<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Precisely why the Daily Mail is irredeemable&#160;shit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 10:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1581123</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1581123</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI

the best</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eBT6OSr1TI</a></p>
<p>the best</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1581076</link>
		<dc:creator>wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1581076</guid>
		<description>That has always been the case. The threat of changing political allegiances is what proprietors and editors use to keep politicians in line. Many readers buy a tabloid because of its sport coverage, its horoscope, page three or its women&#039;s pages. Loyal readers mostly will not be consciously swayed by any particular stance on news items. When they feel that a paper has gone too far they can boycott it viz. The Sun post Hillsborough in Liverpool. There is hope, yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That has always been the case. The threat of changing political allegiances is what proprietors and editors use to keep politicians in line. Many readers buy a tabloid because of its sport coverage, its horoscope, page three or its women&#8217;s pages. Loyal readers mostly will not be consciously swayed by any particular stance on news items. When they feel that a paper has gone too far they can boycott it viz. The Sun post Hillsborough in Liverpool. There is hope, yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580740</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580740</guid>
		<description>Contrary to popular belief, the Mail is not consistently right wing.  They&#039;ll print whatever sells.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contrary to popular belief, the Mail is not consistently right wing.  They&#8217;ll print whatever sells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webstu</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580537</link>
		<dc:creator>webstu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580537</guid>
		<description>Advertising-supported mass media, in general, promotes fear, because advertisers are offering &quot;solutions&quot; to the fears in your life. 

Take the evening news, a horrid reality show, or a &quot;Woman in Jeopardy&quot; movie -- yes, that is an actual genre (e.g., the entire Lifetime channel) -- and break it up with a few dozen commercials for anxiety medications... Ka-ching.

As it turns out, it works well for any advertising and in any media as well, including newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advertising-supported mass media, in general, promotes fear, because advertisers are offering &#8220;solutions&#8221; to the fears in your life. </p>
<p>Take the evening news, a horrid reality show, or a &#8220;Woman in Jeopardy&#8221; movie &#8212; yes, that is an actual genre (e.g., the entire Lifetime channel) &#8212; and break it up with a few dozen commercials for anxiety medications&#8230; Ka-ching.</p>
<p>As it turns out, it works well for any advertising and in any media as well, including newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Petty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580469</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Petty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580469</guid>
		<description>The Express. My parents used to read it when it was a broadsheet called The Daily Express. I don&#039;t know if it was crap then, but it certainly is now.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Express. My parents used to read it when it was a broadsheet called The Daily Express. I don&#8217;t know if it was crap then, but it certainly is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580446</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580446</guid>
		<description>Thanks to your link I now know that narwhals stop Cthulhu from eating me!  Lost an hour in Weebl&#039;s vids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to your link I now know that narwhals stop Cthulhu from eating me!  Lost an hour in Weebl&#8217;s vids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580348</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580348</guid>
		<description>In all honesty I don&#039;t know how bad the Mail is, but I&#039;m well aware of how absolutely dodgy both ACA and Today Tonight are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all honesty I don&#8217;t know how bad the Mail is, but I&#8217;m well aware of how absolutely dodgy both ACA and Today Tonight are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sparg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580341</link>
		<dc:creator>Sparg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580341</guid>
		<description>My favorite paper for laughs in the States is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://weeklyworldnews.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Weekly World News&lt;/a&gt;.  Best source for &quot;news&quot; of the Bat Boy, invading Grays, and superfat babies.  Fine reading for happy mutants everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite paper for laughs in the States is the <a href="http://weeklyworldnews.com" rel="nofollow">Weekly World News</a>.  Best source for &#8220;news&#8221; of the Bat Boy, invading Grays, and superfat babies.  Fine reading for happy mutants everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kringlebertfistyebuns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1580319</link>
		<dc:creator>kringlebertfistyebuns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1580319</guid>
		<description>Thanks to the Internet, one need not ever read a physical copy of the Daily Mail, or ever step foot in the UK to experience its pernicious effects.

