<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Supreme Court copyright rules will eviscerate Access Canada&#039;s business&#160;model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:47:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Curry</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1484640</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Curry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1484640</guid>
		<description> It was pretty obvious that the Supreme Court&#039;s decisions would cripple Access Copyright. Universities (including my alma mater) have been pulling out of planned agreements with them across the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It was pretty obvious that the Supreme Court&#8217;s decisions would cripple Access Copyright. Universities (including my alma mater) have been pulling out of planned agreements with them across the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Nelson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1484147</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 02:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1484147</guid>
		<description>Come on, people. You&#039;ve had a good run and scammed a lot of people out of a lot of money. I suggest you admit it&#039;s over, go to the Cayman&#039;s or Switzerland, visit your money and enjoy the rest of your miserable lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on, people. You&#8217;ve had a good run and scammed a lot of people out of a lot of money. I suggest you admit it&#8217;s over, go to the Cayman&#8217;s or Switzerland, visit your money and enjoy the rest of your miserable lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matlockexpressway</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1484132</link>
		<dc:creator>matlockexpressway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 02:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1484132</guid>
		<description>The board will do just fine since they have most Canadian universities in their pocket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The board will do just fine since they have most Canadian universities in their pocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billstewart</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1484062</link>
		<dc:creator>billstewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1484062</guid>
		<description>&quot;Access Canada&quot;?  Or &quot;Access Copyright&quot;?  Looks like a headline typo. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Access Canada&#8221;?  Or &#8220;Access Copyright&#8221;?  Looks like a headline typo. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fuzzyfuzzyfungus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1483939</link>
		<dc:creator>fuzzyfuzzyfungus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jul 2012 00:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1483939</guid>
		<description>Their spokes-weasels would have to be either idiotic or atypically truth-constrained to say anything else...

If they just come out and say &#039;yup, we are totally screwed&#039; they might as well be providing advice about what people can now get away with. By not doing so, they preserve a pall of FUD that should keep a fair number of customers without access to robust legal advice in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their spokes-weasels would have to be either idiotic or atypically truth-constrained to say anything else&#8230;</p>
<p>If they just come out and say &#8216;yup, we are totally screwed&#8217; they might as well be providing advice about what people can now get away with. By not doing so, they preserve a pall of FUD that should keep a fair number of customers without access to robust legal advice in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1483923</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1483923</guid>
		<description>Good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: futnuh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/20/canadian-supreme-court-copyrig.html#comment-1483813</link>
		<dc:creator>futnuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=172192#comment-1483813</guid>
		<description>I read the collective&#039;s press release soon after the Supreme Court decision came out.  I was surprised at how non-plussed they were about losing.  I guess this was the only rationale response - pretend that their sky really wasn&#039;t falling, and hope institutions buy the &quot;nothing&#039;s changed&quot; line.  My fear now however is that Harper is going to rewrite the copyright act to make the court&#039;s decision moot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the collective&#8217;s press release soon after the Supreme Court decision came out.  I was surprised at how non-plussed they were about losing.  I guess this was the only rationale response &#8211; pretend that their sky really wasn&#8217;t falling, and hope institutions buy the &#8220;nothing&#8217;s changed&#8221; line.  My fear now however is that Harper is going to rewrite the copyright act to make the court&#8217;s decision moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
