<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible spoilers: What NYC landmark might be making a creepy cameo on Doctor&#160;Who?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 21:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemoutan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1495787</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemoutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 23:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1495787</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m now wondering if Shylock may have emigrated to the Bronx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m now wondering if Shylock may have emigrated to the Bronx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urpBurp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1495074</link>
		<dc:creator>urpBurp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1495074</guid>
		<description>Love me some Dr Who!

A couple questions though... don&#039;t all weeping angels have wings? Hence the &quot;angels&quot; part. If Liberty was a weeping angel, where are her wings?  Also since any picture/recorded image of a weeping angel becomes a weeping angel, what about all those millions of images of the Statue of Liberty that are out there... or is that where the other weeping angels came from in the first place? Maybe Liberty is the Weeping Angel Overlord!

...Sorry, I guess I still have some residual MN Convergence vibes bouncing around in me. :)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love me some Dr Who!</p>
<p>A couple questions though&#8230; don&#8217;t all weeping angels have wings? Hence the &#8220;angels&#8221; part. If Liberty was a weeping angel, where are her wings?  Also since any picture/recorded image of a weeping angel becomes a weeping angel, what about all those millions of images of the Statue of Liberty that are out there&#8230; or is that where the other weeping angels came from in the first place? Maybe Liberty is the Weeping Angel Overlord!</p>
<p>&#8230;Sorry, I guess I still have some residual MN Convergence vibes bouncing around in me. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGreens</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494965</link>
		<dc:creator>McGreens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494965</guid>
		<description>Seventh season?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seventh season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chentzilla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494842</link>
		<dc:creator>Chentzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494842</guid>
		<description>I guessed right without looking.

And, Jamie, you post cool things, you just have to know when to stop writing. Are you paid per word? A picture and nothing more after the jump would be enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guessed right without looking.</p>
<p>And, Jamie, you post cool things, you just have to know when to stop writing. Are you paid per word? A picture and nothing more after the jump would be enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WilliamS</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494728</link>
		<dc:creator>WilliamS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494728</guid>
		<description> As well as a certain former vice president who lives on stolen life force.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> As well as a certain former vice president who lives on stolen life force.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Roberts</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494636</guid>
		<description>Those sneaky French though, right? Talk about Greeks bearing gifts... Incidentally, are the replicas in Paris also weeping angels? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those sneaky French though, right? Talk about Greeks bearing gifts&#8230; Incidentally, are the replicas in Paris also weeping angels? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494545</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gotten such recommendations every now and then since high school.  I can&#039;t imagine going all the way back to the early ones (I&#039;m in my forties with two kids and a time-consuming job; I&#039;m neither in the Howard families nor remotely idle, so I really have to ration my time and attention), but I fear if I enjoy the new ones enough I&#039;ll feel the completist urge and the wheels will fall off completely.  I still remember the feeling when I had to go cold-turkey with the Star Wars books once I computed the cost/benefit analysis of staying abreast.  Don&#039;t wanna go through that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gotten such recommendations every now and then since high school.  I can&#8217;t imagine going all the way back to the early ones (I&#8217;m in my forties with two kids and a time-consuming job; I&#8217;m neither in the Howard families nor remotely idle, so I really have to ration my time and attention), but I fear if I enjoy the new ones enough I&#8217;ll feel the completist urge and the wheels will fall off completely.  I still remember the feeling when I had to go cold-turkey with the Star Wars books once I computed the cost/benefit analysis of staying abreast.  Don&#8217;t wanna go through that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gar Lipow</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494525</link>
		<dc:creator>Gar Lipow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494525</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m betting these are foilers.  Or else the Daily Star outright made them up. Actually I hope the first is true, because I don&#039;t think any episode dealing with Weeping Angels will ever be as scary as blink, so  why not make the final weeping angel ep funy-scary and over the top?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m betting these are foilers.  Or else the Daily Star outright made them up. Actually I hope the first is true, because I don&#8217;t think any episode dealing with Weeping Angels will ever be as scary as blink, so  why not make the final weeping angel ep funy-scary and over the top?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: penguinchris</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494498</link>
		<dc:creator>penguinchris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494498</guid>
		<description>&quot;Blink&quot; is perhaps my favorite TV episode, of any show, ever. However, I didn&#039;t find the subsequent appearances of the weeping angels to be particularly scary. They were off to a good start the second time they showed up, but then they showed them actually moving (not when the characters were looking, just the camera). That isn&#039;t scary, and defeats the entire purpose!

