http://www.lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/9.8?lang=eng

8 But, behold, I say unto you, that you must astudy it out in yourbmind; then you must cask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your dbosom shall eburn within you; therefore, you shall ffeel that it is right.

They say they are anti-abortion but want abortions for their mistresses. They say they are job creators but want to fire big bird. They say they want a small government but create the TSA and Homeland Security. They say they want to reduce the deficit but spend enormous amounts of money on wars. They say they support free markets but bail out banks. They say they want to help the average American but serve the 1% richest. The list goes on.

So it really shouldn’t be surprising that they would say they’ve studied the facts when they obviously haven’t, and would accuse Obama of doing things he hasn’t in fact done.

Mittens is such a hopeless idiot that I’d put $500 on him losing.

Truly, we don’t need to play the race card.

Were you deliberately trying to undermine your own point by using language exclusively associated with racists for the last few decades?

Doesn’t anyone here remember how much Clinton was hated?  No one remembers the constant Limbaugh assaults:  accusing them of complicity with Vince Foster’s suicide, the Whitewater investigation (which came to nothing), and Impeachment over a blowjob?  (Certainly not Clinton’s finest hour, but not an impeachable offense.) 

Sure it doesn’t help that Obama is bi-racial, and he can be cast more easily as the Other by “legitimate” racists (waves to Akin), but the Democrat president and his policies will always be vilified by the Republican opposition front.   It was different some decades ago, but as the Republican party is currently constituted, whatever he is, whatever he does, they will oppose.  It’s what they do.

(Edit: There’s been a lot of overt racism thrown Obama’s way, and I’m not at all saying that hasn’t occurred. I’m just saying in this one instance it’s not in evidence.)

Once on the site, I searched for the Karl Marx one.

Also, I once ‘shopped a Karl Marx pic holding a ukulele.  Thanks to it being in a class room, the prof sitting way back in the back of the class thought it was real… I sadly had to tell him that, no, Marx was not a badass uke player.

Seriously though: she realizes she’s ANTI arguing, right? As in: makes me want LESS of whatever she’s serving up.

This goes double for anyone in a Che t-shirt BTW.

But it might be a LDS thing.

8 But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn within you; therefore, you shall feel that it is right.

doctrines and covenants

Pretty much sums it up.