Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

What if the Moon didn't exist?

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 12:51 pm Tue, Jun 26, 2012

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Book Review

The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

The Life's Little Mysteries blog is in the midst of a string of posts that are, basically, like Marvel Comics "What If?" series as applied to the scientific history of Earth.

For example: What if humans had evolved to include more than two sexes, or to need three or more sex cells in order to procreate? What if Pangea (everybody's favorite supercontinent) had never split into chunks? What if Earth had never been in a massive collision with another, huge space object—meaning, what if the Moon didn't exist?

Now, if you've read very many of the comics you know that the answer to "What If?" is almost always "everybody dies". This series of posts is a bit less fatalistic. But, still, the point is made—these changes would radically alter life as we know it, and not necessarily in ways that sound like a lot of fun.

Take that question about the Moon. The implications of a Moon-less Earth are farther-reaching than you might guess:

Huge tides generated by the moon – which orbited much closer to Earth when it formed – washed the chemical building blocks for life from land into the oceans and helped "stir up the primordial soup," said Neil Comins, a professor of physics at the University of Maine.

The moon's gravity has helped slow Earth's rotation from an initial six-hour day to our current 24-hour day, while also stabilizing the tilt of our planet's axis, and thereby moderating the seasons. Life forms on a moonless Earth would therefore have different patterns of activity per the short days and nights, Comins told Life's Little Mysteries. These creatures might need to migrate more frequently to cope with extreme climate swings as well.

What If the Moon Never Formed?

Via "It's Okay to be Smart"

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  life • Science • series • Weird • what if?

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • technogeekagain

    Obligatory music reference:  Christine Lavin’s “If We Had No Moon” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyOyH9u4AdI

  • http://topologicoceans.wordpress.com/ TopOc

    Neil Comins actually wrote a whole book called “What if the Moon didn’t Exist? Voyages to Earths that Might Have Been” – I have a copy which I enjoyed immensely. Contrary the astronomical fine-tuning claims of some ID creationists, he makes a good argument that you can seriously mess with the planet without ruling out complex life. 

    Even so, I thought that he was a little pessimistic at times – for example, he suggests that a moonless world, lacking tidal mixing of the oceans’ chemicals, would have a delayed emergence of life. However, such a world would also have faster winds, leading to more erosion and wind-blown dust (which is important to ocean life even today) as well as stronger wind-driven ocean currents. Might these factors not counter-balance the reduced tidal mixing?

  • Grahamers2002

    If we had no moon, then Bill O’Reilly wouldn’t believe in a god.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BCipg71LbI 

  • http://imcravingpresidency.tumblr.com/ SedanChair

    http://www.thedailybeast.com/content/dailybeast/galleries/2012/05/02/the-many-sad-faces-of-newt-gingrich-photos/jcr:content/gallery/slide_2/image.img.572.jpg/1335971513964.cached.jpg

  • Henry Pootel

    Well, C is for cookie. That good enough for me.

  • rausantaella

    Please, take a look at the Gap in the Long Earth :P

  • http://www.facebook.com/stas.wiatrowski Stas’ Wiatrowski

    Isaac Asimov wrote a brilliant column about this for F&SF, with fascinating exploration of the possible effects on the progress of science vs religion.  Later collected with other essays in:   
    http://www.amazon.com/The-Tragedy-Moon-Isaac-Asimov/dp/0440189993

  • niktemadur

    If memory serves, a magazine article about twenty years ago said that without the Moon, the Earth’s magnetic field would be much weaker, a hundredth or even a thousandth of what it is with the Moon.  Is that statement accurate?

  • http://echofox3.blogspot.com efergus3

    One huge shallow swamp with only very primitive life forms. Sort of like New Jersey.

  • daemonsquire

    Strange: I usually look to Balk, at The Awl, for postulations on moonlessness (although, granted, there, it’s more just lunar antipathy).

  • Neuron

    The universe is they way that it is because if it weren’t, then we wouldn’t be here to observe it. So says the anthropic principle: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropic_principle

  • http://glitch.tl/ Michael Smith

    I read a theory that the moon is the difference between Earth and Venus because the Moon sweeps the top of our atmosphere away.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Evans/100000619020207 David Evans

    Mars has a 24-hour day (approximately) with no large moon to explain it. Could it be that the same impact that formed the Moon also spun-up the Earth?

  • http://www.xradiograph.com/ OtherMichael

    Moon|No Moon