<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compelling bad news about the&#160;economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 14:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: IokSotot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525955</link>
		<dc:creator>IokSotot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525955</guid>
		<description>I think it would be better for the rest of the planet if the USA just painlessly evaporated. It would would solve practically every major global problem. Except Walking Dead season 4 might not work in mandarin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it would be better for the rest of the planet if the USA just painlessly evaporated. It would would solve practically every major global problem. Except Walking Dead season 4 might not work in mandarin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525935</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525935</guid>
		<description>&quot;...over at the Frankenstein pla-a-a-ace!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;over at the Frankenstein pla-a-a-ace!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Breakey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525611</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Breakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525611</guid>
		<description> That&#039;s what makes it a revolution.  When the peasants are starving and they can&#039;t trust the established authorities to protect them, is when most revolutions start.

And in the US there are a LOT of rednecks with guns who are not too fond of the established authorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That&#8217;s what makes it a revolution.  When the peasants are starving and they can&#8217;t trust the established authorities to protect them, is when most revolutions start.</p>
<p>And in the US there are a LOT of rednecks with guns who are not too fond of the established authorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lanny</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525416</link>
		<dc:creator>lanny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525416</guid>
		<description>Marginal revolution maybe ...  No way there will be a shooting revolution in the USA because there are too many vested interests that own the established security and judicial systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marginal revolution maybe &#8230;  No way there will be a shooting revolution in the USA because there are too many vested interests that own the established security and judicial systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B E Pratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525418</link>
		<dc:creator>B E Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525418</guid>
		<description> Dude, I&#039;m sorry. There can&#039;t be much more than 30 chickens there. I counted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Dude, I&#8217;m sorry. There can&#8217;t be much more than 30 chickens there. I counted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B E Pratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525411</link>
		<dc:creator>B E Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525411</guid>
		<description>That makes as much sense as Clint talking to an empty chair. Why is it that Republicans have drilled down to a core argument that simply consists of &quot;I&#039;m rubber and you&#039;re glue&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes as much sense as Clint talking to an empty chair. Why is it that Republicans have drilled down to a core argument that simply consists of &#8220;I&#8217;m rubber and you&#8217;re glue&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525333</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525333</guid>
		<description>The fact that US gasoline &amp; diesel sales have been declining since 2006 might have something to do with that.  People can&#039;t afford to blow so much carbon out of their tailpipes any more, and modern hyper-efficient cars like the Toyota Prius have 90% less emissions anyway.

Also, note that the environment is composed of more than just air and carbon.  You can pull carbon out of the air by planting trees, but you can&#039;t unfracture bedrock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that US gasoline &amp; diesel sales have been declining since 2006 might have something to do with that.  People can&#8217;t afford to blow so much carbon out of their tailpipes any more, and modern hyper-efficient cars like the Toyota Prius have 90% less emissions anyway.</p>
<p>Also, note that the environment is composed of more than just air and carbon.  You can pull carbon out of the air by planting trees, but you can&#8217;t unfracture bedrock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525327</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525327</guid>
		<description>Yea, the proverbial free lunch. Hell, during the early days of oil most of it was left in pools or pumped into rivers because all they wanted was the Kerosene. From today&#039;s viewpoint the wastefulness was epic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, the proverbial free lunch. Hell, during the early days of oil most of it was left in pools or pumped into rivers because all they wanted was the Kerosene. From today&#8217;s viewpoint the wastefulness was epic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525324</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525324</guid>
		<description>Not sure if in pockets or if bought the idea of current economics as a hard science rather than a social science. End result is that they thing the best approach is a hands off approach regarding the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure if in pockets or if bought the idea of current economics as a hard science rather than a social science. End result is that they thing the best approach is a hands off approach regarding the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amelia_G</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525322</link>
		<dc:creator>Amelia_G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525322</guid>
		<description>&quot;There&#039;s a l-i-i-i-ight...&quot; Politicians in many EU countries will only behave better after experiencing credible pressure. We in the USA see only the credible pressure, and we can&#039;t picture politicians&#039; actually straightening up and flying right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a l-i-i-i-ight&#8230;&#8221; Politicians in many EU countries will only behave better after experiencing credible pressure. We in the USA see only the credible pressure, and we can&#8217;t picture politicians&#8217; actually straightening up and flying right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IronEdithKidd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525301</link>
		<dc:creator>IronEdithKidd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525301</guid>
		<description>Do you not understand what happens when hydraulic fraking is done wrong?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you not understand what happens when hydraulic fraking is done wrong?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: regeya</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525236</link>
		<dc:creator>regeya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525236</guid>
		<description>Not to take sides in a partisan debate...okay, so I will:  If you were to sell that narrative to a Republican party member, you probably could have given a speech at the RNC as evidence that Obama has killed the job market.  If you had chosen instead to go to the Occupy protest outside the RNC, though, they&#039;d tell you to go get a job, there&#039;s three million jobs unfilled, ya lazy bum.

