<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amazingly thin iMacs &quot;attractive but&#160;compromised&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1603331</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1603331</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And I use the &quot;you&quot; rhetorically, Brainspore, not personally.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&quot;Seriously, when was the last time you upgraded a computer?&quot; sounded like an actual question to me. If it was rhetorical, why is that &quot;seriously&quot; there?

I know why Apple is going in this direction, but it still sucks for a lot of people and organizations. There are a lot of people and facilities, like mine, which need something more powerful than a Mac Mini but don&#039;t need the horsepower (and expense) of a Mac Pro. Upgradability was an important factor in keeping labs like ours up-to-date without breaking our budgets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And I use the &#8220;you&#8221; rhetorically, Brainspore, not personally.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Seriously, when was the last time you upgraded a computer?&#8221; sounded like an actual question to me. If it was rhetorical, why is that &#8220;seriously&#8221; there?</p>
<p>I know why Apple is going in this direction, but it still sucks for a lot of people and organizations. There are a lot of people and facilities, like mine, which need something more powerful than a Mac Mini but don&#8217;t need the horsepower (and expense) of a Mac Pro. Upgradability was an important factor in keeping labs like ours up-to-date without breaking our budgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ito Kagehisa</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1603235</link>
		<dc:creator>Ito Kagehisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1603235</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;There is no question that an Apple product holds it value longer than a PC product.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That appears to be empirically true.  I sometimes find working one-year-old PCs in the trash, but the Macs are always at least three years old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>There is no question that an Apple product holds it value longer than a PC product.</p></blockquote>
<p>That appears to be empirically true.  I sometimes find working one-year-old PCs in the trash, but the Macs are always at least three years old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1603100</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1603100</guid>
		<description>Weight alone isn&#039;t a good thing as far as being dropped goes.

Inertia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weight alone isn&#8217;t a good thing as far as being dropped goes.</p>
<p>Inertia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimmo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1603097</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1603097</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I just cracked the screen on my iphone 3gs, it was cheaper to buy a new one than even pay for the repair parts.&lt;/blockquote&gt;I cracked the screen on my HTC Legend and replaced it for $20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I just cracked the screen on my iphone 3gs, it was cheaper to buy a new one than even pay for the repair parts.</p></blockquote>
<p>I cracked the screen on my HTC Legend and replaced it for $20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rey Carr</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602436</link>
		<dc:creator>Rey Carr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602436</guid>
		<description>The Mac desktop computers have always been elegant, and they continue to lead the world in desktop design. But why they don&#039;t work on making the fastest and largest capacity available as part of the newest model, has always been a puzzle to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mac desktop computers have always been elegant, and they continue to lead the world in desktop design. But why they don&#8217;t work on making the fastest and largest capacity available as part of the newest model, has always been a puzzle to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602345</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602345</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Either you are blessed with a far faster connection than I, or you are completely rubbish at organizing physical media.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Streaming through iTunes, Netflix, Hulu, etc. is instant to start even with slower DSL connections.  Torrents can be downloaded and kept on a hard drive for instant access later as well on cheap-as-hell, huge hard drives.

Like I said, enjoy your trashy optical discs taking up space in your luggage, etc. (don&#039;t break the jewel cases or scratch the media though!).  This computer isn&#039;t for you or you can go get a glorious, external optical drive if you have dial-up for Internet access.

