<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Posters/petitions for Seattle residents against corporate&#160;personhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: koanhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478414</link>
		<dc:creator>koanhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478414</guid>
		<description> To state that &quot;a corporation is not a person&quot; is not the same as to state that &quot;a corporation is not a container for liability&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> To state that &#8220;a corporation is not a person&#8221; is not the same as to state that &#8220;a corporation is not a container for liability&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koanhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478411</link>
		<dc:creator>koanhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478411</guid>
		<description>I propose we demonize people who spam BoingBoing comments with irrelevant links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I propose we demonize people who spam BoingBoing comments with irrelevant links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koanhead</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478406</link>
		<dc:creator>koanhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478406</guid>
		<description> The time to establish such frameworks was centuries ago. Several such frameworks have been tried, and so far most of them have succumbed to the ability of corporate interests to agitate for increased corporate power.
As it stands, corporations are already more complex than goldfish, puppies, or people. A corporation can be in more than one place at a time, it exists without eating, sleeping or breathing, it can contain other corporations or split off pieces of itself which act independently. 
If, as you claim below, &quot;biology trumps law&quot;, then that is a reason why corporations cannot be people. People are biological entities, corporations are legal ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The time to establish such frameworks was centuries ago. Several such frameworks have been tried, and so far most of them have succumbed to the ability of corporate interests to agitate for increased corporate power.<br />
As it stands, corporations are already more complex than goldfish, puppies, or people. A corporation can be in more than one place at a time, it exists without eating, sleeping or breathing, it can contain other corporations or split off pieces of itself which act independently.<br />
If, as you claim below, &#8220;biology trumps law&#8221;, then that is a reason why corporations cannot be people. People are biological entities, corporations are legal ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BongBong</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478402</link>
		<dc:creator>BongBong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478402</guid>
		<description>More evidence that people misunderstand common legal terms to the point of aggressive stupidity in this &quot;end of the world&quot; directed society we live in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More evidence that people misunderstand common legal terms to the point of aggressive stupidity in this &#8220;end of the world&#8221; directed society we live in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Peters</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478384</link>
		<dc:creator>David Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478384</guid>
		<description>What about corporate personhood collectivizing and protecting individual members of a non-profit charity, when a mistake occurs and the corporate entity is liable?

For example:
&quot;A driver for the local co-op chain crashes into a bus full of kids injuring them. Instead of the co-op being responsible, all individual stakeholders could be sued--including the very parents of kids in the bus.&quot;

I understand that corporate personhood creates a number of problems (especially the idea that corporate persons have &quot;rights&quot; like you or I--i.e. corporations should be restricted from fair elections via caps on campaign donations or outright bans)...

... but that&#039;s not to say that parts of the system protect non-profits, charities, and NGOs from all its members being sued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about corporate personhood collectivizing and protecting individual members of a non-profit charity, when a mistake occurs and the corporate entity is liable?</p>
<p>For example:<br />
&#8220;A driver for the local co-op chain crashes into a bus full of kids injuring them. Instead of the co-op being responsible, all individual stakeholders could be sued&#8211;including the very parents of kids in the bus.&#8221;</p>
<p>I understand that corporate personhood creates a number of problems (especially the idea that corporate persons have &#8220;rights&#8221; like you or I&#8211;i.e. corporations should be restricted from fair elections via caps on campaign donations or outright bans)&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; but that&#8217;s not to say that parts of the system protect non-profits, charities, and NGOs from all its members being sued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retchdog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478382</link>
		<dc:creator>retchdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 05:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478382</guid>
		<description>liability and (full) autonomy seem to be orthogonal concepts, excepting that you can be held liable for things you do, of course. i don&#039;t see why you can&#039;t have either one without the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>liability and (full) autonomy seem to be orthogonal concepts, excepting that you can be held liable for things you do, of course. i don&#8217;t see why you can&#8217;t have either one without the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultranaut</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478304</link>
		<dc:creator>ultranaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478304</guid>
		<description>masturbation is fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>masturbation is fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultranaut</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478302</link>
		<dc:creator>ultranaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478302</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a driver but cars are not people</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a driver but cars are not people</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultranaut</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478301</link>
		<dc:creator>ultranaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478301</guid>
		<description>box turtles!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>box turtles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SomeGuyNamedMark</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478272</link>
		<dc:creator>SomeGuyNamedMark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478272</guid>
		<description>It goes back much further than 2009. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes back much further than 2009. </p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v._Southern_Pacific_Railroad</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478205</guid>
		<description> The Deutsche Mark ceased to be legal tender immediately upon the introduction of the euro. Mark coins and banknotes continued to be accepted as valid forms of payment in Germany until 28 February 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Deutsche Mark ceased to be legal tender immediately upon the introduction of the euro. Mark coins and banknotes continued to be accepted as valid forms of payment in Germany until 28 February 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: austinhamman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478115</link>
		<dc:creator>austinhamman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478115</guid>
		<description> mostly just going by what the wikipedia page on corporate personhood states:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood

