<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Song of Mitt&#039;s&#160;Self</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 10:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceinthedistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512534</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceinthedistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512534</guid>
		<description>✔

http://copypastecharacter.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>✔</p>
<p><a href="http://copypastecharacter.com" rel="nofollow">http://copypastecharacter.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: voiceinthedistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512533</link>
		<dc:creator>voiceinthedistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512533</guid>
		<description>John Smith, you retype bumper stickers remarkably well.  Perhaps the Tea Party is hiring.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Smith, you retype bumper stickers remarkably well.  Perhaps the Tea Party is hiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512522</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512522</guid>
		<description>Yeah, those are square root signs.  They&#039;re fairly easy to find codes for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, those are square root signs.  They&#8217;re fairly easy to find codes for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Atkin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512520</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Atkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 05:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512520</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew

Are you asking about the cuts in the audio clips or the video clips? Aside from that final shot of Mitt speaking directly to camera, the audio and video are sourced from different places.

The video is taken entirely from different Romney ads available on his YouTube channel.

The audio is taken mainly from different interviews, but also from a couple of speeches and debates. I used the C-SPAN and Fox News online video archives, both of which allow you to search time-indexed transcripts.

I often only made short clips of the source audio and didn&#039;t keep a record of the full context, but I&#039;ve done my best and you can at least say where the cuts are.

- I don&#039;t get that spot...
- folks who don&#039;t really know who I am
- I don&#039;t know what the real reason was
- tell people what I believe
- I served as governor for four years
- Like a mini-skirt he said it was short and revealing [recalling how his father described one of his own campaigns]
- I was very clear
- she was liberal
- but I remember
- I was conservative
- who were conservative as well
- Obviously he knows I&#039;m pro-life
- but I remember
- they&#039;d had no difficulty supporting my dad
- abortion
- and then in the January inauguration time period
- I decided to stay
- of considering a run for national office
- and don&#039;t have an idea why [talking about leadership styles, basically saying that someone told him he was a natural leader who lead without knowing why]
- Everybody I talked to said it&#039;s a bad idea [talking about Staples]
- but I remember
- I love debate
- with debate and disagreement over issues
- and in the case of Obamacare
- say I disagree with this
- let me correct myself
- I supported the concept of the stimulus
- the idea of an individual mandate or individual responsibility
- but I remember
- I oppose the, uh
- it&#039;s quite different than what the President did
- And also with regards to gay marriage, I was very clear. I was opposed...
- I looked at some of his policies and said &quot;Gosh, I have exactly the opposite view today [Talking about Teddy Roosevelt - the edit here was to drop &quot;of my&quot; in place of &quot;of his&quot;]
- One reason of course is that I hope to represent all Americans.
- And I think the American people have concluded as I have.
- the states have differences between them.
- we have differing views about how to express that love
- And I agree with the dissent
- voice for the American people.
- I believe in America.
- I&#039;d like to ask you to join with us: volunteer, donate, or just pass this message along to a friend. Thanks so much.

