<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why casual sexism in science&#160;matters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 19:18:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norbert Korzus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1561650</link>
		<dc:creator>Norbert Korzus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1561650</guid>
		<description>The outrage over this is stupid. Single people of both sexes will complain about the lack of attractive people in their everyday lives all the time. I agree sexual harassment is bad but this isn&#039;t even close to than. People want to be surrounded by smart people but they also want to be surrounded by attractive people. How is one good and the other one bad? His argument may be stupid but the outrage is just political correctness and people being oversensitive about it. 
I am very saddened that lately we&#039;ve been conditioning people to be outraged about stuff that never meant to be offensive and that doesn&#039;t suggest a person expressing it lacks respect for you. When my female friends talk about the lack of ripped males (or even hung males) in their vicinity I don&#039;t take offence, nor do I post about it on the internet. Should I? 

Honestly, I think some people have just too much time on their hands and it&#039;s fashionable to be outraged on the internet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The outrage over this is stupid. Single people of both sexes will complain about the lack of attractive people in their everyday lives all the time. I agree sexual harassment is bad but this isn&#8217;t even close to than. People want to be surrounded by smart people but they also want to be surrounded by attractive people. How is one good and the other one bad? His argument may be stupid but the outrage is just political correctness and people being oversensitive about it. <br />
I am very saddened that lately we&#8217;ve been conditioning people to be outraged about stuff that never meant to be offensive and that doesn&#8217;t suggest a person expressing it lacks respect for you. When my female friends talk about the lack of ripped males (or even hung males) in their vicinity I don&#8217;t take offence, nor do I post about it on the internet. Should I? </p>
<p>Honestly, I think some people have just too much time on their hands and it&#8217;s fashionable to be outraged on the internet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissNormaDesmond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1561258</link>
		<dc:creator>MissNormaDesmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1561258</guid>
		<description> And if up were down, falling would be flying.  But it&#039;s not, alas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> And if up were down, falling would be flying.  But it&#8217;s not, alas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MissNormaDesmond</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1561256</link>
		<dc:creator>MissNormaDesmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1561256</guid>
		<description>If that was how you write when you&#039;re taking great care not to appear as an attacker, I&#039;d hate to see you on the attack.  Also, really?  You&#039;re pinning the whole thing on &quot;start to&quot;?  Even after he said he didn&#039;t know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that was how you write when you&#8217;re taking great care not to appear as an attacker, I&#8217;d hate to see you on the attack.  Also, really?  You&#8217;re pinning the whole thing on &#8220;start to&#8221;?  Even after he said he didn&#8217;t know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rattypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1561061</link>
		<dc:creator>rattypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1561061</guid>
		<description> Exactly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Exactly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Madison Brown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1561016</link>
		<dc:creator>Madison Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1561016</guid>
		<description>Since he acted like women should look like supermodels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since he acted like women should look like supermodels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560898</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560898</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...we forget that we are fighting the sum of our evolution to this point.&lt;/blockquote&gt;We&#039;re also fighting it when I don&#039;t murder you for getting on my nerves.  That&#039;s a pathetic excuse, particularly for a university professor.
&lt;blockquote&gt; Should he have to turn off his sexuality because he is at a conference?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Should I have to turn off making cracks about your ass when we work in the same office with you?  Yes.  When you&#039;re in a work setting, you need to shut the fuck up about what your dick wants.
&lt;blockquote&gt;If this were a gay woman who made this comment, would we be just as outraged? If this were a straight woman making the same comment about men, would we be similarly upset?&lt;/blockquote&gt;If you were in an office full of gay men, how would you like to hear about what dogs the straight guys (you) are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;we forget that we are fighting the sum of our evolution to this point.</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re also fighting it when I don&#8217;t murder you for getting on my nerves.  That&#8217;s a pathetic excuse, particularly for a university professor.</p>
<blockquote><p> Should he have to turn off his sexuality because he is at a conference?</p></blockquote>
<p>Should I have to turn off making cracks about your ass when we work in the same office with you?  Yes.  When you&#8217;re in a work setting, you need to shut the fuck up about what your dick wants.</p>
<blockquote><p>If this were a gay woman who made this comment, would we be just as outraged? If this were a straight woman making the same comment about men, would we be similarly upset?</p></blockquote>
<p>If you were in an office full of gay men, how would you like to hear about what dogs the straight guys (you) are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Firmino Martinez</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560833</link>
		<dc:creator>Firmino Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560833</guid>
		<description>Gonna play devil&#039;s advocate here, partially because for me there is a cognitive dissonance on this argument: he did not make any implication regarding the quality of anyone&#039;s work nor the content of anyone&#039;s character. His judgments were purely superficial and made in a personal context. Does that make them right? Not really, they can still be insulting. Does that make them sexist? I don&#039;t think so. It&#039;s an easy line to cross, but if we are calling him out, we should call him out on the right thing.

