Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

Canadian Supreme Court puts Viagra in the public domain because Pfizer wouldn't disclose enough of its workings

Cory Doctorow at 8:57 am Fri, Nov 9, 2012

— FEATURED —

THE LATEST

Guatemala: Nation's highest court throws out Ríos Montt genocide trial verdict and prison sentence

Feature

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

Book Review

The Twelve-Fingered Boy - mesmerizing YA horror novel

Book Review

Black Code: how spies, cops and crims are making cyberspace unfit for human habitation

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Michael Geist sez,

The Supreme Court of Canada this morning shocked the pharmaceutical industry by voiding Pfizer's patent in Canada for Viagra. The unanimous decision provides a strong reaffirmation of the policy behind patent law, namely that patents represent a quid pro quo bargain of public disclosure of inventions in return for a time limited monopoly in the invention. The Supreme Court describes it in this way:

"The patent system is based on a "bargain", or quid pro quo: the inventor is granted exclusive rights in a new and useful invention for a limited period in exchange for disclosure of the invention so that society can benefit from this knowledge. This is the basic policy rationale underlying the Act. The patent bargain encourages innovation and advances science and technology."

Canadian Supreme Court Voids Viagra Patent as Insufficient Disclosure Means It Fails the "Patent Bargain" (Thanks, Michael!)

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  canada • Copyfight • health • law • pharma • Sex

More at Boing Boing

Eurovision 2013: An American in London

The technology that links taxonomy and Star Trek

  • http://twitter.com/dantobias dantobias

    Spammers will love that…

    • rafterman

      viagra are boner pills

      • dbergen

        Correct.

  • NoOneSpecific

    That ruling got me excited! 

  • Souse

    I guess Pfizer is taking this a bit hard…

    • Antinous / Moderator

      No doubt, they’ll take a firm legal stand against it.

      • scatterfingers

        As wood I.

  • http://ae4rv.com/ royaltrux

    I ordered some online from a Canadian pharmacy and got stiffed.

    • PhosPhorious

       So. . . a satisfied customer then?

  • Trevor Perry

    Open source erections?

    • http://ae4rv.com/ royaltrux

       Free as in beer?

      • rrh

         Free as in Willy.

  • voiceinthedistance

    Justice rises again.

  • t3kna2007

    The Justices were all pointing in the same direction on this one.

  • Pete Anderson

    And, suddenly, scores of middle-aged Republican Congressmen reverse their fervent opposition to re-importing drugs from Canada.

  • Snig

    These issues often arise when someone gets rubbed the wrong way.

  • Snig

    “Supreme court hardens stance as Pfizer veils its secret and plays hard to get”
    or
    “Pfizer insists it’s sitting on a precious secret, Court makes it cheap and easily had” 

  • derek prowse

     Dont fuck with our boners.  er, lemme rephrase… 

  • Jeremy Pickett

    these are some pretty soft phallus puns.  honestly, i feel shafted.

  • nox

    The court ruling is very interesting. Pfizer patented several compounds in the same filing, but neglected to mention which one actually worked. 

    This obfuscated the actual invention and would’ve prevented an expert from reproducing the results without trial and experimentation, thus breaking the requirement for disclosure.

    Justice served thanks to a competing wealthy pharma company that thinks all the costs and effort required in this legal battle are worth getting a generic version to the market a couple years early.

  • Robert Cruickshank

    No doubt there are some lawyers feeling very cocky this morning. 

  • Felton / Moderator

    If puns last for more than four hours, consult your physician.

    • PathosBill

       Punapism?

  • http://burntheflag.ca Jardine

    How long until we start seeing studies and news stories that Viagra has some statistically small, but still unacceptable level of danger to it? A small risk of heart attacks or something. Then it’ll be pulled off the market (along with the generic version) and Pfizer will just happen to release a new, slightly different drug that is similar to Viagra, but different enough to get a new patent and not have the same unacceptable risk of whatever side effect Viagra now has.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trent-Baker/100000123865597 Trent Baker

       Of course there are risks associated with viagra, any first year biology major, such as myself, can tell you that messing about with your blood pressure can have consequences. Which I believe is what active ingredient in Viagra is doing.