Hope this more or less answers your question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew</p>
<p>Are you asking about the cuts in the audio clips or the video clips? Aside from that final shot of Mitt speaking directly to camera, the audio and video are sourced from different places.</p>
<p>The video is taken entirely from different Romney ads available on his YouTube channel.</p>
<p>The audio is taken mainly from different interviews, but also from a couple of speeches and debates. I used the C-SPAN and Fox News online video archives, both of which allow you to search time-indexed transcripts.</p>
<p>I often only made short clips of the source audio and didn&#8217;t keep a record of the full context, but I&#8217;ve done my best and you can at least say where the cuts are.</p>
<p>- I don&#8217;t get that spot&#8230;<br />
- folks who don&#8217;t really know who I am<br />
- I don&#8217;t know what the real reason was<br />
- tell people what I believe<br />
- I served as governor for four years<br />
- Like a mini-skirt he said it was short and revealing [recalling how his father described one of his own campaigns]<br />
- I was very clear<br />
- she was liberal<br />
- but I remember<br />
- I was conservative<br />
- who were conservative as well<br />
- Obviously he knows I&#8217;m pro-life<br />
- but I remember<br />
- they&#8217;d had no difficulty supporting my dad<br />
- abortion<br />
- and then in the January inauguration time period<br />
- I decided to stay<br />
- of considering a run for national office<br />
- and don&#8217;t have an idea why [talking about leadership styles, basically saying that someone told him he was a natural leader who lead without knowing why]<br />
- Everybody I talked to said it&#8217;s a bad idea [talking about Staples]<br />
- but I remember<br />
- I love debate<br />
- with debate and disagreement over issues<br />
- and in the case of Obamacare<br />
- say I disagree with this<br />
- let me correct myself<br />
- I supported the concept of the stimulus<br />
- the idea of an individual mandate or individual responsibility<br />
- but I remember<br />
- I oppose the, uh<br />
- it&#8217;s quite different than what the President did<br />
- And also with regards to gay marriage, I was very clear. I was opposed&#8230;<br />
- I looked at some of his policies and said &#8220;Gosh, I have exactly the opposite view today [Talking about Teddy Roosevelt - the edit here was to drop "of my" in place of "of his"]<br />
- One reason of course is that I hope to represent all Americans.<br />
- And I think the American people have concluded as I have.<br />
- the states have differences between them.<br />
- we have differing views about how to express that love<br />
- And I agree with the dissent<br />
- voice for the American people.<br />
- I believe in America.<br />
- I&#8217;d like to ask you to join with us: volunteer, donate, or just pass this message along to a friend. Thanks so much.</p>
<p>Hope this more or less answers your question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snig</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512475</link>
		<dc:creator>Snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512475</guid>
		<description>Thanks for doing it.  A common topic here is the Uncanny Valley, which I&#039;ve always felt was right next to Mitt&#039;s home town.  The video captures that well.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for doing it.  A common topic here is the Uncanny Valley, which I&#8217;ve always felt was right next to Mitt&#8217;s home town.  The video captures that well.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Eisenberg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512474</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Eisenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 03:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512474</guid>
		<description>This is a great video.  It made me laugh at the man&#039;s inconsistencies.

I would be interested in knowing where all of these video clips came from.  More specifically, since the editing was so  smooth, I&#039;d like to know exactly what the individual clips were and where the breaks were.  It would help me put things into context and (IMO) it would not take away from the video&#039;s intended purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great video.  It made me laugh at the man&#8217;s inconsistencies.</p>
<p>I would be interested in knowing where all of these video clips came from.  More specifically, since the editing was so  smooth, I&#8217;d like to know exactly what the individual clips were and where the breaks were.  It would help me put things into context and (IMO) it would not take away from the video&#8217;s intended purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Baker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512440</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512440</guid>
		<description>Actually those look a bit like square roots in this font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually those look a bit like square roots in this font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Baker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512439</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512439</guid>
		<description>You mean like these: √√√√√√?

It&#039;s just option-v, on a Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean like these: √√√√√√?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just option-v, on a Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512428</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512428</guid>
		<description>That doesn&#039;t work for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ipo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512382</link>
		<dc:creator>Ipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512382</guid>
		<description>&#10003;
&amp; # 1 0 0 0 3 ;  without spaces.   
or 10004; for heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#10003;<br />
&amp; # 1 0 0 0 3 ;  without spaces.<br />
or 10004; for heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh Atkin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512349</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh Atkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512349</guid>
		<description>I seriously considered leaving off disclaimer, credits etc and posting it from an entirely new account.

