<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Puerto Rico sends United States a non-binding friend&#160;request</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Crumpton</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1578308</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Crumpton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1578308</guid>
		<description>I am guessing that the republicans will not be big fans of this plan. The last thing they want is more brown folks that won&#039;t vote for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing that the republicans will not be big fans of this plan. The last thing they want is more brown folks that won&#8217;t vote for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perchecreek</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577761</link>
		<dc:creator>perchecreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577761</guid>
		<description>This sounds like progress, given that our usual tactic is to find some drunk guy in the alley, have him X the treaty, and voila! A new territory! Dress with a little genocide sauce, and pretty soon the land of milk and honey is squirting out little Sara Palins and Homer Simpsons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like progress, given that our usual tactic is to find some drunk guy in the alley, have him X the treaty, and voila! A new territory! Dress with a little genocide sauce, and pretty soon the land of milk and honey is squirting out little Sara Palins and Homer Simpsons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577703</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577703</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the thing.  Without mandatory voting, you can&#039;t tell if it&#039;s protest or apathy.  Unless it&#039;s a really big protest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the thing.  Without mandatory voting, you can&#8217;t tell if it&#8217;s protest or apathy.  Unless it&#8217;s a really big protest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dejoh</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577700</link>
		<dc:creator>dejoh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577700</guid>
		<description>I stand corrected and previously unimformed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I stand corrected and previously unimformed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llazy8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577696</link>
		<dc:creator>llazy8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577696</guid>
		<description>No, I was being sincere.  Here in Argentina, the vote is mandatory, so people not voting is obvious and when it&#039;s precisely the number of people pertaining to one party in a region, it&#039;s really obvious.  But then I got wondering about how they can tell who the &#039;protestadas&quot; are.  Wikipedia says their 2011 population was 3.706.690, so how do they know who&#039;s protesting and who&#039;s just not voting?  Anyone?  Crik crik . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I was being sincere.  Here in Argentina, the vote is mandatory, so people not voting is obvious and when it&#8217;s precisely the number of people pertaining to one party in a region, it&#8217;s really obvious.  But then I got wondering about how they can tell who the &#8216;protestadas&#8221; are.  Wikipedia says their 2011 population was 3.706.690, so how do they know who&#8217;s protesting and who&#8217;s just not voting?  Anyone?  Crik crik . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577688</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577688</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say that it worked, just that it&#039;s a philosophy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say that it worked, just that it&#8217;s a philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llazy8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577660</link>
		<dc:creator>llazy8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577660</guid>
		<description>How does it work in a place where the vote isn&#039;t mandatory? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does it work in a place where the vote isn&#8217;t mandatory? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577528</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577528</guid>
		<description>Can I get reparations too?  If so, I&#039;m in favor; but if not, then not.

On a more serious note, I generally think handouts and bailouts are morally hazardous and I&#039;d rather teach someone to fish than give them a McDonald&#039;s fish sandwich.

Let them be a state!  California&#039;s liable to crack off into the ocean at any moment, so we need a spare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I get reparations too?  If so, I&#8217;m in favor; but if not, then not.</p>
<p>On a more serious note, I generally think handouts and bailouts are morally hazardous and I&#8217;d rather teach someone to fish than give them a McDonald&#8217;s fish sandwich.</p>
<p>Let them be a state!  California&#8217;s liable to crack off into the ocean at any moment, so we need a spare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaymorning</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577457</link>
		<dc:creator>jaymorning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577457</guid>
		<description>cute. also, fck ff.

Puerto Ricans still pay social security and other taxes &#039;In 2009, Puerto Rico paid $3.742 billion into the US Treasury&quot; (Wikipedia)

it&#039;s one of the most dynamic economic centers in the region,  counting on pharma products as one of its main exports.....which are American companies. American pharma is so big and profitable in part because they can develop so many product on the island tax free, employing a highly educated workforce for way less than they would pay on the mainland.

