<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siri vs. Google Voice Search for&#160;iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 20:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: immovableobject</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572752</link>
		<dc:creator>immovableobject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572752</guid>
		<description>In cases where Siri misunderstood a command intended to initiate a system or app level action, you might want to rephrase or speak more clearly.  Perhaps defaulting to web search should be an option.  But I don&#039;t have a problem telling Siri to search the web when that&#039;s what I want.  I&#039;m not sure why this is a big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In cases where Siri misunderstood a command intended to initiate a system or app level action, you might want to rephrase or speak more clearly.  Perhaps defaulting to web search should be an option.  But I don&#8217;t have a problem telling Siri to search the web when that&#8217;s what I want.  I&#8217;m not sure why this is a big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIMWICh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572649</link>
		<dc:creator>JIMWICh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572649</guid>
		<description>I was going to say, &quot;It&#039;s hard to wreck a nice beach.&quot;

But that was before Hurricane Sandy... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say, &#8220;It&#8217;s hard to wreck a nice beach.&#8221;</p>
<p>But that was before Hurricane Sandy&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: madopal</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572630</link>
		<dc:creator>madopal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572630</guid>
		<description>BTW, it doesn&#039;t seem like much of a stretch to have Siri default to &quot;if you don&#039;t know, search the web&quot;.  I mean, if the only option it presents is &quot;I don&#039;t know, do you want me to search the web?&quot;...then what, exactly is the user supposed to do if that&#039;s *not* the desired result?  Aren&#039;t the odds better that someone on the web has tried to search with whatever was said than to make the user restate the request?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW, it doesn&#8217;t seem like much of a stretch to have Siri default to &#8220;if you don&#8217;t know, search the web&#8221;.  I mean, if the only option it presents is &#8220;I don&#8217;t know, do you want me to search the web?&#8221;&#8230;then what, exactly is the user supposed to do if that&#8217;s *not* the desired result?  Aren&#8217;t the odds better that someone on the web has tried to search with whatever was said than to make the user restate the request?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: immovableobject</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572463</link>
		<dc:creator>immovableobject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572463</guid>
		<description>It may well be that Google&#039;s voice recognition is superior to Apple&#039;s, and that if only Apple provided system level hooks for third party apps to access and control other apps and access their data, then Google on the iPhone could do everything Siri does, and perhaps more.

For security reasons, Apple has made the decision to tightly sandbox third party apps. iOS is still not invulnerable, but it should be noted that Android is subject to many more malware exploits than iOS.  This is the tradeoff one makes.

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/102212-trendmicro-android-malware-263542.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It may well be that Google&#8217;s voice recognition is superior to Apple&#8217;s, and that if only Apple provided system level hooks for third party apps to access and control other apps and access their data, then Google on the iPhone could do everything Siri does, and perhaps more.</p>
<p>For security reasons, Apple has made the decision to tightly sandbox third party apps. iOS is still not invulnerable, but it should be noted that Android is subject to many more malware exploits than iOS.  This is the tradeoff one makes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/102212-trendmicro-android-malware-263542.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/news/2012/102212-trendmicro-android-malware-263542.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hibiki</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572340</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hibiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572340</guid>
		<description> I think there&#039;s a lot of Russians working at the Google Now division because it is ridiculously good at understanding bad Russian accents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I think there&#8217;s a lot of Russians working at the Google Now division because it is ridiculously good at understanding bad Russian accents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hibiki</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572338</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hibiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572338</guid>
		<description>Reality has an anti Apple agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reality has an anti Apple agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teapot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572275</link>
		<dc:creator>teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572275</guid>
		<description>You are fighting hard to make your point. If Apple allowed non-apple applications to access the OS features and app functions then this Google app could well beat siri at those tasks too. By making the challenge impossible you cannot then claim that siri is superior because it does stuff that the Google app can&#039;t. The reason the Google voice function cannot operate functions within the OS is because Apple wouldn&#039;t let it - or any other non-apple app for that matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are fighting hard to make your point. If Apple allowed non-apple applications to access the OS features and app functions then this Google app could well beat siri at those tasks too. By making the challenge impossible you cannot then claim that siri is superior because it does stuff that the Google app can&#8217;t. The reason the Google voice function cannot operate functions within the OS is because Apple wouldn&#8217;t let it &#8211; or any other non-apple app for that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teapot</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572264</link>
		<dc:creator>teapot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572264</guid>
		<description>OK.. it&#039;s all a bit more complicated then that but basically there are 3 forces at work which hold up OS updates on Android:

1) Carriers who want you to get a new phone more often because they get a cut of the sale. Holding up OS updates means people get annoyed and buy a new phone.

