— FEATURED —
The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker
Eurovision 2013: An American in London
The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: The Truth Behind the Nixonian Presidency of Obama
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Compton, Lonzo Williams and the Wreckin' Cru
Real Stuff: Bad Trip
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
NYT Editorial Board: "Justice Interrupted in Guatemala"
Guatemala's Genocide on Trial: Kate Doyle
Guatemala: After high court collapses genocide case, trial may have to restart
— RECENTLY —
Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation
We Can Fix it! - a graphic novel time travel memoir
The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek
Odd Duck: great picture book about eccentricity and ducks
Scatter, Adapt, and Remember: How Humans Will Survive a Mass Extinction
Illustrator William Stout's Legends of the Blues - exclusive excerpt
Hackers prepare for first "national holiday" in their honor
Review: Disunion, the VR guillotine simulator
Mousetronaut: kids' picture book about mouse in space, written by a Shuttle pilot
Review: Pebble e-paper watch
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Maggie Koerth-Baker at 7:01 am Fri, Aug 3, 2012
I’m disappointed none of Tolkien’s languages are listed.
Congress still resist the British Islands overlords.
OMG, you’re right. Who lists Klingon and not Quenya ? That’s ridiculous, especially when there must have been a lot more references to the latter…
in ISO639-2 Quenya is included in “art” (artificial languages). But take a look at ISO639-3! http://www.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=qya LoC should use the more comprehensive standard, imo
Are Noldorin, Telerin, etc. all lumped in together?
yes, ISO639-2 uses some collective language codes; not only art (artificial languages) but also conglomerates like “aus” (Australien languages) and “cel” (Celtic languages)
The Library of Congress is only listing the languages categorized by ISO 639-2, which defined Klingon (or tlhIngan Hol) as well as other constructed languages. Because Klingon has a formally defined but unusual syntax–created by linguist Marc Okrand–it is studied as much by fans of constructed languages than by Trekkies.
Indeed, IIRC Klingon has more speakers than Navajo.
You’re probably thinking of this article by The Onion: http://www.theonion.com/articles/klingon-speakers-now-outnumber-navajo-speakers,709/
In reality, there are probably fewer than 50 Klingon-speakers (with a decent degree of conversational fluency), and probably more than 120 000 Navajo-speakers.
It’s true as MattLeidHolm says, however, that many of us are more interested in language than we are in Star Trek.
When I started studying Klingon, I still thought Klingons were the pointy-eared guys, and I thought Captain Picard was Captain Kirk.
Last I checked, Klingons are not our Galactic Overlords. All they have on us is cloaking technology, and they always attack before they are ready, and are usually easily defeated.
No Na’vi. Very disappointed.
No Chiac? WTF?
Dano Leblanc’s Acadieman – Au Call Center.
Wait — ALL the Salish languages are lumped into ONE listing?! Uh… hm.
The Library of Congress contains at least one text in Klingon: “The Klingon Hamlet”, published by the Klingon Language Institute.
They also have a copy of HolQeD (Volume 1, #1), the KLI’s formerly quarterly journal, as well as at least two of Marc Okrand’s books on the subject.
Their standard also includes Esperanto, Lojban, Volapük, Blissymbols and Ido.
For those who want Klingon, rather than Esperanto, as the international language see http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8TQGVh025E4