<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 51-star&#160;flag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D K</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1582645</link>
		<dc:creator>D K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1582645</guid>
		<description>The flag debate continues: PR, DC, and beyond! Political problems aside, at least we&#039;ll have the design angle covered.
http://flaghagz.tumblr.com/post/35711433769/flagstargenerator</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flag debate continues: PR, DC, and beyond! Political problems aside, at least we&#8217;ll have the design angle covered.<br />
<a href="http://flaghagz.tumblr.com/post/35711433769/flagstargenerator" rel="nofollow">http://flaghagz.tumblr.com/post/35711433769/flagstargenerator</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CDD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581686</link>
		<dc:creator>CDD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581686</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a working citizen that pays taxes etc etc. I have to spend a lot of money for my health condition. So I can only Hope, Wish and Dream!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a working citizen that pays taxes etc etc. I have to spend a lot of money for my health condition. So I can only Hope, Wish and Dream!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581617</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581617</guid>
		<description>Ask to be given to Sweden</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask to be given to Sweden</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581616</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581616</guid>
		<description>Their zepplin crash of insanity shall make for an entertaining fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their zepplin crash of insanity shall make for an entertaining fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581595</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581595</guid>
		<description>No thanks, it sticks to my teeth


*badum-TISCH*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No thanks, it sticks to my teeth</p>
<p>*badum-TISCH*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sqyntz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581250</link>
		<dc:creator>sqyntz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581250</guid>
		<description>U.S. with a pecker ... how fitting
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mddwriNcpE1qjrq4v.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>U.S. with a pecker &#8230; how fitting<br />
<a href="http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mddwriNcpE1qjrq4v.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mddwriNcpE1qjrq4v.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benher</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581218</link>
		<dc:creator>benher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581218</guid>
		<description>Remember the ol&#039; Adbusters flag? Maybe it&#039;s time to revoke States in favor of the Corp-o&#039;s. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the ol&#8217; Adbusters flag? Maybe it&#8217;s time to revoke States in favor of the Corp-o&#8217;s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donovan acree</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581195</link>
		<dc:creator>donovan acree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581195</guid>
		<description>Good luck PR. I hope you make it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck PR. I hope you make it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581176</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581176</guid>
		<description>I disagree.  

First, the Republican platform is just political posturing and means nothing in reality.

Second, a State of Puerto Rico would send 5 or 6 new Democratic reps to the House of Representatives and two Democratic Senators, and probably have 9 or 10 safe Dem votes in the Electoral College.  Since the number of House seats is set at 435, those seats would have to come from somewhere, and no matter how you look at it, it won&#039;t be to the Republicans&#039; advantage.

In the past, states have been admitted in such ways as to keep the political balance in Washington the same as it was before.  Before the Civil War, free states and slave states were admitted together.  Even Hawaii and Alaska were admitted with this philosophy in mind.  In all reality we&#039;d have to find a state to admit to balance out Puerto Rico - and Washington DC wouldn&#039;t work in that formula at all, just more Dems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree.  </p>
<p>First, the Republican platform is just political posturing and means nothing in reality.</p>
<p>Second, a State of Puerto Rico would send 5 or 6 new Democratic reps to the House of Representatives and two Democratic Senators, and probably have 9 or 10 safe Dem votes in the Electoral College.  Since the number of House seats is set at 435, those seats would have to come from somewhere, and no matter how you look at it, it won&#8217;t be to the Republicans&#8217; advantage.</p>
<p>In the past, states have been admitted in such ways as to keep the political balance in Washington the same as it was before.  Before the Civil War, free states and slave states were admitted together.  Even Hawaii and Alaska were admitted with this philosophy in mind.  In all reality we&#8217;d have to find a state to admit to balance out Puerto Rico &#8211; and Washington DC wouldn&#8217;t work in that formula at all, just more Dems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581168</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s already happened once.  DC was originally carved out of Maryland and Virginia.  The Virginia portion was returned in the 1840&#039;s, including Alexandria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s already happened once.  DC was originally carved out of Maryland and Virginia.  The Virginia portion was returned in the 1840&#8242;s, including Alexandria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Renault</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581134</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Renault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581134</guid>
		<description> I&#039;m not American, so I&#039;ll take a mulligan for my (American) Historical Illiteracy.  Note, I said &#039;constituency&#039;, not &#039;state.  I wonder how you&#039;d do in, say, the Quiet Revolution, why July 1st is celebrated in Canada but observed in Newfoundland &amp; Labrador, le Grand Dérangement, or Louis Riel.

