Features Podcasts Family Video Comics Music Tech Science Books Film & TV Games ✚

Jill

GOP fires author of copyright reform paper

Cory Doctorow at 2:39 pm Fri, Dec 7, 2012

— FEATURED —

Science

Making sense of the confusing Supreme Court DNA patent ruling

Science

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

Feature

The Snowden Principle

Book Review

Carl Hiaasen's Bad Monkey

— FOLLOW US —

Boing Boing is on Twitter and Facebook. Subscribe to our RSS feed or daily email.

 

— POLICIES —

Except where indicated, Boing Boing is licensed under a Creative Commons License permitting non-commercial sharing with attribution

 

— FONTS —

Tweet
Kindle

Derek Khanna, the Republican House staffer who wrote an eminently sensible paper on copyright reform that was retracted less than a day later has been fired. So much for the GOP's drive to attract savvy, net-centric young voters. After all, this is the party that put SOPA's daddy in charge of the House Tech and Science Committee.

But it's pretty terrible for Khanna -- what a shabby way of dealing with dissent within your ranks.

Staffer axed by Republican group over retracted copyright-reform memo [Timothy B. Lee/Ars Technica] (via /.)

I write books. My latest is a YA science fiction novel called Homeland (it's the sequel to Little Brother). More books: Rapture of the Nerds (a novel, with Charlie Stross); With a Little Help (short stories); and The Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow (novella and nonfic). I speak all over the place and I tweet and tumble, too.

MORE:  Copyfight • employment • gop • politics

More at Boing Boing

Ants and Stars: Bruce Sterling and Jasmina Tesanovic visit the Sardinia Radio Telescope in Italy

The Snowden Principle

  • Brainspore

    Perhaps Mr. Khanna will eventually find his way to a more sensible party.

    • Bemopolis

      When it comes to copyright reform, as it is with the War on Drugs, America does not have a sensible party.

      • Brainspore

        Not yet.

        • Iron Clad Burrito

          …are you suggesting Democrats will suddenly come to their senses and risk angering a major industry/employer in their districts, or are you suggesting a new party?
          And as long as you’re dreaming, have you asked for a unicorn yet?

          • Brainspore

            And as long as you’re dreaming, have you asked for a unicorn yet?

            Nah, BoingBoing’s got my back for those.

      • http://theladyfingers.blogspot.com/ Ladyfingers

         The Greens and Libertarians are pretty sensible on both fronts.

        • Thad Boyd

          They’ve got their own share of problems — obscurity probably being the biggest — but sure, I’d be happy to see  Khanna make some noise wherever he winds up.  And I still hold out hope that, if the two major parties continue to dither, eventually one (or more) of the third parties will become viable.  And that this will happen exactly BECAUSE the Republican Party insists on pushing out people like Khanna.  (And, you know, hates science, women, black people, brown people, gay people, and the disabled.)

          • http://twitter.com/fossilfuels Funk Daddy

            and vets.

    • http://profiles.google.com/samsonsworld Samson Samson

      The Green Party exists, and is accepting new members

  • GawainLavers

    But it’s pretty terrible for Khanna — what a shabby way of dealing with dissent within your ranks.

    That probably seems like a reasonable statement to a foreigner, but as an US citizen very familiar with the Republican party…he got off pretty light.

    • mathman_mr_t

      i completely agree.  if one has been paying even the most cursory attention to our current political class it is blatantly obvious that the republican party has gone stark raving mad.  that young man is lucky he wasn’t forced to run through a gauntlet of tea party republicans on his way out of the house office building.

      • Boris Bartlog

        The tea party isn’t responsible for his removal, though – and I seriously doubt that many of them care much one way or the other about copyright. This looks more like corporate influence, and *that* has nothing to do with the recent radicalization of some other elements. In other words, I’m thinking they woulda canned him even if they *hadn’t* gone stark raving mad. In fact I expect the Democrats would have done much the same, only more quietly… maybe via a sideways promotion.

  • niktemadur

    What a shabby way of dealing with dissent within your ranks

    First I thought of a FTFY: “What a shabby way of dealing with reason within your ranks”.  Then it hit me – in their little heads, the republican party is back to the pre-Voltaire days.

