<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Worst Rob Liefeld Drawings, pt.&#160;II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevinC</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1454282</link>
		<dc:creator>DevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1454282</guid>
		<description>I read both the articles.  In some cases the author criticizes what are deliberate (though perhaps misguided) stylistic decisions as mistakes.  But there are just as many others where some plainly awful Liefieldism is passed over in silence, because there is just so much badness going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read both the articles.  In some cases the author criticizes what are deliberate (though perhaps misguided) stylistic decisions as mistakes.  But there are just as many others where some plainly awful Liefieldism is passed over in silence, because there is just so much badness going on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital_7</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1454146</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital_7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1454146</guid>
		<description>Alternately, you can have the kind of taste that you usually get from sucking on your feet and apply it to your comic book habits, like Diogenes there.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alternately, you can have the kind of taste that you usually get from sucking on your feet and apply it to your comic book habits, like Diogenes there.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1453969</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 00:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1453969</guid>
		<description>Translation:  I know what will make you happy better than you know what will make you happy, so you&#039;d better just listen to me and ignore your own tastes.

I love you sidewalk superintendents who have it all figured out and can tell us what is and isn&#039;t art.  Twas ever thus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation:  I know what will make you happy better than you know what will make you happy, so you&#8217;d better just listen to me and ignore your own tastes.</p>
<p>I love you sidewalk superintendents who have it all figured out and can tell us what is and isn&#8217;t art.  Twas ever thus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko the Squiz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1453904</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko the Squiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1453904</guid>
		<description>Oh, he may be undiplomatic but he&#039;s perfectly right. If you can&#039;t tell the difference between Liefeld&#039;s version of the 90s cheeseball Xtreeeme Superhero look and the same thing as done by someone who can draw, looking at things is unlikely to be a rewarding leisure activity for you. It&#039;s like being unable to tell the difference between Ricky Martin and William Hung and insisting that it&#039;s all about the latter&#039;s unique style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, he may be undiplomatic but he&#8217;s perfectly right. If you can&#8217;t tell the difference between Liefeld&#8217;s version of the 90s cheeseball Xtreeeme Superhero look and the same thing as done by someone who can draw, looking at things is unlikely to be a rewarding leisure activity for you. It&#8217;s like being unable to tell the difference between Ricky Martin and William Hung and insisting that it&#8217;s all about the latter&#8217;s unique style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miko the Squiz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1453883</link>
		<dc:creator>Miko the Squiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1453883</guid>
		<description>Not every mistake can be explained away as stylization. His idea of drawing people is to draw a pile of lumps and then put detail lines and crosshatching on it until it looks like a real drawing at a glance. He can&#039;t draw feet. He can&#039;t draw swords in perspective (they always come out bent unless they&#039;re perpendicular to the &#039;camera&#039;). He can&#039;t draw guns. He can&#039;t draw mouths or noses. He can&#039;t draw women. He can&#039;t draw teeth. He can&#039;t draw things to scale with other things, or things in front of or behind other things. He can&#039;t draw people holding things. 

If all those things somehow magically disappeared (which seems unlikely, since he must know that he can&#039;t draw feet - that&#039;s why everyone&#039;s always en pointe or standing behind things or cut off at the calf), he&#039;d be about on a level with the two or three best artists in my high school art class when I was seventeen.

And he&#039;s a millionaire because where others only drew their women anatomically improbable, he drew them fully impossible, where others had revealing necklines he had tits hanging out of bondage gear, where others drew twenty-pound guns and six-foot swords he went for 200-pound guns (even if they were just rectangles with two holes in one end) and fifteen-foot swords (bent). We only like Ed Wood because we feel he&#039;s a noble failure. If Plan 9 From Outer Space had made $380M (adjusted), I doubt we&#039;d think as fondly of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not every mistake can be explained away as stylization. His idea of drawing people is to draw a pile of lumps and then put detail lines and crosshatching on it until it looks like a real drawing at a glance. He can&#8217;t draw feet. He can&#8217;t draw swords in perspective (they always come out bent unless they&#8217;re perpendicular to the &#8216;camera&#8217;). He can&#8217;t draw guns. He can&#8217;t draw mouths or noses. He can&#8217;t draw women. He can&#8217;t draw teeth. He can&#8217;t draw things to scale with other things, or things in front of or behind other things. He can&#8217;t draw people holding things. </p>
<p>If all those things somehow magically disappeared (which seems unlikely, since he must know that he can&#8217;t draw feet &#8211; that&#8217;s why everyone&#8217;s always en pointe or standing behind things or cut off at the calf), he&#8217;d be about on a level with the two or three best artists in my high school art class when I was seventeen.</p>
<p>And he&#8217;s a millionaire because where others only drew their women anatomically improbable, he drew them fully impossible, where others had revealing necklines he had tits hanging out of bondage gear, where others drew twenty-pound guns and six-foot swords he went for 200-pound guns (even if they were just rectangles with two holes in one end) and fifteen-foot swords (bent). We only like Ed Wood because we feel he&#8217;s a noble failure. If Plan 9 From Outer Space had made $380M (adjusted), I doubt we&#8217;d think as fondly of him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Piskor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1453084</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Piskor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1453084</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m very late to the party, but, I had to include my favorite drawing, which wasn&#039;t on either of the lists. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m very late to the party, but, I had to include my favorite drawing, which wasn&#8217;t on either of the lists. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452922</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452922</guid>
		<description>I LIKE Alice; she&#039;s real!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LIKE Alice; she&#8217;s real!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452920</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452920</guid>
		<description>Are you saying you couldn&#039;t connect with the Iron Giant, or Rudolph&#039;s Humble Bumble?  What about the Sean Connery dragon?  Strangeness doesn&#039;t preclude connection.