So, you&#039;re saying that all those world capitals have been or are in mortal danger of being captured by whatever regional constituencies they happen to be in?  That Ottawa has been captured by the regional interests of Ontario?  You&#039;d have a really difficult time convincing me of that.  A lot of White Southern Ontario Racists® and pretty much all of Alberta are always going on about how Ottawa&#039;s been captured by Québec.  

What&#039;s different about the USA vis-à-vis DC, such that you can&#039;t give them representation?  Is it genetic thing?  Manifest destiny®?  Or perhaps (tongue firmly in cheek) because Washington DC has a significant African American population?

Why not carry that argument further?  Whatever county a state capital is in shouldn&#039;t have representation, because the state capital could be captured by the municipal interests.  Likewise, when a mayor gets elected, his ward should automatically be barred from municipal council meetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I&#8217;m not American, so I&#8217;ll take a mulligan for my (American) Historical Illiteracy.  Note, I said &#8216;constituency&#8217;, not &#8216;state.  I wonder how you&#8217;d do in, say, the Quiet Revolution, why July 1st is celebrated in Canada but observed in Newfoundland &amp; Labrador, le Grand Dérangement, or Louis Riel.</p>
<p>So, you&#8217;re saying that all those world capitals have been or are in mortal danger of being captured by whatever regional constituencies they happen to be in?  That Ottawa has been captured by the regional interests of Ontario?  You&#8217;d have a really difficult time convincing me of that.  A lot of White Southern Ontario Racists® and pretty much all of Alberta are always going on about how Ottawa&#8217;s been captured by Québec.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s different about the USA vis-à-vis DC, such that you can&#8217;t give them representation?  Is it genetic thing?  Manifest destiny®?  Or perhaps (tongue firmly in cheek) because Washington DC has a significant African American population?</p>
<p>Why not carry that argument further?  Whatever county a state capital is in shouldn&#8217;t have representation, because the state capital could be captured by the municipal interests.  Likewise, when a mayor gets elected, his ward should automatically be barred from municipal council meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Perkins</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581128</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Perkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581128</guid>
		<description>If you Americans are gonna keep changing the number of states, why not just Velcro the stars on? But seriously, given the furor over changing the color of folding money, I can&#039;t see folks being happy about accepting a different flag. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you Americans are gonna keep changing the number of states, why not just Velcro the stars on? But seriously, given the furor over changing the color of folding money, I can&#8217;t see folks being happy about accepting a different flag. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581114</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581114</guid>
		<description>The &quot;party faithful&quot;, which most of us would call the extremist elements in the party, immediately responded to defeat by baying for more extreme positions and purges of moderates and moderation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;party faithful&#8221;, which most of us would call the extremist elements in the party, immediately responded to defeat by baying for more extreme positions and purges of moderates and moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581104</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581104</guid>
		<description>Do you know how many times I hit the snooze button before heading my wake up calls?  Think back to Republican primaries and ask yourself if that lineup was really the lineup of a party about to come to their senses.

I think the Republicans will need to be thumped solidly at least one more time.  The Republic establishment might understand the danger, but that doesn&#039;t do any good if your primary is decided by white Evangelicals. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know how many times I hit the snooze button before heading my wake up calls?  Think back to Republican primaries and ask yourself if that lineup was really the lineup of a party about to come to their senses.</p>
<p>I think the Republicans will need to be thumped solidly at least one more time.  The Republic establishment might understand the danger, but that doesn&#8217;t do any good if your primary is decided by white Evangelicals. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rindan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581102</link>
		<dc:creator>Rindan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581102</guid>
		<description>Yes, but that was a very bad way to have the questions asked.  It was a very clear ploy by the pro-state folks to twist the vote.  The US is very likely to reject it, and rightfully so.  The difference between a &quot;change in status&quot; that leads to independence and one that leads to statehood is vast.  The US already warned that if they worded the question in that manner, the US likely wouldn&#039;t accept the vote.  They will almost certainly have to do it again before the US will accept the vote, and when they do it again it will be a straight up, &quot;Do you want to apply to become a US state, yes or no?&quot;