2) Manufacturers who want the same as carriers because moar! is never enough.

3) Hardware diversity and regional customisation. Because most manufacturers make a Android phones that range in outright price from ~$200 to $800+ there is a great diversity of hardware from crappy to awesome. It is hard to get all hardware profiles to play nice with new OS updates because some of them simply don&#039;t have the guts to run the basic functions of the OS. Same happens for Apple phones: iphone 3s does not get ios6 and iphone 4 doesn&#039;t have siri (if I&#039;m not mistaken). Regional cistomisation also holds up rollout of OS updates internationally because actual laws govern these phone in regards to things like emergency calling numbers and functions.

If you want OS updates fast there is really only two options: Buy a decent phone and run something like cyanogenmod to take control of the phone and install whatever OS version you want. This option has the problem that in the case of some phone brands/models certain core functions of the phone (like bluetooth or wifi) may not always work (which bites). The other option is to get a Nexus series phone - the series which Google guarantees timely updates for, provided the phone can handle the new functions. I personally have a Nexus S which was one of the first (if not the first) phone to get both the ICS update and JB update over-the-air without any tinkering. This phone was released in late 2010.

I am looking to upgrade soon but sadly Google (or LG, I&#039;m not sure who to blame) this week officially announced the Nexus 4, but also announced that the phone is not going to have 4g connectivity (or LTE as Americans refer to it) which is just. plain. stupid. Talk about building redundancy into a device! That mean at present the phone I am considering is the Samsung Galaxy S3 4g (which has JB) but I really wish I was able to just buy a nexus series phone that had 4g.. C&#039;mon LG/Google - &lt;b&gt;make it and just take my damn money!&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK.. it&#8217;s all a bit more complicated then that but basically there are 3 forces at work which hold up OS updates on Android:</p>
<p>1) Carriers who want you to get a new phone more often because they get a cut of the sale. Holding up OS updates means people get annoyed and buy a new phone.</p>
<p>2) Manufacturers who want the same as carriers because moar! is never enough.</p>
<p>3) Hardware diversity and regional customisation. Because most manufacturers make a Android phones that range in outright price from ~$200 to $800+ there is a great diversity of hardware from crappy to awesome. It is hard to get all hardware profiles to play nice with new OS updates because some of them simply don&#8217;t have the guts to run the basic functions of the OS. Same happens for Apple phones: iphone 3s does not get ios6 and iphone 4 doesn&#8217;t have siri (if I&#8217;m not mistaken). Regional cistomisation also holds up rollout of OS updates internationally because actual laws govern these phone in regards to things like emergency calling numbers and functions.</p>
<p>If you want OS updates fast there is really only two options: Buy a decent phone and run something like cyanogenmod to take control of the phone and install whatever OS version you want. This option has the problem that in the case of some phone brands/models certain core functions of the phone (like bluetooth or wifi) may not always work (which bites). The other option is to get a Nexus series phone &#8211; the series which Google guarantees timely updates for, provided the phone can handle the new functions. I personally have a Nexus S which was one of the first (if not the first) phone to get both the ICS update and JB update over-the-air without any tinkering. This phone was released in late 2010.</p>
<p>I am looking to upgrade soon but sadly Google (or LG, I&#8217;m not sure who to blame) this week officially announced the Nexus 4, but also announced that the phone is not going to have 4g connectivity (or LTE as Americans refer to it) which is just. plain. stupid. Talk about building redundancy into a device! That mean at present the phone I am considering is the Samsung Galaxy S3 4g (which has JB) but I really wish I was able to just buy a nexus series phone that had 4g.. C&#8217;mon LG/Google &#8211; <b>make it and just take my damn money!</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572245</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572245</guid>
		<description> and with my Kiwi accent, Siri was unfortunately not sure what &quot;burking Sandy damage Fullhouse&quot; was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> and with my Kiwi accent, Siri was unfortunately not sure what &#8220;burking Sandy damage Fullhouse&#8221; was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: immovableobject</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572207</link>
		<dc:creator>immovableobject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572207</guid>
		<description>This article (and the video) was about a comparison of the Google Search app for the iPhone vs Siri, the iPhone&#039;s system level voice assistant.  The two things are not exactly equivalent, and one wouldn&#039;t expect them to have exactly the same behavior and capabilities.