Ultimately decided that there was more chance of it being seen (and also not being taken down) if I included the disclaimer and posted it from my main account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously considered leaving off disclaimer, credits etc and posting it from an entirely new account.</p>
<p>Ultimately decided that there was more chance of it being seen (and also not being taken down) if I included the disclaimer and posted it from my main account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512337</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512337</guid>
		<description>Cut and paste from Wikipedia.  I&#039;ve never found a way to code a check mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cut and paste from Wikipedia.  I&#8217;ve never found a way to code a check mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snig</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512325</link>
		<dc:creator>Snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512325</guid>
		<description>I would agree with this.  I don&#039;t feel bad for liking Colbert, though I&#039;m aware there are likely people foolish enough not to immediately realize it&#039;s parody.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with this.  I don&#8217;t feel bad for liking Colbert, though I&#8217;m aware there are likely people foolish enough not to immediately realize it&#8217;s parody.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snig</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512323</link>
		<dc:creator>Snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512323</guid>
		<description>He wasn&#039;t accused of murder, just making business decisions that led to regional poverty, which resulted in people being afraid of accessing healthcare which then led to death.  I think it&#039;s certainly possible that happened.    Biden has not suggested Mitt pals around with terrorists, and no senator or democratic front runner came up with anything as crazy as the birther conspiracy.  I think that&#039;s how low the bar has been set.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He wasn&#8217;t accused of murder, just making business decisions that led to regional poverty, which resulted in people being afraid of accessing healthcare which then led to death.  I think it&#8217;s certainly possible that happened.    Biden has not suggested Mitt pals around with terrorists, and no senator or democratic front runner came up with anything as crazy as the birther conspiracy.  I think that&#8217;s how low the bar has been set.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pecoto</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512320</link>
		<dc:creator>pecoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512320</guid>
		<description>Well, the democrats have already played an ad accusing Romney of being a murderer......I don&#039;t think the bar can get any lower.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the democrats have already played an ad accusing Romney of being a murderer&#8230;&#8230;I don&#8217;t think the bar can get any lower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinnie Tesla</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512309</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinnie Tesla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512309</guid>
		<description> How do you do the cool checkmarks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> How do you do the cool checkmarks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funk Daddy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512241</link>
		<dc:creator>Funk Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512241</guid>
		<description>John I don&#039;t think you are a troll, but how is parody dishonest? Further, how is accurate parody dishonest? Romney is incredibly ambiguous on most any issue and contradictory on more than a few.

So how is pointing it out in parody dishonest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I don&#8217;t think you are a troll, but how is parody dishonest? Further, how is accurate parody dishonest? Romney is incredibly ambiguous on most any issue and contradictory on more than a few.</p>
<p>So how is pointing it out in parody dishonest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funk Daddy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512239</link>
		<dc:creator>Funk Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512239</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you JerryMander, except it&#039;s motion video, not a still. Still, it&#039;s a cheap shot to focus on Romney&#039;s ambiguity on any issue at all. He&#039;s rich and rich people know what is best even if they won&#039;t tell you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you JerryMander, except it&#8217;s motion video, not a still. Still, it&#8217;s a cheap shot to focus on Romney&#8217;s ambiguity on any issue at all. He&#8217;s rich and rich people know what is best even if they won&#8217;t tell you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millie fink</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512222</link>
		<dc:creator>millie fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 15:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512222</guid>
		<description>Maybe for imbeciles, but more likely for ignoramuses. I know a lot  of people who believe the Romney camp&#039;s lie on that line and spout it repeatedly. They&#039;ve just never heard the full context of Obama&#039;s comments. It&#039;s not like the corporate media is going to spend any time correcting the decontextualized lie. They&#039;re too cowed by another lie, the Right&#039;s successful labeling of the &quot;lamestream&quot; media as the &quot;liberal media.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe for imbeciles, but more likely for ignoramuses. I know a lot  of people who believe the Romney camp&#8217;s lie on that line and spout it repeatedly. They&#8217;ve just never heard the full context of Obama&#8217;s comments. It&#8217;s not like the corporate media is going to spend any time correcting the decontextualized lie. They&#8217;re too cowed by another lie, the Right&#8217;s successful labeling of the &#8220;lamestream&#8221; media as the &#8220;liberal media.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Baruch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512204</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Baruch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 14:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512204</guid>
		<description>So they took yer jerb?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they took yer jerb?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston Sturges</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512196</link>
		<dc:creator>Preston Sturges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512196</guid>
		<description>An edited Obama video?  it would be pretty hard to top what the GOP has done there. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An edited Obama video?  it would be pretty hard to top what the GOP has done there. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snig</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512190</link>
		<dc:creator>Snig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512190</guid>
		<description>If you dislike petty, you really shouldn&#039;t read anything political.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you dislike petty, you really shouldn&#8217;t read anything political.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROSSINDETROIT</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512185</link>
		<dc:creator>ROSSINDETROIT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512185</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyhow, I&#039;m working on an Obama video for good measure.&quot;  I&#039;ll look forward to seeing that one as well.  This video of Mitt makes him look silly, but what really identifies its creator as a liberal is that he&#039;d do the same thing to the other side.  Is there the slightest chance that a Right partisan would ever make a humorous video of his own candidate revealing his flaws?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyhow, I&#8217;m working on an Obama video for good measure.&#8221;  I&#8217;ll look forward to seeing that one as well.  This video of Mitt makes him look silly, but what really identifies its creator as a liberal is that he&#8217;d do the same thing to the other side.  Is there the slightest chance that a Right partisan would ever make a humorous video of his own candidate revealing his flaws?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daneyul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512180</link>
		<dc:creator>daneyul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512180</guid>
		<description>Very nicely done. Funny, and very up front about the fact the sound bites were edited.  Yet it didn&#039;t resort to name calling or dubious accusations.  

