<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Funny fake planning&#160;notices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599671</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599671</guid>
		<description>My previous house wasn&#039;t even in a planned community.  It was in a neighborhood that somehow ended up as an architectural review zone because of dubious claims of historical design value.  There are certainly real historical districts, but this wasn&#039;t one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My previous house wasn&#8217;t even in a planned community.  It was in a neighborhood that somehow ended up as an architectural review zone because of dubious claims of historical design value.  There are certainly real historical districts, but this wasn&#8217;t one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599658</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599658</guid>
		<description>Palm Springs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palm Springs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlyphGryph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599516</link>
		<dc:creator>GlyphGryph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599516</guid>
		<description> And I just hope that I never find myself unlucky enough to end up owning a home in one. *fingers crossed*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> And I just hope that I never find myself unlucky enough to end up owning a home in one. *fingers crossed*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GlyphGryph</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599515</link>
		<dc:creator>GlyphGryph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599515</guid>
		<description> I know, right? But no, stupid planning council...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I know, right? But no, stupid planning council&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599502</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599502</guid>
		<description>There are many localities in which even cosmetic changes require approval.  You may not be allowed to change the color of your house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are many localities in which even cosmetic changes require approval.  You may not be allowed to change the color of your house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antinous / Moderator</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599500</link>
		<dc:creator>Antinous / Moderator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599500</guid>
		<description>Our local politicians don&#039;t breed.  The lhasa apso might need a trip to the doggie spa, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our local politicians don&#8217;t breed.  The lhasa apso might need a trip to the doggie spa, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickieD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599478</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickieD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599478</guid>
		<description>I felt it was a big problem in the historic district. I would have liked to have seen more regulations on what people could do to historic properties, but the developers had such a hold on the town council that they never could make regulations on the downtown stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt it was a big problem in the historic district. I would have liked to have seen more regulations on what people could do to historic properties, but the developers had such a hold on the town council that they never could make regulations on the downtown stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMadLibrarian</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599450</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMadLibrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599450</guid>
		<description>I can sympathize with the fight with local permitting and planning commissions.  I wanted to enclose my back porch and move my kitchen there.  I would have had a licensed plumber and an electrician do the plumbing and electrical work, but the rest of it I could have done myself.  However, I was required to have an architect create the plans, provide the original house and lot plans showing all internal and external walls and setbacks, and retrofit the existing porch to comply with current building code.  If I did the work myself to code, it would have cost about $3000.  All the other additions tripled the cost, and made me abandon the plan in favor of remodeling the current kitchen.  Meanwhile, big housing developments go merrily along. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can sympathize with the fight with local permitting and planning commissions.  I wanted to enclose my back porch and move my kitchen there.  I would have had a licensed plumber and an electrician do the plumbing and electrical work, but the rest of it I could have done myself.  However, I was required to have an architect create the plans, provide the original house and lot plans showing all internal and external walls and setbacks, and retrofit the existing porch to comply with current building code.  If I did the work myself to code, it would have cost about $3000.  All the other additions tripled the cost, and made me abandon the plan in favor of remodeling the current kitchen.  Meanwhile, big housing developments go merrily along. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strangefriend</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599449</link>
		<dc:creator>strangefriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599449</guid>
		<description> Do you live in San Francisco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Do you live in San Francisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Simmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599216</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599216</guid>
		<description>I live in a county that has county-wide zoning laws.  In theory there are all sorts of things I have to have permission for.  In practice, in the rural parts we usually gleefully ignore the zoning laws.  Now, if you&#039;re hiring someone to put in a septic tank you&#039;re going to have to pay attention, as well as anything else that you&#039;ll be hiring a contractor for, and you&#039;ll be in a world of hurt if you try to build improvements without having your property reassessed, but other than that, don&#039;t be a dick and you don&#039;t have to worry about it.  

Now, the town closest to me is a different story.  Despite being the home of the first geodesic dome home, owned by none other than Buckminster Fuller, I kinda doubt you could build one there without going through a lot of legal hoops.

Once in a while people get their panties in a bunch when they get told they can&#039;t keep old tires on their property, and so on.  People forget that in the 19th century, people here were still dying of malaria.  In Illinois.  And malaria is still an issue.  Yes, really.

