<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomy Photographer of the Year&#160;2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew from Zhrodague</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537318</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew from Zhrodague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537318</guid>
		<description> tiff in a tarball. I&#039;d love to pick through that. My wife brings home TEM imagery, and I enjoy seeing those too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> tiff in a tarball. I&#8217;d love to pick through that. My wife brings home TEM imagery, and I enjoy seeing those too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe blough</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537244</link>
		<dc:creator>joe blough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537244</guid>
		<description>sorry - wrong. the image of the galaxy above is LRGB, taken thru 4 filters, luminance, red, green, and blue. it&#039;s not false color.

the false-color hubble pictures are narrowband pictures, taken with the 3 common narrowband filters which pick up the red light from 1) the hydrogen-alpha transition, 2) the sulfur-2 transition (also red) and 3) the oxygen-iii transition (kind of a blue-green color) because SII and Ha would be the same color to the human eye (if we could see them - extremely deep red), SII is mapped to the red channel, Ha to green, and OIII to blue.

if you could see that galaxy with your own eyes, it would look very much like the picture above.

source: i am myself an amateur astrophotographer.

most serious astrophotographs are taken with black and white cameras with the above-mentioned filters in front of the sensor. each filter is exposed separately for several hours, but cut up into 5-10 minute exposures and stacked. then the channels are combined to RGB images. when you use RGB filters, you see what the eye would see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8211; wrong. the image of the galaxy above is LRGB, taken thru 4 filters, luminance, red, green, and blue. it&#8217;s not false color.</p>
<p>the false-color hubble pictures are narrowband pictures, taken with the 3 common narrowband filters which pick up the red light from 1) the hydrogen-alpha transition, 2) the sulfur-2 transition (also red) and 3) the oxygen-iii transition (kind of a blue-green color) because SII and Ha would be the same color to the human eye (if we could see them &#8211; extremely deep red), SII is mapped to the red channel, Ha to green, and OIII to blue.</p>
<p>if you could see that galaxy with your own eyes, it would look very much like the picture above.</p>
<p>source: i am myself an amateur astrophotographer.</p>
<p>most serious astrophotographs are taken with black and white cameras with the above-mentioned filters in front of the sensor. each filter is exposed separately for several hours, but cut up into 5-10 minute exposures and stacked. then the channels are combined to RGB images. when you use RGB filters, you see what the eye would see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellocgw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537212</link>
		<dc:creator>cellocgw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537212</guid>
		<description>Re:  &quot;black and white, sadly&quot;  -- all images are basically black and white.  There&#039;s only minor chromatic variation in stellar output  across star types. This pic and all the other &quot;wow&quot; Hubble pix are false-color to enhance our viewing pleasure. (and occasionally to aid in distinguishing visible from IR from radio waves, etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  &#8221;black and white, sadly&#8221;  &#8211; all images are basically black and white.  There&#8217;s only minor chromatic variation in stellar output  across star types. This pic and all the other &#8220;wow&#8221; Hubble pix are false-color to enhance our viewing pleasure. (and occasionally to aid in distinguishing visible from IR from radio waves, etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plingboot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537087</link>
		<dc:creator>plingboot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537087</guid>
		<description>save as... jpeg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>save as&#8230; jpeg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josiah White</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537066</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiah White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537066</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m working with M51, also known as NGC5194/5, which gives me a different view of the galaxy, black and white sadly. I have a .ps file with various graphs of the infrared flux (in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.0, and 8.0 micron wavelength) at various apertures. If anyone is interested in seeing it I&#039;d gladly upload, but what&#039;s the best way to distibute a 5 mb .ps file?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working with M51, also known as NGC5194/5, which gives me a different view of the galaxy, black and white sadly. I have a .ps file with various graphs of the infrared flux (in the 3.6, 4.5, 5.0, and 8.0 micron wavelength) at various apertures. If anyone is interested in seeing it I&#8217;d gladly upload, but what&#8217;s the best way to distibute a 5 mb .ps file?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NefariousNewt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/09/20/astronomy-photographer-of-the.html#comment-1537048</link>
		<dc:creator>NefariousNewt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=182336#comment-1537048</guid>
		<description>WOW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