i really think they should be fighting against the right of corporate persons to provide campaign funds to politicians (citizen&#039;s united v. federal election commission: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission) provide a bill which states that corporations do NOT have first amendment rights (or that campaign donations are not protected by the first amendment, but since congress can&#039;t say that only the supreme court can, and the supreme court has basically said it IS, the former is more likely)
corporations not having first amendment rights will not impair their ability to go into contracts, to sue or be sued. i dont see any reason we need them to have that right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> mostly just going by what the wikipedia page on corporate personhood states:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood</a></p>
<p>i really think they should be fighting against the right of corporate persons to provide campaign funds to politicians (citizen&#8217;s united v. federal election commission: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._Federal_Election_Commission</a>) provide a bill which states that corporations do NOT have first amendment rights (or that campaign donations are not protected by the first amendment, but since congress can&#8217;t say that only the supreme court can, and the supreme court has basically said it IS, the former is more likely)<br />
corporations not having first amendment rights will not impair their ability to go into contracts, to sue or be sued. i dont see any reason we need them to have that right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mantissa128</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478100</link>
		<dc:creator>Mantissa128</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478100</guid>
		<description>...and then nine months later, there are layoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and then nine months later, there are layoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt Guyll</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478090</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt Guyll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478090</guid>
		<description>.orgs are not people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.orgs are not people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia_G</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478091</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia_G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478091</guid>
		<description>Would it be better to treat corporations not like natural predators but perhaps like software, incl. malware? Because natural predators haven&#039;t yet been created by humans but software is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be better to treat corporations not like natural predators but perhaps like software, incl. malware? Because natural predators haven&#8217;t yet been created by humans but software is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478070</link>
		<dc:creator>MB44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478070</guid>
		<description>You were always hired. Now you are promoted to VicePresidentDirectorChairmanPresidentDivisionSupervisor of the Logo Art Division. We have crafted a golden parachute for you out of the souls of the people that you had to crush to get here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You were always hired. Now you are promoted to VicePresidentDirectorChairmanPresidentDivisionSupervisor of the Logo Art Division. We have crafted a golden parachute for you out of the souls of the people that you had to crush to get here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478047</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 14:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478047</guid>
		<description>Your Logo?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Logo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: glaborous_immolate</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478022</link>
		<dc:creator>glaborous_immolate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478022</guid>
		<description>If corporations aren&#039;t people, why is the corporation represented by a human foot in the picture.

Its funny even the graphic designers have to use a human person to claim a corp isn&#039;t a human person. Maybe that tells us something....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If corporations aren&#8217;t people, why is the corporation represented by a human foot in the picture.</p>
<p>Its funny even the graphic designers have to use a human person to claim a corp isn&#8217;t a human person. Maybe that tells us something&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maladi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1478000</link>
		<dc:creator>Maladi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 10:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1478000</guid>
		<description>Bravo, corporate mind-fu#* machine, bravo. I would think like you if I listened to CSPAN/FOX/CNBC/BSCORPRTMDIA too. 
Dear Americans, 
Do try not to be Trogolodytes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, corporate mind-fu#* machine, bravo. I would think like you if I listened to CSPAN/FOX/CNBC/BSCORPRTMDIA too.<br />
Dear Americans,<br />
Do try not to be Trogolodytes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niktemadur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477970</link>
		<dc:creator>niktemadur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477970</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s where something along the lines of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbU4VRs2rro&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Worthington&#039;s Law&lt;/a&gt; comes into effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s where something along the lines of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbU4VRs2rro" rel="nofollow">Worthington&#8217;s Law</a> comes into effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477964</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 06:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477964</guid>
		<description>Quick question: If this legal personhood stuff is so bad, what should substitute it in cases where people sue, say, the Catholic Church or Penn State University? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question: If this legal personhood stuff is so bad, what should substitute it in cases where people sue, say, the Catholic Church or Penn State University? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB44</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477963</link>
		<dc:creator>MB44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 05:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477963</guid>
		<description>I hate being in prison. That&#039;s why I incorporated a long time ago. It was the only way to seize individual rights and protect myself from the hardships of personal responsibility for my actions. It&#039;s not completely clear what exactly we do around here at MB44 Corps but, by god, nobody bothers us while we (I) do it. 

