<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Up In My&#160;Snatch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:57:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiche de Resistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1583130</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiche de Resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1583130</guid>
		<description>Jumpin Jesus on a pogo stick! Everybody knows that a burrow owl lives in a hole in the ground!  Why the hell you think they call it a burrow owl?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jumpin Jesus on a pogo stick! Everybody knows that a burrow owl lives in a hole in the ground!  Why the hell you think they call it a burrow owl?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apocatequil Death</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582974</link>
		<dc:creator>Apocatequil Death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582974</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t anti-woman but it is indicative of a farcical situation more akin to a Carry On... film then a &quot;scandal&quot; involving the CIA, FBI and the military. This has become a cosmic joke not only on the characters involved but the media as well. Even you got something out of it, you get to be holier then thou on the internet. Good for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t anti-woman but it is indicative of a farcical situation more akin to a Carry On&#8230; film then a &#8220;scandal&#8221; involving the CIA, FBI and the military. This has become a cosmic joke not only on the characters involved but the media as well. Even you got something out of it, you get to be holier then thou on the internet. Good for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582772</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582772</guid>
		<description>http://www.metrolyrics.com/whyd-ya-do-it-lyrics-faithfull-marianne.html

To which, by the way, Strange de Jim replied, &quot;Sorry, Mom.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.metrolyrics.com/whyd-ya-do-it-lyrics-faithfull-marianne.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.metrolyrics.com/whyd-ya-do-it-lyrics-faithfull-marianne.html</a></p>
<p>To which, by the way, Strange de Jim replied, &#8220;Sorry, Mom.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sdmikev</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582766</link>
		<dc:creator>sdmikev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582766</guid>
		<description>oy vey, get a sense of humor already.  no need to be offended by everything. jumping jesus on a pogo stick.  IT&#039;S FUNNY!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oy vey, get a sense of humor already.  no need to be offended by everything. jumping jesus on a pogo stick.  IT&#8217;S FUNNY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald Petersen</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582753</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582753</guid>
		<description>Probably it&#039;s just due to the unsophisticated circles in which I move, but I can&#039;t remember ever seeing before the words &quot;my&quot; and &quot;snatch&quot; right next to each other.  Maybe there are lots of women who refer daily to &quot;my snatch,&quot; maybe even with justifiable pride, but I don&#039;t believe I&#039;ve met them.

It&#039;s never struck me as a term one applies to one&#039;s own ladyparts, is all I&#039;m saying.  Correct me if I&#039;m wrong.

More to the point, however, is the hilarity of the post.  I lol&#039;d when my wife showed it to me, almost as hard as she did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably it&#8217;s just due to the unsophisticated circles in which I move, but I can&#8217;t remember ever seeing before the words &#8220;my&#8221; and &#8220;snatch&#8221; right next to each other.  Maybe there are lots of women who refer daily to &#8220;my snatch,&#8221; maybe even with justifiable pride, but I don&#8217;t believe I&#8217;ve met them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s never struck me as a term one applies to one&#8217;s own ladyparts, is all I&#8217;m saying.  Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>More to the point, however, is the hilarity of the post.  I lol&#8217;d when my wife showed it to me, almost as hard as she did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halloween_Jack</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582747</link>
		<dc:creator>Halloween_Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582747</guid>
		<description> You know, having seen this posted a few different places, I keep thinking, damn, she&#039;s got some powerful, Michelle Obama-league guns. She must have set some records for chin-ups at West Point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You know, having seen this posted a few different places, I keep thinking, damn, she&#8217;s got some powerful, Michelle Obama-league guns. She must have set some records for chin-ups at West Point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giantasterisk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582703</link>
		<dc:creator>giantasterisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582703</guid>
		<description>Snatch-a-rooni! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snatch-a-rooni! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maj Variola</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582604</link>
		<dc:creator>Maj Variola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582604</guid>
		<description>Jill&#039;s sister went to Beaver College
http://www.lawyers.com/Florida/Tampa/Natalie-Khawam-31561362-a.html 

