<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Snarky (but accurate) Prometheus&#160;review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: senorglory</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1450671</link>
		<dc:creator>senorglory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1450671</guid>
		<description>They just drive around this moon til they see something out of place?  That&#039;s the plan?  The plan works immediately?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They just drive around this moon til they see something out of place?  That&#8217;s the plan?  The plan works immediately?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448103</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448103</guid>
		<description>Oh, and no none of those people would be allowed on this voyage because they did actual science.  The only people allowed to do science on this voyage are the sarah palin&#039;s of the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and no none of those people would be allowed on this voyage because they did actual science.  The only people allowed to do science on this voyage are the sarah palin&#8217;s of the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448086</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448086</guid>
		<description>yes exactly.  there is a reason that type of faith is called blind faith.

blind faith:  belief without true understanding, perception, or discrimination.  belief in what cannot be known or the unknowable.

when it comes to science, faith in something with no/zero evidence pointing towards or supporting that thing is idiotic.  no influential scientist had faith about things related to their science.  you are confusing their personal beliefs from their professional work.  science goes to great lengths to remove all bias of the experimenter from the experiment.  ones beliefs no matter what they are, are not a part of the scientific process whatsoever.

faith is required for certain religions as there is no tangible evidence collaborating their claims.  that is fine.  they don&#039;t require any evidence and are not concerned with the cataloging of facts or tangible data.  they server a completely different purpose that is not at odds with faith.  there is no room or place for faith in science as faith is anti-science.  science is based on empirical observation and is the cataloging of what can be know.  religions are  various competing stories to explain what cannot yet be known.  as science constantly pushes out the boundaries of what can be known, the unknowable shifts to new areas, hence the old stories for the unknowable often no longer apply.  this is the key reason science and certain religions are at odds.  do note some religons, like Buddhism, do not have this issue as they are completely different in nature from, lets say the judeo-christian religions.

hope that clarifies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes exactly.  there is a reason that type of faith is called blind faith.</p>
<p>blind faith:  belief without true understanding, perception, or discrimination.  belief in what cannot be known or the unknowable.</p>
<p>when it comes to science, faith in something with no/zero evidence pointing towards or supporting that thing is idiotic.  no influential scientist had faith about things related to their science.  you are confusing their personal beliefs from their professional work.  science goes to great lengths to remove all bias of the experimenter from the experiment.  ones beliefs no matter what they are, are not a part of the scientific process whatsoever.</p>
<p>faith is required for certain religions as there is no tangible evidence collaborating their claims.  that is fine.  they don&#8217;t require any evidence and are not concerned with the cataloging of facts or tangible data.  they server a completely different purpose that is not at odds with faith.  there is no room or place for faith in science as faith is anti-science.  science is based on empirical observation and is the cataloging of what can be know.  religions are  various competing stories to explain what cannot yet be known.  as science constantly pushes out the boundaries of what can be known, the unknowable shifts to new areas, hence the old stories for the unknowable often no longer apply.  this is the key reason science and certain religions are at odds.  do note some religons, like Buddhism, do not have this issue as they are completely different in nature from, lets say the judeo-christian religions.</p>
<p>hope that clarifies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardru</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448080</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448080</guid>
		<description>(Odd, my comment never appeared.  I&#039;ll try again).

To me, Arthur C. Clarke would be the epitome of the dull SF movie.  2001 may be a well-made movie that is scientifically accurate in the right places (and magical in turn where needed)...it is frightfully BORING.  2010 is  the same, but is a much more entertaining movie.  Contact is like 2010...a very smart movie, but a lot of SF fans I know find it uninteresting and tedious, at places.  2001&#039;s popularity over time has much more to do with Stanley Kubrick&#039;s visual language than Clarke&#039;s story.  That&#039;s not a slight on Clarke, just an observation that most people view 2001 as a Kubrick film first.

Prometheus has a lot of what Hitchcock referred to as &#039;ice box logic&#039;; plot points that don&#039;t occur to you when watching the film, but do occur afterwards when you&#039;re raiding the fridge.  In Hitchcock&#039;s mind, if it doesn&#039;t hit you until after the movie, he&#039;d done his job.  