The other thing to keep in mind is often times when accusations of sexism are made, we forget that we are fighting the sum of our evolution to this point. That doesn&#039;t excuse the infraction, but I think it&#039;s silly to try and deny that this old model exists because it allowed our species to successfully and efficiently perpetuate itself. We now are choosing to hold ourselves to higher, more fair standards, but we can&#039;t forget that this is ingrained in us biologically and culturally for a reason.

Should we fight sexism? Yes. Women should have the same opportunities and encouragement to pursue the life and career of their choosing. Should he have to turn off his sexuality because he is at a conference? Asking him to do so seems to me to be the inverse problem. Thought experiment: If this were a gay woman who made this comment, would we be just as outraged? If this were a straight woman making the same comment about men, would we be similarly upset?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gonna play devil&#8217;s advocate here, partially because for me there is a cognitive dissonance on this argument: he did not make any implication regarding the quality of anyone&#8217;s work nor the content of anyone&#8217;s character. His judgments were purely superficial and made in a personal context. Does that make them right? Not really, they can still be insulting. Does that make them sexist? I don&#8217;t think so. It&#8217;s an easy line to cross, but if we are calling him out, we should call him out on the right thing.</p>
<p>The other thing to keep in mind is often times when accusations of sexism are made, we forget that we are fighting the sum of our evolution to this point. That doesn&#8217;t excuse the infraction, but I think it&#8217;s silly to try and deny that this old model exists because it allowed our species to successfully and efficiently perpetuate itself. We now are choosing to hold ourselves to higher, more fair standards, but we can&#8217;t forget that this is ingrained in us biologically and culturally for a reason.</p>
<p>Should we fight sexism? Yes. Women should have the same opportunities and encouragement to pursue the life and career of their choosing. Should he have to turn off his sexuality because he is at a conference? Asking him to do so seems to me to be the inverse problem. Thought experiment: If this were a gay woman who made this comment, would we be just as outraged? If this were a straight woman making the same comment about men, would we be similarly upset?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560791</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560791</guid>
		<description>I can dream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560720</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560720</guid>
		<description>Does that happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does that happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangedesperado</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560692</link>
		<dc:creator>orangedesperado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560692</guid>
		<description>Haha -- that seems like the logical solution. At that time the only functioning spigot was in the basement and a hose had to be run out a basement window that had security bars on it that had to be unlocked first = pretty hard to do in a hurry as the asshole approached.

But one time the asshole mysteriously fell backwards off the front steps while pestering me, which I think was a brief manifestation of Carrie type powers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha &#8212; that seems like the logical solution. At that time the only functioning spigot was in the basement and a hose had to be run out a basement window that had security bars on it that had to be unlocked first = pretty hard to do in a hurry as the asshole approached.</p>
<p>But one time the asshole mysteriously fell backwards off the front steps while pestering me, which I think was a brief manifestation of Carrie type powers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VyperX</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560674</link>
		<dc:creator>VyperX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560674</guid>
		<description>Funny, as in odd. Because you seem to imply that a masters degree from Duke is as good as a Ph.D. from lesser schools. I&#039;m sure you didn&#039;t mean that but see how easy it is to twist the seemingly innocent?

