<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analyzing shin angles in the famous bigfoot&#160;movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 04:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Gatz</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1585563</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Gatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1585563</guid>
		<description>And this proves what, besides that a person can lift their foot up higher than normal during a few strides of exaggerated walking? 
If you are wearing rubber clown feet it happens naturally ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this proves what, besides that a person can lift their foot up higher than normal during a few strides of exaggerated walking?<br />
If you are wearing rubber clown feet it happens naturally ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knux The Fox</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1582461</link>
		<dc:creator>Knux The Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1582461</guid>
		<description> Yes, in the woods, you&#039;d lift your foot higher to clear any brush on the ground, hence the higher shin rise.  Go walking in tall grass.  I guarantee your shin will rise more than 52 degrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes, in the woods, you&#8217;d lift your foot higher to clear any brush on the ground, hence the higher shin rise.  Go walking in tall grass.  I guarantee your shin will rise more than 52 degrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enlo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1582276</link>
		<dc:creator>enlo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1582276</guid>
		<description>If you walk through deep snow all day long, you would raise your feet that high too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you walk through deep snow all day long, you would raise your feet that high too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Eyles</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1582239</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Eyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1582239</guid>
		<description>I thought this as well, the angled view changes the shin angle. Also, the aspect ratio (which I&#039;m not sure is correct) in the bigfoot video could also lead to a different &#039;shin angle&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this as well, the angled view changes the shin angle. Also, the aspect ratio (which I&#8217;m not sure is correct) in the bigfoot video could also lead to a different &#8216;shin angle&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris jimson</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1582057</link>
		<dc:creator>chris jimson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1582057</guid>
		<description>I get the impression that when it comes to Bigfoot many skeptics are really just offended, as if they think any serious consideration of it is damaging to science.   I am not a die-hard true believer, I AM skeptical, but that doesn&#039;t mean I have to be automatically dismissive.  

Yes, the lack of solid physical evidence is a valid point, but that doesn&#039;t mean people should stop looking.  Our knowledge of the fossil record is not complete either (I would actually expect that Bigfoot, if real, came over an Arctic land bridge just like humans did.)  I can picture natural mechanisms whereby a population of these things could survive (particularly in the areas where they are most often sighted) without a lot of contact with humans. Sure, I carry a camera (phone) around all the time, but a lot of the images I want to capture are fleeting, and the camera is not out and ready to snap away.  (Besides, millions of cameras being carried around a large city is not the same as a lone cameraman hiking in a vast expanse of forest-- I apparently hiked right past a feeding moose once without even noticing.)

There&#039;s no denying that it would be very cool, particularly from a scientific standpoint, if someone found incontrovertible evidence of Bigfoot, so I won&#039;t mock anyone who is seriously and honestly studying it, any more than I would have mocked the Wright Brothers with &quot;everyone knows flight is impossible.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the impression that when it comes to Bigfoot many skeptics are really just offended, as if they think any serious consideration of it is damaging to science.   I am not a die-hard true believer, I AM skeptical, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I have to be automatically dismissive.  </p>
<p>Yes, the lack of solid physical evidence is a valid point, but that doesn&#8217;t mean people should stop looking.  Our knowledge of the fossil record is not complete either (I would actually expect that Bigfoot, if real, came over an Arctic land bridge just like humans did.)  I can picture natural mechanisms whereby a population of these things could survive (particularly in the areas where they are most often sighted) without a lot of contact with humans. Sure, I carry a camera (phone) around all the time, but a lot of the images I want to capture are fleeting, and the camera is not out and ready to snap away.  (Besides, millions of cameras being carried around a large city is not the same as a lone cameraman hiking in a vast expanse of forest&#8211; I apparently hiked right past a feeding moose once without even noticing.)</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no denying that it would be very cool, particularly from a scientific standpoint, if someone found incontrovertible evidence of Bigfoot, so I won&#8217;t mock anyone who is seriously and honestly studying it, any more than I would have mocked the Wright Brothers with &#8220;everyone knows flight is impossible.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lasermike026</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581905</link>
		<dc:creator>lasermike026</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581905</guid>
		<description>I believe that there is only one group of people on the planet that can solve this mystery...... MYTHBUSTERS!  Call Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman stat!  Active the MYTHBUSTERS signal! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that there is only one group of people on the planet that can solve this mystery&#8230;&#8230; MYTHBUSTERS!  Call Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman stat!  Active the MYTHBUSTERS signal! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan brown</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581888</link>
		<dc:creator>alan brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581888</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s pretty clear that the guy in the bigfoot suit is forced to raise his heel higher because the suit has VERY BIG FEET, otherwise the toe would drag as he brings his leg forward.

comments and ratings disabled, lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s pretty clear that the guy in the bigfoot suit is forced to raise his heel higher because the suit has VERY BIG FEET, otherwise the toe would drag as he brings his leg forward.</p>
<p>comments and ratings disabled, lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plainsaman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581855</link>
		<dc:creator>plainsaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581855</guid>
		<description> How is this relevant to the non-evidence of any ape in the western hemisphere?