http://www.caribbeanbusinesspr.com/prnt_ed/puerto-rico-exported-$41-billion-imported-$24.5-billion-in-2011-7690.html

Finally, Puerto Ricans have disproportionately served and died in the military (and can&#039;t vote for the Commander-in-Chief). In fact, they only got citizenship in 1917 because the US needed cannon fodder for the war. It still continues to this day, Iraq War as a prime example: http://www.progressive.org/media_898

The US will never be in a bad deal, as long as they get something economic or politically strategic. Both are the case in Puerto Rico. To imply Puerto Ricans are freeloaders and welfare babies is to ignore the 100 year history of the oldest colony in the world, and how we&#039;ve all benefited from it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cute. also, fck ff.</p>
<p>Puerto Ricans still pay social security and other taxes &#8216;In 2009, Puerto Rico paid $3.742 billion into the US Treasury&#8221; (Wikipedia)</p>
<p>it&#8217;s one of the most dynamic economic centers in the region,  counting on pharma products as one of its main exports&#8230;..which are American companies. American pharma is so big and profitable in part because they can develop so many product on the island tax free, employing a highly educated workforce for way less than they would pay on the mainland.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.caribbeanbusinesspr.com/prnt_ed/puerto-rico-exported-$41-billion-imported-$24.5-billion-in-2011-7690.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.caribbeanbusinesspr.com/prnt_ed/puerto-rico-exported-$41-billion-imported-$24.5-billion-in-2011-7690.html</a></p>
<p>Finally, Puerto Ricans have disproportionately served and died in the military (and can&#8217;t vote for the Commander-in-Chief). In fact, they only got citizenship in 1917 because the US needed cannon fodder for the war. It still continues to this day, Iraq War as a prime example: <a href="http://www.progressive.org/media_898" rel="nofollow">http://www.progressive.org/media_898</a></p>
<p>The US will never be in a bad deal, as long as they get something economic or politically strategic. Both are the case in Puerto Rico. To imply Puerto Ricans are freeloaders and welfare babies is to ignore the 100 year history of the oldest colony in the world, and how we&#8217;ve all benefited from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GawainLavers</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577193</link>
		<dc:creator>GawainLavers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577193</guid>
		<description>That would be a wildly ironic state name for the stronghold of the Aryan Nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be a wildly ironic state name for the stronghold of the Aryan Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaye Thompson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1577023</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaye Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1577023</guid>
		<description>We stopped the stripes at 13 because of what they stand for. We keep adding stars for the same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We stopped the stripes at 13 because of what they stand for. We keep adding stars for the same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cdh1971</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576929</link>
		<dc:creator>cdh1971</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 08:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576929</guid>
		<description>How about these then?  Click thumb for the larger version....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about these then?  Click thumb for the larger version&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576902</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 06:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576902</guid>
		<description>Puerto Ricans are not entitled to the full rights of US citizenship, yet Puerto Rico is not allowed to leave the arrangement.  This is &lt;i&gt;mala in se&lt;/i&gt;.  It&#039;s extraordinarily embarrassing for a country that started its own War of Independence over lack of representation with the imperial power.

I&#039;m quite impressed that, as a comparison, you used the District of Columbia, whose population is more that half African-American, largely descended from freed slaves and who, to this day, do not enjoy full Congressional representation.  Your comments about letting them pursue independence without compensation are unfortunate.  The relationship is one of duress.  And as in my previous analogy to women who can manage the household budget but not vote, it seems utterly wrong to tell the woman that she&#039;s free to leave the family home with her personal belongings but will get absolutely nothing from the family bank account.
&lt;blockquote&gt;On July 25, 1898, during the Spanish-American War, Puerto Rico was invaded by the United States with a landing at Guánica. As an outcome of the war, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, along with the Philippines and Guam, that were under Spanish sovereignty, to the U.S. under the Treaty of Paris.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Puerto Rico is a &quot;spoil of war&quot;, specifically of a pre-fabricated war created to increase US naval power.
