<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gweek 075: Oliver Sacks&#039;&#160;Hallucinations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 06:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: self-propelled</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1582795</link>
		<dc:creator>self-propelled</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1582795</guid>
		<description>Regarding David&#039;s question about non-pharmaceutical methods of inducing hallucinations, I recently listened to a relevant BBC radio programme (also featuring Dr Sacks) called &quot;Hallucination: Through the Doors of Perception&quot;. An expert in hallucinations called Dominic Ffytche fitted the presenter with a pair of goggles which flashed high-frequency bursts of light at his closed eyes, causing him to experience vivid, complex hallucinations which sounded very interesting. You can see a picture of the goggles here, although sadly the podcast is no longer available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nbq6d

I would have thought that an interested maker could whip up a pair of goggles if they were able to discover the correct frequency and brightness for the light. A bit like a modern &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.science20.com/i_can_get_science/dreamachines_hallucinations_charles_bonnet_syndrome_50_year_old_question_hodological_science_answered&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dreamachine?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding David&#8217;s question about non-pharmaceutical methods of inducing hallucinations, I recently listened to a relevant BBC radio programme (also featuring Dr Sacks) called &#8220;Hallucination: Through the Doors of Perception&#8221;. An expert in hallucinations called Dominic Ffytche fitted the presenter with a pair of goggles which flashed high-frequency bursts of light at his closed eyes, causing him to experience vivid, complex hallucinations which sounded very interesting. You can see a picture of the goggles here, although sadly the podcast is no longer available: <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nbq6d" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01nbq6d</a></p>
<p>I would have thought that an interested maker could whip up a pair of goggles if they were able to discover the correct frequency and brightness for the light. A bit like a modern <a href="http://www.science20.com/i_can_get_science/dreamachines_hallucinations_charles_bonnet_syndrome_50_year_old_question_hodological_science_answered" rel="nofollow">Dreamachine?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Beaty</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1582138</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Beaty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1582138</guid>
		<description>As a kid, I went to many fiestas in Guam.  At one point I think I tried a fruitbat dish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a kid, I went to many fiestas in Guam.  At one point I think I tried a fruitbat dish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Fordham</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Fordham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581190</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a university in Hampstead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a university in Hampstead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581145</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581145</guid>
		<description>I tend to prefer Sacks&#039; book &lt;i&gt;An Anthropologist on Mars&lt;/i&gt;, as it gets away from the anecdotalism of &lt;i&gt;The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat&lt;/i&gt; and delves more deeply into the lives of its subjects, really looking at how they experience consciousness differently; per the old computer ads, they really do &quot;think different.&quot; (IIRC, the book title comes from Temple Grandin&#039;s self-description of feeling literally alienated among the neuro-typical. I also think that this was the book that brought Grandin to general public awareness.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to prefer Sacks&#8217; book <i>An Anthropologist on Mars</i>, as it gets away from the anecdotalism of <i>The Man Who Mistook His Wife For a Hat</i> and delves more deeply into the lives of its subjects, really looking at how they experience consciousness differently; per the old computer ads, they really do &#8220;think different.&#8221; (IIRC, the book title comes from Temple Grandin&#8217;s self-description of feeling literally alienated among the neuro-typical. I also think that this was the book that brought Grandin to general public awareness.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Able</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581141</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Able</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581141</guid>
		<description>Good stuff!  My first encounter with Sacks&#039; work was &quot;The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat&quot;, which blew my mind (repeatedly!)  It&#039;s funny (not ha-ha funny) that the main way we get insights into how the mind works is by examining cases where things have broken badly.

Btw, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s correct to say he has Asperger&#039;s.  He&#039;s said &quot;I’m an honorary Tourette’s because I tend to jerk.  I am also an honorary Asperger. And I’m an honorary bipolar. I suspect we all have a bit of everything.&quot;