Personally, I am all for Puerto Rico joining the Union, but it has to be clear and completely unambiguous that they actually want to join.  To get that, you need a straight up or down vote, and at a bare minimum, you need a majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but that was a very bad way to have the questions asked.  It was a very clear ploy by the pro-state folks to twist the vote.  The US is very likely to reject it, and rightfully so.  The difference between a &#8220;change in status&#8221; that leads to independence and one that leads to statehood is vast.  The US already warned that if they worded the question in that manner, the US likely wouldn&#8217;t accept the vote.  They will almost certainly have to do it again before the US will accept the vote, and when they do it again it will be a straight up, &#8220;Do you want to apply to become a US state, yes or no?&#8221;</p>
<p>Personally, I am all for Puerto Rico joining the Union, but it has to be clear and completely unambiguous that they actually want to join.  To get that, you need a straight up or down vote, and at a bare minimum, you need a majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bzishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581088</link>
		<dc:creator>bzishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 07:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581088</guid>
		<description>They would accept it just as they are going to accept immigration reform during this coming term. I think this election was a wake up call for the Republican Party. With the current demographics, it is impossible to win the Presidency or the majority of the Senate* without strong Hispanic support. As it stands, the Republican Party simply can&#039;t offend Hispanics if they want to survive. If current trends continue and Republicans continue to offend Hispanics, many people are predicting that Texas will be a blue state in 2020 or sooner, at which point it is game over for the Republicans.

*Republicans will still be able to win the House for a little while due to gerrymandering. Without gerrymandering the Democrats would have also won the House this election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They would accept it just as they are going to accept immigration reform during this coming term. I think this election was a wake up call for the Republican Party. With the current demographics, it is impossible to win the Presidency or the majority of the Senate* without strong Hispanic support. As it stands, the Republican Party simply can&#8217;t offend Hispanics if they want to survive. If current trends continue and Republicans continue to offend Hispanics, many people are predicting that Texas will be a blue state in 2020 or sooner, at which point it is game over for the Republicans.</p>
<p>*Republicans will still be able to win the House for a little while due to gerrymandering. Without gerrymandering the Democrats would have also won the House this election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581031</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581031</guid>
		<description>The enlightened founders would be puking buckets.  Tyranny is having your votes mean nothing because a bunch of backwards hicks refuse to move along with progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The enlightened founders would be puking buckets.  Tyranny is having your votes mean nothing because a bunch of backwards hicks refuse to move along with progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petzl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581023</link>
		<dc:creator>Petzl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581023</guid>
		<description>Rest easy, DC.  There&#039;s no conceivable way the Rabid Republicans would let PR in, knowing that it would be a solid blue state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest easy, DC.  There&#8217;s no conceivable way the Rabid Republicans would let PR in, knowing that it would be a solid blue state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1581020</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1581020</guid>
		<description>Why all states have the same number of senators? This is by design by the founding fathers. All states have the same number of senators to ensure one of the bicameral wings of Congress does NOT fall under tyranny of more populated states. As much as you may regret the political leanings of Wyoming, they might feel the same about yours. Let the House play out the population game. The issue becomes if PR becomes a state, we now have 102 Senators with the 2 leaning much more blue than red. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why all states have the same number of senators? This is by design by the founding fathers. All states have the same number of senators to ensure one of the bicameral wings of Congress does NOT fall under tyranny of more populated states. As much as you may regret the political leanings of Wyoming, they might feel the same about yours. Let the House play out the population game. The issue becomes if PR becomes a state, we now have 102 Senators with the 2 leaning much more blue than red. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emacsomancer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580985</link>
		<dc:creator>emacsomancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580985</guid>
		<description>Delhi is a Union Territory, so it&#039;s sort of special too. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_territory )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delhi is a Union Territory, so it&#8217;s sort of special too. ( <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_territory" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_territory</a> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tsol</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580933</link>
		<dc:creator>tsol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580933</guid>
		<description>Yeah- unlike those places, the District (NOT state) of Columbia was specifically set aside from the states to avoid being captured by the regional interests of Virginia and Maryland (among other reasons). IT WAS DESIGNED THAT WAY. 