I&#039;m not a fan of either Clowes or Liefeld.  I just find it hilarious that BB is childish enough to razz one while shilling for the other.  As I said before, consume the art you want, but don&#039;t expect quiet agreement when you diss one chump over another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying you couldn&#8217;t connect with the Iron Giant, or Rudolph&#8217;s Humble Bumble?  What about the Sean Connery dragon?  Strangeness doesn&#8217;t preclude connection.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of either Clowes or Liefeld.  I just find it hilarious that BB is childish enough to razz one while shilling for the other.  As I said before, consume the art you want, but don&#8217;t expect quiet agreement when you diss one chump over another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marko Raos</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452561</link>
		<dc:creator>Marko Raos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452561</guid>
		<description> Gaston deserves a revival in Boingboing, the palace of geekdom!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Gaston deserves a revival in Boingboing, the palace of geekdom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rivkin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452377</link>
		<dc:creator>rivkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452377</guid>
		<description> He used to not be a nice guy.  He used to be an arrogant prick who wouldn&#039;t talk to fans unless they were sucking up.  Or paying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> He used to not be a nice guy.  He used to be an arrogant prick who wouldn&#8217;t talk to fans unless they were sucking up.  Or paying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpeteria</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452254</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpeteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452254</guid>
		<description>Perhaps that&#039;s the crux of the issue here - the criticism being dealt towards Liefeld is not whether or not his characters &quot;feel real&quot; but rather that he constantly is breaking rules of logic in basic illustration terms, creating some incredibly bizarre creatures that he is clearly trying to pass off as photo-realistic. His knowledge and application of both anatomy and physics are severely lacking, or if he does have that knowledge, he certainly isn&#039;t letting it get in the way of his work (which, by the way, has made him quite wealthy). 

If Clowes is on par with Liefeld in regards to whether or not you connect with his characters, so be it, but you simply cannot claim that Clowes is a worse artist, because there is ample evidence to the contrary, especially when you look at work that Clowes has done that he has attempted to make photo-realistic (as opposed to his more common cartoonish style). It&#039;s just better done, plain and simple, and it&#039;s a silly comparison to make based on the valid (albeit super-snarky) criticisms that website is making.

And frankly, to not be able to connect on a &quot;real&quot; level with anything Liefeld has created is beyond the point as well - who the hell could connect with a 700 pound, 9-foot-tall, half-metal or covered in spandex mutant hero who carries around a gun the size of the average human being and who has feet the size of dinner rolls? Or a woman whose spine has at least four right angles which taper off into five foot long femurs? I don&#039;t know anyone like that (nor does anyone else), but I&#039;ve certainly come across a lot of people who are like Enid from Ghost World, or  Jerome from Art School Confidential, etc. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps that&#8217;s the crux of the issue here &#8211; the criticism being dealt towards Liefeld is not whether or not his characters &#8220;feel real&#8221; but rather that he constantly is breaking rules of logic in basic illustration terms, creating some incredibly bizarre creatures that he is clearly trying to pass off as photo-realistic. His knowledge and application of both anatomy and physics are severely lacking, or if he does have that knowledge, he certainly isn&#8217;t letting it get in the way of his work (which, by the way, has made him quite wealthy). </p>
<p>If Clowes is on par with Liefeld in regards to whether or not you connect with his characters, so be it, but you simply cannot claim that Clowes is a worse artist, because there is ample evidence to the contrary, especially when you look at work that Clowes has done that he has attempted to make photo-realistic (as opposed to his more common cartoonish style). It&#8217;s just better done, plain and simple, and it&#8217;s a silly comparison to make based on the valid (albeit super-snarky) criticisms that website is making.</p>
<p>And frankly, to not be able to connect on a &#8220;real&#8221; level with anything Liefeld has created is beyond the point as well &#8211; who the hell could connect with a 700 pound, 9-foot-tall, half-metal or covered in spandex mutant hero who carries around a gun the size of the average human being and who has feet the size of dinner rolls? Or a woman whose spine has at least four right angles which taper off into five foot long femurs? I don&#8217;t know anyone like that (nor does anyone else), but I&#8217;ve certainly come across a lot of people who are like Enid from Ghost World, or  Jerome from Art School Confidential, etc. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452128</link>
		<dc:creator>jackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 03:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452128</guid>
		<description> Have you spent any time with Alice Otterloop and her family?  If not, you should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Have you spent any time with Alice Otterloop and her family?  If not, you should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452044</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452044</guid>
		<description>&quot;...visual art may not be for you.  Stick to music, or food, or rocking back and forth in your chair, but stay away from visual art entirely.&quot;
 