Optical is dead and dying for everyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Either you are blessed with a far faster connection than I, or you are completely rubbish at organizing physical media.</p></blockquote>
<p>Streaming through iTunes, Netflix, Hulu, etc. is instant to start even with slower DSL connections.  Torrents can be downloaded and kept on a hard drive for instant access later as well on cheap-as-hell, huge hard drives.</p>
<p>Like I said, enjoy your trashy optical discs taking up space in your luggage, etc. (don&#8217;t break the jewel cases or scratch the media though!).  This computer isn&#8217;t for you or you can go get a glorious, external optical drive if you have dial-up for Internet access.</p>
<p>Optical is dead and dying for everyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pease</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602165</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pease</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602165</guid>
		<description>i am confident i could find space for a medium tower in any of those cities, and i believe in you--i bet you could too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am confident i could find space for a medium tower in any of those cities, and i believe in you&#8211;i bet you could too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SamSam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602112</link>
		<dc:creator>SamSam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602112</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s pretty much 2013 and that&#039;s been hyperbole for a long time now. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Yeah, this whole thing kind of sound like &quot;Well, if that doo-hicky doesn&#039;t have a VHS drive, how are you going to watch Matlock, eh smart guy?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s pretty much 2013 and that&#8217;s been hyperbole for a long time now. </p></blockquote>
<p>Yeah, this whole thing kind of sound like &#8220;Well, if that doo-hicky doesn&#8217;t have a VHS drive, how are you going to watch Matlock, eh smart guy?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Blank</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602038</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602038</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll explain it to you. Having had to replace the hard drive on my 3rd gen iMac, you have to delicately peal away the mylar heat shield when you first open the back of the computer. If you do not -- you cannot access the internal components of the iMac such as the RAM or the optical drive. Perhaps you have a 4th gen? 1st gen: Bondi blue w/ puck mouse. 2nd gen: Monitor on stalk. 3rd gen: white polycarbonate all-in-1. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll explain it to you. Having had to replace the hard drive on my 3rd gen iMac, you have to delicately peal away the mylar heat shield when you first open the back of the computer. If you do not &#8212; you cannot access the internal components of the iMac such as the RAM or the optical drive. Perhaps you have a 4th gen? 1st gen: Bondi blue w/ puck mouse. 2nd gen: Monitor on stalk. 3rd gen: white polycarbonate all-in-1. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Wham</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1602008</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Wham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1602008</guid>
		<description> An Olds big-block in a Roller is a brilliant idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> An Olds big-block in a Roller is a brilliant idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doggo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601949</link>
		<dc:creator>doggo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601949</guid>
		<description>&quot;...unless you&#039;re a hardcore gamer, or need to do complex scientific modeling, or film editing.&quot;

Yeah. And I work at an educational &lt;i&gt;institution&lt;/i&gt;, in administration, so upgrades matter to us too. But since we&#039;re not doing digital video and multimedia, not as often.

Also, I do some multimedia at home, and I know a visual artist who uses his Mac to do his work. Both of us are using Macs that are more than 4 years old.

My point is, most people, especially people who would be buying an iMac, have a hell of a lot less need to upgrade later in the machine&#039;s life than folks here are proposing.

I&#039;m a system administrator in a large department and have occasion to use and maintain a wide variety of machines and operating systems. I&#039;ve been doing this a long time. And I can tell you from experience, that the need for post purchase upgrades, especially in the last 5 years or so, is mostly overstated by the industry, and us geeks.

If you have vast computing power needs, then an iMac is certainly not the best purchasing decision you could make. If you have modest needs, an iMac will fill them for many years. If you&#039;re a serious IT geek, and simply must have the best specs possible to build up your self-esteem, an iMac is a weak choice... and why the hell are you even having this discussion.

And I use the &quot;you&quot; rhetorically, Brainspore, not personally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;unless you&#8217;re a hardcore gamer, or need to do complex scientific modeling, or film editing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah. And I work at an educational <i>institution</i>, in administration, so upgrades matter to us too. But since we&#8217;re not doing digital video and multimedia, not as often.</p>
<p>Also, I do some multimedia at home, and I know a visual artist who uses his Mac to do his work. Both of us are using Macs that are more than 4 years old.</p>
<p>My point is, most people, especially people who would be buying an iMac, have a hell of a lot less need to upgrade later in the machine&#8217;s life than folks here are proposing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a system administrator in a large department and have occasion to use and maintain a wide variety of machines and operating systems. I&#8217;ve been doing this a long time. And I can tell you from experience, that the need for post purchase upgrades, especially in the last 5 years or so, is mostly overstated by the industry, and us geeks.</p>
<p>If you have vast computing power needs, then an iMac is certainly not the best purchasing decision you could make. If you have modest needs, an iMac will fill them for many years. If you&#8217;re a serious IT geek, and simply must have the best specs possible to build up your self-esteem, an iMac is a weak choice&#8230; and why the hell are you even having this discussion.</p>
<p>And I use the &#8220;you&#8221; rhetorically, Brainspore, not personally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EH</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601938</link>
		<dc:creator>EH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601938</guid>
		<description>Apple design and tablets constitute &quot;the natural progression of technology?&quot; I can see how it would be cheaper to buy a new 3GS than fix yours, since they are basically free now, but by the same token I don&#039;t take my $40 DVD player to be repaired. I&#039;m not sure how these compare to $2-3K computers, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple design and tablets constitute &#8220;the natural progression of technology?&#8221; I can see how it would be cheaper to buy a new 3GS than fix yours, since they are basically free now, but by the same token I don&#8217;t take my $40 DVD player to be repaired. I&#8217;m not sure how these compare to $2-3K computers, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B E Pratt</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601907</link>
		<dc:creator>B E Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601907</guid>
		<description> Not since they climbed into bed with Amazon.com, there isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Not since they climbed into bed with Amazon.com, there isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Drummond Smith, PhD</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601880</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Drummond Smith, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601880</guid>
		<description>I spend a great deal of time in rural areas where I also do work - depending on the cloud at the expense of more traditional hardware is problematic; maybe that means I keep paying a couple hundred dollars more for my computers (typically Toshibas - which still puts them at far less expensive than comparable Apples), but that is fine with me - it is a tool, after all, and the wise man pays for the right tool for the job. (shrug)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spend a great deal of time in rural areas where I also do work &#8211; depending on the cloud at the expense of more traditional hardware is problematic; maybe that means I keep paying a couple hundred dollars more for my computers (typically Toshibas &#8211; which still puts them at far less expensive than comparable Apples), but that is fine with me &#8211; it is a tool, after all, and the wise man pays for the right tool for the job. (shrug)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NelC</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601875</link>
		<dc:creator>NelC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601875</guid>
		<description>Well, yes, I &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; like to play DVDs. I &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; the DVDs already, and various outlets are keen on me buying more. Buying an additional drive to store the rips on is an additional expense, and ripping the DVDs is more work than I really want to commit to, to accommodate Apple&#039;s quirky design decisions.