Also, why do so many like Dario take entropy so goddamned seriously to the point that every crowd must perfectly reflect the world at large?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, as in odd. Because you seem to imply that a masters degree from Duke is as good as a Ph.D. from lesser schools. I&#8217;m sure you didn&#8217;t mean that but see how easy it is to twist the seemingly innocent?</p>
<p>Also, why do so many like Dario take entropy so goddamned seriously to the point that every crowd must perfectly reflect the world at large?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560675</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560675</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you have a hose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you have a hose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560627</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560627</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re a university professor in the field of psychology and you&#039;re still acting out childhood imperatives in the most basic social interactions, you should have your degree revoked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re a university professor in the field of psychology and you&#8217;re still acting out childhood imperatives in the most basic social interactions, you should have your degree revoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: novium</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560564</link>
		<dc:creator>novium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560564</guid>
		<description>I think there also is a certain degree of &quot;putting them in their place&quot; in action with that kind of harassment. It&#039;s a good way to tell someone that their only purpose is as a fuckable object and that nothing else they do will ever be of any consequence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there also is a certain degree of &#8220;putting them in their place&#8221; in action with that kind of harassment. It&#8217;s a good way to tell someone that their only purpose is as a fuckable object and that nothing else they do will ever be of any consequence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tynam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560519</link>
		<dc:creator>Tynam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560519</guid>
		<description>The duelling scar is traditional, sure, but also much rarer than it used to be.  (Over the last few decades it&#039;s become newly traditional to wear protective gear of some kind...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The duelling scar is traditional, sure, but also much rarer than it used to be.  (Over the last few decades it&#8217;s become newly traditional to wear protective gear of some kind&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Laux</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560521</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Laux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560521</guid>
		<description>Presumably, if you could copy someone&#039;s current brainstate, by storing that for two people, and then (somehow... magically?) swapping them so that their brainstate matched your current one and vice versa, then the experience would be of &quot;you&quot; being the other person and vice versa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably, if you could copy someone&#8217;s current brainstate, by storing that for two people, and then (somehow&#8230; magically?) swapping them so that their brainstate matched your current one and vice versa, then the experience would be of &#8220;you&#8221; being the other person and vice versa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Laux</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560511</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Laux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560511</guid>
		<description>In that it was casually made by the speaker, as though there were nothing exception or unusual about the statement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In that it was casually made by the speaker, as though there were nothing exception or unusual about the statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560492</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560492</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t put my leery face on so it should be alright.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t put my leery face on so it should be alright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rattypilgrim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560478</link>
		<dc:creator>rattypilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560478</guid>
		<description> There&#039;s ogling and there&#039;s ogling. Ogle if you must but keep your thoughts to yourself or at least don&#039;t tweet them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> There&#8217;s ogling and there&#8217;s ogling. Ogle if you must but keep your thoughts to yourself or at least don&#8217;t tweet them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missy Pants</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560460</link>
		<dc:creator>Missy Pants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560460</guid>
		<description>BTW - not wanting to have sex with your husband has nothing to do with a lower libido.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW &#8211; not wanting to have sex with your husband has nothing to do with a lower libido.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felton / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560441</link>
		<dc:creator>Felton / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560441</guid>
		<description>I prefer the single &#039;l&#039; myself, but the Wikipedia page I linked uses two, so I went with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer the single &#8216;l&#8217; myself, but the Wikipedia page I linked uses two, so I went with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benenglish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560442</link>
		<dc:creator>benenglish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560442</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m replying to your statement further down the thread, as you have previously done.

To answer your question, it will help me if you&#039;re right.  There&#039;s more to this than simply (1) I&#039;m ugly and (2) Women like handsome men with money.

The older I get, the less important looks become.  I&#039;ve reached an age where women my age are beginning to attach less importance to looks.  As we all get old and lose whatever physical attractiveness we once had, we all lower our standards.  That&#039;s good for me.  The handsome young men who once bested me in any contest for the attention of a woman are now past middle age, developing their outsized paunches, and are on a more-equal-every-day footing with me.  That&#039;s encouraging.

