RE #2 – most JA supporters don’t necessary dispute that he *may* have breached Sweden’s strict sexual conduct laws (though “rape” is a total exaggeration, as confirmed by both Prosecutor Finné and the accusers themselves). The issue is the US persecution threat – see repeated public threats from Biden, Palin et al. 

As well as remaining in Sweden until Finné granted permission for him to leave, JA has repeatedly offered to answer questions in London / by telephone / teleconference, as permitted by Sweden’s legal system during preliminary investigations. JA has even offered to return to Sweden *provided* they can guarantee won’t extradite him to US.

RE Sweden being unable to extradite him without UK consent; the problem is the “temporary surrender” provisions, which allow Sweden to extradite without UK’s consent, provided he is *eventually* returned to Sweden. Further, indications are that US would attempt to prosecute JA under hacking crimes legislation, which is a crime in the UK too, and thus reason not to object to JA being onward extradited.

In response to your comment: “And not having broken any laws in Sweden would prevent them extraditing him to the US (as they have consistently done in the past, and leaked
cables reveal a submissive relationship to US) *how* exactly?”
 I will explain this as clearly and simply as possible for you:
1) I think that the US has no interest in extraditing Assange and that if they wanted to, they very easily could (from the UK just as easily, if not more easily, than from Sweden).
2) Assange probably did commit the crimes for which he has been accused in Sweden.
3) Assange is using the whole, “If I go to Sweden, they’ll send me to America, where I’ll be executed!” thing as an excuse to avoid facing the law.

As for reading up on the issue, you do realize that if Sweden were to attempt to extradite him, the UK would also have a say in that, right? In other words, it is impossible that he could be safer from extradition in the UK than in Sweden. Or are you going to make me explain that, too?

You appear to have little comprehension of the Assange case, so why the off topic comment? Trolling?

Or, in other words, if he hasn’t broken any laws in Sweden, he should want to go there by all means.

Home Office to ignore Wikipedia founder’s petition against O’Dwyer extradition

That’s a joke headline isn’t it? Of course it’s going to ignore Jimmy Wales. He’s got no authority over the UK Home Office. He’s not even a UKanian. It’s crazy that that is the headline here.

It’s the general disgustingness of the UK’s Home Office that’s the issue here. And the contempt in which those in power are rightly held by anyone with any sense of our anthropoid-ape based ‘natural’ justice.

Perhaps we could we arrange for all handgun owners in the US to be rendered here for Illegal possession of a handgun, I think its a 5 year minimum term. It only seems fair, Or if US law does apply here as she seems to think, Id like to resume small bore pistol shooting that i had to give up when they band them.

http://www.tmay.co.uk/contact
Drop her a line, they like to hear from the public.

Of course, that doesn’t make her position invulnerable. It would, however, take a fair bit of effort to make her feel threatened.

“I am deeply saddened and disappointed with this decision. Gary McKinnon is a vulnerable young man and I see no compassion in sending him thousands of miles away from his home and loved ones to face trial. If he has questions to answer, there is a clear argument to be made that he should answer them in a British court. This case raises serious questions about the workings of the Extradition Act, which should be reviewed.”

That is…assuming you didn’t actually commit any crimes in Sweden, right?