Comments on: AOL history through the NYT Crossword

By: Chris Daly

Chris Daly — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:08:00 +0000

Granted, yes, I was responding to the part about difficultly. The 2nd Sunday puzzle is sometimes a crpytic when it’s not an acrostic.

By: jerwin

jerwin — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:08:00 +0000

Yes, but they aren’t cryptics. An cryptic crossword clue consists of two parts: definition and wordplay, while an ordinary crossword clue is limited to a definition.

Here’s a cryptic clue (it’s a down clue)
Questionable money supports Republican presidential candidate (6)
And here’s an ordinary clue
presidential candidate

Both refer to Romney. However, in the ordinary crossword, the dense grid of intersecting clues insures that, even if you’re clueless, you can still fill in the clue by solving the six intersecting clues.

A cryptic uses a less dense grid. You might be able to get three or four of the letters, but no more. The real trick is figuring out that “R” (for Republican) is the first, or topmost letter, and the other five letters are “MONEY”, scrambled– thus R-OMNEY.

By: B E Pratt

B E Pratt — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:53:00 +0000

While true that the early week crosswords are easy, at least they aren’t brain-dead easy. Will Shortz seems to make sure that they are at least amusing.

By: niktemadur

niktemadur — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:19:00 +0000

Bottom-right corner, almost every time, aside “Fashion monogram” – YSL.

By: niktemadur

niktemadur — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:15:00 +0000

Sundays are usually around a Wednesday or Thursday in difficulty but are significantly longer

That’s one helluva good way of putting it, I never would have thought of it.
You sir, have hit the nail firmly on the head.

By: niktemadur

niktemadur — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:10:00 +0000

The Sunday NYT crossword has approximately 125 vertical and 125 horizontal clues, so it’s bound to have several easy ones. Some of the clues, however, are quite challenging, with double meanings and/or surprises, such as a recurring three-letters-in-one-square theme all over the puzzle.

But if you really want a masochistic challenge, try the Saturday NYT crosswords. Mondays are extremely easy and they get progressively more difficult as the week goes by. By Saturday… those things are made by people with high IQs who have chosen the path of evil. Sundays are a large, stand-alone showcase.

EDIT: Yeah, I’ve just underlined what Chris Daly said above me, more or less.

By: jerwin

jerwin — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:52:00 +0000

The Nation, a leftist magazine, runs a weekly cryptic. It's great fun-- bad puns and anagrams abound. It's not part of the Nation's free content; so subscribing or buying it from a newstand is your only option. However, Five vie for Puzzler Mantle, a 2011 contest which was used to pick the successor to Frank W Lewis, is free. According to the current setter's blog, Cosima K. Coinpott won the contest.

By: Clay Hale

Clay Hale — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 20:16:00 +0000

Perpetually close to 116 across too

By: Chris Daly

Chris Daly — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:18:00 +0000

The Times crossword gets more difficult throughout the week – a Monday crossword can be easily completed in under 5 minutes, while a Saturday can be extremely difficult (Sundays are usually around a Wednesday or Thursday in difficulty but are significantly longer). Most likely the rather simple clues are from early week puzzles.

Of course the site won’t load for me at work so I can’t see if they list the days of the week each clue is from.

By: taras

taras — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:05:00 +0000

Do you have cryptic crosswords in America? Or ones with slightly more taxing clues? You’d never get “Popular I.S.P.” = AOL in a British crossword.

Never really thought the way crosswords worked would vary by culture.

By: semiotix

semiotix — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 19:04:00 +0000

Direct link. This is great, though. One of my back-burner long-term plans as a cultural historian is to do a sort of longitudinal study of NYT crosswords. I'm glad to know it's technically feasible.

By: GawainLavers

GawainLavers — Fri, 07 Dec 2012 18:36:00 +0000

That link doesn’t work for me. I see the title appear briefly, then it jumps to their main page… and I can’t even find the article after that.