Also, Cowicide: &lt;i&gt;Suffer?&lt;/I&gt; Does the presence of an optical drive really cause you existential angst or some form of physical suffering? Or does it just mean you might have to pay an extra $20 for the computer? I notice you don&#039;t care about &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt; hypothetically having to buy an extra DVD drive merely so that you don&#039;t have to contemplate your beautifully-designed Mac having an unsightly slot in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes, I <i>do</i> like to play DVDs. I <i>have</i> the DVDs already, and various outlets are keen on me buying more. Buying an additional drive to store the rips on is an additional expense, and ripping the DVDs is more work than I really want to commit to, to accommodate Apple&#8217;s quirky design decisions.</p>
<p>Also, Cowicide: <i>Suffer?</i> Does the presence of an optical drive really cause you existential angst or some form of physical suffering? Or does it just mean you might have to pay an extra $20 for the computer? I notice you don&#8217;t care about <i>me</i> hypothetically having to buy an extra DVD drive merely so that you don&#8217;t have to contemplate your beautifully-designed Mac having an unsightly slot in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taugust</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601866</link>
		<dc:creator>taugust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601866</guid>
		<description>&quot;I can stream or play a downloaded film in less time than it takes to find a DVD on the shelf (or wherever), shove it in the computer and hit play.&quot;

Either you are blessed with a far faster connection than I, or you are completely rubbish at organizing physical media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I can stream or play a downloaded film in less time than it takes to find a DVD on the shelf (or wherever), shove it in the computer and hit play.&#8221;</p>
<p>Either you are blessed with a far faster connection than I, or you are completely rubbish at organizing physical media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toyg</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601778</link>
		<dc:creator>toyg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601778</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;there&#039;s no reason to be concerned about it occupying too much space&lt;/i&gt;

You clearly have never lived in NYC. Or in London. Or in SF. Or or or...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>there&#8217;s no reason to be concerned about it occupying too much space</i></p>
<p>You clearly have never lived in NYC. Or in London. Or in SF. Or or or&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Earwicker</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601763</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Earwicker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601763</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also like to play my DVDs on my Mac&quot;

No you don&#039;t! No one does. You like to watch movies/TV shows on your Mac.

To do that, you get a large capacity USB hard drive (very cheap) and you rip your DVDs on to it using Handbrake. Then you can watch them with VLC instantly whenever you want: no searching for physical discs that were put back in the wrong case, no ugly/baffling menu screens, no copyright messages you can&#039;t skip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also like to play my DVDs on my Mac&#8221;</p>
<p>No you don&#8217;t! No one does. You like to watch movies/TV shows on your Mac.</p>
<p>To do that, you get a large capacity USB hard drive (very cheap) and you rip your DVDs on to it using Handbrake. Then you can watch them with VLC instantly whenever you want: no searching for physical discs that were put back in the wrong case, no ugly/baffling menu screens, no copyright messages you can&#8217;t skip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aarontheman</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601679</link>
		<dc:creator>aarontheman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601679</guid>
		<description>Tonight I&#039;ve been playing Star Wars: Dark Forces under OS 9.1 on my PowerPC 7500. Point being, there&#039;s still life in old Macs (not my lack of social life).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tonight I&#8217;ve been playing Star Wars: Dark Forces under OS 9.1 on my PowerPC 7500. Point being, there&#8217;s still life in old Macs (not my lack of social life).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McKinley H. Tabor</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601624</link>
		<dc:creator>McKinley H. Tabor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 04:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601624</guid>
		<description>There is no question that an Apple product holds it value longer than a PC product. However it&#039;s impossible to say that this extreem all-in-one design philosophy will make the resale market more &quot;vibrate&quot; given that it&#039;s still very new, there are simply no end-of-life MacBook Retinas of Late-2012 iMac units on the resale market.