I think a large portion of Prometheus problem is the cache of it&#039;s predecessor coupled with the originator of the franchise semi-returning to the fold set up expectations far beyond what the film would be capable of delivering.  Which isn&#039;t an excuse for some of the film&#039;s problems, just a thought that maybe the film wouldn&#039;t be viewed so harshly if those particular situations didn&#039;t exist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Odd, my comment never appeared.  I&#8217;ll try again).</p>
<p>To me, Arthur C. Clarke would be the epitome of the dull SF movie.  2001 may be a well-made movie that is scientifically accurate in the right places (and magical in turn where needed)&#8230;it is frightfully BORING.  2010 is  the same, but is a much more entertaining movie.  Contact is like 2010&#8230;a very smart movie, but a lot of SF fans I know find it uninteresting and tedious, at places.  2001&#8242;s popularity over time has much more to do with Stanley Kubrick&#8217;s visual language than Clarke&#8217;s story.  That&#8217;s not a slight on Clarke, just an observation that most people view 2001 as a Kubrick film first.</p>
<p>Prometheus has a lot of what Hitchcock referred to as &#8216;ice box logic&#8217;; plot points that don&#8217;t occur to you when watching the film, but do occur afterwards when you&#8217;re raiding the fridge.  In Hitchcock&#8217;s mind, if it doesn&#8217;t hit you until after the movie, he&#8217;d done his job.  </p>
<p>I think a large portion of Prometheus problem is the cache of it&#8217;s predecessor coupled with the originator of the franchise semi-returning to the fold set up expectations far beyond what the film would be capable of delivering.  Which isn&#8217;t an excuse for some of the film&#8217;s problems, just a thought that maybe the film wouldn&#8217;t be viewed so harshly if those particular situations didn&#8217;t exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448079</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448079</guid>
		<description>The space jockey looked good. The interiors of the alien ship were lovely. It&#039;s the plot, the characters, the writing and the stupidity that I object to. 

I liked many of the effects too. Sparkly lights, wheeee! But the people and the monsters and the mess of the story got in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The space jockey looked good. The interiors of the alien ship were lovely. It&#8217;s the plot, the characters, the writing and the stupidity that I object to. </p>
<p>I liked many of the effects too. Sparkly lights, wheeee! But the people and the monsters and the mess of the story got in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448078</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448078</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t keep myself from enjoying Prometheus. I wanted to like it, I was struggling to like it. I&#039;d paid good money and I was out for a nice evening and I am not that rigid. I have great affection for all of the original four Alien movies, even the FRENCH ONE.

But every time I sat back to just enjoy the show, they&#039;d hit me over the head with some other massive stupidity and they just NEVER LET UP. I didn&#039;t go looking for flaws. They rained down from the screen like the cinders from the burning tree in Avatar. And my gawd, I like Avatar better than this mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t keep myself from enjoying Prometheus. I wanted to like it, I was struggling to like it. I&#8217;d paid good money and I was out for a nice evening and I am not that rigid. I have great affection for all of the original four Alien movies, even the FRENCH ONE.</p>
<p>But every time I sat back to just enjoy the show, they&#8217;d hit me over the head with some other massive stupidity and they just NEVER LET UP. I didn&#8217;t go looking for flaws. They rained down from the screen like the cinders from the burning tree in Avatar. And my gawd, I like Avatar better than this mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UglyTooth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448076</link>
		<dc:creator>UglyTooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448076</guid>
		<description>Whoa, whoa whoa...so faith in the unknown is now idiotic? I&#039;m not suggesting folks subscribe to my own beliefs, but don&#039;t both of you guys realize that a great number of influential scientists had faith?

Is Kelvin not allowed on this voyage? Richard Smalley? Freeman Dyson? Come on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa, whoa whoa&#8230;so faith in the unknown is now idiotic? I&#8217;m not suggesting folks subscribe to my own beliefs, but don&#8217;t both of you guys realize that a great number of influential scientists had faith?</p>
<p>Is Kelvin not allowed on this voyage? Richard Smalley? Freeman Dyson? Come on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448075</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448075</guid>
		<description>It wanted giant albino penguins. They probably would have helped. Certainly wouldn&#039;t have made a lick of difference as far as believability goes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wanted giant albino penguins. They probably would have helped. Certainly wouldn&#8217;t have made a lick of difference as far as believability goes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448074</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448074</guid>
		<description>Exactly. I&#039;m no Star Wars fan, so I was not able to empathize, until last night, the pain the true believers felt when first they saw Jar Jar Blinks.