/Hates Historical Illiteracy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah- unlike those places, the District (NOT state) of Columbia was specifically set aside from the states to avoid being captured by the regional interests of Virginia and Maryland (among other reasons). IT WAS DESIGNED THAT WAY. </p>
<p>/Hates Historical Illiteracy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Navin_Johnson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580934</link>
		<dc:creator>Navin_Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580934</guid>
		<description>Who are the left &#039;nutters&#039; you&#039;re talking about?  There&#039;s some kind of far left extreme that has a seat at the table when it comes to the political dialogue in the larger media?  And who are their elected representatives?  Like who are their Michelle Bachman&#039;s, Joe Walsh&#039;s, Alan West&#039;s etc. etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are the left &#8216;nutters&#8217; you&#8217;re talking about?  There&#8217;s some kind of far left extreme that has a seat at the table when it comes to the political dialogue in the larger media?  And who are their elected representatives?  Like who are their Michelle Bachman&#8217;s, Joe Walsh&#8217;s, Alan West&#8217;s etc. etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tennnfan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580895</link>
		<dc:creator>Tennnfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580895</guid>
		<description>To be fair, the actual story behind the DC flag (that it is based on George Washington&#039;s family crest) is a pretty good one in and of itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, the actual story behind the DC flag (that it is based on George Washington&#8217;s family crest) is a pretty good one in and of itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperMatt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580896</link>
		<dc:creator>SuperMatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580896</guid>
		<description>Well then, stop charging residents of DC federal income tax.  No more taxation without representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well then, stop charging residents of DC federal income tax.  No more taxation without representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: waetherman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580886</link>
		<dc:creator>waetherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580886</guid>
		<description>Lately, yes the split has been leaning right. But in other years its leaned left (at least from some people&#039;s perspective). I&#039;m trying to be balanced here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lately, yes the split has been leaning right. But in other years its leaned left (at least from some people&#8217;s perspective). I&#8217;m trying to be balanced here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580881</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 00:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580881</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The other 10% of the electorate are right-wing and left-wing nutters who have pretty much divided this country&lt;/blockquote&gt;10% left-wing?  Maybe 3% on a good day.  Unless your definition of left-wing nutter is what Europe calls &#039;moderate right&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The other 10% of the electorate are right-wing and left-wing nutters who have pretty much divided this country</p></blockquote>
<p>10% left-wing?  Maybe 3% on a good day.  Unless your definition of left-wing nutter is what Europe calls &#8216;moderate right&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren_Terra</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580845</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren_Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580845</guid>
		<description>If we&#039;re going to revisit the list of states (and I&#039;m actually for giving PR statehood if that&#039;s what its people wants, which the recent referendum seems a bit weak on), then not only do we have to give representation in Congress to residents of DC (either by statehood or by retrocession of land not occupied by the Federal government), we also have to consider other huge issues - such as why do the 600,000 people of Wyoming have the same number of senators as the 40,000,000 people of California? I&#039;m sure the people of Wyoming are all sterling folks (much as I regret their overall political leanings), but I know a lot of Californians and suspect they&#039;re not actually 60-odd times less important.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we&#8217;re going to revisit the list of states (and I&#8217;m actually for giving PR statehood if that&#8217;s what its people wants, which the recent referendum seems a bit weak on), then not only do we have to give representation in Congress to residents of DC (either by statehood or by retrocession of land not occupied by the Federal government), we also have to consider other huge issues &#8211; such as why do the 600,000 people of Wyoming have the same number of senators as the 40,000,000 people of California? I&#8217;m sure the people of Wyoming are all sterling folks (much as I regret their overall political leanings), but I know a lot of Californians and suspect they&#8217;re not actually 60-odd times less important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teirhan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580841</link>
		<dc:creator>Teirhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580841</guid>
		<description> The republican party platform includes explicit support for the statehood of puerto rico, so you may be surprised.  Likewise, the Democrats support the outcome of the referendum, whatever it is - so their party platform has them supporting statehood as well in this case.  I expect you will see a relatively easy approval by congress, though puerto rico may still choose to reject statehood when it has its referendum on the matter at its post-acceptance constitutional convention.  

That&#039;s how i understand it working, at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The republican party platform includes explicit support for the statehood of puerto rico, so you may be surprised.  Likewise, the Democrats support the outcome of the referendum, whatever it is &#8211; so their party platform has them supporting statehood as well in this case.  I expect you will see a relatively easy approval by congress, though puerto rico may still choose to reject statehood when it has its referendum on the matter at its post-acceptance constitutional convention.  </p>
<p>That&#8217;s how i understand it working, at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teirhan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580828</link>
		<dc:creator>Teirhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580828</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m trying to think of an &quot;any sufficiently advanced flag is indistinguishable from magic&quot; joke but failing.    

Maybe we can have a flag where 51 stars are visible at any one time in a projection of the 51 brightest stars in the night sky over some arbitrary location in America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to think of an &#8220;any sufficiently advanced flag is indistinguishable from magic&#8221; joke but failing.    </p>
<p>Maybe we can have a flag where 51 stars are visible at any one time in a projection of the 51 brightest stars in the night sky over some arbitrary location in America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/51-star-flag.html#comment-1580804</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193645#comment-1580804</guid>
		<description>Are we not sufficiently advanced to make stars that twinkle on our flags?  And stripes that wave themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we not sufficiently advanced to make stars that twinkle on our flags?  And stripes that wave themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
