimate political football). The private sector is indeed known for efficiency, but it&#039;s also known for being short-sighted and subjecting everything to cost-benefit analysis - and ignoring intangible benefits (i.e, anything that isn&#039;t immediate profit).

I applaud the SpaceX team, and hope this is a new chapter of private-public partnerships, not NASA&#039;s exit from space exploration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems a fair assessment, but I always worry that the private sector won&#8217;t focus on the basic science and long-term goals that NASA used to (at least before it became the ultimate political football). The private sector is indeed known for efficiency, but it&#8217;s also known for being short-sighted and subjecting everything to cost-benefit analysis &#8211; and ignoring intangible benefits (i.e, anything that isn&#8217;t immediate profit).</p>
<p>I applaud the SpaceX team, and hope this is a new chapter of private-public partnerships, not NASA&#8217;s exit from space exploration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
