<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ilford disposable&#160;cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 09:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Dyer</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1602986</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1602986</guid>
		<description>XP2 is C41-process film, so you can get that developed anywhere that still handles color film.  HP5 is genuine B&amp;W and will push.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP2 is C41-process film, so you can get that developed anywhere that still handles color film.  HP5 is genuine B&amp;W and will push.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alpacaman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599860</link>
		<dc:creator>Alpacaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599860</guid>
		<description>Your local camera shop will do it for you too, and some pharmacies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your local camera shop will do it for you too, and some pharmacies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dlo Burns</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599649</link>
		<dc:creator>Dlo Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 23:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599649</guid>
		<description>Most people doing home dev have a film scanner - it&#039;s amazing how flexible film can be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people doing home dev have a film scanner &#8211; it&#8217;s amazing how flexible film can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spejic</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599569</link>
		<dc:creator>spejic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 22:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599569</guid>
		<description>&quot;Disposable&quot; is only the vernacular term for such cameras. They are not thrown away, but are refilled with film, the battery changed (if it has a flash), and then repackaged and resold. The disposable camera you buy in a store has been used many times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Disposable&#8221; is only the vernacular term for such cameras. They are not thrown away, but are refilled with film, the battery changed (if it has a flash), and then repackaged and resold. The disposable camera you buy in a store has been used many times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mswendyk</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599482</link>
		<dc:creator>mswendyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599482</guid>
		<description>Any idea when these will be available in the US? The one store I found that would ship here charged 75 pounds to ship. A tad high given the cost of the camera. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any idea when these will be available in the US? The one store I found that would ship here charged 75 pounds to ship. A tad high given the cost of the camera. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Smith</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599477</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599477</guid>
		<description>Will they let me push it to 1600 ASA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will they let me push it to 1600 ASA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Ockrassa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599443</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Ockrassa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599443</guid>
		<description>Good, because what we really need is more throw-away shit clogging landfills.

WTH is wrong with buying an OM-1 off eBay for $100 and shooting film through that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, because what we really need is more throw-away shit clogging landfills.</p>
<p>WTH is wrong with buying an OM-1 off eBay for $100 and shooting film through that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599367</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599367</guid>
		<description>Wrong. Color print paper is layered with transparent dyes so the &quot;pixels&quot; overlap. the reason for the lesser resolution is the size of the dye clusters that remain after the smaller silver particles are removed. In B&amp;W paper, the dye IS the (metallic) silver. See also:  http://www.amazon.com/Photographic-Materials-Processes-Leslie-Stroebel/dp/0240804058</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong. Color print paper is layered with transparent dyes so the &#8220;pixels&#8221; overlap. the reason for the lesser resolution is the size of the dye clusters that remain after the smaller silver particles are removed. In B&amp;W paper, the dye IS the (metallic) silver. See also:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Photographic-Materials-Processes-Leslie-Stroebel/dp/0240804058" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Photographic-Materials-Processes-Leslie-Stroebel/dp/0240804058</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599338</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599338</guid>
		<description>Huzzah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huzzah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nadreck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599333</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599333</guid>
		<description>Be careful getting this developed.  Most places will just print out your B&amp;W negatives onto colour photographic paper.  This cuts your resolution to 1/3rd of what it should be.  One of the whole points of B&amp;W photography is that every &quot;pixel&quot; on your print only has to be of the kind that is on the Black -&gt; White continuum.  On colour paper you have groups of three chemical &quot;pixels&quot; (usually one each of Red, Green and Blue) to make one visual dot on your print.  In the same space you could have three dots of Black and White &quot;pixels&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful getting this developed.  Most places will just print out your B&amp;W negatives onto colour photographic paper.  This cuts your resolution to 1/3rd of what it should be.  One of the whole points of B&amp;W photography is that every &#8220;pixel&#8221; on your print only has to be of the kind that is on the Black -&gt; White continuum.  On colour paper you have groups of three chemical &#8220;pixels&#8221; (usually one each of Red, Green and Blue) to make one visual dot on your print.  In the same space you could have three dots of Black and White &#8220;pixels&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Weisberger</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599322</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Weisberger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599322</guid>
		<description>Says you can send to Ilford for all sorts of neat processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Says you can send to Ilford for all sorts of neat processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Schenck</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599311</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Schenck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599311</guid>
		<description>Ohhh, HP5 was my jam. Nice to see it&#039;s still around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohhh, HP5 was my jam. Nice to see it&#8217;s still around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tofagerl</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599304</link>
		<dc:creator>tofagerl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599304</guid>
		<description>90s hell, I did that two years ago :) Bought a used Nikon F75 for peanuts. It has more options and features than my digital SLR!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>90s hell, I did that two years ago :) Bought a used Nikon F75 for peanuts. It has more options and features than my digital SLR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599277</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599277</guid>
		<description>I wonder if you need a home darkroom to develop the prints? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you need a home darkroom to develop the prints? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo Jara</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/05/ilford-disposable-cameras.html#comment-1599278</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo Jara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=198490#comment-1599278</guid>
		<description>Link is screwed. Used to love revealing B&amp;W films on Illford paper. It was just great being in a tiny bathroom, with all windows blacked out and the smell of the chemicals. Good ol&#039; times... Ah, the 90&#039;s. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Link is screwed. Used to love revealing B&amp;W films on Illford paper. It was just great being in a tiny bathroom, with all windows blacked out and the smell of the chemicals. Good ol&#8217; times&#8230; Ah, the 90&#8242;s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