This kind of thing is along the lines of the GOP&#039;s saturation campaign of ads showing Kerry saying &quot;I was for the war before I was against it&quot;.

And it&#039;s much, much more honest than the ridiculous and  out of context uses of Obama&#039;s &quot;You didn&#039;t build that&quot; line they&#039;re using now that seem designed for complete imbeciles.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nicely done. Funny, and very up front about the fact the sound bites were edited.  Yet it didn&#8217;t resort to name calling or dubious accusations.  </p>
<p>This kind of thing is along the lines of the GOP&#8217;s saturation campaign of ads showing Kerry saying &#8220;I was for the war before I was against it&#8221;.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s much, much more honest than the ridiculous and  out of context uses of Obama&#8217;s &#8220;You didn&#8217;t build that&#8221; line they&#8217;re using now that seem designed for complete imbeciles.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catgrin</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512170</link>
		<dc:creator>catgrin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512170</guid>
		<description>While this is clearly a parody, anyone who&#039;s been following the campaign to this point should be well aware of the Romney camp&#039;s penchant for taking Obama&#039;s vocal clips out of context and using them inappropriately. This has been done in several ads by the Romney campaign, but has not once been reported by the Obama campaign. In fact, the only national in favor of Obama that has sparked any controversy was not released by the campaign nor signed off on by the President. (&quot;Romney killed my wife&quot; was released by another group.)

Meanwhile, Romney has signed off on several ads which used out-of-context speech in a way it was not intended, or simply contained untruths, and even after his campaign was notified that the press was aware of the problems, they allowed the ads to continue to run. Examples of this include:

&quot;You didn&#039;t build that.&quot; where Obama was actually referring to infrastructure in a previous sentence, not people&#039;s own small businesses. (Politifact gave it a &quot;false&quot; rating after lots of debates back and forth. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/26/mitt-romney/putting-mitt-romneys-attacks-you-didnt-build-truth/)

&quot;Welfare&quot; This ad actually forced a response from Bill Clinton who was furious. In the ad, an announcer claims that Obama has made changes to welfare that make people no longer have to work for welfare. Not only was it untrue, Romney had to know it was untrue before the ad ever aired, because he was one of the several GOP Governors who asked for the changes in welfare that would allow states to experiment with alternate plans. All the plans still required work for welfare. (Politifact gave it a &quot;pants on fire&quot; rating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/07/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-barack-obamas-plan-abandons-tenet/)

Or there was the ad where they used the sound bite, &quot;If we keep talking about the economy, we&#039;re going to lose.&quot; (The very first ad from the Romney campaign.) Obama DID say that, but what he fully said in the speech was,&quot;Sen. McCain&#039;s campaign actually said, and I quote, if we keep talking about the economy, we&#039;re going to lose.&quot; So, Romney&#039;s ad quoted Obama, quoting McCain, but failed to clarify that it was doing so. (Politifact gave it a &quot;pants on fire&quot; rating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/nov/22/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-obama-said-if-we-keep-talking-abo/)