I&#039;m not saying that to say, &quot;vote Republican,&quot; I&#039;m saying it because of my disgust after reading a hit piece on the Occupy protest outside the RNC being a Democrat planned event, and the protest outside the DNC being a farce.  In the U.S. we have two parties, and neither party seems to get it.  We want leadership, we want solutions, and what we get instead are gay marriage, fetus citizenship, and partisan sniping.  I know some people will take my exception to including gay marriage but, I&#039;m sorry, it&#039;s not one of the top issues for most Americans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to take sides in a partisan debate&#8230;okay, so I will:  If you were to sell that narrative to a Republican party member, you probably could have given a speech at the RNC as evidence that Obama has killed the job market.  If you had chosen instead to go to the Occupy protest outside the RNC, though, they&#8217;d tell you to go get a job, there&#8217;s three million jobs unfilled, ya lazy bum.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that to say, &#8220;vote Republican,&#8221; I&#8217;m saying it because of my disgust after reading a hit piece on the Occupy protest outside the RNC being a Democrat planned event, and the protest outside the DNC being a farce.  In the U.S. we have two parties, and neither party seems to get it.  We want leadership, we want solutions, and what we get instead are gay marriage, fetus citizenship, and partisan sniping.  I know some people will take my exception to including gay marriage but, I&#8217;m sorry, it&#8217;s not one of the top issues for most Americans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Breakey</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525222</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Breakey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525222</guid>
		<description> Proving even more how governments  are in the pocket of certain corporations is how little has been done on energy.  Renewable energy and electric cars have been viable technologies for 20 years.  Why take free energy from the sun, when we could be shipping toxic sludge from warzones?

Why have a car that would make no noise, greatly reduce emissions, (even if charged from a COAL PLANT), and can be plugged in at home and charged for a couple dollars, (if that), when I can make a special trip to get gas from an environmental / fire hazard waiting to happen and spend $50 to fill up my Yaris?

Even the US Military is petitioning the government to focus more on renewable power, (as expensive as oil is getting here, it&#039;s a hundred times worse in warzones).

And, as you said, the banks are no more regulated now then they were just before the world economic catastrophe, and Mitt Romney wants to REMOVE EVEN MORE REGULATION.

Funny enough, Canada is passing laws to solve the problem, when it wasn&#039;t our problem to begin with, (we never removed the regulation that would have started the crash, which means there was nothing to fix).

Oh yeah, and for food, we&#039;re letting major corporations play dangerous games with our food supply.  GMO&#039;s and desertification have recently caused famines, and the other horrible things about industrial feedlots aside, the simple act of having them is causing major issues in world grain supply.