Karma is bitch. Last night I writhed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly. I&#8217;m no Star Wars fan, so I was not able to empathize, until last night, the pain the true believers felt when first they saw Jar Jar Blinks.</p>
<p>Karma is bitch. Last night I writhed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UglyTooth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448070</link>
		<dc:creator>UglyTooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448070</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I love that moment. Plus, it confirms that Bishop has cold logic about it: if he runs into xenos in that tube, one pistol isn&#039;t going to make a lot of difference. The fact that he&#039;s probably calculated it will do more potential good with the humans, and provide him no advantages beyond emotional comfort (which he doesn&#039;t need) underscores his android nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I love that moment. Plus, it confirms that Bishop has cold logic about it: if he runs into xenos in that tube, one pistol isn&#8217;t going to make a lot of difference. The fact that he&#8217;s probably calculated it will do more potential good with the humans, and provide him no advantages beyond emotional comfort (which he doesn&#8217;t need) underscores his android nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448071</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448071</guid>
		<description>&quot;At it&#039;s core it&#039;s a slow paced monster movie.&quot;
But Alien was a rather elegant and ground-breaking monster movie. This film is lumpy as my grandmother&#039;s mashed potatoes and it doesn&#039;t have an original bone in its body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;At it&#8217;s core it&#8217;s a slow paced monster movie.&#8221;<br />
But Alien was a rather elegant and ground-breaking monster movie. This film is lumpy as my grandmother&#8217;s mashed potatoes and it doesn&#8217;t have an original bone in its body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448068</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448068</guid>
		<description>I suspect that smoking on a spaceship might be less of a big deal if smoking had become a more acceptable part of the culture. 

In New London, CT, I once took a tour of the first nuclear-powered sub. There were ashtrays in every freakin&#039; cabin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect that smoking on a spaceship might be less of a big deal if smoking had become a more acceptable part of the culture. </p>
<p>In New London, CT, I once took a tour of the first nuclear-powered sub. There were ashtrays in every freakin&#8217; cabin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UglyTooth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448067</link>
		<dc:creator>UglyTooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448067</guid>
		<description>Yep. Most of the conquest of the new world was undertaken by folks subscribing to the same sorts of dangerous quests, often for financial gain. See also: Encomiendas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Most of the conquest of the new world was undertaken by folks subscribing to the same sorts of dangerous quests, often for financial gain. See also: Encomiendas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448066</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448066</guid>
		<description>I think the director&#039;s cut could stand to do a bit of thinning, like maybe two hours worth and just leave us with all that lovely geological wonder  landscape photography at the beginning.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the director&#8217;s cut could stand to do a bit of thinning, like maybe two hours worth and just leave us with all that lovely geological wonder  landscape photography at the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448064</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448064</guid>
		<description>Oh that biologist. &quot;It looks like a small reptile.&quot; No. It doesn&#039;t even look like a vertebrate, it looks like a goddamn tapeworm. And all that &quot;Isn&#039;t she a little beauty?&quot; shit was channeling Steve Irwin and he would have known it wasn&#039;t a reptile.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh that biologist. &#8220;It looks like a small reptile.&#8221; No. It doesn&#8217;t even look like a vertebrate, it looks like a goddamn tapeworm. And all that &#8220;Isn&#8217;t she a little beauty?&#8221; shit was channeling Steve Irwin and he would have known it wasn&#8217;t a reptile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UglyTooth</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448060</link>
		<dc:creator>UglyTooth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448060</guid>
		<description>The ability to imagine possibilities, to postulate theories, and to reach one&#039;s fingertips towards the unknown is the heart of wonder, the core driver of new scientific theories, and the root of religious bearing. The soul of the scientist is the soul of the priest, both sets of eyes turned to the unknown, asking if they can find it. Science, too, is filled with a host of discoveries made despite a lack of evidence, early on, that such achievements could be possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ability to imagine possibilities, to postulate theories, and to reach one&#8217;s fingertips towards the unknown is the heart of wonder, the core driver of new scientific theories, and the root of religious bearing. The soul of the scientist is the soul of the priest, both sets of eyes turned to the unknown, asking if they can find it. Science, too, is filled with a host of discoveries made despite a lack of evidence, early on, that such achievements could be possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipenta</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448061</link>
		<dc:creator>pipenta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448061</guid>
		<description>Well, if you are going into a dark area that you have not yet explored, and the brightest lights on your goddamn helmet are not the ones pointing outwards, but the ones blasting directly into your eyes, then you might just want to peel the stupid thing off and damn the consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if you are going into a dark area that you have not yet explored, and the brightest lights on your goddamn helmet are not the ones pointing outwards, but the ones blasting directly into your eyes, then you might just want to peel the stupid thing off and damn the consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wizardru</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448037</link>
		<dc:creator>wizardru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448037</guid>
		<description>Never seen it.  That was the head-bending indie time-travel movie?  Need to add that to my list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never seen it.  That was the head-bending indie time-travel movie?  Need to add that to my list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChurchoftheBlackPanda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1448017</link>
		<dc:creator>ChurchoftheBlackPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1448017</guid>
		<description>Primer? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primer? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447674</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 03:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447674</guid>
		<description>i finally put my finger on what bothered me about this film...