My parents live in a nearby county, where the zoning laws are nearly nonexistent as well as property taxes.  My Palin-loving, gun-toting mother actually said that she wished for stricter zoning laws in her county, after she had an asshole move next door to her who plopped a crappy old trailer, piles of junk, and would ride a four-wheeler around the perimeter of his property, including by the part of their house that faced their bedroom, at 3 a.m.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live in a county that has county-wide zoning laws.  In theory there are all sorts of things I have to have permission for.  In practice, in the rural parts we usually gleefully ignore the zoning laws.  Now, if you&#8217;re hiring someone to put in a septic tank you&#8217;re going to have to pay attention, as well as anything else that you&#8217;ll be hiring a contractor for, and you&#8217;ll be in a world of hurt if you try to build improvements without having your property reassessed, but other than that, don&#8217;t be a dick and you don&#8217;t have to worry about it.  </p>
<p>Now, the town closest to me is a different story.  Despite being the home of the first geodesic dome home, owned by none other than Buckminster Fuller, I kinda doubt you could build one there without going through a lot of legal hoops.</p>
<p>Once in a while people get their panties in a bunch when they get told they can&#8217;t keep old tires on their property, and so on.  People forget that in the 19th century, people here were still dying of malaria.  In Illinois.  And malaria is still an issue.  Yes, really.</p>
<p>My parents live in a nearby county, where the zoning laws are nearly nonexistent as well as property taxes.  My Palin-loving, gun-toting mother actually said that she wished for stricter zoning laws in her county, after she had an asshole move next door to her who plopped a crappy old trailer, piles of junk, and would ride a four-wheeler around the perimeter of his property, including by the part of their house that faced their bedroom, at 3 a.m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Simmons</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599202</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane Simmons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599202</guid>
		<description>A wall of firecrackers would be pretty awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A wall of firecrackers would be pretty awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lupus_Yonderboy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599181</link>
		<dc:creator>Lupus_Yonderboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599181</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I used to live in Wilmywood as well and I know what you mean - if you owned property (I never did but I had friends who did) and you wanted to do something usually it was as easy as just submitting a form.  There was a bit of a kerflufle about there being too many bars downtown (basically bars &amp; restaurants revitalized the downtown area and once it was revitalized the people who moved down there/moved other businesses in didn&#039;t like that there were so many bars around) but it never actually *went* anywhere beyond the complaining stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I used to live in Wilmywood as well and I know what you mean &#8211; if you owned property (I never did but I had friends who did) and you wanted to do something usually it was as easy as just submitting a form.  There was a bit of a kerflufle about there being too many bars downtown (basically bars &amp; restaurants revitalized the downtown area and once it was revitalized the people who moved down there/moved other businesses in didn&#8217;t like that there were so many bars around) but it never actually *went* anywhere beyond the complaining stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deidzoeb</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599110</link>
		<dc:creator>Deidzoeb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599110</guid>
		<description>I thought UK planning notices were kept on display in the basement in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying &#039;Beware of the Leopard&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought UK planning notices were kept on display in the basement in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying &#8216;Beware of the Leopard&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGreens</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599097</link>
		<dc:creator>McGreens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599097</guid>
		<description>Nope, but I did notice each one&#039;s signed by hot sauce peddler Levi Roots :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, but I did notice each one&#8217;s signed by hot sauce peddler Levi Roots :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tw1515tw</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599093</link>
		<dc:creator>tw1515tw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599093</guid>
		<description>Many UK houses have old covenants on their houses that ban them from having fun fairs, caravans, show roundabouts or swings in their front gardens. But good luck in finding the covenant owners to enforce those.

There&#039;s also 3rd party wall agreements. If you don&#039;t have one of those, and you&#039;re building within 1 metre of the boundary line, then your neighbour can get a injunction to stop your building work.

Brighton, aka London-on-Sea or Skidrow-on-Sea, has a lot of houses thrown up to home soldiers in the early 1800s with next to no foundations. So doing any building work on these 200 year old houses can lead to horror after horror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many UK houses have old covenants on their houses that ban them from having fun fairs, caravans, show roundabouts or swings in their front gardens. But good luck in finding the covenant owners to enforce those.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also 3rd party wall agreements. If you don&#8217;t have one of those, and you&#8217;re building within 1 metre of the boundary line, then your neighbour can get a injunction to stop your building work.</p>
<p>Brighton, aka London-on-Sea or Skidrow-on-Sea, has a lot of houses thrown up to home soldiers in the early 1800s with next to no foundations. So doing any building work on these 200 year old houses can lead to horror after horror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LaGrange</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599078</link>
		<dc:creator>LaGrange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599078</guid>
		<description>If by &quot;ugly&quot; you meant &quot;dressed up as a gigantic Heineken ad&quot; then yeah, your comment is relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If by &#8220;ugly&#8221; you meant &#8220;dressed up as a gigantic Heineken ad&#8221; then yeah, your comment is relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiote</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599076</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599076</guid>
		<description>The exact phrase is, &quot;As such the proposed extension would detract from the character and appearance of the street scene&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The exact phrase is, &#8220;As such the proposed extension would detract from the character and appearance of the street scene&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Snodgrass</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599073</link>
		<dc:creator>James Snodgrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599073</guid>
		<description>Did anybody else notice the reference numbers?
TR7/XJS (mid-70s British sports cars)
TSR 1/ G-BOAC (failed 1960s British fighter aircraft / reg number of a BA Concorde)
RB211/A320 (Rolls Royce jet that bankrupted the company / Airbus narrowbody)
VC10/BAC1-11 (British passenger jets of the 1960s)
IL86/TU-144 (USSR copies of VC10 and Concorde)
etc. etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anybody else notice the reference numbers?<br />
TR7/XJS (mid-70s British sports cars)<br />
TSR 1/ G-BOAC (failed 1960s British fighter aircraft / reg number of a BA Concorde)<br />
RB211/A320 (Rolls Royce jet that bankrupted the company / Airbus narrowbody)<br />
VC10/BAC1-11 (British passenger jets of the 1960s)<br />
IL86/TU-144 (USSR copies of VC10 and Concorde)<br />
etc. etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Symbiote</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599074</link>
		<dc:creator>Symbiote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599074</guid>
		<description> Hmm, I think describing it as &quot;a glass box on my disused balcony to grow plants in&quot; gives a different impression to the planning application, &quot;construction of a single storey front extension on the existing balcony at second floor level with the erection of a roof terrace above at third floor level.&quot;