Chinese Academy of Science research suggests that the rise of the Tibetan plateau 1.6 million to 800,000 years ago altered the climate of South Asia, ushering in a colder, drier period when forests shrank. Also, Gigantopithecus&#039;s neighbor, Homo erectus may have over-hunted and/or outcompeted him into extinction. 

It&#039;s also unexplained how this lumbering, 1,200-pound quadruped that only ate C3 forest plants like bamboo could (1) get to the western hemisphere in the first place, and (2) turn into a swift, agile, upright walker in such a short time on an evolutionary timescale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> How is this relevant to the non-evidence of any ape in the western hemisphere?</p>
<p>Chinese Academy of Science research suggests that the rise of the Tibetan plateau 1.6 million to 800,000 years ago altered the climate of South Asia, ushering in a colder, drier period when forests shrank. Also, Gigantopithecus&#8217;s neighbor, Homo erectus may have over-hunted and/or outcompeted him into extinction. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s also unexplained how this lumbering, 1,200-pound quadruped that only ate C3 forest plants like bamboo could (1) get to the western hemisphere in the first place, and (2) turn into a swift, agile, upright walker in such a short time on an evolutionary timescale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581842</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581842</guid>
		<description>Is it?

Or is it an ALIEN IN A BIGFOOT SUIT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it?</p>
<p>Or is it an ALIEN IN A BIGFOOT SUIT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hoebeck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581835</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hoebeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581835</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a guy in a suit, get over it already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a guy in a suit, get over it already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581821</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581821</guid>
		<description>I said &quot;North America.&quot; I&#039;m well aware that there were (and are) non-human apes in Asia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said &#8220;North America.&#8221; I&#8217;m well aware that there were (and are) non-human apes in Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noctilucent Studios</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581798</link>
		<dc:creator>Noctilucent Studios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581798</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigantopithecus</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Bösch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581730</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Bösch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581730</guid>
		<description>And you grow hair, lots of hair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you grow hair, lots of hair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florian Bösch</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581725</link>
		<dc:creator>Florian Bösch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581725</guid>
		<description>I believe there&#039;s dedicated study material for shin rise related biomechanics to be found on the internet, mostly on some fantastic sites with streaming video that ask you if you&#039;re old enough to see all those shin rises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there&#8217;s dedicated study material for shin rise related biomechanics to be found on the internet, mostly on some fantastic sites with streaming video that ask you if you&#8217;re old enough to see all those shin rises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevinC</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581701</link>
		<dc:creator>DevinC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581701</guid>
		<description>If he&#039;s walking away from the camera, and not perpendicularly, then the shin angle will seem smaller (measured from the vertical), not larger.  (The apparent height of the knee and ankle won&#039;t change, but the leg will be foreshortened.)  