It&#039;s like the big pocket corporations are playing with matches, and instead of taking them away, the government is giving them more tinder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Proving even more how governments  are in the pocket of certain corporations is how little has been done on energy.  Renewable energy and electric cars have been viable technologies for 20 years.  Why take free energy from the sun, when we could be shipping toxic sludge from warzones?</p>
<p>Why have a car that would make no noise, greatly reduce emissions, (even if charged from a COAL PLANT), and can be plugged in at home and charged for a couple dollars, (if that), when I can make a special trip to get gas from an environmental / fire hazard waiting to happen and spend $50 to fill up my Yaris?</p>
<p>Even the US Military is petitioning the government to focus more on renewable power, (as expensive as oil is getting here, it&#8217;s a hundred times worse in warzones).</p>
<p>And, as you said, the banks are no more regulated now then they were just before the world economic catastrophe, and Mitt Romney wants to REMOVE EVEN MORE REGULATION.</p>
<p>Funny enough, Canada is passing laws to solve the problem, when it wasn&#8217;t our problem to begin with, (we never removed the regulation that would have started the crash, which means there was nothing to fix).</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and for food, we&#8217;re letting major corporations play dangerous games with our food supply.  GMO&#8217;s and desertification have recently caused famines, and the other horrible things about industrial feedlots aside, the simple act of having them is causing major issues in world grain supply.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like the big pocket corporations are playing with matches, and instead of taking them away, the government is giving them more tinder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525198</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525198</guid>
		<description>You do realize there&#039;s more to the environment than the greenhouse effect, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do realize there&#8217;s more to the environment than the greenhouse effect, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robcat2075</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525183</link>
		<dc:creator>robcat2075</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525183</guid>
		<description>On item 12 and &quot;you will devastate the environment&quot;... US carbon emissions are at a 20 year low because the new prevalence of natural gas supplies.  Low cost cleaner gas is displacing dirtier coal in power plants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On item 12 and &#8220;you will devastate the environment&#8221;&#8230; US carbon emissions are at a 20 year low because the new prevalence of natural gas supplies.  Low cost cleaner gas is displacing dirtier coal in power plants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocatagon</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525158</link>
		<dc:creator>ocatagon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525158</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true mcv, but doesn&#039;t negate my point. There are many houses to be had for the average wage earner (and they&#039;re not all in the country).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true mcv, but doesn&#8217;t negate my point. There are many houses to be had for the average wage earner (and they&#8217;re not all in the country).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Jørgensen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525148</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Jørgensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525148</guid>
		<description>Electricity is cheaper than oil. Much cheaper. A full order of magnitude cheaper. Electric cars are currently expensive as heck, but if someone rolled out a electric car priced at a reasonable point tommorow, you would have to be a complete imbicile to buy anything else. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electricity is cheaper than oil. Much cheaper. A full order of magnitude cheaper. Electric cars are currently expensive as heck, but if someone rolled out a electric car priced at a reasonable point tommorow, you would have to be a complete imbicile to buy anything else. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImmutableMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525145</link>
		<dc:creator>ImmutableMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525145</guid>
		<description>@Al - I think we might be talking at cross purposes or my satire detector is set to  &quot;obtuse&quot;. I was thinking about the privatizations that took place in many countries in the 80&#039;s and 90&#039;s.  As a taxpayer, I used to own these things before they were sold off to equity firms at bargain basement prices. 

Getting those shares back would mean nationizing those companies. I don&#039;t know much about the GOP, but they (or any other Major US party) don&#039;t strike me as the nationalizing sort....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Al &#8211; I think we might be talking at cross purposes or my satire detector is set to  &#8220;obtuse&#8221;. I was thinking about the privatizations that took place in many countries in the 80&#8242;s and 90&#8242;s.  As a taxpayer, I used to own these things before they were sold off to equity firms at bargain basement prices. </p>
<p>Getting those shares back would mean nationizing those companies. I don&#8217;t know much about the GOP, but they (or any other Major US party) don&#8217;t strike me as the nationalizing sort&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: futnuh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525120</link>
		<dc:creator>futnuh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525120</guid>
		<description>Christ, reading this thread is like hanging out in a Czech nightclub.   The pessimism is palpable.  I almost feel guilty for being happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ, reading this thread is like hanging out in a Czech nightclub.   The pessimism is palpable.  I almost feel guilty for being happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cservant</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525117</link>
		<dc:creator>cservant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525117</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re going to do that with 4k you might as well invest in ETFs.

