<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter planning to add annoying photo-filters to compete with Instagram&#039;s annoying&#160;photo-filters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: B E Pratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1574049</link>
		<dc:creator>B E Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1574049</guid>
		<description> &quot;Sepia Sandwich!&quot; Damn, that just sounds downright nasty....[and/or interesting]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221;Sepia Sandwich!&#8221; Damn, that just sounds downright nasty&#8230;.[and/or interesting]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederik</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573693</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 10:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573693</guid>
		<description>It is popular because people like it, allot. Wich is fine, doesn&#039;t bother me personally. It is a shame though that the trend seems to be that a filter is seen as giving a photo personality, rather then what it actually captures.

It&#039;s a personal choice and personal taste, but I think people&#039;s photo&#039;s would end up getting better if they concentrated more on what and how they caputred an image rather then the post processing part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is popular because people like it, allot. Wich is fine, doesn&#8217;t bother me personally. It is a shame though that the trend seems to be that a filter is seen as giving a photo personality, rather then what it actually captures.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a personal choice and personal taste, but I think people&#8217;s photo&#8217;s would end up getting better if they concentrated more on what and how they caputred an image rather then the post processing part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: W Thomas</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573686</link>
		<dc:creator>W Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 09:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573686</guid>
		<description>I imagine an Onion headline like &quot;Forty-somethings In 2050&#039;s Lament Childhood Photos Ruined By Parent&#039;s Trendy Camera-Phone Applications&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine an Onion headline like &#8220;Forty-somethings In 2050&#8242;s Lament Childhood Photos Ruined By Parent&#8217;s Trendy Camera-Phone Applications&#8221;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Ewing</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573625</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573625</guid>
		<description>Am I alone in thinking that some of the instagram effects are decidedly not annoying? I hardly think that instagram was such a big hit because everyone was annoyed by photos that at least seem to have a little more soul than the lifeless digital images that most phone cams are/were capable of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I alone in thinking that some of the instagram effects are decidedly not annoying? I hardly think that instagram was such a big hit because everyone was annoyed by photos that at least seem to have a little more soul than the lifeless digital images that most phone cams are/were capable of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemoutan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573390</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemoutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573390</guid>
		<description>Mmmmm, cuttlefish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmmmm, cuttlefish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vonbobo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573275</link>
		<dc:creator>vonbobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573275</guid>
		<description>Sepia Sandwich!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sepia Sandwich!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tristan eldritch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/03/twitter-planning-to-add-annoyi.html#comment-1573232</link>
		<dc:creator>tristan eldritch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 14:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192028#comment-1573232</guid>
		<description>Instagram contact lenses are the obvious next step.

Death to Instagram, Long live the New Retina!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instagram contact lenses are the obvious next step.</p>
<p>Death to Instagram, Long live the New Retina!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
