<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Moorcock&#039;s new New Worlds is&#160;go!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html</link>
	<description>Brain candy for Happy Mutants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheOven</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1603367</link>
		<dc:creator>TheOven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1603367</guid>
		<description>Nice article, but it completely fails to tell me what any of this that&#039;s being brought back to life actually is. 

Is New Worlds a MMPO game? is it a Magazine? Is it a website? 
Is it too much to stick to the basics when telling us something is back by informing us what it is in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, but it completely fails to tell me what any of this that&#8217;s being brought back to life actually is. </p>
<p>Is New Worlds a MMPO game? is it a Magazine? Is it a website?<br />
Is it too much to stick to the basics when telling us something is back by informing us what it is in the first place?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vertigo25</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602910</link>
		<dc:creator>vertigo25</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602910</guid>
		<description>Cory logic: having to pay for content and paywalls are never ever ok. Unless it&#039;s branded as appealing to ubergeeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cory logic: having to pay for content and paywalls are never ever ok. Unless it&#8217;s branded as appealing to ubergeeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tempo</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602891</link>
		<dc:creator>tempo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 00:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602891</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s what it says before you have to pay the 3 pounds to read the full article:
&quot;A Rand-t!
By Iain Banks
Lafayette Ron Hubbard and Ayn Rand; two figures from the nineteen-fifties who still loom large today.  One was a proficient if not particularly gifted Science Fiction writer who founded a bizarre cult which nowadays has many famous adherents and whose continuing influence, frankly, tests one’s faith in human nature, and the other invented Scientology.
Read more&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what it says before you have to pay the 3 pounds to read the full article:<br />
&#8220;A Rand-t!<br />
By Iain Banks<br />
Lafayette Ron Hubbard and Ayn Rand; two figures from the nineteen-fifties who still loom large today.  One was a proficient if not particularly gifted Science Fiction writer who founded a bizarre cult which nowadays has many famous adherents and whose continuing influence, frankly, tests one’s faith in human nature, and the other invented Scientology.<br />
Read more&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minh mcCloy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602342</link>
		<dc:creator>minh mcCloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602342</guid>
		<description>Found my rego in spam filter but shall wait - even if it is Iain Banks - have just reread two of the CUlture tomes so am temporarily sated. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found my rego in spam filter but shall wait &#8211; even if it is Iain Banks &#8211; have just reread two of the CUlture tomes so am temporarily sated. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minh mcCloy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602328</link>
		<dc:creator>minh mcCloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 02:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602328</guid>
		<description>Well shall stop waiting for rego and start waiting for word that some sense &amp; sensibility has been achieved </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well shall stop waiting for rego and start waiting for word that some sense &amp; sensibility has been achieved </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minh mcCloy</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602325</link>
		<dc:creator>minh mcCloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602325</guid>
		<description>sighsigh sigh - still waiting - so annoying - Iain Banks </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sighsigh sigh &#8211; still waiting &#8211; so annoying &#8211; Iain Banks </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Wham</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602133</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilbert Wham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602133</guid>
		<description>What, exactly, is the point of a website that you have to pay toread the content of as an offline  download ? And asking for names, addresses etc. &lt;i&gt;just to be able to look at the site&lt;/i&gt; is abject lunacy. I want to like the idea that New Worlds is back, really I do, but the whole thing essentially amounts to no more than an extremely overwrought banner ad...  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, exactly, is the point of a website that you have to pay toread the content of as an offline  download ? And asking for names, addresses etc. <i>just to be able to look at the site</i> is abject lunacy. I want to like the idea that New Worlds is back, really I do, but the whole thing essentially amounts to no more than an extremely overwrought banner ad&#8230;  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1602017</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1602017</guid>
		<description> If it were an actual small publisher at a newsstand, I&#039;d be able to leaf through it and see if I like it first. In any case, I regard paper zines as a waste of trees and might put down some money to look at something on line but won&#039;t look at something that demands I buy paper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If it were an actual small publisher at a newsstand, I&#8217;d be able to leaf through it and see if I like it first. In any case, I regard paper zines as a waste of trees and might put down some money to look at something on line but won&#8217;t look at something that demands I buy paper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s2redux</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601967</link>
		<dc:creator>s2redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601967</guid>
		<description>Have to admit, I was tempted to pay; gems like this head/subhead shouldn&#039;t go unrewarded:
&lt;b&gt;Planet Illuminated with Four Moons Discovered&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;Incredibly rare discovery made by volunteers of exoplanet over 5,000 lights away&lt;/i&gt;