Could not make this up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jill&#8217;s sister went to Beaver College<br />
<a href="http://www.lawyers.com/Florida/Tampa/Natalie-Khawam-31561362-a.html " rel="nofollow">http://www.lawyers.com/Florida/Tampa/Natalie-Khawam-31561362-a.html </a></p>
<p>Could not make this up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oasisob1</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582571</link>
		<dc:creator>oasisob1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582571</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not photoshopped. Those are her real shoulders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not photoshopped. Those are her real shoulders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Berry</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582567</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582567</guid>
		<description>This is funny shit!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny shit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Mielke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582564</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Mielke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582564</guid>
		<description>Reminds me of this old classic: (wheat donuts, maybe...certainly not cake donuts!)

http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/shakespeares_sister/shakes5/sogood.png</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminds me of this old classic: (wheat donuts, maybe&#8230;certainly not cake donuts!)</p>
<p><a href="http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/shakespeares_sister/shakes5/sogood.png" rel="nofollow">http://media.photobucket.com/image/recent/shakespeares_sister/shakes5/sogood.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJBudSonic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582551</link>
		<dc:creator>DJBudSonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582551</guid>
		<description>Having worked on many production teams in my day this is more likely the result of the old &#039;data placeholder&#039; snafu.  Someone was making up the gfx and inserted this image in place of the real one, then, to their horror, they went to lunch and the segment got aired before they could switch back. For the same reason I used to populate test data bases with actual information, not whatever the programmers might put in, which was usually offensive.  That way, when you forget that the client has demo access, they don&#039;t run your test pages and end up ordering &quot;42  $1000 Boogers&quot; to be shipped to &quot;Mrs. Buttface, 123 Lane, Anywhere, KS, 55555&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked on many production teams in my day this is more likely the result of the old &#8216;data placeholder&#8217; snafu.  Someone was making up the gfx and inserted this image in place of the real one, then, to their horror, they went to lunch and the segment got aired before they could switch back. For the same reason I used to populate test data bases with actual information, not whatever the programmers might put in, which was usually offensive.  That way, when you forget that the client has demo access, they don&#8217;t run your test pages and end up ordering &#8220;42  $1000 Boogers&#8221; to be shipped to &#8220;Mrs. Buttface, 123 Lane, Anywhere, KS, 55555&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerplatanoides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582529</link>
		<dc:creator>acerplatanoides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582529</guid>
		<description>in&#039;noutuendo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in&#8217;noutuendo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shinkuhadoken</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582527</link>
		<dc:creator>Shinkuhadoken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582527</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s just me, but I thought the title &quot;All In&quot; had enough innuendo on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just me, but I thought the title &#8220;All In&#8221; had enough innuendo on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jandrese</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582492</link>
		<dc:creator>jandrese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582492</guid>
		<description>You live by Google Image Search, you die by Google Image Search.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You live by Google Image Search, you die by Google Image Search.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerplatanoides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582485</link>
		<dc:creator>acerplatanoides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582485</guid>
		<description>Do we need more lambasting of women who use their vaginas to manipulate the patriarchy for their own personal gain?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we need more lambasting of women who use their vaginas to manipulate the patriarchy for their own personal gain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bruno</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582486</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582486</guid>
		<description> This comment is beyond Like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> This comment is beyond Like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: royaltrux</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582466</link>
		<dc:creator>royaltrux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582466</guid>
		<description> The staff member who pulled that photo obviously did not take the time TO LOOK AT IT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The staff member who pulled that photo obviously did not take the time TO LOOK AT IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bruno</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582447</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582447</guid>
		<description> The staff member who pulled that photo obviously did not take the time to note the source of the downloaded photo. If they did they would have noticed that it came from a cheeky blog. Best journalistic practices say document your source. If the source is not documented how can anyone be sure the photo is available for use without charge?