Now you are talking about comparing system level voice actions on the iPhone compared to that on your HTC.   This is a worthwhile comparison to make, but not really within the scope of this article. But understand that each phone&#039;s voice input capability has its strengths and weakness, and one can bias the competition by choosing precisely which test cases to include. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article (and the video) was about a comparison of the Google Search app for the iPhone vs Siri, the iPhone&#8217;s system level voice assistant.  The two things are not exactly equivalent, and one wouldn&#8217;t expect them to have exactly the same behavior and capabilities.</p>
<p>Now you are talking about comparing system level voice actions on the iPhone compared to that on your HTC.   This is a worthwhile comparison to make, but not really within the scope of this article. But understand that each phone&#8217;s voice input capability has its strengths and weakness, and one can bias the competition by choosing precisely which test cases to include. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572193</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572193</guid>
		<description>While Gaelic is a beautiful language, I only got through the first few Pimsleurs lessons and found no one in Scotland who speaks it in my brief time there, so it might be easier for Americans to learn Scots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Gaelic is a beautiful language, I only got through the first few Pimsleurs lessons and found no one in Scotland who speaks it in my brief time there, so it might be easier for Americans to learn Scots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technicalogical</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572192</link>
		<dc:creator>technicalogical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572192</guid>
		<description>Would you consider it a fair test if both programs had been asked to set an alarm or send a text message, and Google Search failed miserably?
Just tried it on my HTC One S and it worked flawlessly.  Opened my text app, set my alarm, and I was able to call out.  The voice recognition is pretty spot on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you consider it a fair test if both programs had been asked to set an alarm or send a text message, and Google Search failed miserably?<br />
Just tried it on my HTC One S and it worked flawlessly.  Opened my text app, set my alarm, and I was able to call out.  The voice recognition is pretty spot on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572190</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572190</guid>
		<description>Scots or Gaelic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scots or Gaelic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572152</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572152</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny how quickly we hit the flip phone phase that resembled the Star Trek communicators and then cell phone designers realized that the flipping aspect was just a deterrent to easy access. 

The single function device concept was the short-sighted prediction of the future. 

That and our &quot;futuristic&quot; space uniforms don&#039;t involve girls in go-go outfits either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny how quickly we hit the flip phone phase that resembled the Star Trek communicators and then cell phone designers realized that the flipping aspect was just a deterrent to easy access. </p>
<p>The single function device concept was the short-sighted prediction of the future. </p>
<p>That and our &#8220;futuristic&#8221; space uniforms don&#8217;t involve girls in go-go outfits either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sagodjur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572150</link>
		<dc:creator>Sagodjur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572150</guid>
		<description>It would be more entertaining if we Americans would learn to speak Scottish. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be more entertaining if we Americans would learn to speak Scottish. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Carnage</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572136</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Carnage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572136</guid>
		<description> You&#039;re correct. The analysis is being done in the cloud. It uses a massive collection of previous Google searches to determine what search you&#039;re asking for is the most likely. Since these searches comprise up to 230 Billion words (according to c&#124;net ), it&#039;s obviously not going to work locally. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You&#8217;re correct. The analysis is being done in the cloud. It uses a massive collection of previous Google searches to determine what search you&#8217;re asking for is the most likely. Since these searches comprise up to 230 Billion words (according to c|net ), it&#8217;s obviously not going to work locally. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ladyfingers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572065</link>
		<dc:creator>Ladyfingers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572065</guid>
		<description>Google voice commands are pretty thoroughly integrated on Android devices. The only major lack I&#039;ve noted is an inability to search locally stored music files. I&#039;m not sure if this level of integration is purposefully stymied by Apple on iOS, but given their general reticence to allow default associations to be changed, it seems likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google voice commands are pretty thoroughly integrated on Android devices. The only major lack I&#8217;ve noted is an inability to search locally stored music files. I&#8217;m not sure if this level of integration is purposefully stymied by Apple on iOS, but given their general reticence to allow default associations to be changed, it seems likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: switcha</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1572001</link>
		<dc:creator>switcha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1572001</guid>
		<description>Well then, the obvious conclusion ... it&#039;s crap!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, the obvious conclusion &#8230; it&#8217;s crap!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571949</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571949</guid>
		<description>Eleven!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eleven!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571820</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571820</guid>
		<description>Well why the hell don&#039;t you Scottish people learn to speak American?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well why the hell don&#8217;t you Scottish people learn to speak American?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramltfaw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571791</link>
		<dc:creator>ramltfaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571791</guid>
		<description>I got might as soon as it was released. Never ever will I do that again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got might as soon as it was released. Never ever will I do that again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manveruppd</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571785</link>
		<dc:creator>manveruppd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571785</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care which one is fastest, I just want a voice commands implementation that understands my weird accent! :p Ironically, the only one I ever tried that was even close to functional for me was the voice dialling service in my old Nokia 3310, which, instead of using sophisticated voice parsing algorhitms to understand who I was asking it to call, simply made me record MY VOICE saying each contact&#039;s name!