I could be convinced that &quot;the proposed extension, [...] is considered to be out of character with, and incongruous to, the host building. [...] would detract from the character and appearance of the street scene&quot;, but it looks a complete mess anyway, so I&#039;m not sure why they care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hmm, I think describing it as &#8220;a glass box on my disused balcony to grow plants in&#8221; gives a different impression to the planning application, &#8220;construction of a single storey front extension on the existing balcony at second floor level with the erection of a roof terrace above at third floor level.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could be convinced that &#8220;the proposed extension, [...] is considered to be out of character with, and incongruous to, the host building. [...] would detract from the character and appearance of the street scene&#8221;, but it looks a complete mess anyway, so I&#8217;m not sure why they care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trondmm</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599062</link>
		<dc:creator>trondmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599062</guid>
		<description> Are ugly people allowed to spend time on a balcony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Are ugly people allowed to spend time on a balcony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChickieD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599061</link>
		<dc:creator>ChickieD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599061</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve lived in both extremes. When I lived in Columbia, MD, which is a private city (yes, you read that right, the entire city is owned by a corporation), when I closed on my townhome I received three telephone book sized binders of regulations. There was one for the city regulations. One for the village regulations. The third was for the townhouse regulations. There were rules about where and how you could put in skylights, the kinds of vehicles you could park in front of your home, the size of the fence around a pool, the colors and sizes that you could build a deck, the kinds of siding that were permissible. The result of this was that it was one of the few areas I lived where there were almost no additions to any of the homes.  To add an addition required so many hoops to jump through, most people found it easier to move to a larger house. The values of the neighborhoods were very stable. However, the town paper was just hilarious to read, with every new sign and light causing a major discussion in letters to the editor. Neighbors got into the most tremendous fights about minor rule violations. It was a beautiful, homogenous exterior of a place to live with a lot of nastiness seething underneath.

After living there, I moved to Wilmington, NC. When I closed on my house in a golf course community I received the rules for the community - one piece of paper. It is the only place I have lived where there was a junk yard and a trailer park next to such an exclusive community. There wasn&#039;t anything you could do if your neighbor did something stupid to their property that affected you, but for the most part I didn&#039;t see much of that kind of thing. People segregated themselves into the communities that were right for them - the people who wanted to park work trucks in front of their homes didn&#039;t live in the communities where the retirees devoted their lives to their perfect lawns. There were very few community resources there; if you want to run a class, for example,  you had to start your own small business instead of having a community center that would advertise and run it for you. 

