<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City of Oakland sues to prevent closure of embattled medical marijuana&#160;dispensary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/10/12/city-of-oakland-sues-to-preven.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/12/city-of-oakland-sues-to-preven.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lexica</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/12/city-of-oakland-sues-to-preven.html#comment-1555614</link>
		<dc:creator>Lexica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=187110#comment-1555614</guid>
		<description>The idiocy of Melinda Haag&#039;s argument is remarkable. &quot;They&#039;re so big and doing so much business, they MUST be breaking the law!&quot;

By that reasoning, let&#039;s shut down McDonald&#039;s! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idiocy of Melinda Haag&#8217;s argument is remarkable. &#8220;They&#8217;re so big and doing so much business, they MUST be breaking the law!&#8221;</p>
<p>By that reasoning, let&#8217;s shut down McDonald&#8217;s! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eFarther</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/12/city-of-oakland-sues-to-preven.html#comment-1555474</link>
		<dc:creator>eFarther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=187110#comment-1555474</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with this is that the city has to prove it&#039;s right to have the dispensary. It should be the Fed&#039;s obligation to prove that it doesn&#039;t. Which end of the dog is leading this parade anyway? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with this is that the city has to prove it&#8217;s right to have the dispensary. It should be the Fed&#8217;s obligation to prove that it doesn&#8217;t. Which end of the dog is leading this parade anyway? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