 I agree that most news sources can use a promotional book image under fair use but any image of the cover is not the official promotional image. All major publishers use an official promotional image because of concerns about image quality and version, also many book jackets are regional or retailer specific.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The staff member who pulled that photo obviously did not take the time to note the source of the downloaded photo. If they did they would have noticed that it came from a cheeky blog. Best journalistic practices say document your source. If the source is not documented how can anyone be sure the photo is available for use without charge?</p>
<p> I agree that most news sources can use a promotional book image under fair use but any image of the cover is not the official promotional image. All major publishers use an official promotional image because of concerns about image quality and version, also many book jackets are regional or retailer specific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582428</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582428</guid>
		<description>I actually noticed just after posting that it was two different T-Shirt companies, each with a different boob-filling ad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually noticed just after posting that it was two different T-Shirt companies, each with a different boob-filling ad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acerplatanoides</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582423</link>
		<dc:creator>acerplatanoides</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582423</guid>
		<description>Someone looked in the wrong tube. sadtrombone.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone looked in the wrong tube. sadtrombone.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582416</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582416</guid>
		<description>You forgot to add &quot;It&#039;s not funny!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot to add &#8220;It&#8217;s not funny!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zotlerg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582411</link>
		<dc:creator>zotlerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582411</guid>
		<description>Call me cynical, but I can&#039;t help thinking this was all done on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me cynical, but I can&#8217;t help thinking this was all done on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zotlerg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582406</link>
		<dc:creator>zotlerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582406</guid>
		<description>Ha, yeah. The woman on the advert with the reddish &#039;I used to care&#039; t-shirt looks half crazed to me, I really don&#039;t looking at her face. ; ) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, yeah. The woman on the advert with the reddish &#8216;I used to care&#8217; t-shirt looks half crazed to me, I really don&#8217;t looking at her face. ; ) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOmbudsman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582395</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOmbudsman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582395</guid>
		<description> News coverage is generally considered &quot;fair use&quot; though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> News coverage is generally considered &#8220;fair use&#8221; though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ant Duke</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582387</link>
		<dc:creator>Ant Duke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582387</guid>
		<description>Too funny?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hornby</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582383</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hornby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582383</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amusing (in a not very fun way) to read this comment, surrounding by adverts for a T-Shirt brand that fill their ads with as much boob as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amusing (in a not very fun way) to read this comment, surrounding by adverts for a T-Shirt brand that fill their ads with as much boob as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiche de Resistance</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582328</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiche de Resistance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582328</guid>
		<description>Excellent comment, and I certainly agree with you on the need to eliminate slut-shaming.  But this is not necessarily that.
Women can use &quot;offensive&quot; slang as much as men, ideally in a non-slut shaming context.  He was all up in HER snatch, he was educated by HER is a clear implication.  In our sexist society I&#039;m sure most will see it as a put-down of her, but I like to see it in a sexually empowered woman way.
I also LOVE the implied meaning that Petraeus was schooled by Broadwell AND Vernon Loeb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comment, and I certainly agree with you on the need to eliminate slut-shaming.  But this is not necessarily that.<br />
Women can use &#8220;offensive&#8221; slang as much as men, ideally in a non-slut shaming context.  He was all up in HER snatch, he was educated by HER is a clear implication.  In our sexist society I&#8217;m sure most will see it as a put-down of her, but I like to see it in a sexually empowered woman way.<br />
I also LOVE the implied meaning that Petraeus was schooled by Broadwell AND Vernon Loeb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P1rat3</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582327</link>
		<dc:creator>P1rat3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582327</guid>
		<description>While I agree with you in general, I don&#039;t see the laughs being derived from this altered cover as slut-shaming Paula Broadwell. All that happened is that someone added a couple of words to the already pregnant title &quot;All In&quot;, to make a juvenile joke about the adultery that both parties committed in the course of researching and writing the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with you in general, I don&#8217;t see the laughs being derived from this altered cover as slut-shaming Paula Broadwell. All that happened is that someone added a couple of words to the already pregnant title &#8220;All In&#8221;, to make a juvenile joke about the adultery that both parties committed in the course of researching and writing the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJBudSonic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/14/all-up-in-my-snatch.html#comment-1582326</link>
		<dc:creator>DJBudSonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194092#comment-1582326</guid>
		<description>More of a comment on the quality of news reporting these days than anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a comment on the quality of news reporting these days than anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