Second, I&#039;m far from rich but I&#039;m financially stable.  Believe it or not, on a couple of occasions in my life, pretty women in dire financial straits have thrown themselves at me simply because I had a steady income and wasn&#039;t one missed paycheck from being homeless.  The observation of that sort of desperation was sobering.  Again, at my age (mid-50s), I&#039;ve begun to achieve something closer to parity on the overall attractiveness scale that women seem to employ.

Finally, my attitude is changing.  Since retirement, I&#039;ve lost a great deal of weight.  Within the next year or so, if this progress continues without too many setbacks, I&#039;ll be thinner and healthier than at any other time in my adult life.  With these changes comes an increase in confidence and a better attitude about just about everything, including my own desirability.

As an aside, I&#039;m not sure why you conclude that I don&#039;t like women much.  In fact, I like them very much.  I&#039;ve been consistently disappointed by them throughout my life; the disconnect between what they say they want (&quot;I just want a nice guy who will treat me well out of sincere love&quot;) and what they actually want (i.e., what they actually sleep with - &quot;bad boys&quot; or just your run-of-the-mill good looking, moneyed jerks who break their hearts without even a twinge of regret) grates on my nerves but I actively work to keep from allowing bitterness to creep into my outlook.

The older I get the better life gets.  I accept I&#039;ll never bang a supermodel but that&#039;s not really the point.  As both I and potential partners age and see enough of life to appreciate the spiritual more than the physical, my chances of finding a lasting relationship improve.

Or, as my dearly departed mother used to say, &quot;Of course you don&#039;t get laid.  You&#039;re a nice guy.  Most women haven&#039;t been crapped on by life enough to appreciate you.  Believe me, once you&#039;re in the retirement home, you&#039;ll have all the tail you want.  It&#039;ll most likely be rolling your way in a procession of wheelchairs, but you&#039;ll have your pick.&quot;

Mom, bless her soul and in case you couldn&#039;t figure it out for yourself, had a wonderful, wicked, scathing sense of humor.  As I get old, though, I begin to realize that she was probably right.  :-)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m replying to your statement further down the thread, as you have previously done.</p>
<p>To answer your question, it will help me if you&#8217;re right.  There&#8217;s more to this than simply (1) I&#8217;m ugly and (2) Women like handsome men with money.</p>
<p>The older I get, the less important looks become.  I&#8217;ve reached an age where women my age are beginning to attach less importance to looks.  As we all get old and lose whatever physical attractiveness we once had, we all lower our standards.  That&#8217;s good for me.  The handsome young men who once bested me in any contest for the attention of a woman are now past middle age, developing their outsized paunches, and are on a more-equal-every-day footing with me.  That&#8217;s encouraging.</p>
<p>Second, I&#8217;m far from rich but I&#8217;m financially stable.  Believe it or not, on a couple of occasions in my life, pretty women in dire financial straits have thrown themselves at me simply because I had a steady income and wasn&#8217;t one missed paycheck from being homeless.  The observation of that sort of desperation was sobering.  Again, at my age (mid-50s), I&#8217;ve begun to achieve something closer to parity on the overall attractiveness scale that women seem to employ.</p>
<p>Finally, my attitude is changing.  Since retirement, I&#8217;ve lost a great deal of weight.  Within the next year or so, if this progress continues without too many setbacks, I&#8217;ll be thinner and healthier than at any other time in my adult life.  With these changes comes an increase in confidence and a better attitude about just about everything, including my own desirability.</p>
<p>As an aside, I&#8217;m not sure why you conclude that I don&#8217;t like women much.  In fact, I like them very much.  I&#8217;ve been consistently disappointed by them throughout my life; the disconnect between what they say they want (&#8220;I just want a nice guy who will treat me well out of sincere love&#8221;) and what they actually want (i.e., what they actually sleep with &#8211; &#8220;bad boys&#8221; or just your run-of-the-mill good looking, moneyed jerks who break their hearts without even a twinge of regret) grates on my nerves but I actively work to keep from allowing bitterness to creep into my outlook.</p>
<p>The older I get the better life gets.  I accept I&#8217;ll never bang a supermodel but that&#8217;s not really the point.  As both I and potential partners age and see enough of life to appreciate the spiritual more than the physical, my chances of finding a lasting relationship improve.</p>
<p>Or, as my dearly departed mother used to say, &#8220;Of course you don&#8217;t get laid.  You&#8217;re a nice guy.  Most women haven&#8217;t been crapped on by life enough to appreciate you.  Believe me, once you&#8217;re in the retirement home, you&#8217;ll have all the tail you want.  It&#8217;ll most likely be rolling your way in a procession of wheelchairs, but you&#8217;ll have your pick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mom, bless her soul and in case you couldn&#8217;t figure it out for yourself, had a wonderful, wicked, scathing sense of humor.  As I get old, though, I begin to realize that she was probably right.  :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inkmatt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560423</link>
		<dc:creator>Inkmatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560423</guid>
		<description>Making her, I suppose, a super bounder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Making her, I suppose, a super bounder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tré</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560400</link>
		<dc:creator>tré</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560400</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, he didn&#039;t say that &quot;he didn&#039;t know whether it&#039;s possible for someone outside a phenomenon to understand it *as well*.&quot; He said, &quot;I don&#039;t know if you can really *start* to understand.&quot; There&#039;s a huge difference. 