The general Computer buying public is very different from us tech enthusiasts. The average user will choose to run their systems far beyond any useful resell value before they will meekly submit to a $1k to $2k upgrade. 

I think Apple wants to create the same mindset with iMacs and MacBooks they they have created for iPhones, iPods, and to a lesser extent iPads. They want to get consumers accustom to the ideal of periodic total equipment replacement. I honestly don&#039;t know how this strategy will work out in the long term, but on it&#039;s face it does seem very anti-consumer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no question that an Apple product holds it value longer than a PC product. However it&#8217;s impossible to say that this extreem all-in-one design philosophy will make the resale market more &#8220;vibrate&#8221; given that it&#8217;s still very new, there are simply no end-of-life MacBook Retinas of Late-2012 iMac units on the resale market.</p>
<p>The general Computer buying public is very different from us tech enthusiasts. The average user will choose to run their systems far beyond any useful resell value before they will meekly submit to a $1k to $2k upgrade. </p>
<p>I think Apple wants to create the same mindset with iMacs and MacBooks they they have created for iPhones, iPods, and to a lesser extent iPads. They want to get consumers accustom to the ideal of periodic total equipment replacement. I honestly don&#8217;t know how this strategy will work out in the long term, but on it&#8217;s face it does seem very anti-consumer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackbird</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601548</link>
		<dc:creator>jackbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601548</guid>
		<description>Also, burning CDs and DVDs.  Computers are creation machines, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, burning CDs and DVDs.  Computers are creation machines, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarge Misfit</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601529</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarge Misfit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 01:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601529</guid>
		<description> I agree, that is how business is working today. And they are missing out as a result.

People who prefer to upgrade their systems themselves are not going to buy a complete system unless it is upgradeable. By limiting/eliminating the ability to upgrade a system, the company loses out on those sales, as well as the sales of individual components.

There is no loss of sales to people who are not interested in upgrading on their own. But here&#039;s an opportunity to increase sales by selling upgradeable systems and their components.

And then there&#039;s the positive advertising that such a change would bring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I agree, that is how business is working today. And they are missing out as a result.</p>
<p>People who prefer to upgrade their systems themselves are not going to buy a complete system unless it is upgradeable. By limiting/eliminating the ability to upgrade a system, the company loses out on those sales, as well as the sales of individual components.</p>
<p>There is no loss of sales to people who are not interested in upgrading on their own. But here&#8217;s an opportunity to increase sales by selling upgradeable systems and their components.</p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s the positive advertising that such a change would bring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idon't Know</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601523</link>
		<dc:creator>Idon't Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601523</guid>
		<description>Get used to it.  This is the way things are going.  Especially since HP, Dell, Lenovo etc copy Apple as quickly as they can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get used to it.  This is the way things are going.  Especially since HP, Dell, Lenovo etc copy Apple as quickly as they can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601458</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601458</guid>
		<description>Why would you expect the form factor to change? What benefit does a change is chasis bring to a tower?

All the internal components save the mother/logic-board and (as we both agree, redundant) optical drive have had decent upgrades in the last few years: RAM, Graphics, CPU and HDD. It would be nice if there was some USB3 or Thunderbolt support, but I don&#039;t really see a problem with retaining the form factor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you expect the form factor to change? What benefit does a change is chasis bring to a tower?</p>
<p>All the internal components save the mother/logic-board and (as we both agree, redundant) optical drive have had decent upgrades in the last few years: RAM, Graphics, CPU and HDD. It would be nice if there was some USB3 or Thunderbolt support, but I don&#8217;t really see a problem with retaining the form factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brainspore</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601451</link>
		<dc:creator>Brainspore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601451</guid>
		<description>I work at an educational facility that has a lab full of iMacs used to teach digital video and multimedia. Yes, upgrades matter to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work at an educational facility that has a lab full of iMacs used to teach digital video and multimedia. Yes, upgrades matter to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itsumishi</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601445</link>
		<dc:creator>Itsumishi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601445</guid>
		<description>*facepalm*

If you&#039;re dragging your desktop on a plane hoping to watch a movie, the lack of an optical drive is the least of your worries!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*facepalm*</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re dragging your desktop on a plane hoping to watch a movie, the lack of an optical drive is the least of your worries!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cowicide</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601437</link>
		<dc:creator>Cowicide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601437</guid>
		<description>Are you replying to me?  And, if so, why?  Do you not understand the point?