  • http://twitter.com/missshenna Lithi

    I shouldn’t be surprised at this, but how discouraging. As someone on Ars pointed out, even though US politics bow to the highest bidder, the fact that they don’t bother to hide it is very disturbing.

    This is my favorite comment from Ars:

    Can we just rename the USA “Hollywood’s Bitchmonkey” now and be done with it? Every time the movie industry says “jump” it seems like all of our politicians and judges ask “on which of our so-called citizens?”

  • Andrew Singleton

    Is there any way we can indavidually and or collectivly get in contact with this guy and tell him we /agree/ with him?

    • Thad Boyd

      This.  I’d been meaning to look up his contact info and do exactly that BEFORE I heard he was fired.

      He could use some support, some reassurance — ideally a new, better job.

    • Matthew Stone

      The TechDirt edition of this story says that Derek Khanna has been continuing the conversation on his Twitter feed. That’s a place to start at least.

      http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121206/08510021258/republican-study-committee-dumps-derek-khanna-author-copyright-reform-brief-after-members-complain.shtml

      https://twitter.com/dkhanna11

  • Rindan

    The Republicans kill me.  The US has a two party system.  It doesn’t function without an opposition party.  You need another party to gently apply the breaks when the other party is getting out of hand and handing out too many gifts to its constituents.  You need another party to take the ‘other side’ of stuff that deserves to have another side.  SOPA is exactly why I want a function opposition party.  Without the threat of an opposition party to take your seat, SOPA would have been passed by Democrats.  

    The fucking Republicans seem bent on making the US a one party nation.I would LOVE to have a viable Republican opposition.  I in fact do want a party that balks at deficit spending and counters the interests that Democrats have in stuff like copyright.  The Republicans are utterly hellbent on not being that party.  When something meaningful comes out where they can serve their god damn two party function of saying “no” to the other side, like copyright, the assholes suddenly find their bipartisan spirit.  When it comes to subjects they should just abandon because it is a subject that they are going to lose (rightfully so), like gay marriage, those pieces of shit dig in their heels and try and fight off history like they stand any chance of winning.My masturbation fantasy is that in the same way the once incredibly racist Democratic party surrendered almost all at once the civil rights issue to get on the right side of history, that the Republicans will do the same.  In my fantasy, the Republican party abandons the crazy evangelicals, finds their moderate libertarian balls, and battles for the youth and working professional vote.  They could slice into a huge swath of the youth vote by simply flipping on gay marriage, opposing democrats in the copyright field, and realize that the “small government” (ha!) party should be the first to surrender the war on drugs and get slashy with military budget.

    I’m not going to hold my breath.

  • http://twitter.com/fossilfuels Funk Daddy

    EFF/like agency job candidate? He was fired after all.

  • redjon

    Wait, what?  The GOP is AGAINST limiting damages as a result of lawsuits?  In the health care industry, that is what they are all about… reducing costs and all that in cases where there is physical damage to persons.

    Oh, oops, but those are cases in which people are actually physically damaged or, worse, killed, by malpractice.  The whole copyright thing is about the ever-so-much-more-important issue of damage to intellectual property.

    So, what the GOP is really saying is that damage to intellectual property (not even physical property) is more harmful to society in general than damage to persons.

    Hmmmmmm………………

  • jimh

    I am not surprised by this, nor do I feel particularly saddened.

    I think Mr. Khanna deserves to work for better people, who value his talent and insight. I once had a boss who said “who asked you to think?” It became obvious in that instant that I was there only to follow directions, and never to question the status quo. I have never enjoyed quitting a job more. The GOP did him a favor by showing him who they are, just as my former employer did for me.

  • caseym54

    The “GOP” isn’t a monolith, and isn’t beholden to the media barons like the Democrats are.  Mr Khanna needs to primary someone and see if they listen better when he wins a House seat.  Make this an issue in a campaign and if it’s a winner, others will take note.  Congress doesn’t respect logic, or justice, but it surely does respect votes.