&lt;blockquote&gt;The Foraker Act of 1900 gave Puerto Rico a certain amount of civilian popular government, including a popularly elected House of Representatives, also a judicial system following the American legal system that includes both state courts and federal courts establishing a Puerto Rico Supreme Court and a United State District Court; and a non-voting member of Congress, by the title of &quot;Resident Commissioner&quot;... As a result of their new U.S. citizenship, many Puerto Ricans were drafted into World War I and all subsequent wars with U.S. participation in which a national military draft was in effect.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Puerto Ricans are subject to the Draft without also being given full Congressional representation.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Some political leaders, like Pedro Albizu Campos who led the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party, demanded change. On March 21, 1937, a march was organized in the southern city of Ponce by the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party. This march turned bloody when the Insular Police, &quot;a force somewhat resembling the National Guard which answered to the U.S.-appointed governor&quot;, opened fire upon unarmed and defenseless cadets and bystanders alike, as reported by a U.S. Congressman Vito Marcantonio and the &quot;Hays Commission&quot; led by Arthur Garfield Hays. Nineteen were killed and over 200 were badly wounded, many in their backs while running away. An American Civil Liberties Union report declared it a massacre and it has since been known as the Ponce Massacre.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Those protesting for independence have been massacred by the US-appointed authorities.
&lt;blockquote&gt;On October 30, 1950, Pedro Albizu Campos and other nationalists led a 3-day revolt against the United States in various cities and towns of Puerto Rico in what is known as the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party Revolts of the 1950s. The most notable occurred in Jayuya and Utuado. In the Jayuya revolt, known as the Jayuya Uprising, the United States declared martial law, and attacked Jayuya with infantry, artillery and bombers. The Utuado Uprising culminated in what is known as the Utuado massacre.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Attempts at independence were once again met by a massacre.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Puerto Rico has a republican form of government, subject to U.S. jurisdiction and sovereignty. Its current powers are all delegated by the United States Congress and lack full protection under the United States Constitution.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Property, not participant.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Constitutionally, Puerto Rico is subject to the Congress&#039;s plenary powers under the territorial clause of Article IV, sec. 3, of the U.S. Constitution.  (In a series of opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States, referred to as the Insular Cases, the Court ruled that territories belonged to, but were not part of the United States. Therefore, under the Territorial clause Congress had the power to determine which parts of the Constitution applied to the territories.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit stated that Congress may unilaterally repeal the Puerto Rican Constitution or the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act and replace them with any rules or regulations of its choice.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization passed resolutions calling on the United States to expedite a process &quot;that would allow Puerto Ricans to fully exercise their inalienable right to self-determination and independence&quot;, and to release all Puerto Rican political prisoners in U.S. prisons, to clean up, decontaminate and return the lands in the islands of Vieques and Culebra to the people of Puerto Rico, to perform a probe into U.S. human rights violations on the island and a probe into the killing by the FBI of pro-independence leader Filiberto Ojeda Rios.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Mostly taken from here, with some digressions to linked subjects:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puerto Ricans are not entitled to the full rights of US citizenship, yet Puerto Rico is not allowed to leave the arrangement.  This is <i>mala in se</i>.  It&#8217;s extraordinarily embarrassing for a country that started its own War of Independence over lack of representation with the imperial power.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite impressed that, as a comparison, you used the District of Columbia, whose population is more that half African-American, largely descended from freed slaves and who, to this day, do not enjoy full Congressional representation.  Your comments about letting them pursue independence without compensation are unfortunate.  The relationship is one of duress.  And as in my previous analogy to women who can manage the household budget but not vote, it seems utterly wrong to tell the woman that she&#8217;s free to leave the family home with her personal belongings but will get absolutely nothing from the family bank account.</p>
<blockquote><p>On July 25, 1898, during the Spanish-American War, Puerto Rico was invaded by the United States with a landing at Guánica. As an outcome of the war, Spain ceded Puerto Rico, along with the Philippines and Guam, that were under Spanish sovereignty, to the U.S. under the Treaty of Paris.</p></blockquote>
<p>Puerto Rico is a &#8220;spoil of war&#8221;, specifically of a pre-fabricated war created to increase US naval power.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Foraker Act of 1900 gave Puerto Rico a certain amount of civilian popular government, including a popularly elected House of Representatives, also a judicial system following the American legal system that includes both state courts and federal courts establishing a Puerto Rico Supreme Court and a United State District Court; and a non-voting member of Congress, by the title of &#8220;Resident Commissioner&#8221;&#8230; As a result of their new U.S. citizenship, many Puerto Ricans were drafted into World War I and all subsequent wars with U.S. participation in which a national military draft was in effect.</p></blockquote>