That it what I am replying to.  That was Capital_7&#039;s comment.  You want to talk about &quot;posting the same crap reply over and over again&quot; without reading what someone said, try scrolling up a few replies to Capital&#039;s comment and reading it.  If you can&#039;t do that, I think we&#039;re done here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;visual art may not be for you.  Stick to music, or food, or rocking back and forth in your chair, but stay away from visual art entirely.&#8221;</p>
<p>That it what I am replying to.  That was Capital_7&#8242;s comment.  You want to talk about &#8220;posting the same crap reply over and over again&#8221; without reading what someone said, try scrolling up a few replies to Capital&#8217;s comment and reading it.  If you can&#8217;t do that, I think we&#8217;re done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452041</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452041</guid>
		<description>No you keep posting the same crap reply over and over again not reading what is actually being said. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No you keep posting the same crap reply over and over again not reading what is actually being said. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452034</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452034</guid>
		<description> C&#039;mon Rider, you&#039;re getting deep in the weeds here.  Capital_7 was being a pompous twit, insulting anyone who liked art of which Capital doesn&#039;t approve.  That kind of arrogance has a long history with art and self-appointed critics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> C&#8217;mon Rider, you&#8217;re getting deep in the weeds here.  Capital_7 was being a pompous twit, insulting anyone who liked art of which Capital doesn&#8217;t approve.  That kind of arrogance has a long history with art and self-appointed critics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452015</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452015</guid>
		<description>You keep missing the point.  There is nothing about taste or style here. Go back look at the pictures and actually read what they are pointing out.  The guy makes basic and fundamental mistakes, like having partsof costumes that should match perfectly attach themselves at different points of the costume in the same frame.

No one is talking about style here, they are talking about very very basic skills here.  like not giving characters two left feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You keep missing the point.  There is nothing about taste or style here. Go back look at the pictures and actually read what they are pointing out.  The guy makes basic and fundamental mistakes, like having partsof costumes that should match perfectly attach themselves at different points of the costume in the same frame.</p>
<p>No one is talking about style here, they are talking about very very basic skills here.  like not giving characters two left feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452006</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452006</guid>
		<description> The point is that people who pay for his work do so by their own choice.  I don&#039;t, but he seems to get by without my money just fine.  If you don&#039;t like it, don&#039;t buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The point is that people who pay for his work do so by their own choice.  I don&#8217;t, but he seems to get by without my money just fine.  If you don&#8217;t like it, don&#8217;t buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452004</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452004</guid>
		<description>Translation: If you don&#039;t share Capital_7&#039;s taste in art, you are wrong and you should leave art to those of us who are superior yet not at all pompous or arrogant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Translation: If you don&#8217;t share Capital_7&#8242;s taste in art, you are wrong and you should leave art to those of us who are superior yet not at all pompous or arrogant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452002</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452002</guid>
		<description> I disagree, but I don&#039;t expect everyone to share my tastes.  I think Clowes is on par with Liefeld.  Neither draw characters that appeal to me or feel real to me.  I&#039;m not talking photo-real either; Calvin felt real (and I miss him)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I disagree, but I don&#8217;t expect everyone to share my tastes.  I think Clowes is on par with Liefeld.  Neither draw characters that appeal to me or feel real to me.  I&#8217;m not talking photo-real either; Calvin felt real (and I miss him)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken McCracken</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1452000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken McCracken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1452000</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s no Travis Charest.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s no Travis Charest.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueelm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451935</link>
		<dc:creator>blueelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451935</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m going to have to be honest here. Finding out that this kind of art was not the only thing comics and graphic novels had to offer made all the difference in the world to me.