I know jack about Region Bank, but if it&#039;s still -80% from 2008, it&#039;s not worth keeping.  The market, recovered back to 2008 prices in 3 years.  If you bought and held any index ETF you&#039;d be in the black.

Quit gambling with your money and invest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re going to do that with 4k you might as well invest in ETFs.</p>
<p>I know jack about Region Bank, but if it&#8217;s still -80% from 2008, it&#8217;s not worth keeping.  The market, recovered back to 2008 prices in 3 years.  If you bought and held any index ETF you&#8217;d be in the black.</p>
<p>Quit gambling with your money and invest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525116</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 09:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525116</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. Some guy in Mexico is buying up Dutch utilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. Some guy in Mexico is buying up Dutch utilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525115</link>
		<dc:creator>Martijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525115</guid>
		<description>Whether you can buy a house on what kind of income depends entirely on the kind of house, its location, and whether you have a double income or not. In Amsterdam, an apartment big enough for a small family requires a double income. In the country, we could get a huge house for half that price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you can buy a house on what kind of income depends entirely on the kind of house, its location, and whether you have a double income or not. In Amsterdam, an apartment big enough for a small family requires a double income. In the country, we could get a huge house for half that price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525103</link>
		<dc:creator>Wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525103</guid>
		<description>For developed economies isn&#039;t belief in growth as a fundamental indicator of economic well-being the problem. The only people who benefit both in times of expansion and contraction are the wealthy. Beyond a certain level of development the majority are only trying to get by and are subject to the ups and downs which benefit the few. People feel the lack of security which that produces and so vote for the growth which prevents them achieving the security they need. It is a vicious circle. What developed economies need is flexibility in the application of resources (and not the spurious flexibility of job insecurity) which the search for growth prohibits.
This &#039;bad news&#039; (which is the same old news) doesn&#039;t get us very far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For developed economies isn&#8217;t belief in growth as a fundamental indicator of economic well-being the problem. The only people who benefit both in times of expansion and contraction are the wealthy. Beyond a certain level of development the majority are only trying to get by and are subject to the ups and downs which benefit the few. People feel the lack of security which that produces and so vote for the growth which prevents them achieving the security they need. It is a vicious circle. What developed economies need is flexibility in the application of resources (and not the spurious flexibility of job insecurity) which the search for growth prohibits.<br />
This &#8216;bad news&#8217; (which is the same old news) doesn&#8217;t get us very far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SedanChair</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525100</link>
		<dc:creator>SedanChair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525100</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the wealth of the rich and major corporations has recovered and in many countries exceeded its prior highs. They are doing fine. Austerity is not hurting them. They control your politicians. The depression will not end until it is in their interest for it to do so, or their wealth and power is broken.&lt;/blockquote&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQvB6OjHOU</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the wealth of the rich and major corporations has recovered and in many countries exceeded its prior highs. They are doing fine. Austerity is not hurting them. They control your politicians. The depression will not end until it is in their interest for it to do so, or their wealth and power is broken.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQvB6OjHOU" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygQvB6OjHOU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525096</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525096</guid>
		<description>You have too much free time. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have too much free time. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525094</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525094</guid>
		<description>Vote Republican and I&#039;m sure that you&#039;ll get them back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote Republican and I&#8217;m sure that you&#8217;ll get them back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: artaxerxes</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525093</link>
		<dc:creator>artaxerxes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525093</guid>
		<description>Ayn Rand called AGAIN. She wants her Medicare and Social Security back. Damn lumbago&#039;s acting up again, apparently. Well, that and the lung cancer. Which, she adds, is yet another flaccid fabrication typical of the liberal media elite. In response, she offers wisdom from a real man of the people, Tex Ritter*: &quot;I&#039;ve smoked &#039;em all my life, And I ain&#039;t dead yet.&quot; Well-played. Well-played, indeed, Tovarishch Rand.