<p>Puerto Ricans are subject to the Draft without also being given full Congressional representation.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some political leaders, like Pedro Albizu Campos who led the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party, demanded change. On March 21, 1937, a march was organized in the southern city of Ponce by the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party. This march turned bloody when the Insular Police, &#8220;a force somewhat resembling the National Guard which answered to the U.S.-appointed governor&#8221;, opened fire upon unarmed and defenseless cadets and bystanders alike, as reported by a U.S. Congressman Vito Marcantonio and the &#8220;Hays Commission&#8221; led by Arthur Garfield Hays. Nineteen were killed and over 200 were badly wounded, many in their backs while running away. An American Civil Liberties Union report declared it a massacre and it has since been known as the Ponce Massacre.</p></blockquote>
<p>Those protesting for independence have been massacred by the US-appointed authorities.</p>
<blockquote><p>On October 30, 1950, Pedro Albizu Campos and other nationalists led a 3-day revolt against the United States in various cities and towns of Puerto Rico in what is known as the Puerto Rican Nationalist Party Revolts of the 1950s. The most notable occurred in Jayuya and Utuado. In the Jayuya revolt, known as the Jayuya Uprising, the United States declared martial law, and attacked Jayuya with infantry, artillery and bombers. The Utuado Uprising culminated in what is known as the Utuado massacre.</p></blockquote>
<p>Attempts at independence were once again met by a massacre.</p>
<blockquote><p>Puerto Rico has a republican form of government, subject to U.S. jurisdiction and sovereignty. Its current powers are all delegated by the United States Congress and lack full protection under the United States Constitution.</p></blockquote>
<p>Property, not participant.</p>
<blockquote><p>Constitutionally, Puerto Rico is subject to the Congress&#8217;s plenary powers under the territorial clause of Article IV, sec. 3, of the U.S. Constitution.  (In a series of opinions by the Supreme Court of the United States, referred to as the Insular Cases, the Court ruled that territories belonged to, but were not part of the United States. Therefore, under the Territorial clause Congress had the power to determine which parts of the Constitution applied to the territories.)</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit stated that Congress may unilaterally repeal the Puerto Rican Constitution or the Puerto Rican Federal Relations Act and replace them with any rules or regulations of its choice.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>In 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, and 2011 the United Nations Special Committee on Decolonization passed resolutions calling on the United States to expedite a process &#8220;that would allow Puerto Ricans to fully exercise their inalienable right to self-determination and independence&#8221;, and to release all Puerto Rican political prisoners in U.S. prisons, to clean up, decontaminate and return the lands in the islands of Vieques and Culebra to the people of Puerto Rico, to perform a probe into U.S. human rights violations on the island and a probe into the killing by the FBI of pro-independence leader Filiberto Ojeda Rios.</p></blockquote>
<p>Mostly taken from here, with some digressions to linked subjects:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Rico</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ocker3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576884</link>
		<dc:creator>ocker3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576884</guid>
		<description> I see what you did there</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I see what you did there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaronmhill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576840</link>
		<dc:creator>aaronmhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576840</guid>
		<description>Add Puerto Rico as a friend.
Downgrade Texas to just being a follower. They want to secede anyways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add Puerto Rico as a friend.<br />
Downgrade Texas to just being a follower. They want to secede anyways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waetherman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576837</link>
		<dc:creator>waetherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 02:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576837</guid>
		<description>We don&#039;t &quot;own&quot; the people of Puerto Rico and they aren&#039;t slaves. Really, to suggest that they are in need of the same sort of reparations as if they were former slaves or Japanese Americans who were interned during WWII is just offensive to both Puerto Ricans and to former slaves and prisoners. Your comparison to women in the 1800&#039;s is equally inaccurate and offensive. If anything, the status of Puerto Ricans is about the same as residents of DC. It&#039;s not  full status and it&#039;s not right, but it&#039;s not the same as any of the situations you&#039;ve tried to compare it to. I don&#039;t see how you can&#039;t see how distasteful and offensive it is to be saying that kind of thing about Puerto Ricans. 
I&#039;m also particularly frustrated by your attempt to change your original language from &quot;reparations&quot; and imagery of invasion, subjugation, mistreatment and enslavement, to a language of &quot;redress&quot;. This is a weak attempt to avoid owning what you were originally saying and try to avoid the counterargument - it&#039;s the worst kind of sophistry.