prometheus is more of a sequel to gladiator than a prequel to aliens. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i finally put my finger on what bothered me about this film&#8230;</p>
<p>prometheus is more of a sequel to gladiator than a prequel to aliens. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: social_maladroit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447627</link>
		<dc:creator>social_maladroit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447627</guid>
		<description>One of the screenplay&#039;s writers, Damon Lindelof (&lt;i&gt;Lost&lt;/i&gt;) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/2012/06/07/154163335/damon-lindelof-risks-the-wrath-of-loyal-fans-again&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;had this advice to give to potential theater-goers about the movie&lt;/a&gt; during an interview:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess my message would be: Try not to bring too much of what you want Prometheus to be into the theater. The first time you see the movie, your sense of what you want it to be and what it&#039;s going to be could potentially override you just sitting back and watching it. And I do feel that at the very least, taking full responsibility for my own role in the writing of the film, it&#039;s one of the most visually spectacular things that I&#039;ve seen recently. It can be experienced as just something that washes over you &lt;b&gt;if it&#039;s possible for you to turn your brain off&lt;/b&gt;. I just hope people dig it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

(Bolding added.) See, all y&#039;all need to just stop thinking so hard about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the screenplay&#8217;s writers, Damon Lindelof (<i>Lost</i>) <a href="http://www.npr.org/2012/06/07/154163335/damon-lindelof-risks-the-wrath-of-loyal-fans-again" rel="nofollow">had this advice to give to potential theater-goers about the movie</a> during an interview:</p>
<blockquote><p>I guess my message would be: Try not to bring too much of what you want Prometheus to be into the theater. The first time you see the movie, your sense of what you want it to be and what it&#8217;s going to be could potentially override you just sitting back and watching it. And I do feel that at the very least, taking full responsibility for my own role in the writing of the film, it&#8217;s one of the most visually spectacular things that I&#8217;ve seen recently. It can be experienced as just something that washes over you <b>if it&#8217;s possible for you to turn your brain off</b>. I just hope people dig it.</p></blockquote>
<p>(Bolding added.) See, all y&#8217;all need to just stop thinking so hard about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447618</link>
		<dc:creator>HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 01:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447618</guid>
		<description>