In the US, for example, the Daily Mail is sometimes promoted by conservatives as a reliable source of information about social and political topics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to the Internet, one need not ever read a physical copy of the Daily Mail, or ever step foot in the UK to experience its pernicious effects.</p>
<p>In the US, for example, the Daily Mail is sometimes promoted by conservatives as a reliable source of information about social and political topics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eviladrian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579846</link>
		<dc:creator>eviladrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 23:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579846</guid>
		<description> Oh gawd, I had to watch the Chaser Affair reel to wash my brain out after that one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHso1e6NY90</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Oh gawd, I had to watch the Chaser Affair reel to wash my brain out after that one: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHso1e6NY90" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHso1e6NY90</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579804</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579804</guid>
		<description>How is a description of one&#039;s own specific personal experiences &#039;generalization&#039;?  Are we supposed to pretend that people everywhere are morally and politically fungible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is a description of one&#8217;s own specific personal experiences &#8216;generalization&#8217;?  Are we supposed to pretend that people everywhere are morally and politically fungible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579803</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579803</guid>
		<description>Behold Paul Dacre, the human nutcracker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold Paul Dacre, the human nutcracker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DewiMorgan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579777</link>
		<dc:creator>DewiMorgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579777</guid>
		<description>Probably since I&#039;ve not read it since the 80&#039;s, I thought the Mail was on a par with, say, the Mirror, and above the Sun and the Sport (which are basically comics for simple adults, but with poorer graphics). It&#039;s a tabloid, so it&#039;s 50% hype, 50% racism, 50% illicit sex, and 50% celebrities (with considerable overlap).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably since I&#8217;ve not read it since the 80&#8242;s, I thought the Mail was on a par with, say, the Mirror, and above the Sun and the Sport (which are basically comics for simple adults, but with poorer graphics). It&#8217;s a tabloid, so it&#8217;s 50% hype, 50% racism, 50% illicit sex, and 50% celebrities (with considerable overlap).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackPanda</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579711</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579711</guid>
		<description>GAY PIGEON AIDS STOLE MY BABY FROM POLISH CANNABIS HELL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GAY PIGEON AIDS STOLE MY BABY FROM POLISH CANNABIS HELL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCowboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579622</link>
		<dc:creator>iCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579622</guid>
		<description>And the Mail is already using it to beat up Leveson demanding that they are not regulated but the BBC should be (from toady&#039;s MoS):
&quot;We must be careful here to ensure that politicians do not gain power over the BBC. It is vital it remains independent of government. But some way should be found of giving the public – who pay for it – more of a say in its governance.It is striking that, as Lord Justice Leveson is expected to recommend statutory regulation of newspapers, there is still no plan to create an effective external watchdog for the BBC, a body that has been needed for many years.  Newspapers are commercially independent. The BBC is financed by a national poll tax enforced by the threat of prison. Newspapers are varied and competitive. The BBC is a national monopoly whose rivals are far smaller and weaker.Surely – especially now it has shown it can and does sometimes behave more irresponsibly than the most raucous newspaper – there is a far stronger case for BBC regulation than for placing legal chains on the press?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the Mail is already using it to beat up Leveson demanding that they are not regulated but the BBC should be (from toady&#8217;s MoS):<br />
&#8220;We must be careful here to ensure that politicians do not gain power over the BBC. It is vital it remains independent of government. But some way should be found of giving the public – who pay for it – more of a say in its governance.It is striking that, as Lord Justice Leveson is expected to recommend statutory regulation of newspapers, there is still no plan to create an effective external watchdog for the BBC, a body that has been needed for many years.  Newspapers are commercially independent. The BBC is financed by a national poll tax enforced by the threat of prison. Newspapers are varied and competitive. The BBC is a national monopoly whose rivals are far smaller and weaker.Surely – especially now it has shown it can and does sometimes behave more irresponsibly than the most raucous newspaper – there is a far stronger case for BBC regulation than for placing legal chains on the press?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCowboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579621</link>
		<dc:creator>iCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579621</guid>
		<description>&#039;thank you! not living anywhere near the UK i may never see a copy of the daily mail&#039;

Distressingly British Airways hand out copies of the Mail to passengers on their flights. I imagine thousands of passengers, trapped in their seats think they&#039;re being taken to a country filled with neo Nazi long-lens photographers taking photos of children so that they can ward off gay muslim atheist disabled immigrants who have created a cancer solely to crash house prices in order that the BBC can rule over us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;thank you! not living anywhere near the UK i may never see a copy of the daily mail&#8217;</p>
<p>Distressingly British Airways hand out copies of the Mail to passengers on their flights. I imagine thousands of passengers, trapped in their seats think they&#8217;re being taken to a country filled with neo Nazi long-lens photographers taking photos of children so that they can ward off gay muslim atheist disabled immigrants who have created a cancer solely to crash house prices in order that the BBC can rule over us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCowboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579620</link>
		<dc:creator>iCowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579620</guid>
		<description>Their website is incredibly cleverly laid out. 
Scandal and sleaze on the lefthand side of the page, slappers on the right. So you can follow the relentless march of cellulite through Hollywood and the terminally sagging breasts of your favourite micro celebrities whilst the main article is kindly informing you that Twitter causes cancer.