I never said I was against &quot;redress&quot; - quite the opposite. I said that I was in favor of correcting the situation by allowing them to become a state if that&#039;s what they want. But I don&#039;t think we need to pay Puerto Ricans reparations if they decide not to become a state and instead pursue independence. That&#039;s the entirety of what I was saying. If you want to change your language again to try to make me look like the one who is &quot;repulsive&quot; you can certainly do so, but you won&#039;t be arguing with me, you&#039;ll just be arguing with yourself. Again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t &#8220;own&#8221; the people of Puerto Rico and they aren&#8217;t slaves. Really, to suggest that they are in need of the same sort of reparations as if they were former slaves or Japanese Americans who were interned during WWII is just offensive to both Puerto Ricans and to former slaves and prisoners. Your comparison to women in the 1800&#8242;s is equally inaccurate and offensive. If anything, the status of Puerto Ricans is about the same as residents of DC. It&#8217;s not  full status and it&#8217;s not right, but it&#8217;s not the same as any of the situations you&#8217;ve tried to compare it to. I don&#8217;t see how you can&#8217;t see how distasteful and offensive it is to be saying that kind of thing about Puerto Ricans. <br />
I&#8217;m also particularly frustrated by your attempt to change your original language from &#8220;reparations&#8221; and imagery of invasion, subjugation, mistreatment and enslavement, to a language of &#8220;redress&#8221;. This is a weak attempt to avoid owning what you were originally saying and try to avoid the counterargument &#8211; it&#8217;s the worst kind of sophistry.</p>
<p>I never said I was against &#8220;redress&#8221; &#8211; quite the opposite. I said that I was in favor of correcting the situation by allowing them to become a state if that&#8217;s what they want. But I don&#8217;t think we need to pay Puerto Ricans reparations if they decide not to become a state and instead pursue independence. That&#8217;s the entirety of what I was saying. If you want to change your language again to try to make me look like the one who is &#8220;repulsive&#8221; you can certainly do so, but you won&#8217;t be arguing with me, you&#8217;ll just be arguing with yourself. Again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576802</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576802</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If it is a colony it is a rare colony that can decide to become part of the colonizing country, choose independence or independence with continued association with the colonizing country.&lt;/blockquote&gt;But it can&#039;t do any of those things.  It just held what is ultimately Barbie&#039;s Fun Poll and has no legal effect whatsoever on what the US decides.

And the verbiage is not mine, it&#039;s the legal definition of the relationship.
&lt;blockquote&gt;However, according to the United States Supreme Court, Puerto Rico is not free or associated; it is only a state in the general sense, not as a state of the Union in the U.S. constitutional sense. According to consistent U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, Puerto Rico belongs to but is not an integral part of the United States. Moreover, the said jurisprudence has determined that regardless of what nominal or cosmetic veneer has moted Puerto Rico&#039;s political status, it is essentially a U.S. colonial territory, since it is under the plenary powers of the U.S. Congress. &lt;b&gt;At its most basic, this Supreme Court doctrine expresses that Puerto Rico is more like property, far from a free-governing community or nation&lt;/b&gt;, and thus &quot;domestic in a foreign sense&quot; (not for the taking or meddling by free foreign nations), but &quot;foreign in a domestic sense&quot; (not a partner or an equal). In the Insular Cases, the Court ruled that the United States Constitution does not automatically apply in Puerto Rico.&lt;/blockquote&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_state_%28government%29#Puerto_Rico</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If it is a colony it is a rare colony that can decide to become part of the colonizing country, choose independence or independence with continued association with the colonizing country.</p></blockquote>
<p>But it can&#8217;t do any of those things.  It just held what is ultimately Barbie&#8217;s Fun Poll and has no legal effect whatsoever on what the US decides.</p>
<p>And the verbiage is not mine, it&#8217;s the legal definition of the relationship.</p>
<blockquote><p>However, according to the United States Supreme Court, Puerto Rico is not free or associated; it is only a state in the general sense, not as a state of the Union in the U.S. constitutional sense. According to consistent U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence, Puerto Rico belongs to but is not an integral part of the United States. Moreover, the said jurisprudence has determined that regardless of what nominal or cosmetic veneer has moted Puerto Rico&#8217;s political status, it is essentially a U.S. colonial territory, since it is under the plenary powers of the U.S. Congress. <b>At its most basic, this Supreme Court doctrine expresses that Puerto Rico is more like property, far from a free-governing community or nation</b>, and thus &#8220;domestic in a foreign sense&#8221; (not for the taking or meddling by free foreign nations), but &#8220;foreign in a domestic sense&#8221; (not a partner or an equal). In the Insular Cases, the Court ruled that the United States Constitution does not automatically apply in Puerto Rico.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_state_%28government%29#Puerto_Rico" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_state_%28government%29#Puerto_Rico</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $19428857</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576799</link>
