<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK government is squatting on 1.67 million unused IPv4&#160;addresses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tore Sinding Bekkedal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1537605</link>
		<dc:creator>Tore Sinding Bekkedal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1537605</guid>
		<description>Except it&#039;s a futile, short-term waste of money in either private or public sector. 

If you&#039;re going to petition, then petition that they convert to IPv6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except it&#8217;s a futile, short-term waste of money in either private or public sector. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to petition, then petition that they convert to IPv6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tore Sinding Bekkedal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1537601</link>
		<dc:creator>Tore Sinding Bekkedal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1537601</guid>
		<description>Good luck renumbering a /8 in any large company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck renumbering a /8 in any large company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535923</guid>
		<description>We have five Class Cs, four of them in a contiguous CIDR block.  We need them because we connect to a great many other organizations that are about as network-savvy as a french poodle, yet also obsessed with security (although it&#039;s pure &quot;security theater&quot; since they don&#039;t have the slightest clue what they are doing).  These organizations all use conflicting RFC1918 addressing (some of them actually internally conflict, no lie, they can end up with NAT &lt;em&gt;inside&lt;/em&gt; an office flat) and have nonsensical rules about what can and can&#039;t be done when NATting to business partners &amp; research organizations.  The only way to cut through their Gordian knots of authoritarian cluelessness is to use true &quot;portable&quot; IANA addresses; this allows the sidestepping of policies which would otherwise require six months of form-filling and dozens of teleconferences with officious, technically ignorant bureaucrats.

Most of these addresses are not visible from the public Internet, and would appear untenanted to an average sturdy English yeoman.  They are visible from dozens of Internet-connected private sites, though.  If we gave up these addresses, the business would realize no profit, and incur significant loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have five Class Cs, four of them in a contiguous CIDR block.  We need them because we connect to a great many other organizations that are about as network-savvy as a french poodle, yet also obsessed with security (although it&#8217;s pure &#8220;security theater&#8221; since they don&#8217;t have the slightest clue what they are doing).  These organizations all use conflicting RFC1918 addressing (some of them actually internally conflict, no lie, they can end up with NAT <em>inside</em> an office flat) and have nonsensical rules about what can and can&#8217;t be done when NATting to business partners &amp; research organizations.  The only way to cut through their Gordian knots of authoritarian cluelessness is to use true &#8220;portable&#8221; IANA addresses; this allows the sidestepping of policies which would otherwise require six months of form-filling and dozens of teleconferences with officious, technically ignorant bureaucrats.</p>
<p>Most of these addresses are not visible from the public Internet, and would appear untenanted to an average sturdy English yeoman.  They are visible from dozens of Internet-connected private sites, though.  If we gave up these addresses, the business would realize no profit, and incur significant loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblebeeeeeee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535802</link>
		<dc:creator>bumblebeeeeeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 14:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535802</guid>
		<description>exactly, if one company needs /8, then running every gov computer across a whole country in hospitals, schools etcetc is gonna need most of an /8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exactly, if one company needs /8, then running every gov computer across a whole country in hospitals, schools etcetc is gonna need most of an /8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535744</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535744</guid>
		<description>&quot;If they have any sane network infrastructure &quot;

… we&#039;re talking about a government department here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If they have any sane network infrastructure &#8221;</p>
<p>… we&#8217;re talking about a government department here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535442</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535442</guid>
		<description>Eli Lily the first company/person to produce penicillin! They probably have a bunch of IPs for internal research communication. 


Also I&#039;m surprised Apple doesn&#039;t have a double set like HP because they&#039;ve been constantly experimenting/failing with internet services like that apple village thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eli Lily the first company/person to produce penicillin! They probably have a bunch of IPs for internal research communication. </p>
<p>Also I&#8217;m surprised Apple doesn&#8217;t have a double set like HP because they&#8217;ve been constantly experimenting/failing with internet services like that apple village thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535391</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535391</guid>
		<description> 1 Billion UK pounds wouldn&#039;t help with that, or something else useful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> 1 Billion UK pounds wouldn&#8217;t help with that, or something else useful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblebeeeeeee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535371</link>
		<dc:creator>bumblebeeeeeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535371</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really annoyed Cory posted this with a direct link to the e-petition. As it, come on this needs signing... I assumed had been done to verify the claims (not least by the person starting the petition)... so went straight though and signed it. 