Both places were nice to live. Wilmington was a lot of fun but sometimes it felt too much like everyone had to be out for themselves. Columbia had tons of parks and community gyms and places to take classes, but to me it felt oppressive that everyone was so fixated on the rules.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve lived in both extremes. When I lived in Columbia, MD, which is a private city (yes, you read that right, the entire city is owned by a corporation), when I closed on my townhome I received three telephone book sized binders of regulations. There was one for the city regulations. One for the village regulations. The third was for the townhouse regulations. There were rules about where and how you could put in skylights, the kinds of vehicles you could park in front of your home, the size of the fence around a pool, the colors and sizes that you could build a deck, the kinds of siding that were permissible. The result of this was that it was one of the few areas I lived where there were almost no additions to any of the homes.  To add an addition required so many hoops to jump through, most people found it easier to move to a larger house. The values of the neighborhoods were very stable. However, the town paper was just hilarious to read, with every new sign and light causing a major discussion in letters to the editor. Neighbors got into the most tremendous fights about minor rule violations. It was a beautiful, homogenous exterior of a place to live with a lot of nastiness seething underneath.</p>
<p>After living there, I moved to Wilmington, NC. When I closed on my house in a golf course community I received the rules for the community &#8211; one piece of paper. It is the only place I have lived where there was a junk yard and a trailer park next to such an exclusive community. There wasn&#8217;t anything you could do if your neighbor did something stupid to their property that affected you, but for the most part I didn&#8217;t see much of that kind of thing. People segregated themselves into the communities that were right for them &#8211; the people who wanted to park work trucks in front of their homes didn&#8217;t live in the communities where the retirees devoted their lives to their perfect lawns. There were very few community resources there; if you want to run a class, for example,  you had to start your own small business instead of having a community center that would advertise and run it for you. </p>
<p>Both places were nice to live. Wilmington was a lot of fun but sometimes it felt too much like everyone had to be out for themselves. Columbia had tons of parks and community gyms and places to take classes, but to me it felt oppressive that everyone was so fixated on the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peregrinus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599013</link>
		<dc:creator>peregrinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599013</guid>
		<description>Like Ben Eine on Middlesex St in London
http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/jun/27/streetart

The UK PM (not a name check or endorsement) even made a gift of some of his art to Mr Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Ben Eine on Middlesex St in London<br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/jun/27/streetart" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/jun/27/streetart</a></p>
<p>The UK PM (not a name check or endorsement) even made a gift of some of his art to Mr Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lemoutan</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599012</link>
		<dc:creator>Lemoutan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599012</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that why we have graffitti artists?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that why we have graffitti artists?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hiles</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599008</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 13:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599008</guid>
		<description>Not really a solution if you don&#039;t own the shutters but have to suffer looking at them anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really a solution if you don&#8217;t own the shutters but have to suffer looking at them anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wreckrob8</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1599004</link>
		<dc:creator>Wreckrob8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1599004</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t like them you can always paint them. They make a perfect canvas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t like them you can always paint them. They make a perfect canvas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hiles</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1598998</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1598998</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t need permission for everything. There are certain changes you can make without getting planning permission. For major changes, yeah you need to get permission. This seems reasonable, otherwise there would be no purpose in planning system and our cities would look much worse than they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need permission for everything. There are certain changes you can make without getting planning permission. For major changes, yeah you need to get permission. This seems reasonable, otherwise there would be no purpose in planning system and our cities would look much worse than they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: class_enemy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1598996</link>
		<dc:creator>class_enemy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1598996</guid>
		<description> Antinous, you obviously failed to make the appropriate campaign contributions in advance.

The whole point of planning and zoning laws is to make sure that the children of local politicians are not unduly burdened by college debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Antinous, you obviously failed to make the appropriate campaign contributions in advance.</p>
<p>The whole point of planning and zoning laws is to make sure that the children of local politicians are not unduly burdened by college debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Hiles</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1598997</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Hiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1598997</guid>
		<description>Well, riots happen roughly once every 10 years. Metal shutters look crap all the damn time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, riots happen roughly once every 10 years. Metal shutters look crap all the damn time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew_Gehringer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1598993</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew_Gehringer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1598993</guid>
		<description> Yes, some places still make bakelite.

As for making it yourself...it&#039;s phenol and fomaldehyde (two carcinogens) baked in a pressure vessel, so...not unless you like tumors.

Galalith, another early plastic, can be made at home, though.  

http://www.wikihow.com/Turn-Milk-to-Stone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Yes, some places still make bakelite.</p>
<p>As for making it yourself&#8230;it&#8217;s phenol and fomaldehyde (two carcinogens) baked in a pressure vessel, so&#8230;not unless you like tumors.</p>
<p>Galalith, another early plastic, can be made at home, though.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wikihow.com/Turn-Milk-to-Stone" rel="nofollow">http://www.wikihow.com/Turn-Milk-to-Stone</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kayest</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/04/funny-fake-planning-notices.html#comment-1598978</link>
		<dc:creator>kayest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198152#comment-1598978</guid>
		<description>Although I&#039;ve never made a planning application myself I wonder what the point of not changing the proposed plans is if you are resubmitting requests for the same refused plan?

Also I don&#039;t see the phrase &quot;disrupt the street scene&quot; on Hackney&#039;s planning refusal page for your submission. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I&#8217;ve never made a planning application myself I wonder what the point of not changing the proposed plans is if you are resubmitting requests for the same refused plan?</p>
<p>Also I don&#8217;t see the phrase &#8220;disrupt the street scene&#8221; on Hackney&#8217;s planning refusal page for your submission. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