		<dc:creator>$19428857</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576799</guid>
		<description>IIf it is a colony it is a rare colony that can decide to become part of the colonizing country, choose independence or independence with continued association with the colonizing country. It&#039;s not like a &quot;classic&quot; colony such as European colonies in Africa. It&#039;s a self-governing incorporated territory. There is no governor general or Federally appointed overlord. There has been no effort to replace the indigenous population with settlers from the colonizing power (Spain did that, though). More like a &quot;lite&quot; colony. Plus &quot;&#039;Belongs to but is not part of&quot;&#039; the US&quot; is an odd locution to me. Does Hennepin County, Minnesota, &quot;belong&quot; to the US? Mostly Puerto Rico &quot;belongs&quot; to the people who live there and are the local property owners, who are all US citizens (and Puerto Ricans at the same time)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIf it is a colony it is a rare colony that can decide to become part of the colonizing country, choose independence or independence with continued association with the colonizing country. It&#8217;s not like a &#8220;classic&#8221; colony such as European colonies in Africa. It&#8217;s a self-governing incorporated territory. There is no governor general or Federally appointed overlord. There has been no effort to replace the indigenous population with settlers from the colonizing power (Spain did that, though). More like a &#8220;lite&#8221; colony. Plus &#8220;&#8216;Belongs to but is not part of&#8221;&#8216; the US&#8221; is an odd locution to me. Does Hennepin County, Minnesota, &#8220;belong&#8221; to the US? Mostly Puerto Rico &#8220;belongs&#8221; to the people who live there and are the local property owners, who are all US citizens (and Puerto Ricans at the same time)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsthebus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576793</link>
		<dc:creator>itsthebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576793</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t aware Columbia, Maryland was known for its coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t aware Columbia, Maryland was known for its coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: $19428857</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576779</link>
		<dc:creator>$19428857</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576779</guid>
		<description> No picking on North Carolina. Its a truly purple state and keeps getting bluer all the time (not that you can tell from our legislature and new lipless governor). The state is has always been Black enough and now increasingly Hispanic to be a full time Blue state. The major metro areas are always reliably progressive Democratic and we have one of the few truly vibrant Democratic parties left in the South. Personally, if we have to do a swap, I vote for solid red yet lily white Utah. If it has to be a Carolina, there is another choice just below us. Never can go to SC w/o witnessing an act of gratuitous racism. Every converstion I had there seems to come around the &quot;the War&quot; (Civil) and &quot;all them lazy nigras&quot;. Hell, they seceded once already, but there are a lot of really nice, REALLY long suffering African-American folks  there who don&#039;t deserve to get booted out with the the white morons of South Carolina. Utah for Puerto Rico just works better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No picking on North Carolina. Its a truly purple state and keeps getting bluer all the time (not that you can tell from our legislature and new lipless governor). The state is has always been Black enough and now increasingly Hispanic to be a full time Blue state. The major metro areas are always reliably progressive Democratic and we have one of the few truly vibrant Democratic parties left in the South. Personally, if we have to do a swap, I vote for solid red yet lily white Utah. If it has to be a Carolina, there is another choice just below us. Never can go to SC w/o witnessing an act of gratuitous racism. Every converstion I had there seems to come around the &#8220;the War&#8221; (Civil) and &#8220;all them lazy nigras&#8221;. Hell, they seceded once already, but there are a lot of really nice, REALLY long suffering African-American folks  there who don&#8217;t deserve to get booted out with the the white morons of South Carolina. Utah for Puerto Rico just works better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576776</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576776</guid>
		<description>We own them, and yet they don&#039;t get to participate in the government of the US like the citizens of the 50 states.  They get to &quot;self-govern&quot; as long as we agree with their decisions.  Their situation is comparable to that of pre-suffrage women who got a weekly allowance to run the household but weren&#039;t allowed the vote.  What part of that isn&#039;t repulsive to you and deserving of redress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We own them, and yet they don&#8217;t get to participate in the government of the US like the citizens of the 50 states.  They get to &#8220;self-govern&#8221; as long as we agree with their decisions.  Their situation is comparable to that of pre-suffrage women who got a weekly allowance to run the household but weren&#8217;t allowed the vote.  What part of that isn&#8217;t repulsive to you and deserving of redress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576756</link>
		<dc:creator>heph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576756</guid>
		<description>Wasnt New york before the renaming &quot;New Amsterdam&quot;? 

