Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Why do NASA engineers like peanuts?

Maggie Koerth-Baker at 9:51 pm Thu, Aug 16, 2012

— FEATURED —

Book Review

The Man Who Laughs: grotesque Victor Hugo potboiler was the basis for The Joker

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

As Curiosity was landing safely on Mars, many of you noted that the Jet Propulsion Laboratory engineers orchestrating the whole thing were eating an awful lot of peanuts. In fact, each workstation boasted a little commemorative jar of peanuts. Seriously, what is up with all those peanuts?

Discovery News has an answer. And it's surprisingly interesting.

Turns out, this is a JPL-specific tradition, dating back to 1964, when the lab's funding was on the line after the Ranger program—unmanned missions to photograph the Moon—weren't living up to expectations. In fact, six Ranger missions in a row had failed.

This was the heritage leading up to Ranger 7. There was talk that JPL should be shut down, that a university-affiliated center couldn’t handle a rigorous spaceflight program. There were suggestions that the program had been sabotaged -- a worker found a small polyethylene bag with 14 screws and a lock washer in one of the sealed electronic modules in Ranger 7’s television subsystem.

Just before Ranger 7 launched to the moon on July 28, mission manager Harris Schurmeier handed out peanuts to ease tensions. He figured chewing or playing with them on the table would give his team something else to focus on.

The full story is pretty neat. You can read the rest at Discovery News

Via Ed Yong

Maggie Koerth-Baker is the science editor at BoingBoing.net. She writes a monthly column for The New York Times Magazine and is the author of Before the Lights Go Out, a book about electricity, infrastructure, and the future of energy. You can find Maggie on Twitter and Facebook.

Maggie goes places and talks to people. Find out where she'll be speaking next.

MORE:  curiosity • History • jpl • NASA • Ranger • Science • Space • traditions

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • evilpeacock

    Sheesh, I thought it was pretty obvious that the peanuts thing was to provide enough vitality for NASA employees to go through a matter transference beam — that is if any Vogons turn up.

  • haileris

    I still think it’s more amusing to think that the REAL tradition is to say “penis” on air and passing peanuts around was just a clever way for them to get away with saying “penis” live on NASA TV.

  • Shashwath T.R.

    I just assumed that was their pay…

  • http://twitter.com/ClothMicrofiber Galen Shen

     I think peanut shape can decrease more resistance of the air

  • Jake0748

     … “There was talk that JPL should be shut down…”   But luckily, cooler heads prevailed and everyone realized that shutting down a place with the coolest fucking name ever devised, “Jet Propulsion Laboratory” would be the height of folly.   Whew!

    • Lobster

       Yeah, until they open the Laser Explosion Laboratory next year.

  • Lobster

    HELP WANTED: Rocket physicists.  Willing to work long hours.  People with peanut allergy need not apply.

  • anansi133

    This story has been told for quite a while, but up until a week ago, the peanuts were always surrounded by chocolate and a candy aeroshell. Not exactly airbrushing out a discredited politician, but it makes me uncomfortable.

    • anansi133

       OK, looks like I’m wrong on this one, I found a Donna Shirley passage that says peanuts back in the sojourner days. Coulda sworn I saw a picture of M&Ms in the control room, though!

  • ChickieD

    I have an issue with the conclusion of the article that it was a success after all those failures. I think it was a success BECAUSE of all the failures. Having worked in R&D for so many years, it is frustrating how risk adverse companies are. They need to recognize that “failure” is part of the learning curve to success.

    • cecilia FXX

      I completely agree. The real meaning of “failure” is to never try.
      you only get to your goals when you learn from your mistakes.