If you are one of the &lt;b&gt;RARE&lt;/b&gt; people that wants to watch out-of-print movie titles that have yet to be sold online, then this computer isn&#039;t for you - or for f&#039;s sake, go buy an external optical drive.

But, once again, why should the rest of us suffer for the minority of you that want a larger iMac for esoteric uses?
&lt;blockquote&gt;Or are you just really into Adam Sandler and Charlie&#039;s Angels remakes?&lt;/blockquote&gt;It&#039;s pretty much 2013 and that&#039;s been hyperbole for a long time now.  There&#039;s a vast collection of titles available nowadays and if the film producers are too stupid to make it available, you can download the torrent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you replying to me?  And, if so, why?  Do you not understand the point?</p>
<p>If you are one of the <b>RARE</b> people that wants to watch out-of-print movie titles that have yet to be sold online, then this computer isn&#8217;t for you &#8211; or for f&#8217;s sake, go buy an external optical drive.</p>
<p>But, once again, why should the rest of us suffer for the minority of you that want a larger iMac for esoteric uses?</p>
<blockquote><p>Or are you just really into Adam Sandler and Charlie&#8217;s Angels remakes?</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty much 2013 and that&#8217;s been hyperbole for a long time now.  There&#8217;s a vast collection of titles available nowadays and if the film producers are too stupid to make it available, you can download the torrent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Garner</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601436</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 23:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601436</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t argue that the Death of the Desktop is overhyped, but considering there are rumors that processor sockets in PCs are going away in the near future and ALL atom based systems are soldered down I don&#039;t think its hyperbole. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t argue that the Death of the Desktop is overhyped, but considering there are rumors that processor sockets in PCs are going away in the near future and ALL atom based systems are soldered down I don&#8217;t think its hyperbole. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elusis</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601426</link>
		<dc:creator>elusis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601426</guid>
		<description>My point is that if optical drives vanish and &quot;buying hard drives is a false economy&quot; because of streaming and the cloud, that doesn&#039;t leave a user with the means to address all kinds of current usage situations.  I am currently in trouble with my hard drive space thanks to my giant music collection, which I am not interested in turning over to Apple or Amazon to hold for me.  I have a decent sized DVD collection which is impractical to rip to my hard drive due to capacity limits.  An optical drive, AND a decent sized hard drive, AND the cloud all serve different aspects of my needs.  
(Another place I can&#039;t count on &quot;the cloud&quot;?  In my classroom.  The university&#039;s network capacity fluctuates so randomly that even counting on YouTube videos to play reliably is a fool&#039;s errand.  Thank goodness for Download Helper and the fact that I can still get DVDs from Netflix when I need things I don&#039;t own already.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point is that if optical drives vanish and &#8220;buying hard drives is a false economy&#8221; because of streaming and the cloud, that doesn&#8217;t leave a user with the means to address all kinds of current usage situations.  I am currently in trouble with my hard drive space thanks to my giant music collection, which I am not interested in turning over to Apple or Amazon to hold for me.  I have a decent sized DVD collection which is impractical to rip to my hard drive due to capacity limits.  An optical drive, AND a decent sized hard drive, AND the cloud all serve different aspects of my needs. <br />
(Another place I can&#8217;t count on &#8220;the cloud&#8221;?  In my classroom.  The university&#8217;s network capacity fluctuates so randomly that even counting on YouTube videos to play reliably is a fool&#8217;s errand.  Thank goodness for Download Helper and the fact that I can still get DVDs from Netflix when I need things I don&#8217;t own already.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcus</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/amazingly-thin-imacs-attract.html#comment-1601423</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199084#comment-1601423</guid>
		<description> Really? Do you have access to the thousands of out-of-print movie titles that only appear on optical media? Or are you just really into Adam Sandler and Charlie&#039;s Angels remakes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Really? Do you have access to the thousands of out-of-print movie titles that only appear on optical media? Or are you just really into Adam Sandler and Charlie&#8217;s Angels remakes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