Further, she&#039;s blazing with red-hot ire at the perfidy of Signet, her most illustrious publishers (*cough*). An acquaintance has brought to her attention the existence of something called e-books. This acquaintance is in publishing, or was it emu husbandry? No matter. The fellow is a sterling example of a renegade American achiever, with a fine square jaw and a gigantic head covered with thick, sandy hair. 

At any rate, he has informed Rand that savvy authors who&#039;ve grasped the sea-change in digital publishing are harnessing the power of new paradigms and publishing their own Intellectual Property. Being an ahead-of-the-curve-kinda-gal with an indomitable sense of her own superiority and why that should make people give her lots of money, she grasped the water buffalo by the horns and browbeat a team of dull, but awe-struck, graduate students into publishing her most popular novels as e-books.

And wouldn&#039;t you know it? Those Marxist lickspittles at Signet (and Plume and I&#039;mAHammerYou&#039;reANail, et al.) had the nerve to have their lawyers inform her that &quot;the digital properties&quot; were, in fact, their Intellectual Property and she&#039;d best cease and desist before they hauled her gangrenous, chain-smoking Zombie Hips&#039;n&#039;Tits into court. And about any profits you may have generated, Miz Rand… In sum, better step in line with a quickness, missy.

As it ever was, the entire population of the world, excluding her, is abysmally imbecilic and intellectually cretinous, lagging light-years behind her in the evolutionary march towards merciless godhood. 

So, it&#039;s easy to understand why she&#039;s having difficulty with such a simple task as crafting a narrative that blames this cock-up on the Bolsheviks (Obama. She got the mail.) But in the mean time, she&#039;d like all of us to know that the Bolsheviks are behind this. All. Of. This.

She will be exposing this entire dastardly hoodwinking as soon as she super-humanly can. 

She can&#039;t afford an internet connection right now (She&#039;s a senior on a fixed income with serious chronic health problems, what the hell do you expect?), but her local public library has all the resources she needs to prove that the responsibility for this corruption of flawless capitalist method is the sole fault of the Obama administration, his liberal goons and his Arugula-worshipping wife.

She asks us all to wait until next Tuesday or so, because lacking computer and connectivity (just for the time being), she&#039;ll be using the new Macs and lightning-fast wi-fi at her local branch. And Darryl&#039;s next shift isn&#039;t until Thursday. 