    • heph

      The correct answer is: Negative 5 years or so. Viagra has indeed some already documented side effects and uses outside of giving you a boner and its highly recommended that you dont take it of you had any pre-existing heart problems.

  • http://dailygrail.com/ Red Pill Junkie

    Ole ‘One Eye’ salutes you, Canada!!

    http://dontloseyourdayjob.com/wp-content/uploads/Big-Boss-Salute-440×249.jpg

  • http://profiles.google.com/spacewatcer Marios P.

    i wonder how will Pfizer fight that ruling. I do not think they will accept it like that perhaps pulling viagra of canada?

    • http://twitter.com/mjlonsda Matt L

      Well, the SCC is the highest court in Canada, so there’s nowhere for them to appeal to. And they could pull Viagra in Canada if they wanted to, but that wouldn’t stop companies from producing generic versions of the drug and selling it in Canada.

      The patent was due to expire in 2014 anyways. I suspect Pfizer is more worried about the precedent this might set for future patent applications and their ability to game the system than they are about losing 1.5 years worth of a monopoly in a country that probably only represents a very small portion of their market internationally. 

    • Stuart Reichler

      Pfizer can pull out if they want, but it won’t do them any good now.

    • http://weirdly.net Jacob Ewing

      Unlike countries, which generally behave like temperamental brats, corporations tend to behave like cold psychopaths.  I’m sure Pfizer would realize that *ahem* “pulling out” of Canada would cost them money and gain them nothing, and decide like a good little psycho to stay keep pushing drugs.

    • DevinC

      They can do that, but it’s too little too late.  Someone is just going to make a generic.  

      • DevinC

        @DevinC: Please actually read the article linked to before you post.  Yours truly, your brain (the big one, not the little one.)

  • http://weirdly.net Jacob Ewing

    WHat!!?!?!   A company is being stopped from abusing the patent system!?  Next week we’ll see flying pigs and and the four horsemen.

  • DevinC

    When I read this I was so excited by my Supreme Court’s commitment to intellectual freedom that I ripped my shirt off and started running around the cafe I’m in screaming YEAAAH VIAGRAAA!!!1!  (Yes, I screamed “!!!1!”; it’s a skill I have.)  People are now all looking at the middle-aged man jumping on tables yelling about erectile dysfunction medication but they’re all just jelling on me.  

    And now this team of bright young men in blue uniforms say they want to introduce me to another nice drug called “thorazine”.

  • Frank W

    A judge who remembers what the original excuse for patent law was again. Indeed, strange things come to pass. 

  • Boris Bartlog

    That’s great news. Not so much because of what small effect it might have on the availability of Viagra in Canada, but because it should serve as a nice warning to all those who deliberately write shitty obfuscated patents. I’ve read a fair number of patents in the area of chemistry, and the difference between those of eighty or a hundred years ago and those filed forty years ago or less is dramatic. Modern patents aren’t quite gibberish, but they sure aren’t written with any intention of helping the reader implement the idea in question.

  • scatterfingers

    EXTRA EXTRA – Price of artificial wood falls dramatically in Canada…

    • elix

      Softwood lumber disputes indeed…

  • Thorzdad

    Worldwide, the country-by-country patents on Viagra are starting to expire and Pfizer is scrambling. Brazilian patents expired in 2010. US patents were supposed to expire this year, but Pfizer won a court case when Teva jumped the gun and tried to bring a generic into the US. The result of the case is Pfizer’s US patent may be extended through 2019.

  • F Lengyel

    These comments are swell!

  • http://twitter.com/KarlieMildraed KarlieMildraed

    It took me longer than four hours to read all this.