New photo printing tech reflects light like 3D object

Discuss

14 Responses to “New photo printing tech reflects light like 3D object”

  1. Tom says:

    Can’t wait for this technology to be available in e-ink, or even better LCD.

  2. booomer says:

    Their paper might not be flat, but that guy’s delivery sure is.

  3. nixiebunny says:

    The remaining question: How to print it for $1 a page?

  4. big ryan says:

    i could see this being neat large scale in public areas with lots of moving light, or maybe on some kind of display that rotates

  5. eldueno says:

    As if 3-D is not the same as 3-D which requires a convergence of two images for the mind to determine distance of field. I suspect the printed dimples prevent proper focus to create an indeterment distance of field.

    • Boundegar says:

      No, a single POV that moves in time can have a similar effect, which is why birds can catch bugs.  You’ll see them bobbing their heads to get a range on something.  And don’t movies fool our brains every time?

      • Bill Beaty says:

        Wow!   If a fixed-location pointsource illuminator is used (a spotlight, as with rainbow holograms,) then the reflective dimples become the equivalent of lenses, and the printing becomes the equivalent of small images.

        In other words, this can function as a PRINTABLE 3D lenticular display. A hologram employing geometrical optics.  But it’s based on mirrors rather than lenses.   And by using a lens-array rather than a row of cylinders,  it gives up/down parallax, not just left/right.

        > printed dimples prevent proper focus

        Lenticular postcards have exactly this property.  They produce no variable focus as found in real 3D objects, only parallax information as with stereopticons.  They might not look very 3D unless you tilt them back and forth (or walk past a large one.)

        So, print one yards wide, view from yards away, each dimple functions as a “3D pixel.”

  6. You can re-light a plane onto which a normal map has been textured. Same basic idea.

  7. “The problem with paper is that it’s flat”

    I’m pretty sure that’s a feature of paper.

    Great concept though, naturally not ideal for everything, but I can think of a few things this would be perfect for. I’m imagining that cost will be an issue though.

  8. SoItBegins says:

    So now real objects can look ‘shopped! BRILLIANT!

  9. oasisob1 says:

    How long before it’s used to print porn?

  10. BillGlover says:

    Was I the only one that expected the final example to suddenly change and cover her face?

  11. Paul Renault says:

    I want to say three things:

    1) Oh great!  It’s ‘silk’ surface, all over again.

    2) But, but, but, prints are 3D objects….

    3) Actually, it’s an older technique, but without needing a separate lens array, glued to the print.

  12. Amelia_G says:

    You could do a shroud of Turin.

Leave a Reply