I like the way he&#039;s expressed that - all too often people like to claim they have &quot;mild Asperger&#039;s&quot; or similar.  The &quot;geek chic&quot; aura around this condition is perverse because it&#039;s been specifically created to label those who are genuinely disabled (at least in the sense of being able to function normally in the modern world - from the DSM-IV definition we have &quot; clinically significant impairments in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning&quot; and &quot;restricted repetitive &amp; stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities&quot;).  It&#039;s important to remember it&#039;s an artificial set of criteria - people who don&#039;t quite meet the full set may get the less glamorous label of PDD-NOS, or be described as having some autistic traits.  But &quot;mild Asperger&#039;s&quot; is akin to describing cold feet as &quot;mild frostbite and gangrene&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff!  My first encounter with Sacks&#8217; work was &#8220;The Man Who Mistook His Wife For A Hat&#8221;, which blew my mind (repeatedly!)  It&#8217;s funny (not ha-ha funny) that the main way we get insights into how the mind works is by examining cases where things have broken badly.</p>
<p>Btw, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s correct to say he has Asperger&#8217;s.  He&#8217;s said &#8220;I’m an honorary Tourette’s because I tend to jerk.  I am also an honorary Asperger. And I’m an honorary bipolar. I suspect we all have a bit of everything.&#8221;</p>
<p>I like the way he&#8217;s expressed that &#8211; all too often people like to claim they have &#8220;mild Asperger&#8217;s&#8221; or similar.  The &#8220;geek chic&#8221; aura around this condition is perverse because it&#8217;s been specifically created to label those who are genuinely disabled (at least in the sense of being able to function normally in the modern world &#8211; from the DSM-IV definition we have &#8221; clinically significant impairments in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning&#8221; and &#8220;restricted repetitive &amp; stereotyped patterns of behavior, interests and activities&#8221;).  It&#8217;s important to remember it&#8217;s an artificial set of criteria &#8211; people who don&#8217;t quite meet the full set may get the less glamorous label of PDD-NOS, or be described as having some autistic traits.  But &#8220;mild Asperger&#8217;s&#8221; is akin to describing cold feet as &#8220;mild frostbite and gangrene&#8221;.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581115</link>
		<dc:creator>jkg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 10:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581115</guid>
		<description>gotta mention the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW98yCt5NvE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Big Black classic &quot;L-Dopa&quot;&lt;/a&gt; since we are on the subject </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta mention the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TW98yCt5NvE" rel="nofollow">Big Black classic &#8220;L-Dopa&#8221;</a> since we are on the subject </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581111</link>
		<dc:creator>jkg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581111</guid>
		<description> wow! great anecdote, certainly DeNiro is one who could pull it off
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> wow! great anecdote, certainly DeNiro is one who could pull it off</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ágúst Rafnsson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581112</link>
		<dc:creator>Ágúst Rafnsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581112</guid>
		<description>Being dyslexic I thought how many olives are in a sack and how can they cause hallucinations. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being dyslexic I thought how many olives are in a sack and how can they cause hallucinations. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SedanChair</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581106</link>
		<dc:creator>SedanChair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 09:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581106</guid>
		<description>Sacks actually wrote an essay about consulting on the film. He said that De Niro could simulate symptoms so convincingly that at one point Sacks thought he was having a seizure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacks actually wrote an essay about consulting on the film. He said that De Niro could simulate symptoms so convincingly that at one point Sacks thought he was having a seizure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581098</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 08:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581098</guid>
		<description>Yep, it was a good 1990 film.  Scores highly at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1032970-awakenings/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rotten tomatoes&lt;/a&gt; as well.  I think I&#039;m gonna watch it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, it was a good 1990 film.  Scores highly at <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1032970-awakenings/" rel="nofollow">rotten tomatoes</a> as well.  I think I&#8217;m gonna watch it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jkg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581041</link>
		<dc:creator>jkg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581041</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099077/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;movie&lt;/a&gt; with DeNiro and Williams ain&#039;t bad either</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0099077/" rel="nofollow">movie</a> with DeNiro and Williams ain&#8217;t bad either</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/12/gweek-075-oliver-sacks-hall.html#comment-1581028</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 04:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193765#comment-1581028</guid>
		<description>Dang, I&#039;m falling behind. I still have to read Sack&#039;s book about music.

I think the first Sacks book I read was &lt;I&gt;Island of the Colorblind.&lt;/I&gt; A travelogue, botany lesson, and neurology tale all in one. I hooked my aunt and mother on his books, and they actually went to his lectures back East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang, I&#8217;m falling behind. I still have to read Sack&#8217;s book about music.</p>
<p>I think the first Sacks book I read was <i>Island of the Colorblind.</i> A travelogue, botany lesson, and neurology tale all in one. I hooked my aunt and mother on his books, and they actually went to his lectures back East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