At the same time though, they really don&#039;t offend me. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m going to have to be honest here. Finding out that this kind of art was not the only thing comics and graphic novels had to offer made all the difference in the world to me.</p>
<p>At the same time though, they really don&#8217;t offend me. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carpeteria</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451847</link>
		<dc:creator>Carpeteria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 12:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451847</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an apples/oranges comparison, though. You might as well complain that Charles Schultz&#039; drawings of children aren&#039;t realistic, either. Clowes is not attempting to draw in a &quot;hyper-realistic&quot; form the way Liefeld has been, and yet Liefeld seems to not grasp basic anatomy and/or physics in some of the most rudimentary ways possible. Clowes is drawing in a much more cartoon-based form, and while it&#039;s far less realistic, his basic skills are far beyond what Liefeld possesses in terms of things like composition and basic mechanics of illustration. I&#039;d wager very few 8th graders could pull off what Clowes can, yet I&#039;m sure quite a few can muster up the scribbly, bendy, millions-of-lines-covered nonsense that Liefeld continuously puts out.

But that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an apples/oranges comparison, though. You might as well complain that Charles Schultz&#8217; drawings of children aren&#8217;t realistic, either. Clowes is not attempting to draw in a &#8220;hyper-realistic&#8221; form the way Liefeld has been, and yet Liefeld seems to not grasp basic anatomy and/or physics in some of the most rudimentary ways possible. Clowes is drawing in a much more cartoon-based form, and while it&#8217;s far less realistic, his basic skills are far beyond what Liefeld possesses in terms of things like composition and basic mechanics of illustration. I&#8217;d wager very few 8th graders could pull off what Clowes can, yet I&#8217;m sure quite a few can muster up the scribbly, bendy, millions-of-lines-covered nonsense that Liefeld continuously puts out.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital_7</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451829</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital_7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451829</guid>
		<description>If you enjoy his artwork, or think that there is no difference in his artwork than the work of other more respected artists, visual art may not be for you.  Stick to music, or food, or rocking back and forth in your chair, but stay away from visual art entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you enjoy his artwork, or think that there is no difference in his artwork than the work of other more respected artists, visual art may not be for you.  Stick to music, or food, or rocking back and forth in your chair, but stay away from visual art entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarBarSeven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451745</link>
		<dc:creator>BarBarSeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451745</guid>
		<description>I actually like Clowes art more than his writing. He’s a decent illustrator.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like Clowes art more than his writing. He’s a decent illustrator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BarBarSeven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451743</link>
		<dc:creator>BarBarSeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451743</guid>
		<description>I have never seen a 1990s comic book that made me not want to wretch. Not disrespect, but 1990s comic books &amp; tribal tattoos go hand in fugly hand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have never seen a 1990s comic book that made me not want to wretch. Not disrespect, but 1990s comic books &amp; tribal tattoos go hand in fugly hand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Templeton Peck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451709</link>
		<dc:creator>Templeton Peck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451709</guid>
		<description>&quot;...Phil Noto, Cliff Chiang or Fiona Staples  &quot;...thanks for those name drops. That&#039;s some awesome art this comic book dunce has never seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;Phil Noto, Cliff Chiang or Fiona Staples  &#8220;&#8230;thanks for those name drops. That&#8217;s some awesome art this comic book dunce has never seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451622</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 00:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451622</guid>
		<description> 80?  Pick any book of his.  In my opinion they both draw like mildly talented 8th graders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 80?  Pick any book of his.  In my opinion they both draw like mildly talented 8th graders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devophill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451531</link>
		<dc:creator>devophill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451531</guid>
		<description>&gt;X-Men #1 was pretty much the last comic I bought for close to two decades.

You&#039;re me almost, except I never actually bought it.
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;X-Men #1 was pretty much the last comic I bought for close to two decades.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re me almost, except I never actually bought it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devophill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451529</link>
		<dc:creator>devophill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451529</guid>
		<description>&gt;the Liefeld stlye went by the wayside

His imitators learned to draw better, but &lt;b&gt;he&#039;s still drawing like that!!&lt;/b&gt;
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;the Liefeld stlye went by the wayside</p>
<p>His imitators learned to draw better, but <b>he&#8217;s still drawing like that!!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mindfu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/06/15/the-worst-rob-liefeld-drawings.html#comment-1451475</link>
		<dc:creator>mindfu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=166561#comment-1451475</guid>
		<description>Agreed. Thank heaven for Alan Moore, Warren Ellis and Garth Ennis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. Thank heaven for Alan Moore, Warren Ellis and Garth Ennis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