Much more limited in scope, but far more reliable, as now I can&#039;t do anything, as it&#039;s bound to misinterpret one word or another in any command longer than a word or two!

As an aside, I found the voice commands in my HP Pré 3 to be much better at understanding me than Google Voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care which one is fastest, I just want a voice commands implementation that understands my weird accent! :p Ironically, the only one I ever tried that was even close to functional for me was the voice dialling service in my old Nokia 3310, which, instead of using sophisticated voice parsing algorhitms to understand who I was asking it to call, simply made me record MY VOICE saying each contact&#8217;s name!</p>
<p>Much more limited in scope, but far more reliable, as now I can&#8217;t do anything, as it&#8217;s bound to misinterpret one word or another in any command longer than a word or two!</p>
<p>As an aside, I found the voice commands in my HP Pré 3 to be much better at understanding me than Google Voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teirhan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571784</link>
		<dc:creator>Teirhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571784</guid>
		<description> Poor thunderbolt...  We were all sure it&#039;d get ICS before the bionic.  :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Poor thunderbolt&#8230;  We were all sure it&#8217;d get ICS before the bionic.  :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: immovableobject</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571771</link>
		<dc:creator>immovableobject</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571771</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m doubtful. Comments on the cited article share my skepticism.

WIthout access to Google&#039;s server, the app would be nonfunctional regardless of whether text was being parsed locally.  The fact that the app reports a missing internet connection before you start speaking doesn&#039;t prove anything. It is preemptively warning you that speaking your query would be a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m doubtful. Comments on the cited article share my skepticism.</p>
<p>WIthout access to Google&#8217;s server, the app would be nonfunctional regardless of whether text was being parsed locally.  The fact that the app reports a missing internet connection before you start speaking doesn&#8217;t prove anything. It is preemptively warning you that speaking your query would be a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vonbobo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571758</link>
		<dc:creator>vonbobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571758</guid>
		<description>Yeah... that&#039;s the point of the video too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; that&#8217;s the point of the video too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jordan314</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571737</link>
		<dc:creator>jordan314</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571737</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so fast that I initially thought it was parsing the speech locally too; I don&#039;t think it is though. I just tried google voice search in airplane mode and it immediately errorred out and said &quot;no internet connection&quot;. I think it&#039;s just extremely fast at sending each transient to a cloud service, optimizing networking so that it communicates with a farm closest to you, and sending back and displaying and tweaking results in real time. It&#039;s pretty amazing.  
Here&#039;s an article with more info on how it works.
http://waxy.org/2008/11/deconstructing_google_mobiles_voice_search_on_the_iphone/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so fast that I initially thought it was parsing the speech locally too; I don&#8217;t think it is though. I just tried google voice search in airplane mode and it immediately errorred out and said &#8220;no internet connection&#8221;. I think it&#8217;s just extremely fast at sending each transient to a cloud service, optimizing networking so that it communicates with a farm closest to you, and sending back and displaying and tweaking results in real time. It&#8217;s pretty amazing.  <br />
Here&#8217;s an article with more info on how it works.<br />
<a href="http://waxy.org/2008/11/deconstructing_google_mobiles_voice_search_on_the_iphone/" rel="nofollow">http://waxy.org/2008/11/deconstructing_google_mobiles_voice_search_on_the_iphone/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bodhipaksa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571733</link>
		<dc:creator>Bodhipaksa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571733</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m Scottish, so if I search for &quot;Hurricane Sandy Damage Photos&quot; I either get results for &quot;Hurricane Sunday Damage Photos&quot; or &quot;Hurricane, it&#039;s Andy. Damage Photos.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Scottish, so if I search for &#8220;Hurricane Sandy Damage Photos&#8221; I either get results for &#8220;Hurricane Sunday Damage Photos&#8221; or &#8220;Hurricane, it&#8217;s Andy. Damage Photos.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geordie Korper</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571730</link>
		<dc:creator>Geordie Korper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571730</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but I use Siri for sending text messages and setting timers/alarms. I pretty much never use it to search the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but I use Siri for sending text messages and setting timers/alarms. I pretty much never use it to search the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbergen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571683</link>
		<dc:creator>dbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571683</guid>
		<description>Ok then, what was faulty about the video? What did they troll? What grain of salt was there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok then, what was faulty about the video? What did they troll? What grain of salt was there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbergen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/01/siri-vs-google-voice-search-f.html#comment-1571684</link>
		<dc:creator>dbergen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191586#comment-1571684</guid>
		<description>Exactly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