Darryl&#039;s her research assistant, a rugged, individualist libertarian and high-school sophomore, who volunteers Tuesdays and Thursdays after school, teaching seniors internet skills and the basics of word processing and spread sheets. He might even help her with the PowerPoint. (Squee!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ayn Rand called AGAIN. She wants her Medicare and Social Security back. Damn lumbago&#8217;s acting up again, apparently. Well, that and the lung cancer. Which, she adds, is yet another flaccid fabrication typical of the liberal media elite. In response, she offers wisdom from a real man of the people, Tex Ritter*: &#8220;I&#8217;ve smoked &#8216;em all my life, And I ain&#8217;t dead yet.&#8221; Well-played. Well-played, indeed, Tovarishch Rand.</p>
<p>Further, she&#8217;s blazing with red-hot ire at the perfidy of Signet, her most illustrious publishers (*cough*). An acquaintance has brought to her attention the existence of something called e-books. This acquaintance is in publishing, or was it emu husbandry? No matter. The fellow is a sterling example of a renegade American achiever, with a fine square jaw and a gigantic head covered with thick, sandy hair. </p>
<p>At any rate, he has informed Rand that savvy authors who&#8217;ve grasped the sea-change in digital publishing are harnessing the power of new paradigms and publishing their own Intellectual Property. Being an ahead-of-the-curve-kinda-gal with an indomitable sense of her own superiority and why that should make people give her lots of money, she grasped the water buffalo by the horns and browbeat a team of dull, but awe-struck, graduate students into publishing her most popular novels as e-books.</p>
<p>And wouldn&#8217;t you know it? Those Marxist lickspittles at Signet (and Plume and I&#8217;mAHammerYou&#8217;reANail, et al.) had the nerve to have their lawyers inform her that &#8220;the digital properties&#8221; were, in fact, their Intellectual Property and she&#8217;d best cease and desist before they hauled her gangrenous, chain-smoking Zombie Hips&#8217;n'Tits into court. And about any profits you may have generated, Miz Rand… In sum, better step in line with a quickness, missy.</p>
<p>As it ever was, the entire population of the world, excluding her, is abysmally imbecilic and intellectually cretinous, lagging light-years behind her in the evolutionary march towards merciless godhood. </p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s easy to understand why she&#8217;s having difficulty with such a simple task as crafting a narrative that blames this cock-up on the Bolsheviks (Obama. She got the mail.) But in the mean time, she&#8217;d like all of us to know that the Bolsheviks are behind this. All. Of. This.</p>
<p>She will be exposing this entire dastardly hoodwinking as soon as she super-humanly can. </p>
<p>She can&#8217;t afford an internet connection right now (She&#8217;s a senior on a fixed income with serious chronic health problems, what the hell do you expect?), but her local public library has all the resources she needs to prove that the responsibility for this corruption of flawless capitalist method is the sole fault of the Obama administration, his liberal goons and his Arugula-worshipping wife.</p>
<p>She asks us all to wait until next Tuesday or so, because lacking computer and connectivity (just for the time being), she&#8217;ll be using the new Macs and lightning-fast wi-fi at her local branch. And Darryl&#8217;s next shift isn&#8217;t until Thursday. </p>
<p>Darryl&#8217;s her research assistant, a rugged, individualist libertarian and high-school sophomore, who volunteers Tuesdays and Thursdays after school, teaching seniors internet skills and the basics of word processing and spread sheets. He might even help her with the PowerPoint. (Squee!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImmutableMichael</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525079</link>
		<dc:creator>ImmutableMichael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525079</guid>
		<description>I can remember owning shares in telecommunications, ultilities, airlines and the health sector.  Then the government sold them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can remember owning shares in telecommunications, ultilities, airlines and the health sector.  Then the government sold them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Billings</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525070</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Billings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525070</guid>
		<description> (I can&#039;t reply at your comment depth.)

I don&#039;t trust the Federal statistics on labor. I know, for a fact, that they&#039;ve redefined &quot;employment&quot; multiple times over the last 50 years, moving the goal posts and fudging numbers.

If you&#039;d mentioned an independent, NGO or the like, I might have believed it. Not the Feds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> (I can&#8217;t reply at your comment depth.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust the Federal statistics on labor. I know, for a fact, that they&#8217;ve redefined &#8220;employment&#8221; multiple times over the last 50 years, moving the goal posts and fudging numbers.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d mentioned an independent, NGO or the like, I might have believed it. Not the Feds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aloisius</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/04/compelling-bad-news-about-the.html#comment-1525068</link>
		<dc:creator>Aloisius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179339#comment-1525068</guid>
		<description>The US Government.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics and Department of Commerce have, quite literally, perfect records of straight shooting for the past hundred years and they can be cross-verified using state government data.

The numbers aren&#039;t great, but every sign points to a slow, but accelerating economic recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Government.</p>
<p>The Bureau of Labor Statistics and Department of Commerce have, quite literally, perfect records of straight shooting for the past hundred years and they can be cross-verified using state government data.</p>
<p>The numbers aren&#8217;t great, but every sign points to a slow, but accelerating economic recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