Romney&#039;s perfectly happy to use another man&#039;s words out of context in an effort to damage him. I think it&#039;s damn well time someone did it to him, and I&#039;m glad that the Obama campaign hasn&#039;t stooped to his level. An independent supporter took the time to do it for them, and did it well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While this is clearly a parody, anyone who&#8217;s been following the campaign to this point should be well aware of the Romney camp&#8217;s penchant for taking Obama&#8217;s vocal clips out of context and using them inappropriately. This has been done in several ads by the Romney campaign, but has not once been reported by the Obama campaign. In fact, the only national in favor of Obama that has sparked any controversy was not released by the campaign nor signed off on by the President. (&#8220;Romney killed my wife&#8221; was released by another group.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, Romney has signed off on several ads which used out-of-context speech in a way it was not intended, or simply contained untruths, and even after his campaign was notified that the press was aware of the problems, they allowed the ads to continue to run. Examples of this include:</p>
<p>&#8220;You didn&#8217;t build that.&#8221; where Obama was actually referring to infrastructure in a previous sentence, not people&#8217;s own small businesses. (Politifact gave it a &#8220;false&#8221; rating after lots of debates back and forth. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jul/26/mitt-romney/putting-mitt-romneys-attacks-you-didnt-build-truth/)</p>
<p>&#8220;Welfare&#8221; This ad actually forced a response from Bill Clinton who was furious. In the ad, an announcer claims that Obama has made changes to welfare that make people no longer have to work for welfare. Not only was it untrue, Romney had to know it was untrue before the ad ever aired, because he was one of the several GOP Governors who asked for the changes in welfare that would allow states to experiment with alternate plans. All the plans still required work for welfare. (Politifact gave it a &#8220;pants on fire&#8221; rating. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/07/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-barack-obamas-plan-abandons-tenet/)</p>
<p>Or there was the ad where they used the sound bite, &#8220;If we keep talking about the economy, we&#8217;re going to lose.&#8221; (The very first ad from the Romney campaign.) Obama DID say that, but what he fully said in the speech was,&#8221;Sen. McCain&#8217;s campaign actually said, and I quote, if we keep talking about the economy, we&#8217;re going to lose.&#8221; So, Romney&#8217;s ad quoted Obama, quoting McCain, but failed to clarify that it was doing so. (Politifact gave it a &#8220;pants on fire&#8221; rating. <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/nov/22/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-obama-said-if-we-keep-talking-abo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/nov/22/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-obama-said-if-we-keep-talking-abo/</a>)</p>
<p>Romney&#8217;s perfectly happy to use another man&#8217;s words out of context in an effort to damage him. I think it&#8217;s damn well time someone did it to him, and I&#8217;m glad that the Obama campaign hasn&#8217;t stooped to his level. An independent supporter took the time to do it for them, and did it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 666beast1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512158</link>
		<dc:creator>666beast1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512158</guid>
		<description>Great job.  For me at least this captures who Mitt Romney is (or isn&#039;t).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job.  For me at least this captures who Mitt Romney is (or isn&#8217;t).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rezeya Montecore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512155</link>
		<dc:creator>Rezeya Montecore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512155</guid>
		<description>God damn it, Antinous. Why don&#039;t you just arrest him for mopery and get it over with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God damn it, Antinous. Why don&#8217;t you just arrest him for mopery and get it over with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mobobo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512152</link>
		<dc:creator>mobobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512152</guid>
		<description>I was going to say it sounded like the True Romance score (and just did!) - great flick, great sound - i particularly enjoyed the scene between Hopper &amp; Walken.Well done on the vid - it was the mini skirt line that got my antenna a waggling, but I think the balance of delivery overall very subtle which just adds to the whole for me. Parody too blatant becomes boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say it sounded like the True Romance score (and just did!) &#8211; great flick, great sound &#8211; i particularly enjoyed the scene between Hopper &amp; Walken.Well done on the vid &#8211; it was the mini skirt line that got my antenna a waggling, but I think the balance of delivery overall very subtle which just adds to the whole for me. Parody too blatant becomes boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Wood</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512105</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512105</guid>
		<description>Papers not in order? Well then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Papers not in order? Well then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/08/18/177032.html#comment-1512103</link>
		<dc:creator>Wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 08:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=177032#comment-1512103</guid>
		<description>So change but no hope then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So change but no hope then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
