Comments on: Steve Jobs' Palo Alto burglarized in "totally random" attack

By: wrybread

wrybread — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 08:47:00 +0000

It was a close call, some quality entries, but I’m going to go ahead and award the thread to you.

oasisob1 — Wed, 15 Aug 2012 00:36:00 +0000

I have to point out you.

Antinous / Moderator — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:50:00 +0000

That just goes to what you know.

Jonathan Carpenter — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:23:00 +0000

This happened July 17, not last night as stated on the posting.

bryan rasmussen — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:02:00 +0000

Samsung has gone too far this time!

DewiMorgan — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:46:00 +0000

Yeah, I wasn’t sure if this article was hyping some new randomizer they’d invented in Palo Alto, or what.

Conan Librarian — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:32:00 +0000

They get Bourgeoisglarized, you get Burgerled with Cheese.

Toffer99 — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:28:00 +0000

Are you saying the place was burglarificationed?

theophrastvs — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:27:00 +0000

just for comparison, what would a totally non-random (burglarizationaleous) ‘attack’ look like?

Funk Daddy — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:20:00 +0000

No, Mr. Jobs closed on the purchase of Palo Alto before passing didn’t he?

Ben Sherman — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:18:00 +0000

I think you a word out of the headline.

Daneel — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:16:00 +0000

Even after death, the 1% get a better level of service from the police than the rest of us schmucks.

Edit: burglarized? What’s wrong with burgled?

Funk Daddy — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:09:00 +0000

Cops “So, did any of this stuff have any kinda tracking doohickeys on it?”

Jobs people “oh, uh, yeah, um, all of it I guess, lemme flick a switch”

Cops “Oh yeah, there he is… cool”