Turns out, 80% of the block is used, thought out UK gov, some FoI replies: 
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a_2

Things such as the GCSX and GSI exist there... every gov computer across the country. The cost would be lost changing everything (even if feasible) .

Also, not something that could be sold anyway. If it&#039;s not used, must be returned to 
RIPE. Cannot be sold. 

Apart from the easily-kicked target of the british govt. there are loads of companies that are also sitting on /8&#039;s. Ford Motors, Eli Lilly (who?), the long-defunct DEC (sold to HP so they have two lots of /8. Hell: even Apple have a slice of the pie.
And if you can tell me how I can force these companies to tell me what they are doing with these addresses I will do it.If isn&#039;t just that the British govt is an easy target, it is because they have to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really annoyed Cory posted this with a direct link to the e-petition. As it, come on this needs signing&#8230; I assumed had been done to verify the claims (not least by the person starting the petition)&#8230; so went straight though and signed it. </p>
<p>Turns out, 80% of the block is used, thought out UK gov, some FoI replies: <br />
<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a</a><br />
<a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a_2" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/internet_protocol_ipv4_address_a_2</a></p>
<p>Things such as the GCSX and GSI exist there&#8230; every gov computer across the country. The cost would be lost changing everything (even if feasible) .</p>
<p>Also, not something that could be sold anyway. If it&#8217;s not used, must be returned to <br />
RIPE. Cannot be sold. </p>
<p>Apart from the easily-kicked target of the british govt. there are loads of companies that are also sitting on /8&#8242;s. Ford Motors, Eli Lilly (who?), the long-defunct DEC (sold to HP so they have two lots of /8. Hell: even Apple have a slice of the pie.<br />
And if you can tell me how I can force these companies to tell me what they are doing with these addresses I will do it.If isn&#8217;t just that the British govt is an easy target, it is because they have to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimmer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535370</link>
		<dc:creator>Dimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535370</guid>
		<description>Indeed if they want to do anything major then moving to v6 would make sense. My suggested solution would just run a NAT service (or two) between them and the outside world: no need to change their internal assignments at all, and no blocking of the released IP space/new porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed if they want to do anything major then moving to v6 would make sense. My suggested solution would just run a NAT service (or two) between them and the outside world: no need to change their internal assignments at all, and no blocking of the released IP space/new porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdmikev</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535354</link>
		<dc:creator>sdmikev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535354</guid>
		<description>Yep, they own that.
Not that uncommon for companies to be sitting on blocks like that.  My company owns a /16 block that serves no purpose right now..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, they own that.<br />
Not that uncommon for companies to be sitting on blocks like that.  My company owns a /16 block that serves no purpose right now..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scav</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535348</link>
		<dc:creator>scav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535348</guid>
		<description>Also, they are harder than normal IP addresses, and there&#039;s 3000 year&#039;s supply of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, they are harder than normal IP addresses, and there&#8217;s 3000 year&#8217;s supply of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kraut</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535344</link>
		<dc:creator>kraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535344</guid>
		<description>Some Europeans are mildly socialist. Social democrats would be a more accurate description. 

The Torys are hardly more conservative than &quot;New&quot; Labour was.
Of course, by current US standards Margaret Thatcher was a communist, and Attila the Hun was a pinko-softie-hippy-liberal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some Europeans are mildly socialist. Social democrats would be a more accurate description. </p>
<p>The Torys are hardly more conservative than &#8220;New&#8221; Labour was.<br />
Of course, by current US standards Margaret Thatcher was a communist, and Attila the Hun was a pinko-softie-hippy-liberal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc45</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535318</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535318</guid>
		<description>Well they&#039;ve got at least 16,777,216 IP surveillance cameras to implement.  I don&#039;t think this block will be large enough ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they&#8217;ve got at least 16,777,216 IP surveillance cameras to implement.  I don&#8217;t think this block will be large enough ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Ellis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535259</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535259</guid>
		<description>Most things support it but the auto-config stuff for Consumer Premesis Equipment (CPE) is still somewhat in flux.

Tunneling through Hurricane Electric, you can do a manual setup, but most people don&#039;t want to deal with manual setups. (The idea of helping my mother to do an IPv6 setup on her home nework... just no.)

If it&#039;s as simple as your ISP handing you a /64 and you run with that /64 at your house, it&#039;s fairly easy, assuming your router/modem knows how to automatically get that info from the ISP. If it looks like most ISPs will actually hand a /48, /56 or /60, now your router needs to auto configure for multiple subnets (something I personally like).