And dare I say it that the Mail isn&#039;t actually worst paper in Britain. For that you&#039;d need to go to the Express. Unlike the Mail which carefully codes its language and relies on insinuation to whip up hatred, the Express is nakedly racist. My parents read the Express and I was shocked how they began to perceive the world through that prism - the EU was destroying Britain, Muslims hated our country, everyone on benefits was a scrounged. So I bought them an annual subscription to the i and they&#039;re nearly back to normal and now realise what a horrible worldview they&#039;d been exposed to.

It wouldn&#039;t surprise you to know that the Mail is determined that Lord Leveson doesn&#039;t impose statutory regulation on the press. For that reason alone, it has to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their website is incredibly cleverly laid out. <br />
Scandal and sleaze on the lefthand side of the page, slappers on the right. So you can follow the relentless march of cellulite through Hollywood and the terminally sagging breasts of your favourite micro celebrities whilst the main article is kindly informing you that Twitter causes cancer.</p>
<p>And dare I say it that the Mail isn&#8217;t actually worst paper in Britain. For that you&#8217;d need to go to the Express. Unlike the Mail which carefully codes its language and relies on insinuation to whip up hatred, the Express is nakedly racist. My parents read the Express and I was shocked how they began to perceive the world through that prism &#8211; the EU was destroying Britain, Muslims hated our country, everyone on benefits was a scrounged. So I bought them an annual subscription to the i and they&#8217;re nearly back to normal and now realise what a horrible worldview they&#8217;d been exposed to.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t surprise you to know that the Mail is determined that Lord Leveson doesn&#8217;t impose statutory regulation on the press. For that reason alone, it has to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Girard</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579605</link>
		<dc:creator>Girard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 13:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579605</guid>
		<description> When the punchline lands, it makes it clear what he&#039;s doing. However, the way he keeps smacking his lips during that whole opening discussion doesn&#039;t really do much to alleviate the &#039;skeeve&#039; factor even when you know what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> When the punchline lands, it makes it clear what he&#8217;s doing. However, the way he keeps smacking his lips during that whole opening discussion doesn&#8217;t really do much to alleviate the &#8216;skeeve&#8217; factor even when you know what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Coleby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579598</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Coleby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579598</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s some nice Daily Mail style generalisation there, fancy a job in journalism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some nice Daily Mail style generalisation there, fancy a job in journalism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Coleby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579595</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Coleby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579595</guid>
		<description>Spot on. The Bild, much like The Sun, is generally laughable rather than simply evil. The Hillsborough affair excepted of course...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on. The Bild, much like The Sun, is generally laughable rather than simply evil. The Hillsborough affair excepted of course&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Coleby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579593</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Coleby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579593</guid>
		<description>Yes but in the case of the Daily Mail, the single filter that all this has to go through is the editor. Imagining that there is a single malevolent curator of shite and hatred behind all of modern television rather than a general lowering of standards is not the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes but in the case of the Daily Mail, the single filter that all this has to go through is the editor. Imagining that there is a single malevolent curator of shite and hatred behind all of modern television rather than a general lowering of standards is not the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gehringer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579588</link>
		<dc:creator>gehringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579588</guid>
		<description> &quot;This internet pervert&#039;s been taking horrible upskirt photos!  Here, have a look at how horrible they are!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> &#8221;This internet pervert&#8217;s been taking horrible upskirt photos!  Here, have a look at how horrible they are!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: knoxblox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579586</link>
		<dc:creator>knoxblox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579586</guid>
		<description> Side note: As for the subject of this news blurb, I think this would be one of the benefits of living in the UK and partaking of the wonderful/hateful thing called The BBC.

They get badgers, we get Whitney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Side note: As for the subject of this news blurb, I think this would be one of the benefits of living in the UK and partaking of the wonderful/hateful thing called The BBC.</p>
<p>They get badgers, we get Whitney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579566</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579566</guid>
		<description>Badgers on Shrooms have a wild ride on a stolen snake... film at 11....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIyixC9NsLI</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Badgers on Shrooms have a wild ride on a stolen snake&#8230; film at 11&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIyixC9NsLI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIyixC9NsLI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579564</link>
		<dc:creator>wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579564</guid>
		<description>The worst is Melanie &#039;I should know fucking better, but don&#039;t give a fuck anymore&#039; Phillips - a former Guardian columnist and a supposedly serious journalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst is Melanie &#8216;I should know fucking better, but don&#8217;t give a fuck anymore&#8217; Phillips &#8211; a former Guardian columnist and a supposedly serious journalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579560</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579560</guid>
		<description>I do not think you can blame it all on Beck, oh fuck did I just say that, but more so on a country tearing itself apart to find the boogeyman they promise us they will find if we give up a little more freedom... to be safe.  If we give up a few more rights... we&#039;ll be safe.  If we trust that the FBI caught real terrorists and not some easily manipulated morons they have to explain to that they hated america and wanted to bomb it and hand them the plan and a box of playdough with wires on it.