(If I had the time and a piece of paper, I&#039;d do the trig here.)It seems to me much more likely that the necessities imposed by wearing a large, ill-fitting costume are to blame.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he&#8217;s walking away from the camera, and not perpendicularly, then the shin angle will seem smaller (measured from the vertical), not larger.  (The apparent height of the knee and ankle won&#8217;t change, but the leg will be foreshortened.)  </p>
<p>(If I had the time and a piece of paper, I&#8217;d do the trig here.)It seems to me much more likely that the necessities imposed by wearing a large, ill-fitting costume are to blame.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robertdee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581690</link>
		<dc:creator>robertdee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581690</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of elaborate explanations on here employing unverifiable variables. Occam&#039;s razor dictates that the simplest solution is most likely true which would mean that the most scientific reading is that the film does indeed show a non-human hominid of indeterminate origin. Most likely your mum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of elaborate explanations on here employing unverifiable variables. Occam&#8217;s razor dictates that the simplest solution is most likely true which would mean that the most scientific reading is that the film does indeed show a non-human hominid of indeterminate origin. Most likely your mum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plainsaman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581668</link>
		<dc:creator>plainsaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581668</guid>
		<description>That would be correct. ZERO fossil evidence of great apes in the western hemisphere. Prior to the arrival of new world monkeys, there is some very fragmentary early Paleocene fossil evidence in western North America of small, primate-like mammals roughly similar to squirrels and tree shrews in appearance, but that&#039;s it. Unless you want to count Nebraska Man. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be correct. ZERO fossil evidence of great apes in the western hemisphere. Prior to the arrival of new world monkeys, there is some very fragmentary early Paleocene fossil evidence in western North America of small, primate-like mammals roughly similar to squirrels and tree shrews in appearance, but that&#8217;s it. Unless you want to count Nebraska Man. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anansi133</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581648</link>
		<dc:creator>anansi133</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581648</guid>
		<description> That was my first thought. Film somebody walking somewhat away from the camera, and that angle will be easy to replicate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> That was my first thought. Film somebody walking somewhat away from the camera, and that angle will be easy to replicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581642</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581642</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Still waiting for someone to find some bigfoot poop.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Bigfoot poop is actually quite plentiful. The problem is that it&#039;s biologically indistinguishable from bullshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Still waiting for someone to find some bigfoot poop.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bigfoot poop is actually quite plentiful. The problem is that it&#8217;s biologically indistinguishable from bullshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wysinwyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581635</link>
		<dc:creator>wysinwyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581635</guid>
		<description>Poop.  Still waiting for someone to find some bigfoot poop.  A corpse would be even more convincing but if you can&#039;t find me some poop at least I&#039;m going to doubt the existence of the creature in question.

&quot;But...but...but bigfoot doesn&#039;t have an anus!&quot;  No excuses.  If you want bigfoot to be a part of biology proper then evidence or STFU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poop.  Still waiting for someone to find some bigfoot poop.  A corpse would be even more convincing but if you can&#8217;t find me some poop at least I&#8217;m going to doubt the existence of the creature in question.</p>
<p>&#8220;But&#8230;but&#8230;but bigfoot doesn&#8217;t have an anus!&#8221;  No excuses.  If you want bigfoot to be a part of biology proper then evidence or STFU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581627</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581627</guid>
		<description>It would be neat to find something like that, but as far as I&#039;ve heard the only non-human primates known to have reached the Americas have been New World Monkeys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be neat to find something like that, but as far as I&#8217;ve heard the only non-human primates known to have reached the Americas have been New World Monkeys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueelm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581624</link>
		<dc:creator>blueelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581624</guid>
		<description>Thought there were. Maybe I&#039;m wrong. I&#039;m neither a paleontologist, nor some one who is very interested in the field. So it&#039;s totally likely I&#039;m misinformed.

[Edit: google seems to suggest these were hoaxes as well FWIW. Learns me for relying on news from my childhood]

Even if there had been though it wouldn&#039;t suggest bigfoot is one or exists. 

Rather even that wouldn&#039;t make it a 50/50 split between Bigfoot and Stupid People.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought there were. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong. I&#8217;m neither a paleontologist, nor some one who is very interested in the field. So it&#8217;s totally likely I&#8217;m misinformed.</p>
<p>[Edit: google seems to suggest these were hoaxes as well FWIW. Learns me for relying on news from my childhood]</p>
<p>Even if there had been though it wouldn&#8217;t suggest bigfoot is one or exists. </p>
<p>Rather even that wouldn&#8217;t make it a 50/50 split between Bigfoot and Stupid People.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581614</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Now there are fossils of large North American apes that have been found, but these are very ancient fossils. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Really? I hadn&#039;t heard that. What fossils were those?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Now there are fossils of large North American apes that have been found, but these are very ancient fossils. </p></blockquote>
<p>Really? I hadn&#8217;t heard that. What fossils were those?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blueelm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581608</link>
		<dc:creator>blueelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581608</guid>
		<description>Well we know there was one who got hit by a car. That&#039;s one hoaxer, not one heretofore unheard of North American large ape. 

We also know that people, while some times clever, can be infinitely stupid. This gets demonstrated regularly.Now there are fossils of large North American apes that have been found, but these are very ancient fossils. 

So your question boils down to this: is it more likely that  there a species of non-human  large ape still living in North America, or that there are a lot of very very stupid people living in North America?

