Comments on: Mr. Shirtless http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html Brain candy for Happy Mutants Tue, 21 May 2013 13:43:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1 By: Stooge http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1585224 Stooge Sat, 17 Nov 2012 02:01:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1585224 No, he sent an innocuous photo to several hundred people. I'm talking about what happened prior to the widespread publication of the photo when someone let it be known that he had sent a shirtless picture to Jill Kelley and that might constitute potentially inappropriate conduct. That was clearly some malicious bullshit. No, he sent an innocuous photo to several hundred people.

I’m talking about what happened prior to the widespread publication of the photo when someone let it be known that he had sent a shirtless picture to Jill Kelley and that might constitute potentially inappropriate conduct. That was clearly some malicious bullshit.

]]> By: Antinous / Moderator http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1585046 Antinous / Moderator Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:55:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1585046 He sent it to the press himself, along with several hundred other recipients. He sent it to the press himself, along with several hundred other recipients.

]]> By: Antinous / Moderator http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1585010 Antinous / Moderator Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:34:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1585010 Anipplemia? Anipplemia?

]]> By: Brainspore http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584695 Brainspore Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:57:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584695 Well, which one <em>is</em> he? Well, which one is he?

]]> By: Stooge http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584678 Stooge Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:44:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584678 Oh, he <i>is</i> in trouble: whoever spoonfed the press this "shirtless" guff is evidently an enemy to be reckoned with. Oh, he is in trouble: whoever spoonfed the press this “shirtless” guff is evidently an enemy to be reckoned with.

]]> By: daneyul http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584556 daneyul Fri, 16 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584556 Hopefully he won't get in trouble for this--it just looks to be innocent goofing around--showing his bald-resemblance to the target dummies.  Not sexting, and nothing salacious or really inappropriate considering he and Kelley were supposedly friends.  Hopefully he won’t get in trouble for this–it just looks to be innocent goofing around–showing his bald-resemblance to the target dummies.  Not sexting, and nothing salacious or really inappropriate considering he and Kelley were supposedly friends. 

]]> By: Magill Foote http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584437 Magill Foote Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:53:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584437 Invisi-nipples. Invisi-nipples.

]]> By: Stooge http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584413 Stooge Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:31:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584413 You call <i>that</i> sexting, Xeni? You call that sexting, Xeni?

]]> By: Chuck http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584397 Chuck Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:23:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584397  *ba-DOOMP*  *!CHING!*  *ba-DOOMP*  *!CHING!*

]]> By: oasisob1 http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584388 oasisob1 Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:17:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584388 Yes, but they were just dummy accounts. Yes, but they were just dummy accounts.

]]> By: Chuck http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/mr-shirtless.html#comment-1584382 Chuck Fri, 16 Nov 2012 15:13:00 +0000 http://boingboing.net/?p=194592#comment-1584382 Did anyone investigate the E-mail accounts of the target dummies? Did anyone investigate the E-mail accounts of the target dummies?

]]>