MB44 Corps, Because Fuck You, That&#039;s Why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate being in prison. That&#8217;s why I incorporated a long time ago. It was the only way to seize individual rights and protect myself from the hardships of personal responsibility for my actions. It&#8217;s not completely clear what exactly we do around here at MB44 Corps but, by god, nobody bothers us while we (I) do it. </p>
<p>MB44 Corps, Because Fuck You, That&#8217;s Why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477959</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 05:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477959</guid>
		<description>Limited reliability shouldn&#039;t protect owners not from criminal acts, of course. Same for sharholder&#039;s profits. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Limited reliability shouldn&#8217;t protect owners not from criminal acts, of course. Same for sharholder&#8217;s profits. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retepslluerb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477958</link>
		<dc:creator>retepslluerb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 05:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477958</guid>
		<description>The corporation would have to make the donation and it would not be tax deductible, of course. 

And frankly, the neighbors of Dubai are trying to do this by building mosques. But you didn&#039;t want to year that. 

Also, it wouldn&#039;t really matter much. The shitstorm would force the party on question to forego the donation.  

Also, parties which manage to get elected get reimbursed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The corporation would have to make the donation and it would not be tax deductible, of course. </p>
<p>And frankly, the neighbors of Dubai are trying to do this by building mosques. But you didn&#8217;t want to year that. </p>
<p>Also, it wouldn&#8217;t really matter much. The shitstorm would force the party on question to forego the donation.  </p>
<p>Also, parties which manage to get elected get reimbursed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neural Kernel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477951</link>
		<dc:creator>Neural Kernel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 05:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477951</guid>
		<description>Why are children the exception? An embryo is legally NOT a person (in most common law nations) but is most definitely human (biology trumps law). And why is man &quot;fallible&quot; while the random swirling of complex molecules is not? All I&#039;m saying that an entity should be granted or denied personhood based on its behaviour and abilities and not on any other factors, frankly I&#039;m a little shocked that it seems like such an outlandish idea to so many... people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are children the exception? An embryo is legally NOT a person (in most common law nations) but is most definitely human (biology trumps law). And why is man &#8220;fallible&#8221; while the random swirling of complex molecules is not? All I&#8217;m saying that an entity should be granted or denied personhood based on its behaviour and abilities and not on any other factors, frankly I&#8217;m a little shocked that it seems like such an outlandish idea to so many&#8230; people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhertzli</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477931</link>
		<dc:creator>jhertzli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477931</guid>
		<description>The reason corporations are not human beings is not that  they aren&#039;t human. They are human (at least on this planet). They are not human beings because they are not beings. Corporations don&#039;t actually exist.

What that means is that any confiscation of the property of a corporation is confiscation of that property from the beings composing it. Those beings have rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason corporations are not human beings is not that  they aren&#8217;t human. They are human (at least on this planet). They are not human beings because they are not beings. Corporations don&#8217;t actually exist.</p>
<p>What that means is that any confiscation of the property of a corporation is confiscation of that property from the beings composing it. Those beings have rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhertzli</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477930</link>
		<dc:creator>jhertzli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477930</guid>
		<description>The People&#039;s Rights Amendment is UNFAIR TO ROBOTS! (ObSF: &lt;i&gt;Valentina&lt;/i&gt; by Joseph H. Delaney and Marc Stiegler)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The People&#8217;s Rights Amendment is UNFAIR TO ROBOTS! (ObSF: <i>Valentina</i> by Joseph H. Delaney and Marc Stiegler)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477924</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477924</guid>
		<description>I checked him out on Facebook and he supports the RNC and dates Rush Limbaugh.

He&#039;s not kidding;  But, he still shouldn&#039;t be taken seriously.  I&#039;m just still trying to figure out how he drunkenly stumbled into Boing Boing from FOX &quot;News&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I checked him out on Facebook and he supports the RNC and dates Rush Limbaugh.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s not kidding;  But, he still shouldn&#8217;t be taken seriously.  I&#8217;m just still trying to figure out how he drunkenly stumbled into Boing Boing from FOX &#8220;News&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477920</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477920</guid>
		<description>The only true Libertarian is a hermit that lives out in the woods without electricity, running water or sanitation.  What a hero.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only true Libertarian is a hermit that lives out in the woods without electricity, running water or sanitation.  What a hero.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/14/posterspetitions-for-seattle.html#comment-1477918</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 02:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=171214#comment-1477918</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m a shareholder, I guess I am not a person.&lt;/blockquote&gt;So...  when the corporation with personhood breaks the law, should you and all the other shareholder people go to prison like normal people do when they break laws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m a shareholder, I guess I am not a person.</p></blockquote>
<p>So&#8230;  when the corporation with personhood breaks the law, should you and all the other shareholder people go to prison like normal people do when they break laws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