But then I realized Moorcock&#039;s revenue stream would be best handled by refugee subs from &lt;i&gt;The Daily&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to admit, I was tempted to pay; gems like this head/subhead shouldn&#8217;t go unrewarded:<br />
<b>Planet Illuminated with Four Moons Discovered</b><br />
<i>Incredibly rare discovery made by volunteers of exoplanet over 5,000 lights away</i></p>
<p>But then I realized Moorcock&#8217;s revenue stream would be best handled by refugee subs from <i>The Daily</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Groom</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601900</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Groom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601900</guid>
		<description>Wait, so we&#039;re being offered a legit 70&#039;s sci-fi zine, with content from Banks,  for £3....

Sold!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, so we&#8217;re being offered a legit 70&#8242;s sci-fi zine, with content from Banks,  for £3&#8230;.</p>
<p>Sold!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tynam</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601793</link>
		<dc:creator>Tynam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601793</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because Apple has the know-how and resources to do it right.

Yes, my standards &lt;i&gt;are&lt;/i&gt; different for small publishers, zines and fan stuff.  What of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because Apple has the know-how and resources to do it right.</p>
<p>Yes, my standards <i>are</i> different for small publishers, zines and fan stuff.  What of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjcamp</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601774</link>
		<dc:creator>pjcamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601774</guid>
		<description>Grand? It&#039;s a bunch of half-paragraphs with bullshit demands to purchase a paper rag. That&#039;s so sad. Moorcock is living in the 70&#039;s. He must have fish swimming through his platforms.

Registration was flagged by gmail as spam. That seems about right. Geez, Cory, if this were Apple you&#039;d be apoplectic. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grand? It&#8217;s a bunch of half-paragraphs with bullshit demands to purchase a paper rag. That&#8217;s so sad. Moorcock is living in the 70&#8242;s. He must have fish swimming through his platforms.</p>
<p>Registration was flagged by gmail as spam. That seems about right. Geez, Cory, if this were Apple you&#8217;d be apoplectic. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boundegar</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601742</link>
		<dc:creator>Boundegar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 07:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601742</guid>
		<description>Or body-stealing shapeshifters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or body-stealing shapeshifters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramone</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601622</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 04:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601622</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but unless I&#039;m entering credit card information they have no business asking for my home address. Clearly, the site was set up by rank amateurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but unless I&#8217;m entering credit card information they have no business asking for my home address. Clearly, the site was set up by rank amateurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim in SF</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601581</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim in SF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601581</guid>
		<description>It seems as if I am to pay £3 to read the article. 

Is it worth it, Cory? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems as if I am to pay £3 to read the article. </p>
<p>Is it worth it, Cory? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Saul</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Saul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 02:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601564</guid>
		<description>Me too, since I&#039;m on page 412 of &lt;i&gt;The Hydrogen Sonata&lt;/i&gt; right now.

Still waiting for confirmation email.

Must register for any content access, with real-world street address as required fields?

Update - registration email came in... still must pay for content. D&#039;oh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too, since I&#8217;m on page 412 of <i>The Hydrogen Sonata</i> right now.</p>
<p>Still waiting for confirmation email.</p>
<p>Must register for any content access, with real-world street address as required fields?</p>
<p>Update &#8211; registration email came in&#8230; still must pay for content. D&#8217;oh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Lenchner</title>
		<link>http://boingboing.net/2012/12/07/michael-moorcocks-new-new-wo.html#comment-1601558</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Lenchner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2012 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boingboing.net/?p=199046#comment-1601558</guid>
		<description>I tried to register to read what Iain Banks had to say. Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried to register to read what Iain Banks had to say. Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