I would not put those odds at 50/50. I&#039;d put forth the suggestion that we KNOW there are a lot of very very stupid people living in North America.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we know there was one who got hit by a car. That&#8217;s one hoaxer, not one heretofore unheard of North American large ape. </p>
<p>We also know that people, while some times clever, can be infinitely stupid. This gets demonstrated regularly.Now there are fossils of large North American apes that have been found, but these are very ancient fossils. </p>
<p>So your question boils down to this: is it more likely that  there a species of non-human  large ape still living in North America, or that there are a lot of very very stupid people living in North America?</p>
<p>I would not put those odds at 50/50. I&#8217;d put forth the suggestion that we KNOW there are a lot of very very stupid people living in North America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drabula</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581600</link>
		<dc:creator>Drabula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581600</guid>
		<description>Saw an article somewhere else today about someone in America trying to raise cash for a Bigfoot hunt using thermal imaging gear attached to a blimp......supposedly going to criss cross the forest somewhere etc. I like the weirdo stuff but Bigfoot&#039;s never interested me much. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw an article somewhere else today about someone in America trying to raise cash for a Bigfoot hunt using thermal imaging gear attached to a blimp&#8230;&#8230;supposedly going to criss cross the forest somewhere etc. I like the weirdo stuff but Bigfoot&#8217;s never interested me much. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plainsaman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581584</link>
		<dc:creator>plainsaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581584</guid>
		<description> Yeah, about that &quot;evidence&quot;:
http://www.csicop.org/si/show/bigfoot_at_50_evaluating_a_half-century_of_bigfoot_evidence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yeah, about that &#8220;evidence&#8221;:<br />
<a href="http://www.csicop.org/si/show/bigfoot_at_50_evaluating_a_half-century_of_bigfoot_evidence" rel="nofollow">http://www.csicop.org/si/show/bigfoot_at_50_evaluating_a_half-century_of_bigfoot_evidence</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581569</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581569</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;…is it more ridiculous to believe there is a large ape species we haven&#039;t physically verified,&lt;/blockquote&gt;In Africa, maybe. In North America? That would be pretty darn astounding.
&lt;blockquote&gt;…or that there is an army of hoaxers running around in ape suits in the middle of nowhere (including during hunting season?)&lt;/blockquote&gt;&quot;Army&quot; seems a bit strong since the number of sightings which would require hoaxers (i.e. photos &amp; video that unmistakably depict a furry hominid) are pretty few and far between. Most of the &quot;evidence&quot; is open to some pretty wide interpretation, to say the least.

Consider this: the number of people who carry high-quality cameras with them at all times has increased exponentially over the last generation. Why aren&#039;t we seeing a corresponding increase in Bigfoot photos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>…is it more ridiculous to believe there is a large ape species we haven&#8217;t physically verified,</p></blockquote>
<p>In Africa, maybe. In North America? That would be pretty darn astounding.</p>
<blockquote><p>…or that there is an army of hoaxers running around in ape suits in the middle of nowhere (including during hunting season?)</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Army&#8221; seems a bit strong since the number of sightings which would require hoaxers (i.e. photos &amp; video that unmistakably depict a furry hominid) are pretty few and far between. Most of the &#8220;evidence&#8221; is open to some pretty wide interpretation, to say the least.</p>
<p>Consider this: the number of people who carry high-quality cameras with them at all times has increased exponentially over the last generation. Why aren&#8217;t we seeing a corresponding increase in Bigfoot photos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rider</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581558</link>
		<dc:creator>Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581558</guid>
		<description>They haven&#039;t  from that section of video which shows the upper body and the turn which footers always claim is impossible for a human to do, the legs are not visible.  The angle of the legs which this person is making his extreme illogical jump from is only visible for about two steps during very beginning of the film.  The rest of the time &quot;Bigfoot&quot; is walking behind rocks and tress.. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IORdWpu5KM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They haven&#8217;t  from that section of video which shows the upper body and the turn which footers always claim is impossible for a human to do, the legs are not visible.  The angle of the legs which this person is making his extreme illogical jump from is only visible for about two steps during very beginning of the film.  The rest of the time &#8220;Bigfoot&#8221; is walking behind rocks and tress.. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IORdWpu5KM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4IORdWpu5KM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Nicholls</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581550</link>
		<dc:creator>William Nicholls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581550</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s a combination of a bogus comparison (viewing angle, woman in high heels) and a film of someone who&#039;s trying to pretend to be a big hairy critter. The suited guy was obviously a fan of Groucho Marx, or perhaps Mr. Natural. Keep on truckin&#039;, sasquatch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s a combination of a bogus comparison (viewing angle, woman in high heels) and a film of someone who&#8217;s trying to pretend to be a big hairy critter. The suited guy was obviously a fan of Groucho Marx, or perhaps Mr. Natural. Keep on truckin&#8217;, sasquatch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/13/unhoaxing-the-famous-bigfoot-m.html#comment-1581545</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=193886#comment-1581545</guid>
		<description>You try walking in clown shoes or snow shoes on rough ground and see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You try walking in clown shoes or snow shoes on rough ground and see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