Add on a sensible default IP filter, because most people have got used to NAT in front of their home devices and don&#039;t run a local firewall on their machines, or have sharing for a bunch of services turned on.

So while my phone might do IPv6 just fine, there&#039;s still a little ways to go for things integration between wireless APs, cable and DSL modems to make it braindead enough for joe average consumer. I need to be able to plug a Linksys or Airport Extreme into the modem, and have IPv6 seamlessly spread into my home with minimal configuration, perhaps choosing a &#039;public&#039; and a &#039;private&#039; local network, for example, so my friends can use the local WiFi while not being on my personal server network. I&#039;d also be curious to see if, say, my TV or my Receiver have a functional IPv6 stack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most things support it but the auto-config stuff for Consumer Premesis Equipment (CPE) is still somewhat in flux.</p>
<p>Tunneling through Hurricane Electric, you can do a manual setup, but most people don&#8217;t want to deal with manual setups. (The idea of helping my mother to do an IPv6 setup on her home nework&#8230; just no.)</p>
<p>If it&#8217;s as simple as your ISP handing you a /64 and you run with that /64 at your house, it&#8217;s fairly easy, assuming your router/modem knows how to automatically get that info from the ISP. If it looks like most ISPs will actually hand a /48, /56 or /60, now your router needs to auto configure for multiple subnets (something I personally like).</p>
<p>Add on a sensible default IP filter, because most people have got used to NAT in front of their home devices and don&#8217;t run a local firewall on their machines, or have sharing for a bunch of services turned on.</p>
<p>So while my phone might do IPv6 just fine, there&#8217;s still a little ways to go for things integration between wireless APs, cable and DSL modems to make it braindead enough for joe average consumer. I need to be able to plug a Linksys or Airport Extreme into the modem, and have IPv6 seamlessly spread into my home with minimal configuration, perhaps choosing a &#8216;public&#8217; and a &#8216;private&#8217; local network, for example, so my friends can use the local WiFi while not being on my personal server network. I&#8217;d also be curious to see if, say, my TV or my Receiver have a functional IPv6 stack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535253</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535253</guid>
		<description>Europeans are socialists.  Scotland is socialist.  England&#039;s current Tory government?  Not a chance.  (And no, the LibDems probably don&#039;t count here...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europeans are socialists.  Scotland is socialist.  England&#8217;s current Tory government?  Not a chance.  (And no, the LibDems probably don&#8217;t count here&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillStewart2012</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535244</link>
		<dc:creator>BillStewart2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535244</guid>
		<description>Any equipment that&#039;s difficult to renumber is so obsolete that it ought to be replaced anyway - except for servers and routers, anything from this millennium pretty much uses DHCP and DNS*.  Yes, it would only get the world a few extra months of address space - but RIPE just ran out of their stash, and are now measuring out their Last /8 with coffee spoons.   

*Yes, I know that there are VPN tunnel servers that are exceptions to that - it&#039;s unlikely that the Department needs to keep more than a few hundred /24s for themselves to handle all of those.   The more significant problem than cost is that it&#039;d take months for the bureaucrats to argue about what to do, and a few more months to actually implement it, so we won&#039;t be seeing much of this address space for another year or two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any equipment that&#8217;s difficult to renumber is so obsolete that it ought to be replaced anyway &#8211; except for servers and routers, anything from this millennium pretty much uses DHCP and DNS*.  Yes, it would only get the world a few extra months of address space &#8211; but RIPE just ran out of their stash, and are now measuring out their Last /8 with coffee spoons.   </p>
<p>*Yes, I know that there are VPN tunnel servers that are exceptions to that &#8211; it&#8217;s unlikely that the Department needs to keep more than a few hundred /24s for themselves to handle all of those.   The more significant problem than cost is that it&#8217;d take months for the bureaucrats to argue about what to do, and a few more months to actually implement it, so we won&#8217;t be seeing much of this address space for another year or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonfrog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535234</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535234</guid>
		<description>Derp.  Watch me fail at reading comprehension...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derp.  Watch me fail at reading comprehension&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jens Alfke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jens Alfke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535229</guid>
		<description>Oops, yeah — inevitably a nitpick about someone&#039;s math will have its own math errors (just like any grammar flame contains grammar errors.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, yeah — inevitably a nitpick about someone&#8217;s math will have its own math errors (just like any grammar flame contains grammar errors.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblebeeeeeee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535189</link>
		<dc:creator>bumblebeeeeeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535189</guid>
		<description>well, Europe invented the internet, so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, Europe invented the internet, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bumblebeeeeeee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535187</link>
		<dc:creator>bumblebeeeeeee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535187</guid>
		<description>department of what? 