Well if the New Yorkers get that Canabis legalisation too i think they have all right to go back to the old Name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasnt New york before the renaming &#8220;New Amsterdam&#8221;? </p>
<p>Well if the New Yorkers get that Canabis legalisation too i think they have all right to go back to the old Name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerplatanoides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576722</link>
		<dc:creator>acerplatanoides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576722</guid>
		<description>Just add PR to Florida. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just add PR to Florida. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576712</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576712</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s already a national anthem.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Borinque%C3%B1a#Original_1868_revolutionary_version_by_Lola_Rodr.C3.ADguez_de_Ti.C3.B3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOKUUqE08cY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already a national anthem.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Borinque%C3%B1a#Original_1868_revolutionary_version_by_Lola_Rodr.C3.ADguez_de_Ti.C3.B3" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_Borinque%C3%B1a#Original_1868_revolutionary_version_by_Lola_Rodr.C3.ADguez_de_Ti.C3.B3</a><br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOKUUqE08cY" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOKUUqE08cY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: niktemadur</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576710</link>
		<dc:creator>niktemadur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576710</guid>
		<description>Ah!  Much like Mexican singer Emmanuel co-opting Lucio Dalla&#039;s &quot;Tutta la vita&quot;.

But as a state anthem, &quot;Claridad&quot; sounds like a much better idea than &quot;Súbete a mi moto&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!  Much like Mexican singer Emmanuel co-opting Lucio Dalla&#8217;s &#8220;Tutta la vita&#8221;.</p>
<p>But as a state anthem, &#8220;Claridad&#8221; sounds like a much better idea than &#8220;Súbete a mi moto&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChicagoD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576696</link>
		<dc:creator>ChicagoD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576696</guid>
		<description>That&#039;d be a better point if it were true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d be a better point if it were true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerplatanoides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576691</link>
		<dc:creator>acerplatanoides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576691</guid>
		<description> and similarly, using the same evidence, there isn&#039;t a clear desire to not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> and similarly, using the same evidence, there isn&#8217;t a clear desire to not. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waetherman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576675</link>
		<dc:creator>waetherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576675</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s distasteful is to imply that Puerto Ricans are slaves who ought to be paid 40 acres and a mule. Puerto Ricans aren&#039;t &quot;subjugated&quot; and they don&#039;t deserve &quot;reparations&quot; what they deserve is full admission and participation in our democracy. And if they choose not to participate, they should be allowed to go on their own way as they choose. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s distasteful is to imply that Puerto Ricans are slaves who ought to be paid 40 acres and a mule. Puerto Ricans aren&#8217;t &#8220;subjugated&#8221; and they don&#8217;t deserve &#8220;reparations&#8221; what they deserve is full admission and participation in our democracy. And if they choose not to participate, they should be allowed to go on their own way as they choose. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576664</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576664</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a colony.  &quot;Belongs to but is not part of&quot; the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a colony.  &#8220;Belongs to but is not part of&#8221; the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/07/puerto-rico-sends-united-state.html#comment-1576662</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=192670#comment-1576662</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I&#039;m with you, though I don&#039;t see why we need to give anyone a parting gift.&lt;/blockquote&gt;You don&#039;t see why we owe reparations to a country that we conquered and subjugated?  How distasteful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m with you, though I don&#8217;t see why we need to give anyone a parting gift.</p></blockquote>
<p>You don&#8217;t see why we owe reparations to a country that we conquered and subjugated?  How distasteful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