I&#039;m not claiming I know what it&#039;s like to have spent a lifetime, from birth to death, as a Western woman. But I am claiming that I can certainly &quot;start to understand,&quot; and go far beyond that start.

As far as venom or empathy goes, I actually took great care not to appear as an attacker; oh well, internet.

From what I can tell, most of your other comments in this string are based on this one misreading of my original comment, so I guess consider this a reply to those, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, he didn&#8217;t say that &#8220;he didn&#8217;t know whether it&#8217;s possible for someone outside a phenomenon to understand it *as well*.&#8221; He said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know if you can really *start* to understand.&#8221; There&#8217;s a huge difference. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not claiming I know what it&#8217;s like to have spent a lifetime, from birth to death, as a Western woman. But I am claiming that I can certainly &#8220;start to understand,&#8221; and go far beyond that start.</p>
<p>As far as venom or empathy goes, I actually took great care not to appear as an attacker; oh well, internet.</p>
<p>From what I can tell, most of your other comments in this string are based on this one misreading of my original comment, so I guess consider this a reply to those, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benenglish</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560392</link>
		<dc:creator>benenglish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560392</guid>
		<description>A useful and sobering reply.  Thanks.  Photography and pistol shooting have been my lifelong hobbies.  Instead of looking for a different hobby where women are present, perhaps I should reexamine those two pursuits with an idea to finding some pocket(s) of feminine participation.  Needle in a haystack, here I come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A useful and sobering reply.  Thanks.  Photography and pistol shooting have been my lifelong hobbies.  Instead of looking for a different hobby where women are present, perhaps I should reexamine those two pursuits with an idea to finding some pocket(s) of feminine participation.  Needle in a haystack, here I come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560385</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560385</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a designer, does that mean I can ogle?  Seriously I want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a designer, does that mean I can ogle?  Seriously I want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OoerictoO</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560383</link>
		<dc:creator>OoerictoO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560383</guid>
		<description>i work in device modeling.  quite a different field. 
but it can be spelled either way, i believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i work in device modeling.  quite a different field.<br />
but it can be spelled either way, i believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560376</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560376</guid>
		<description>I think it depends on context - but I definitely agree that it applies to women all of the time, and men only some of the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on context &#8211; but I definitely agree that it applies to women all of the time, and men only some of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560352</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560352</guid>
		<description>Porn and attractiveness can have little do with one another though.

You could, for example, have a fetish for ugly people.  But by definition you&#039;d need to have a basis of attractive, an awareness of it and probably even an appreciation of it to be able to identify with, and ultimate get off on, the opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porn and attractiveness can have little do with one another though.</p>
<p>You could, for example, have a fetish for ugly people.  But by definition you&#8217;d need to have a basis of attractive, an awareness of it and probably even an appreciation of it to be able to identify with, and ultimate get off on, the opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/10/18/why-casual-sexism-in-science-m.html#comment-1560347</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=188230#comment-1560347</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re only human, we can&#039;t be good at everything!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re only human, we can&#8217;t be good at everything!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