The Department for Work and Pensions is responsible for welfare and pension policy and is a key player in tackling child poverty. It is the biggest public service delivery department in the UK and serves over 20 million customers.  http://dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/what-we-do/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>department of what? </p>
<p>The Department for Work and Pensions is responsible for welfare and pension policy and is a key player in tackling child poverty. It is the biggest public service delivery department in the UK and serves over 20 million customers.  <a href="http://dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/what-we-do/" rel="nofollow">http://dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/what-we-do/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheKaz1969</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535180</link>
		<dc:creator>TheKaz1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535180</guid>
		<description>I picture Vincent Gambini yelling, &quot;Are you sure about 4%? ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT 4%?!?!&quot;

&quot;I may have been mistaken&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I picture Vincent Gambini yelling, &#8220;Are you sure about 4%? ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT 4%?!?!&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I may have been mistaken&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gandalf23</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535181</link>
		<dc:creator>gandalf23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535181</guid>
		<description>I think you mean almost 0.4%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean almost 0.4%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheKaz1969</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535177</link>
		<dc:creator>TheKaz1969</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535177</guid>
		<description>Wait. Aren&#039;t Europeans socialists? should they be giving these away to everyone?

Here in the US, we&#039;d tell the national debt to get off its lazy behind and get a job and earn the money instead of taking handouts from the government...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait. Aren&#8217;t Europeans socialists? should they be giving these away to everyone?</p>
<p>Here in the US, we&#8217;d tell the national debt to get off its lazy behind and get a job and earn the money instead of taking handouts from the government&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristofer Keane</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535176</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristofer Keane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535176</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the petition&#039;s intention is primarily to free up addresses, but rather to suggest that the British Government could sell those off for revenue purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the petition&#8217;s intention is primarily to free up addresses, but rather to suggest that the British Government could sell those off for revenue purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MarlboroTestMonkey7</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535174</link>
		<dc:creator>MarlboroTestMonkey7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535174</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll create a local network with those addresses, just to get that english vibe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll create a local network with those addresses, just to get that english vibe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dragonfrog</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535175</link>
		<dc:creator>dragonfrog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535175</guid>
		<description>The department of Public Works is probably responsible for bridge and road maintenance - they probably have thousands of two-man offices all over the place, lorry weigh stations, field offices for brige inspectors in desolate corners of the country, etc. etc.

Don&#039;t forget you can&#039;t just update your LAN equipment - all the changes have to be synchronized with WAN networking changes too.  And no field office can be without access to corporate applications for more than half a day (or some such requirement), including the VT-120 emulator software that runs the mainframe applications that are running on a mainframe emulation environment in an outsourced data centre Spain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The department of Public Works is probably responsible for bridge and road maintenance &#8211; they probably have thousands of two-man offices all over the place, lorry weigh stations, field offices for brige inspectors in desolate corners of the country, etc. etc.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget you can&#8217;t just update your LAN equipment &#8211; all the changes have to be synchronized with WAN networking changes too.  And no field office can be without access to corporate applications for more than half a day (or some such requirement), including the VT-120 emulator software that runs the mainframe applications that are running on a mainframe emulation environment in an outsourced data centre Spain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: funkyfresh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535173</link>
		<dc:creator>funkyfresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535173</guid>
		<description> Are you sure about that 4% ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Are you sure about that 4% ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535171</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535171</guid>
		<description>This is just what I&#039;ve heard.  I&#039;m pretty sure everything I have supports it, but there&#039;s a hell of a lot of old tech in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just what I&#8217;ve heard.  I&#8217;m pretty sure everything I have supports it, but there&#8217;s a hell of a lot of old tech in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Peterson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535169</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535169</guid>
		<description>I thought their only strategic reserve was funny white people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought their only strategic reserve was funny white people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timquinn</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/18/uk-government-is-squatting-on.html#comment-1535150</link>
		<dc:creator>timquinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=181583#comment-1535150</guid>
		<description>Hold on, if they sell this off now where will be build the national parks of the internets. Think of the digital children!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, if they sell this off now where will be build the national parks of the internets. Think of the digital children!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