They sold us on fear and distrust of people who were &quot;different&quot;... are we surprised that history repeated itself and those with more radical visions took up that mantle and went even further?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not think you can blame it all on Beck, oh fuck did I just say that, but more so on a country tearing itself apart to find the boogeyman they promise us they will find if we give up a little more freedom&#8230; to be safe.  If we give up a few more rights&#8230; we&#8217;ll be safe.  If we trust that the FBI caught real terrorists and not some easily manipulated morons they have to explain to that they hated america and wanted to bomb it and hand them the plan and a box of playdough with wires on it.</p>
<p>They sold us on fear and distrust of people who were &#8220;different&#8221;&#8230; are we surprised that history repeated itself and those with more radical visions took up that mantle and went even further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That_Anonymous_Coward</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579558</link>
		<dc:creator>That_Anonymous_Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579558</guid>
		<description>David Cameron can read?!
I thought he was just some sort of puppet with some sweaty dudes hand stuffed up his.... nevermind...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Cameron can read?!<br />
I thought he was just some sort of puppet with some sweaty dudes hand stuffed up his&#8230;. nevermind&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandros</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579557</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandros</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579557</guid>
		<description>Neh, the &quot;Bild&quot; is more like &quot;the Sun&quot;, vile, but not as vile as the &quot;Daily Mail&quot;. The Bild is at least not fueling racism and anti-EU sentiments in the way the &quot;Daily Mail&quot; does (they are pretty much the propaganda organ of the UKIP). Also the &quot;Bild&quot; will never be as obsessed with WW&quot; and Nazi stories as the &quot;Daily Fail&quot;.
Besides the smaller, local Tabloids, like the &quot;EXPRESS&quot;, the &quot;Hamburger Morgenpost&quot; or the &quot;Berliner Kurier&quot; are far worse.
No argument on RTL and their retarded little brother RTL2 thou...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neh, the &#8220;Bild&#8221; is more like &#8220;the Sun&#8221;, vile, but not as vile as the &#8220;Daily Mail&#8221;. The Bild is at least not fueling racism and anti-EU sentiments in the way the &#8220;Daily Mail&#8221; does (they are pretty much the propaganda organ of the UKIP). Also the &#8220;Bild&#8221; will never be as obsessed with WW&#8221; and Nazi stories as the &#8220;Daily Fail&#8221;.<br />
Besides the smaller, local Tabloids, like the &#8220;EXPRESS&#8221;, the &#8220;Hamburger Morgenpost&#8221; or the &#8220;Berliner Kurier&#8221; are far worse.<br />
No argument on RTL and their retarded little brother RTL2 thou&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devophill</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579537</link>
		<dc:creator>devophill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579537</guid>
		<description> You&#039;re right. I can&#039;t read that at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You&#8217;re right. I can&#8217;t read that at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/10/precisely-why-the-daily-ma.html#comment-1579526</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193277#comment-1579526</guid>
		<description>But when they&#039;re funny, they&#039;re funny.
&lt;blockquote&gt;And the crisis deepened last night as it was claimed that the former director-general personally intervened to axe a Panorama investigation into two newspaper tycoons, which was due to be aired tomorrow.  According to well-placed BBC sources, Mr Entwistle ordered the programme on Daily Telegraph owners Sir Frederick and Sir David Barclay to be pulled as he believed it was ‘risky’ – but did not fully explain what he meant.

It will be replaced by a documentary about badgers.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But when they&#8217;re funny, they&#8217;re funny.</p>
<blockquote><p>And the crisis deepened last night as it was claimed that the former director-general personally intervened to axe a Panorama investigation into two newspaper tycoons, which was due to be aired tomorrow.  According to well-placed BBC sources, Mr Entwistle ordered the programme on Daily Telegraph owners Sir Frederick and Sir David Barclay to be pulled as he believed it was ‘risky’ – but did not fully explain what he meant.</p>
<p>It will be replaced by a documentary about badgers.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
