<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sequencing of barley genome could have implications for home&#160;brewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Vanegas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1573468</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Vanegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1573468</guid>
		<description>Maggie comment is correct that maps are particularly useful. You make a good point that they don&#039;t have one for barley; they have raw sequence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie comment is correct that maps are particularly useful. You make a good point that they don&#8217;t have one for barley; they have raw sequence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Vanegas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1573467</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Vanegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 19:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1573467</guid>
		<description>Interesting sentiment, but completely inconsistent with reality today All the new hops varieties are proprietary.  You can&#039;t get plants of them unless you are a contracted producer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting sentiment, but completely inconsistent with reality today All the new hops varieties are proprietary.  You can&#8217;t get plants of them unless you are a contracted producer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digi_owl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1573198</link>
		<dc:creator>digi_owl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1573198</guid>
		<description>Free beer! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free beer! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Badger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1572906</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Badger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 00:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1572906</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;sequenced the genome of barley...&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;Crop researchers can use genome maps...&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;em&gt;...learning about barley&#039;s genetic code&lt;/em&gt;

No offense Maggie, and you are far from being the only science writer who does this (the linked article itself makes the map/sequence error), but as a genomicist myself it is frustrating how a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_sequencing&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;genome sequence&lt;/a&gt;, a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_mapping&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;genome map&lt;/a&gt;, and a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_code&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;genetic code&lt;/a&gt; get conflated in scientific journalism. They are three completely different things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>sequenced the genome of barley&#8230;</em><br />
<em>Crop researchers can use genome maps&#8230;</em><br />
<em>&#8230;learning about barley&#8217;s genetic code</em></p>
<p>No offense Maggie, and you are far from being the only science writer who does this (the linked article itself makes the map/sequence error), but as a genomicist myself it is frustrating how a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_sequencing" rel="nofollow">genome sequence</a>, a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_mapping" rel="nofollow">genome map</a>, and a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_code" rel="nofollow">genetic code</a> get conflated in scientific journalism. They are three completely different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1572846</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1572846</guid>
		<description>Copyrights, patents, it&#039;s all wrong. The hops must be free to all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Copyrights, patents, it&#8217;s all wrong. The hops must be free to all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phazeaction</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1572842</link>
		<dc:creator>phazeaction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 23:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1572842</guid>
		<description>Nerdulent.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nerdulent.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krystin Norman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1572785</link>
		<dc:creator>Krystin Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1572785</guid>
		<description>I think you meant to refer to patents on biologically engineered organisms, as copyright is not an issue (you might want to look up the differences between patents and copyrights). Patenting has already been done with yeast strains, and plenty of plants such as wheat. Sequencing the genome of an organism does not give you the right to have a patent on it, it just gives you information about the subtle differences between variants of that species, or sub-species.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you meant to refer to patents on biologically engineered organisms, as copyright is not an issue (you might want to look up the differences between patents and copyrights). Patenting has already been done with yeast strains, and plenty of plants such as wheat. Sequencing the genome of an organism does not give you the right to have a patent on it, it just gives you information about the subtle differences between variants of that species, or sub-species.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/02/sequencing-of-barley-genome-co.html#comment-1572775</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=191941#comment-1572775</guid>
		<description>As long as we don&#039;t suddenly have copyright issues with brewing...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as we don&#8217;t suddenly have copyright issues with brewing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
