— FEATURED —
Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling
The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel
Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy
The Snowden Principle
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Real Stuff: The Joeist Philosophy
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Chuck D and Spectrum City
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Workin' in the Data Mine...
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere—livestreamed event in D.C. today
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere event D.C. May 29 with scholars, survivors; Xeni moderating
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
— RECENTLY —
Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey
Atoms for Peace play a surprise intimate show in Los Angeles
Blunders of Genius: interesting errors by Darwin, Pauling, and Einstein
"By His Things Will You Know Him," a short story
Topsy Turvy World: surreal kids' picture book, now out in the USA
Hubsan X4 quadcopters: tiny cheap, powerful copter
Monsters and Legends: kids' monster book now in the USA!
Akissi: kids' comic about a mischievous girl in Cote D'Ivoire [now in the USA!]
A User's Guide to Neglectful Parenting, by Guy Delisle
Walking Dead 18: a magnificent villain who makes Hannibal Lecter look like Mr Rogers
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Rob Beschizza at 9:47 am Mon, Jul 30, 2012
It’s the law enforcement version of CNN’s headline-hunting. ACA wasn’t overturned, and he wasn’t a criminal. No harm, no foul, just a little irrational exuberance.
No harm, no foul
State-sponsored intimidation against non-white people is ‘no harm’?
Why does it matter that Holmes is black? State-sponsored intimidation causes a harm, period–even if committed against someone as lily-white as I am.
You have a point. And if you were nearly as likely to be stopped for no good reason, you’d have a much more meaningful point.
Are you really suggesting that a person being intimidated by police isn’t as meaningful because of the color of their skin?
Because that is certainly how that statement came off to me and I have really hard time believing that’s what you meant.
How about if any instance is wrong and, frankly, equally wrong.
I’m all for finding problem areas via statistics, etc., (e.g.. DWB) and focusing on those, but the intimidation is wrong regardless of race or creed.
Do you not know that non-white people are routinely stopped far more often than white people?
“Do you not know that non-white people are routinely stopped far more often than white people?”
Um, yes (and duh ), which is why I also had a comment about focusing on problem areas (in the U.S). like blacks being stopped more often.
But if it’s okay to discount someone’s negative experience with the police due to the color of their skin, then I would argue that you are following the same race-logic as the cops who decided someone is more deserving of being pulled over because of the color of their skin. (although, if you were suggesting those particular cops are deserving of being pulled over and intimidated for no reasons, I’d likely be with you on you that, although actually being disciplined in an effective manner would be even better ).
Your response has nothing to do with my comments.
Of course not, but I’m using CNN’s ACA headline-mistake rationale with a soucon (dunno how to put a Frasier-tail on that ‘c’) of sarcasm. They leapt for a truth and missed. In the police case, that would refer to being able to find something to pin on whatever black person they pulled over. How were they suppose to know he was innocent?
You google the word to find somebody who did put the tail on the ‘c’, then copy-paste it. Soupçon.
Alt + 0231
If you can use that system.
Press [Compose key], [comma] and [c].
(On Mac, it’s Option-C.)
Uh, whatever happened to innocent, until proven guilty?
I’m an Australian, and I got your sarcasm :)
Wow! I am glad he tweeted that and I hope it is followed by an apology from the police. Being pulled over to make sure you have insurance is complete and utter BS. We need more accountability when it comes to the police. Again, glad he documented the experience.
In light of how the NYPD deals with their overtly racist stop & frisk policies, I’d put better odds on “doubling down on racial profiling while avoiding using the words ‘racial profiling’” than the odds I’d give an apology.
Not having some excuse ready for the entirely-possible-situation where the incipient perp opens his door and a haze of weed smoke fails to pour out seems amazingly sloppy on the cops’ part.
Is it really so hard to accuse the guy of being going X+M in an X MPH zone, or have some stock line about a reported stolen car of the make and model they just pulled over? Lying just isn’t that difficult…
I dont see why anyone is surprised at him being pulled over for DWB or possibly DWBWLES… especially in the south.
Are we allowed to be surprised that he wasn’t taken down in a hail of inaccurate gunfire when he reached for his phone in order to do some tweeting?
While Listening to Enya Songs?
DWB While Looking Extremely Suspicious
Is anyone surprised that there is an “Is anyone surprised?” comment in this story? I’m going to presume you are surprised, but really, who would be surprised by such a thing on the internet? Not me. I’m not the sort of person who surprises easily.
“Why was I pulled over officer?”
“Oh, we have a trouble maker here.”
Fortunately it happened to a high profile, well-connected black man this time, rather than the usual poor black youth. At least he’ll be able to follow up and call the cops out on their racial profiling.
As he tweeted, he’s far from the only person this happens to. And an inconvenient traffic stop is far from the worst fate that targets of racial profiling meet.
Ice Cube has a song title which covers this situation nicely.
If the cops really had the nerve, they could have charged him for using his cell phone while he was behind the wheel of his car (and pretend that they pulled him over for suspected texting while driving).
If they did pull him over for texting while driving, it would have been fully justifiable. ..Sonny Perdue signed the “texting while driving” law into effect a couple of years ago for better or worse. http://www1.legis.ga.gov/legis/2009_10/fulltext/sb360.htm
As far as the use of not one, but two police cruisers for a single person, that seems to have become standard practice in Georgia. I rarely see a car pulled over by a single policeman, and if it has been, they’re waiting for the nearest cruiser to show up. I’m not saying that single pullovers don’t happen…just that they’re increasingly rare, regardless of the civilian’s race, age or gender.