<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanning whole books is fair&#160;use</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 06:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Ottaviani</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1556682</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Ottaviani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1556682</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re confusing derivative works (e.g. foreign language translations) with transformative works (e.g. creating massive, multi-book indexes). Authors/creators usually reserve the rights for derivative works, but transformative uses, depending on the four factors the judge described in detail, can be fair uses...and in this case, were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re confusing derivative works (e.g. foreign language translations) with transformative works (e.g. creating massive, multi-book indexes). Authors/creators usually reserve the rights for derivative works, but transformative uses, depending on the four factors the judge described in detail, can be fair uses&#8230;and in this case, were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1555569</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1555569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If I write a book...&lt;/blockquote&gt;This seems to be the key concept in comments opposing fair use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If I write a book&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>This seems to be the key concept in comments opposing fair use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald Pottol</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1555479</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Pottol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1555479</guid>
		<description>Well, there is first sale doctrine, as long as you don&#039;t make logical copies (only one user per purchase book at a time), you are legal. 
So I can buy your postcards, and laminate them into coasters, and I&#039;m legal. Now if I go and make copies of your work, and make coasters from that, you can sue me for copyright violations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there is first sale doctrine, as long as you don&#8217;t make logical copies (only one user per purchase book at a time), you are legal. <br />
So I can buy your postcards, and laminate them into coasters, and I&#8217;m legal. Now if I go and make copies of your work, and make coasters from that, you can sue me for copyright violations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1555146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1555146</guid>
		<description>If I write a book, and get it published, then produce a braille version, and maybe an audio-book version, and then someone else simply takes the printed edition, scans it entirely and uses Google translate to make a Japanese version - is that still fair use?

What if I don&#039;t do a braille version? Or I&#039;m working on the audio-book version and someone else does it first?
The judge seems to be suggesting that simply taking a printed work and scanning it, for some purpose other than originally intended, is fair use. So if I don&#039;t make my book available in .epub format, does that mean someone else is allowed to do so?

There&#039;s a local artist in my town who sells originals and prints of her work, along with postcards of the same images. She&#039;s just found out that someone has been making cheap coasters and other items, using her images, all made in China and now sold in some local souvenir shops.  She didn&#039;t intend for that to happen - is that fair use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I write a book, and get it published, then produce a braille version, and maybe an audio-book version, and then someone else simply takes the printed edition, scans it entirely and uses Google translate to make a Japanese version &#8211; is that still fair use?</p>
<p>What if I don&#8217;t do a braille version? Or I&#8217;m working on the audio-book version and someone else does it first?<br />
The judge seems to be suggesting that simply taking a printed work and scanning it, for some purpose other than originally intended, is fair use. So if I don&#8217;t make my book available in .epub format, does that mean someone else is allowed to do so?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a local artist in my town who sells originals and prints of her work, along with postcards of the same images. She&#8217;s just found out that someone has been making cheap coasters and other items, using her images, all made in China and now sold in some local souvenir shops.  She didn&#8217;t intend for that to happen &#8211; is that fair use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: highdesert</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554988</link>
		<dc:creator>highdesert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554988</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s like making a concordance for every book ever, which is not only legitimate fair use but also awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s like making a concordance for every book ever, which is not only legitimate fair use but also awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mighty Blowhole</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554985</link>
		<dc:creator>Mighty Blowhole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554985</guid>
		<description>Your quote is too short... 
&quot;Timothy B Lee does a good job summing up the judgment and its implications for Ars Technica&quot;
His good job consists of the summing up... (which was done for arstechnica.com).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your quote is too short&#8230;<br />
&#8220;Timothy B Lee does a good job summing up the judgment and its implications for Ars Technica&#8221;<br />
His good job consists of the summing up&#8230; (which was done for arstechnica.com).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon in Notts</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon in Notts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554970</guid>
		<description>But what are &quot; its implications for Ars Technica&quot; ? I didn&#039;t see that in the article</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what are &#8220; its implications for Ars Technica&#8221; ? I didn&#8217;t see that in the article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554957</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554957</guid>
		<description> A key proviso, making the ruling seem quite nuanced and intelligent. 

And hooray for giving more access to books for the sight-impaired!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A key proviso, making the ruling seem quite nuanced and intelligent. </p>
<p>And hooray for giving more access to books for the sight-impaired!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Sanfilippo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554953</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Sanfilippo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554953</guid>
		<description>I think the ruling was a little more subtle than the headline portrays. Judge Baer said libraries could scan for the purpose of indexing and data mining, and to offer their materials for the print disabled. I don&#039;t think that this ruling includes scanning for public circulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the ruling was a little more subtle than the headline portrays. Judge Baer said libraries could scan for the purpose of indexing and data mining, and to offer their materials for the print disabled. I don&#8217;t think that this ruling includes scanning for public circulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TaymonBeal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554863</link>
		<dc:creator>TaymonBeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 05:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554863</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m particularly heartened by that last point. I sincerely hope it becomes widely adopted as a legal precedent.

To give a single example of something that would benefit from this: Sampling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m particularly heartened by that last point. I sincerely hope it becomes widely adopted as a legal precedent.</p>
<p>To give a single example of something that would benefit from this: Sampling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robuluz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554800</link>
		<dc:creator>robuluz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554800</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. That sounds like a common sense interpretation of the law as it relates to new techniques and innovations made possible by technology.

IT&#039;S THE APOCOLYPSE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. That sounds like a common sense interpretation of the law as it relates to new techniques and innovations made possible by technology.</p>
<p>IT&#8217;S THE APOCOLYPSE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMac001</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554801</link>
		<dc:creator>JMac001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554801</guid>
		<description>Though I am usually tenacious in my defense of &quot;Fair Use&quot;, the headline caused me to say &quot;Uh-oh&quot;. How could scanning entire books be fair use?

However for search purposes in a public research library I can see the benefit clearly, and without general access the scanning makes much more sense.

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I am usually tenacious in my defense of &#8220;Fair Use&#8221;, the headline caused me to say &#8220;Uh-oh&#8221;. How could scanning entire books be fair use?</p>
<p>However for search purposes in a public research library I can see the benefit clearly, and without general access the scanning makes much more sense.</p>
<p>Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nettdata</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/11/scanning-whole-books-is-fair-u.html#comment-1554792</link>
		<dc:creator>nettdata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=186974#comment-1554792</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on this, Cory?  It&#039;d be interesting to hear from someone who has some skin in this game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on this, Cory?  It&#8217;d be interesting to hear from someone who has some skin in this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