Thankfully, they &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; shown constraint and didn&#039;t ruin them by using them all the time. The other regular Doctor Who monsters you can&#039;t really ruin by overusing them, but the weeping angels need to be used sparingly to remain effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Blink&#8221; is perhaps my favorite TV episode, of any show, ever. However, I didn&#8217;t find the subsequent appearances of the weeping angels to be particularly scary. They were off to a good start the second time they showed up, but then they showed them actually moving (not when the characters were looking, just the camera). That isn&#8217;t scary, and defeats the entire purpose!</p>
<p>Thankfully, they <i>have</i> shown constraint and didn&#8217;t ruin them by using them all the time. The other regular Doctor Who monsters you can&#8217;t really ruin by overusing them, but the weeping angels need to be used sparingly to remain effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Carley Oliver</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494477</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Carley Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494477</guid>
		<description> Most likely during the mid-80s, multi-year renovation. Come to think of it, it&#039;s quite possible that Lee Iacocca is an alien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Most likely during the mid-80s, multi-year renovation. Come to think of it, it&#8217;s quite possible that Lee Iacocca is an alien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tynam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494476</link>
		<dc:creator>Tynam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494476</guid>
		<description>The Ponds are actually among the more long-serving companions (if you count in stories and series; changes in TV since then mean nobody&#039;s ever going to match some of the earlier companions for episode count!)  Unless you count the Brigadier, almost nobody&#039;s ever survived as a companion for more than three series without being written out *somehow*.  (The only exceptions are Sarah Jane and Tegan, as far as I can recall, and they were still only regulars for about three years.)

Not saying part of me doesn&#039;t want to see those two crazy kids retire happy.  (But then, part of me would have killed Amy last series, and had Rory emerge as the villain behind the Silence as a result.  Part of me is &lt;i&gt;not nice&lt;/i&gt;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ponds are actually among the more long-serving companions (if you count in stories and series; changes in TV since then mean nobody&#8217;s ever going to match some of the earlier companions for episode count!)  Unless you count the Brigadier, almost nobody&#8217;s ever survived as a companion for more than three series without being written out *somehow*.  (The only exceptions are Sarah Jane and Tegan, as far as I can recall, and they were still only regulars for about three years.)</p>
<p>Not saying part of me doesn&#8217;t want to see those two crazy kids retire happy.  (But then, part of me would have killed Amy last series, and had Rory emerge as the villain behind the Silence as a result.  Part of me is <i>not nice</i>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BombBlastLightingWaltz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494471</link>
		<dc:creator>BombBlastLightingWaltz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494471</guid>
		<description>Sounds great, Look forward to seeing Baker. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds great, Look forward to seeing Baker. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494444</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494444</guid>
		<description>You really need to work on that.  Start with the current run (Christopher Eccleston to David Tennant to Matt Smith) rather than the original 1960&#039;s and 70&#039;s episodes, since you&#039;ve gotten the late start.  You&#039;ll catch up quickly enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really need to work on that.  Start with the current run (Christopher Eccleston to David Tennant to Matt Smith) rather than the original 1960&#8242;s and 70&#8242;s episodes, since you&#8217;ve gotten the late start.  You&#8217;ll catch up quickly enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494441</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494441</guid>
		<description>Fair point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chgoliz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494437</link>
		<dc:creator>chgoliz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494437</guid>
		<description>But facing the largest metropolis in the US means there is never a moment when someone isn&#039;t staring at her.  Sneaky stuff, Moffitt.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But facing the largest metropolis in the US means there is never a moment when someone isn&#8217;t staring at her.  Sneaky stuff, Moffitt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Trotsky</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494410</link>
		<dc:creator>David Trotsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494410</guid>
		<description>As I&#039;ve always said, Never Trust The French</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve always said, Never Trust The French</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: redrobot25</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494389</link>
		<dc:creator>redrobot25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494389</guid>
		<description>It makes me really mad that you just spoiled what would have been a really cool reveal in a show i really like.  You did not have a break, and the image gave everything away as i scrolled down. This is the second major spoiler i have seen on BB this week, and it&#039;s really pretty crappy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes me really mad that you just spoiled what would have been a really cool reveal in a show i really like.  You did not have a break, and the image gave everything away as i scrolled down. This is the second major spoiler i have seen on BB this week, and it&#8217;s really pretty crappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink Frankenstein</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494372</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink Frankenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494372</guid>
		<description>FYI
The potential spoiler is right there, there is no jump as promised in the first paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI<br />
The potential spoiler is right there, there is no jump as promised in the first paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494369</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494369</guid>
		<description>But the Statue of Liberty is made of metal and the Weeping Angels are of stone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the Statue of Liberty is made of metal and the Weeping Angels are of stone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A J</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494316</link>
		<dc:creator>A J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494316</guid>
		<description> Please - if this was supposed to be &#039;after the jump&#039; then make it after the jump and requires clicking through.  Right now, it&#039;s all on the front page, ready to look at.

