<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roger Ebert&#039;s memoir is going to become a movie that might be awkward for him to&#160;review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:33:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kent williams</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1528726</link>
		<dc:creator>kent williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1528726</guid>
		<description>Obviously anything he would write about this movie can&#039;t be regarded as objective film criticism. But don&#039;t you want to read it anyway?

While I&#039;m on the subject: I write music reviews.  I&#039;ve written hundreds of them, over the last 14 years.  I think that objectivity is crap. You&#039;re paid to be personal and subjective, and what other reaction does one have to art but a personal one?
I think &quot;This movie is based on my autobiography, and here&#039;s what I think of it.&quot; is a perfectly fine first sentence for a review. Even better would be if he hated it.  And actually wouldn&#039;t a movie based on Ebert&#039;s life that was awful be more interesting than one that was earnest and well crafted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously anything he would write about this movie can&#8217;t be regarded as objective film criticism. But don&#8217;t you want to read it anyway?</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m on the subject: I write music reviews.  I&#8217;ve written hundreds of them, over the last 14 years.  I think that objectivity is crap. You&#8217;re paid to be personal and subjective, and what other reaction does one have to art but a personal one?<br />
I think &#8220;This movie is based on my autobiography, and here&#8217;s what I think of it.&#8221; is a perfectly fine first sentence for a review. Even better would be if he hated it.  And actually wouldn&#8217;t a movie based on Ebert&#8217;s life that was awful be more interesting than one that was earnest and well crafted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Olsen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1527093</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Olsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1527093</guid>
		<description>He won&#039;t recuse his thumbs, just sit on them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He won&#8217;t recuse his thumbs, just sit on them. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crummett</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1527077</link>
		<dc:creator>crummett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1527077</guid>
		<description>Who better to review it? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who better to review it? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1526921</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1526921</guid>
		<description>If Charlie Kaufman can write &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptation_(film)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a movie that&#039;s about itself&lt;/a&gt; then surely Roger Ebert can have a movie that reviews itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Charlie Kaufman can write <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptation_(film)" rel="nofollow">a movie that&#8217;s about itself</a> then surely Roger Ebert can have a movie that reviews itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1526920</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1526920</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s how he handled a &quot;review&quot; of Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, for which he wrote the screenplay:  http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19700101/REVIEWS/708110301/1023</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how he handled a &#8220;review&#8221; of Beyond the Valley of the Dolls, for which he wrote the screenplay:  http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19700101/REVIEWS/708110301/1023</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/07/roger-ebert-documentary.html#comment-1526919</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=179889#comment-1526919</guid>
		<description>James also did The Interrupters.  This sounds awesome, and it would be a fitting tribute Ebert. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James also did The Interrupters.  This sounds awesome, and it would be a fitting tribute Ebert. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
