<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Impact of Twitter on Journalism&#160;(Video)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wexelblat</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1586339</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wexelblat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1586339</guid>
		<description>Ooh, thank you for linking that.  I meant to watch it this past weekend when it showed up in my subscriptions digest but got distracted.  (Distracted on the Internets?! unheard-of!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh, thank you for linking that.  I meant to watch it this past weekend when it showed up in my subscriptions digest but got distracted.  (Distracted on the Internets?! unheard-of!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scratcheee</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1585200</link>
		<dc:creator>Scratcheee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 01:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1585200</guid>
		<description>One thing that bothers me about Twitter and &quot;the news&quot; is when a news presenter reads a tweet as if it was a normal quote from a person.  The stunted lingo just doesn&#039;t translate to a normal context.  It would be like using &quot;headline-ese&quot; in anything other than a headline.  

In other words, &quot;Twitter in News Irritating:  Scratcheee.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that bothers me about Twitter and &#8220;the news&#8221; is when a news presenter reads a tweet as if it was a normal quote from a person.  The stunted lingo just doesn&#8217;t translate to a normal context.  It would be like using &#8220;headline-ese&#8221; in anything other than a headline.  </p>
<p>In other words, &#8220;Twitter in News Irritating:  Scratcheee.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1585049</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1585049</guid>
		<description>TL;DR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TL;DR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bkad</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1584782</link>
		<dc:creator>bkad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1584782</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m unqualified to talk about twitter, since I last used it in 2008. My new girlfriend, a journalist, teases me a little about this.

But in regards to journalism... I think the reason I&#039;m not attracted to twitter (but am to other forms of web and print journalism) is two-fold. First, I&#039;m not good at filtering: I don&#039;t want to skim through hundreds of snippets a day; I&#039;m not good at it, and I don&#039;t find it interesting. Second, and this could have changed since 2008, I suspect twitter users have opinions. I don&#039;t want opinions in my news. I&#039;m not saying the traditional media are unbiased, but I do think there is an expectation in professional journalism that you&#039;re supposed to try.

[Edit: But to be fair, I can&#039;t expect the world to cater to my particular disability: Lot&#039;s of people CAN filter. And more news sources empower them. But, I do think there is a place for professionals to find out what I need to know and tell me.  I don&#039;t want to spend all day, or even much of my day, reading the news. I&#039;m more than willing to have someone help with that. ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unqualified to talk about twitter, since I last used it in 2008. My new girlfriend, a journalist, teases me a little about this.</p>
<p>But in regards to journalism&#8230; I think the reason I&#8217;m not attracted to twitter (but am to other forms of web and print journalism) is two-fold. First, I&#8217;m not good at filtering: I don&#8217;t want to skim through hundreds of snippets a day; I&#8217;m not good at it, and I don&#8217;t find it interesting. Second, and this could have changed since 2008, I suspect twitter users have opinions. I don&#8217;t want opinions in my news. I&#8217;m not saying the traditional media are unbiased, but I do think there is an expectation in professional journalism that you&#8217;re supposed to try.</p>
<p>[Edit: But to be fair, I can't expect the world to cater to my particular disability: Lot's of people CAN filter. And more news sources empower them. But, I do think there is a place for professionals to find out what I need to know and tell me.  I don't want to spend all day, or even much of my day, reading the news. I'm more than willing to have someone help with that. ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fogbert</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1584673</link>
		<dc:creator>Fogbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1584673</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m being naive, but Journalism (capitalized on purpose) has a lot it could offer.

- Report unimpeachable facts.
- Report informed analysis.
- Report from access. Offer me information I can&#039;t get anywhere else.
- Remove bias. This is a whole other can of worms, but it&#039;s important.
- Lose the hyperbole.

Unfortunately, the press (I&#039;m oversimplifying by treating it as an entity) moved away from these core principles long before Twitter--or the Internet for that matter--and on cruft, Twitter is eating everyone&#039;s lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m being naive, but Journalism (capitalized on purpose) has a lot it could offer.</p>
<p>- Report unimpeachable facts.<br />
- Report informed analysis.<br />
- Report from access. Offer me information I can&#8217;t get anywhere else.<br />
- Remove bias. This is a whole other can of worms, but it&#8217;s important.<br />
- Lose the hyperbole.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the press (I&#8217;m oversimplifying by treating it as an entity) moved away from these core principles long before Twitter&#8211;or the Internet for that matter&#8211;and on cruft, Twitter is eating everyone&#8217;s lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melinda9</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/16/the-impact-of-twitter-on-journ.html#comment-1584668</link>
		<dc:creator>Melinda9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=194687#comment-1584668</guid>
		<description>Uh I thought journalism was reporting, investigation, checking veracity of sources, etc. - whereas twitter is as they put it generously &#039;raw information&#039; with no way to know if it&#039;s true or its context. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh I thought journalism was reporting, investigation, checking veracity of sources, etc. &#8211; whereas twitter is as they put it generously &#8216;raw information&#8217; with no way to know if it&#8217;s true or its context. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