I&#039;d heard of the images (and the concept has been around for ages now) but others may not be quite as aware.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Please &#8211; if this was supposed to be &#8216;after the jump&#8217; then make it after the jump and requires clicking through.  Right now, it&#8217;s all on the front page, ready to look at.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d heard of the images (and the concept has been around for ages now) but others may not be quite as aware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TooGoodToCheck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494299</link>
		<dc:creator>TooGoodToCheck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494299</guid>
		<description>I imagine the biggest difference would be that Sherlockians never have to worry that people will assume that they are unreasonably enthusiastic fans of HGTV&#039;s Mike Holmes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine the biggest difference would be that Sherlockians never have to worry that people will assume that they are unreasonably enthusiastic fans of HGTV&#8217;s Mike Holmes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger11</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494292</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494292</guid>
		<description>Yep, K-9 and Company, with the most amazing opening theme EVAR: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu7OiJpnlUs

Warning: What has been seen cannot be UNseen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, K-9 and Company, with the most amazing opening theme EVAR: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu7OiJpnlUs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hu7OiJpnlUs</a></p>
<p>Warning: What has been seen cannot be UNseen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vickie Kostecki</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494280</link>
		<dc:creator>Vickie Kostecki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494280</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s got his own spin off as well (it&#039;s animated, and he&#039;s only barely recognisable as K9). If I&#039;m not mistaken, he had one back in the 70&#039;s as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s got his own spin off as well (it&#8217;s animated, and he&#8217;s only barely recognisable as K9). If I&#8217;m not mistaken, he had one back in the 70&#8242;s as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyger11</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494273</link>
		<dc:creator>tyger11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494273</guid>
		<description> Speaking of which, it&#039;s time K-9 returned to Dr. Who.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Speaking of which, it&#8217;s time K-9 returned to Dr. Who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angusm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494257</link>
		<dc:creator>angusm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494257</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the point. You thought they organized all those boat tours and visits to Liberty Island just for the benefit of the tourists? No, the whole idea is to ensure that there&#039;s &lt;b&gt;always&lt;/b&gt; someone watching it.

It&#039;s not an accident that the Statue was moved from Paris to New York, &quot;the city that never sleeps&quot;. Can&#039;t take any chances with a Weeping Angel that big ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the point. You thought they organized all those boat tours and visits to Liberty Island just for the benefit of the tourists? No, the whole idea is to ensure that there&#8217;s <b>always</b> someone watching it.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not an accident that the Statue was moved from Paris to New York, &#8220;the city that never sleeps&#8221;. Can&#8217;t take any chances with a Weeping Angel that big &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supernumerary</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494253</link>
		<dc:creator>Supernumerary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494253</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know re: spin-offs. Without even touching on Torchwood, there was The Sarah Jane Adventures, and that pitch RTD made to give Rose her own program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know re: spin-offs. Without even touching on Torchwood, there was The Sarah Jane Adventures, and that pitch RTD made to give Rose her own program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494254</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494254</guid>
		<description>Ah.  Thank you.  Now I wonder if they live in Whovervilles.

Someone once explained to me the difference between &quot;Sherlockians&quot; and &quot;Holmesians&quot; but I&#039;ll be damned if I can remember the distinction now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  Thank you.  Now I wonder if they live in Whovervilles.</p>
<p>Someone once explained to me the difference between &#8220;Sherlockians&#8221; and &#8220;Holmesians&#8221; but I&#8217;ll be damned if I can remember the distinction now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Psychotronic (Michael F.)</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494250</link>
		<dc:creator>Psychotronic (Michael F.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494250</guid>
		<description>Considering that the source article is a British tabloid, I&#039;m taking the story with a fair bit of salt. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering that the source article is a British tabloid, I&#8217;m taking the story with a fair bit of salt. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Harvey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494248</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494248</guid>
		<description>IIRC, River Song has seen The Doctor&#039;s (final) death, and her reaction when Amy (I think) asked about it was something like &quot;I don&#039;t fear The Doctor&#039;s death and neither should you. There&#039;s a much worse day coming for all of us&quot;. Since River is going backward relative to The Doctor (and the Ponds?) the version of her that we know has presumably already experienced this episode. If the Ponds are killed off, I&#039;m thinking this is what she was talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, River Song has seen The Doctor&#8217;s (final) death, and her reaction when Amy (I think) asked about it was something like &#8220;I don&#8217;t fear The Doctor&#8217;s death and neither should you. There&#8217;s a much worse day coming for all of us&#8221;. Since River is going backward relative to The Doctor (and the Ponds?) the version of her that we know has presumably already experienced this episode. If the Ponds are killed off, I&#8217;m thinking this is what she was talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hanglyman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/07/31/doctor-who-weeping-angel-landm.html#comment-1494238</link>
		<dc:creator>Hanglyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=174003#comment-1494238</guid>
		<description> Plus the fact that it&#039;s hollow and you can explore the inside just raises a whole lot of questions. Are the other Weeping Angels potentially hollow too? Does observing it from the inside have the same effect as from the outside? Also looking forward to the explanation for how a massive, famous, constantly-observed human-built structure was replaced by an alien. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Plus the fact that it&#8217;s hollow and you can explore the inside just raises a whole lot of questions. Are the other Weeping Angels potentially hollow too? Does observing it from the inside have the same effect as from the outside? Also looking forward to the explanation for how a massive, famous, constantly-observed human-built structure was replaced by an alien. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
