— FEATURED —
Gweek 098: Win Hugh Howey's Paperwhite Kindle!
Lexicon: smart, sharp technothriller from Max "Jennifer Government" Barry
The 'Geisters: spooky, scary novel
Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy
ADVERTISE AT BOING BOING!
— COMICS —
Tom the Dancing Bug
TOM THE DANCING BUG: Did You Know - Fun Facts About NYC!
Real Stuff: The Joeist Philosophy
Brain Rot: Hip Hop Family Tree, Chuck D and Spectrum City
— GUATEMALA SPECIAL SERIES —
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere—livestreamed event in D.C. today
Guatemala: Genocide in Our Hemisphere event D.C. May 29 with scholars, survivors; Xeni moderating
Photos: Throughout Latin America, protests demand justice for Guatemala after genocide trial overturned
— RECENTLY —
The Snowden Principle
Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey
Atoms for Peace play a surprise intimate show in Los Angeles
Blunders of Genius: interesting errors by Darwin, Pauling, and Einstein
"By His Things Will You Know Him," a short story
Topsy Turvy World: surreal kids' picture book, now out in the USA
Hubsan X4 quadcopters: tiny cheap, powerful copter
Monsters and Legends: kids' monster book now in the USA!
Akissi: kids' comic about a mischievous girl in Cote D'Ivoire [now in the USA!]
A User's Guide to Neglectful Parenting, by Guy Delisle
— FOLLOW US —
Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.
— POLICIES —
Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution
— FONTS —
Maggie Koerth-Baker at 1:03 pm Wed, Oct 3, 2012
You know what science I’d like to have applied to the debates?
What was on George W. Bush’s back during the Bush Kerry Debates?
What it was, No matter what, could have told us something interesting about Bush.
Was it a back brace? (Is he in pain? How bad is his back?)
Was it a bullet proof vest? Does the president usually wear a bullet proof vest when he goes out? I’m could understand if this is a state secret at the time, but it’s years later. Is this now standard practice?
Was it another medical device for his heart?
Was it a inducer for getting audio to the president in a secure encrypted fashion so that in case of a national emergency he will be in touch with the DOD command?
I would like to know the answer to that question.
Well, I’m glad you asked me that. There are so many important problems facing America today. We need universal healthcare…
I see what you did there
Here’s twelve ways to avoid a question.
Yeah, well.. the problem is that all the moderators are total wimps. If they simply cut off the mike and said “you have to answer the question asked.” sooner or later the candidates might get the message.
Hey! I have an idea…
I’ve always wanted to be a moderator to a political and end a question with, ‘And remember you are under oath.” The reason is that it would remind people that their is nothing compelling these people to tell the truth.
There are no consequences for lying and making up your own facts. And, with the sad state of our current media, they will rarely get called on a blatant lie in real time. The media person will go to the “other side” and get their comment but of course then it’s just “the other sides opinion”
People on the left often think that, “If only people knew the facts!” but that isn’t always true. The truth DOESN’T always win out, especially when you have a lot of money going into creating a world where things like scientific truths are doubted because they might cut into the bottom line of a massive energy industry.
The same research (referred to above) covered that. It turns out that if the candidate dodges the question, and the moderator pushes the point, it makes the audience trust the candidate MORE, not less, because the moderator gets perceived as rude, push, aggressive, and so people identify with the poor helpless bullied candidate.
tl;dr version of the other key findings: if the candidate stalls for at least 10 seconds, they can answer any question they want, because the vast majority of the audience no longer remember what the question was, and the majority of the audience considers any well-rehearsed answer to be “probably truthful” and any answer where the candidate stops to think, even briefly, as “probably dishonest.”
(Gods’ teeth, I hate neurotypicals some times.)
The one thing that they found that worked was to keep the question on the screen, in text form, during the answers. The Commission on Presidential Debates, which is answerable to both candidates and to nobody else, has so far said no to that, although the networks could do it themselves if they wanted to.