<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube launches new Human Rights channel with Witness.org and&#160;Storyful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 02:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: techtonix</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1435121</link>
		<dc:creator>techtonix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1435121</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great idea and a wonderful gesture.

I&#039;m just wondering if the formation of that channel would simply make it easier for corporations and other oppressive regimes to filter and block in mass? 

Also Time-Warner can specify that website to a lower bandwidth, but keep youtube fast. Isn&#039;t it better to be able to mix all the witness videos in with clips of cats, instructional videos, and hot yoga vids?

If everything is mixed up, there will be more of an outrage that all of youtube is blocked rather then some &#039;pesky&#039; advocacy channel. 

Then again I&#039;m in Beijing and youtube is blocked anyways...

Also, as in China, anything with certain word tags are automatically blocked, for example recently any mention of Ferrari was blocked in China because of some incident where a high ranking Communist got in an accident from reckless driving in Beijing. 

It would be cool if all the videos on the Human Rights Channel were cloned into regular youtube, and so forth, just to maintain coverage if censorship were to occur.

Awesome though, rock on!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great idea and a wonderful gesture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just wondering if the formation of that channel would simply make it easier for corporations and other oppressive regimes to filter and block in mass? </p>
<p>Also Time-Warner can specify that website to a lower bandwidth, but keep youtube fast. Isn&#8217;t it better to be able to mix all the witness videos in with clips of cats, instructional videos, and hot yoga vids?</p>
<p>If everything is mixed up, there will be more of an outrage that all of youtube is blocked rather then some &#8216;pesky&#8217; advocacy channel. </p>
<p>Then again I&#8217;m in Beijing and youtube is blocked anyways&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, as in China, anything with certain word tags are automatically blocked, for example recently any mention of Ferrari was blocked in China because of some incident where a high ranking Communist got in an accident from reckless driving in Beijing. </p>
<p>It would be cool if all the videos on the Human Rights Channel were cloned into regular youtube, and so forth, just to maintain coverage if censorship were to occur.</p>
<p>Awesome though, rock on!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philllies</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1434775</link>
		<dc:creator>philllies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1434775</guid>
		<description>Me too. Woosh, don&#039;t wan&#039;t to get any more outraged today unless absolutely needed. Headscarf is a symbol of VOLUNTARY female subjugation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too. Woosh, don&#8217;t wan&#8217;t to get any more outraged today unless absolutely needed. Headscarf is a symbol of VOLUNTARY female subjugation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldjove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1434603</link>
		<dc:creator>oldjove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1434603</guid>
		<description>Ah good. I was worried you were making a reference to the headscarf, symbol of female oppression and all that, and I was about to get all outraged. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah good. I was worried you were making a reference to the headscarf, symbol of female oppression and all that, and I was about to get all outraged. ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gATO</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1434477</link>
		<dc:creator>gATO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1434477</guid>
		<description>Just the position of the button. At this time of the morning, I&#039;m not able to analyze much beyond that.

(see? I can&#039;t even make a witty reply!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just the position of the button. At this time of the morning, I&#8217;m not able to analyze much beyond that.</p>
<p>(see? I can&#8217;t even make a witty reply!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldjove</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1434466</link>
		<dc:creator>oldjove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 08:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1434466</guid>
		<description>Whatever could you mean? Is it the unfortunate positioning of the YouTube button covering her mouth? Or is it the shoulder pads and makeup she&#039;s wearing? Deforming her appearance as signs of subordination to a patriarchal system?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever could you mean? Is it the unfortunate positioning of the YouTube button covering her mouth? Or is it the shoulder pads and makeup she&#8217;s wearing? Deforming her appearance as signs of subordination to a patriarchal system?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gATO</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/05/25/youtube-launches-new-human-rig.html#comment-1434424</link>
		<dc:creator>gATO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=163144#comment-1434424</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a pretty ironic picture, given the subject ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a pretty ironic picture, given the subject ;) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