I&#039;ll hold the money.  See you back here in 35 years!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll hold the money.  See you back here in 35 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nachoproblem</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447573</link>
		<dc:creator>nachoproblem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447573</guid>
		<description>He isn&#039;t just an asshole, he&#039;s a RICH asshole. Rich assholes typically have enough money to hire competent assholes, even if they are, as you say, assholes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He isn&#8217;t just an asshole, he&#8217;s a RICH asshole. Rich assholes typically have enough money to hire competent assholes, even if they are, as you say, assholes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nachoproblem</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447571</link>
		<dc:creator>nachoproblem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447571</guid>
		<description>Arthur C. Clarke was a hint. You&#039;ve got to understand that &quot;too sciency&quot; = &quot;sciency enough to make sense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur C. Clarke was a hint. You&#8217;ve got to understand that &#8220;too sciency&#8221; = &#8220;sciency enough to make sense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nachoproblem</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447570</link>
		<dc:creator>nachoproblem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447570</guid>
		<description> Well, it made sense for anybody at that point to leave with the explanation of, &quot;Yes, let&#039;s leave, because everything we&#039;re doing down here is totally stupid and dangerous and we clearly have no scientific protocols in place.&quot; But otherwise, since that didn&#039;t occur to anybody, then the biologist wanting to leave at that point made about as much sense as Dr. Charlie drowning his sorrows because the first alien race that had been discovered ever wasn&#039;t actually present right then for him to talk to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Well, it made sense for anybody at that point to leave with the explanation of, &#8220;Yes, let&#8217;s leave, because everything we&#8217;re doing down here is totally stupid and dangerous and we clearly have no scientific protocols in place.&#8221; But otherwise, since that didn&#8217;t occur to anybody, then the biologist wanting to leave at that point made about as much sense as Dr. Charlie drowning his sorrows because the first alien race that had been discovered ever wasn&#8217;t actually present right then for him to talk to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: princeminski</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447554</link>
		<dc:creator>princeminski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447554</guid>
		<description>Your &quot;Ideocracy&quot; analogy is brilliant. If I view all &quot;future&quot; movies as if they were the logical progression of my students carried into future generations they make a lot more sense. Especially if it could be established that all the technology was somehow left over from a distant past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;Ideocracy&#8221; analogy is brilliant. If I view all &#8220;future&#8221; movies as if they were the logical progression of my students carried into future generations they make a lot more sense. Especially if it could be established that all the technology was somehow left over from a distant past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x jeremy jarratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447550</link>
		<dc:creator>x jeremy jarratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447550</guid>
		<description>I thought hard about the time frame thing too. But then i remembered that at the turn of the 20th century most people were still riding around in horse-driven buggies... and yet we made it to the moon barely 70 years after that. We used to communicate via beeps which lasted maybe a quarter second long each... now we&#039;re capable of transmitting something like 25 trillion beeps in that same amount of time. Before the century was out we already had space probes flinging themselves past Uranus and - holyhell!  - &lt;em&gt;robots on Mars&lt;/em&gt;. So you never know. I do still think it pretty unlikely... just not quite impossible. I mean, we are talking about FTL travel, which may or may not even be possible no matter HOW much time we spend smashing subatomic particles against each other. But if it turns out that there IS a loophole* around the Great Speed Limit, it&#039;s no less likely to be discovered next year than a thousand years from now.

&lt;em&gt;*this is your one hint about that, humans, and that&#039;s all i&#039;m saying about it.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought hard about the time frame thing too. But then i remembered that at the turn of the 20th century most people were still riding around in horse-driven buggies&#8230; and yet we made it to the moon barely 70 years after that. We used to communicate via beeps which lasted maybe a quarter second long each&#8230; now we&#8217;re capable of transmitting something like 25 trillion beeps in that same amount of time. Before the century was out we already had space probes flinging themselves past Uranus and - holyhell!  - <em>robots on Mars</em>. So you never know. I do still think it pretty unlikely&#8230; just not quite impossible. I mean, we are talking about FTL travel, which may or may not even be possible no matter HOW much time we spend smashing subatomic particles against each other. But if it turns out that there IS a loophole* around the Great Speed Limit, it&#8217;s no less likely to be discovered next year than a thousand years from now.</p>
<p><em>*this is your one hint about that, humans, and that&#8217;s all i&#8217;m saying about it.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447540</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447540</guid>
		<description>i agree 100%...i wanted to shout &quot;keep your religious blind stupidity our of my sci-fi&quot;...and i actually like deep sci-film that have religious aspects, heck even star wars and 2001 had a spiritual/religious elements.  i have no problem with religion, it is the blindly stupid crowd that makes my skin crawl.  sarah palin could have written this movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree 100%&#8230;i wanted to shout &#8220;keep your religious blind stupidity our of my sci-fi&#8221;&#8230;and i actually like deep sci-film that have religious aspects, heck even star wars and 2001 had a spiritual/religious elements.  i have no problem with religion, it is the blindly stupid crowd that makes my skin crawl.  sarah palin could have written this movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redesigned</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447537</link>
		<dc:creator>redesigned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447537</guid>
		<description>i take that bet.  see you back here in 35 years! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i take that bet.  see you back here in 35 years! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/10/snarky-but-accurate-promethe.html#comment-1447535</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=165675#comment-1447535</guid>
		<description>We might occasionally be saying things like &quot;Remember Highlander 2, how hard it sucked? And Indiana Jones and the Crystal skulls? The Phantom menace? Wow, those films really pissed right in the fans&#039; faces didn&#039;t they? What about Prometheus? Yeah it was pretty bad - made no fucking sense. Another beer?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We might occasionally be saying things like &#8220;Remember Highlander 2, how hard it sucked? And Indiana Jones and the Crystal skulls? The Phantom menace? Wow, those films really pissed right in the fans&#8217; faces didn&#8217;t they? What about Prometheus? Yeah it was pretty bad &#8211; made no fucking sense. Another beer?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
