<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joss Whedon&#039;s extracurricular Much Ado About Nothing gets a release&#160;date</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 09:15:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crashproof</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595423</link>
		<dc:creator>Crashproof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595423</guid>
		<description>I will always think of that character as Benethingy, thanks to some indiscriminate forum censoring software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will always think of that character as Benethingy, thanks to some indiscriminate forum censoring software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohbejoyful</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595214</link>
		<dc:creator>ohbejoyful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595214</guid>
		<description>Yay! Cannot wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! Cannot wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595181</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595181</guid>
		<description>Of course its the Buffyverse, but she was not (ever) in Buffy. Although there were a few episodes where her character was on the opposite end of a phone line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course its the Buffyverse, but she was not (ever) in Buffy. Although there were a few episodes where her character was on the opposite end of a phone line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595074</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595074</guid>
		<description> Thanks! I wonder if I saw a &quot;making of&quot; type trailer . . . or just filled in the color in my memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Thanks! I wonder if I saw a &#8220;making of&#8221; type trailer . . . or just filled in the color in my memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coderjoe</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595065</link>
		<dc:creator>Coderjoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595065</guid>
		<description>Angel is usually considered part of the &quot;Buffyverse&quot;, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angel is usually considered part of the &#8220;Buffyverse&#8221;, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonotwit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595048</link>
		<dc:creator>anonotwit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595048</guid>
		<description>Black and white. I saw it at TIFF and if I remember correctly Whedon said that his rationale for using black and white was so that he didn&#039;t have to worry about the white balance.

I liked the Branagh version better but I enjoyed this one. It&#039;s one of my favorite Shakespeare plays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black and white. I saw it at TIFF and if I remember correctly Whedon said that his rationale for using black and white was so that he didn&#8217;t have to worry about the white balance.</p>
<p>I liked the Branagh version better but I enjoyed this one. It&#8217;s one of my favorite Shakespeare plays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Jones</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1595037</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 23:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1595037</guid>
		<description>I saw a trailer for this in the theater. I can&#039;t remember what film it ran before.

But I could have sworn it was in color. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a trailer for this in the theater. I can&#8217;t remember what film it ran before.</p>
<p>But I could have sworn it was in color. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevel</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/11/29/joss-whedon-much-ado.html#comment-1594973</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=197377#comment-1594973</guid>
		<description>Amy Acker was in Angel, Dollhouse and Cabin in the Woods; not Buffy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amy Acker was in Angel, Dollhouse and Cabin in the Woods; not Buffy. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
